Trifiletti, Daniel M.

Background The goal of this study was to characterize the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) versus conventionally fractionated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy (CFRT) for the definitive treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The primary outcome measure was efficacy, defined by 2‐year overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were incidence of any grade 3/4 toxicity and 1‐year OS. Methods A PICOS/PRISMA/MOOSE selection protocol was used to identify eligible studies. Inclusion criteria were: 1) patients diagnosed with locally advanced N0‐1 M0 pancreatic cancer; 2) CFRT 1.8 to 2.0 Gy/fraction with chemotherapy per protocol or SBRT ≥5 Gy/fraction in ≤5 fractions; 3) either no control group or another definitive chemotherapy or radiation therapy arm; 4) at least 1 of the outcome measures reported; and 5) single or multi‐arm phase 2/3 prospective study for CFRT and/or phase 1/2 or retrospective study for SBRT. Neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy was prescribed per protocol specifications. Weighted random effects meta‐analyses were conducted using the DerSimonian and Laird method to characterize summary effect sizes for each outcome. Results A total of 470 studies were initially screened; of these, 9 studies assessed SBRT and 11 studies assessed CFRT. For SBRT, the median dose was 30 Gy, and the most common regimen was 30 Gy/5 fractions. For CFRT, doses ranged from 45 to 54 Gy in 1.8‐ to 2.0‐Gy fractions, with the majority of studies delivering 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions with concurrent gemcitabine. The random effects estimate for 2‐year OS was 26.9% (95% CI, 20.6%‐33.6%) for SBRT versus 13.7% (95% CI, 8.9%‐19.3%) for CFRT and was statistically significant in favor of SBRT. The random effects estimate for 1‐year OS was 53.7% (95% CI, 39.3%‐67.9%) for SBRT versus 49.3% (95% CI, 39.3%‐59.4%) for CFRT, and was not statistically significant. The random effects estimate for acute grade 3/4 toxicity was 5.6% (95% CI, 0.0%‐20.0%) for SBRT versus 37.7% (95% CI, 24.0%‐52.5%) for CFRT and was statistically significant in favor of SBRT. The random effects estimate for late grade 3/4 toxicity was 9.0% for SBRT (95% CI, 3.3%‐17.1%) versus 10.1% (95% CI, 1.8%‐23.8%) for CFRT, which was not statistically significant. Conclusion These results suggest that SBRT for LAPC may result in a modest improvement in 2‐year OS with decreased rates of acute grade 3/4 toxicity and no change in 1‐year‐OS or late toxicity. Further study into the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy for these patients is needed.

AbstractIntroduction Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are slow growing tumors. Although there are a wide variety of available treatment options, these tumors are often initially observed. We aimed to establish the presenting symptoms and outcomes of patients treated with initial observation at our institution.Methods The medical records of patients with radiographically diagnosed VS were reviewed from 1989 to 2018. Actuarial estimates of radiographic tumor control and freedom of local therapy were calculated and compared using Cox regression analyses.Results A total of 360 patients were diagnosed with VS at our institution from 1989 through 2018 with a median age of 59.9 years. After radiographic diagnosis, 243 patients (67.5%) opted for initial observation. Local control at 1, 5, and 10 years was 91, 67, and 58%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with shorter time to radiographic tumor progression included younger patient age (p = 0.016) and tumors with an extracanalicular component (p = 0.032). Regarding time until definitive treatment only larger baseline American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) tumor size predicted for earlier initiation of therapy (p < 0.001), although this was restricted to tumors with an extracanalicular component (p = 0.004), as opposed to purely internal auditory canal tumors (p = 0.839).Conclusion Many patients who were initially observed continued to have satisfactory local control rates at 10 years. In patients with extracanalicular tumors, larger AAO-HNS tumor measurements were associated with earlier radiographic tumor progression and shorter time to local therapy, with 7 mm serving as a potential threshold value for extracanalicular tumors. Younger patients and tumors with primarily an extracanalicular portion may warrant closer observation.

OBJECTIVE The current standard initial therapy for pilocytic astrocytoma is maximal safe resection. Radiation therapy is considered for residual, recurrent, or unresectable pilocytic astrocytomas. However, the optimal radiation strategy has not yet been established. Here, the authors describe the outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for pilocytic astrocytoma in a large multiinstitutional cohort. METHODS An institutional review board–approved multiinstitutional database of patients treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) between 1990 and 2016 was queried. Data were gathered from 9 participating International Radiosurgery Research Foundation (IRRF) centers. Patients with a histological diagnosis of pilocytic astrocytoma treated using a single session of GKRS and with at least 6 months of follow-up were included in the analysis. RESULTS A total of 141 patients were analyzed in the study. The median patient age was 14 years (range 2–84 years) at the time of GKRS. The median follow-up was 67.3 months. Thirty-nine percent of patients underwent SRS as the initial therapy, whereas 61% underwent SRS as salvage treatment. The median tumor volume was 3.45 cm 3 . The tumor location was the brainstem in 30% of cases, with a nonbrainstem location in the remainder. Five- and 10-year overall survival rates at the last follow-up were 95.7% and 92.5%, respectively. Five- and 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 74.0% and 69.7%, respectively. On univariate analysis, an age < 18 years, tumor volumes < 4.5 cm 3 , and no prior radiotherapy or chemotherapy were identified as positive prognostic factors for improved PFS. On multivariate analysis, only prior radiotherapy was significant for worse PFS. CONCLUSIONS This represents the largest study of single-session GKRS for pilocytic astrocytoma to date. Favorable long-term PFS and overall survival were observed with GKRS. Further prospective studies should be performed to evaluate appropriate radiosurgery dosing, timing, and sequencing of treatment along with their impact on toxicity and the quality of life of patients with pilocytic astrocytoma.

Abstract Aims This observational study characterized cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality risk for multiple cancer sites, with respect to the following: (i) continuous calendar year, (ii) age at diagnosis, and (iii) follow-up time after diagnosis. Methods and results The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program was used to compare the US general population to 3 234 256 US cancer survivors (1973–2012). Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated using coded cause of death from CVDs (heart disease, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, atherosclerosis, and aortic aneurysm/dissection). Analyses were adjusted by age, race, and sex. Among 28 cancer types, 1 228 328 patients (38.0%) died from cancer and 365 689 patients (11.3%) died from CVDs. Among CVDs, 76.3% of deaths were due to heart disease. In eight cancer sites, CVD mortality risk surpassed index-cancer mortality risk in at least one calendar year. Cardiovascular disease mortality risk was highest in survivors diagnosed at &lt;35 years of age. Further, CVD mortality risk is highest (SMR 3.93, 95% confidence interval 3.89–3.97) within the first year after cancer diagnosis, and CVD mortality risk remains elevated throughout follow-up compared to the general population. Conclusion The majority of deaths from CVD occur in patients diagnosed with breast, prostate, or bladder cancer. We observed that from the point of cancer diagnosis forward into survivorship cancer patients (all sites) are at elevated risk of dying from CVDs compared to the general US population. In endometrial cancer, the first year after diagnosis poses a very high risk of dying from CVDs, supporting early involvement of cardiologists in such patients.

Abstract BACKGROUND: It is well known that for patients with solitary metastatic disease in the brain, aggressive surgical treatment can prolong survival. However, there is a paucity of literature focusing on simultaneous resection of multiple metastatic brain tumors. METHODS: We analyzed 13 patients and 26 tumors between 2005–2019 who had simultaneous resection of at least 2 metastatic brain tumors via either one or two craniotomies. We independently analyzed those patients with simultaneous resection of metastatic disease in both the supra- and infratentorial compartments. RESULTS: Overall, 26 tumors were resected in a simultaneous fashion. There were 7 females (53.8%) and 6 males (46.2%) total. 5/13 (38.5%) patients had previously known brain metastases in which all 5 had previous adjuvant radiation. All 13 patients had 2 metastatic lesions resected during one operation. Gross total resection rate reached 88.5% with a median post-operative stay of 3 days. Complications presented in only 3 out of 13 cases (grade 2 and 3 according to CTCAE). Primary sites of metastatic disease were lung, breast, skin and renal. 12/13 (92.3%) had two distinct craniotomies and 23/26 (88.5%) tumors had gross total resection of both lesions. There were 11 frontal (42.3%), 7 parietal (26.9%), 2 temporal (7.7%), 1 occipital (3.8%) and 5 cerebellar (19.2%) tumors. There were three patients with both supra- and intratentorial tumors with simultaneous resection. All three patients had two craniotomies and two separate incisions. 1 of the 3 had pre-operative SRS. Overall, average local progression since surgery to at least one resected tumor bed was 88.3 days. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that patients with multiple metastatic brain lesions have comparable outcomes and similar rates of surgical risk to those with solitary brain lesions. In patients with simultaneous supra- and infratentorial brain metastatic disease and indications for decompression, safe resection is feasible.

Abstract PURPOSE: Preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for symptomatic brain metastases has arisen as a therapeutic option for patients with brain lesions, potentially reducing radionecrosis risk, leptomeningeal disease risk, as well as delays in systemic therapy after craniotomy. The purpose of our work is to analyze the current evidence regarding 1-year local control (LC) and RN rates in the preoperative and postoperative settings. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes, Study Design/Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines were used to select articles in which patients had “large” brain metastases (&gt;4 cm3 or &gt;2 cm in diameter) solely treated with preoperative or postoperative SRS and 1-year LC and/or rates of RN reported. Radiosurgery was stratified by timing: preoperatively or postoperatively. Random effects meta-analyses using timing of SRS relative to surgery as covariates were conducted. Meta-regression and Wald-type tests were used to determine the effect of increasing tumor size on the summary estimate, where the null hypothesis was rejected for p &lt; 0.05. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included (of 314 screened), published between 2012 and 2018 with 854 brain metastases. Preoperative SRS was delivered in 229 lesions. The 1-year LC random effects estimate was 79.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 55.9–95.0%; I 2 = 80%) for preoperative SRS and 80.5% (95% CI: 66.3–91.5%; I 2 = 93%) for postoperative SRS (p=0.9). Radionecrosis incidence random effects estimate was 2.1% (95% CI: 0.1–8.6%; I 2 = 36%) for preoperative SRS and 6.3% (95% CI: 1.1–15.4%; I 2 = 90%) for postoperative SRS (p=0.52). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of 1-year LC and RN incidence are similar after preoperative SRS as compared to postoperative SRS for large brain metastases. Results from ongoing prospective clinical trials studying preoperative SRS are important to further investigate these two techniques.

Purpose: We aim to systematically review and analyze the available literature on “exceptional responders” in oncology. We hypothesize that survival or patients with an exceptional response may be predicted based on clinical factors. Materials and Methods: A PICOS/PRISMA/MOOSE selection protocol was used to find studies that reported oncology patients with an exceptional response. A total of 333 initial articles were screened, and 76 articles were included, accounting for 85 patients. The primary outcome was survival after exceptional response therapy (ERT). The secondary outcome was survival since diagnosis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted for both outcomes with 17 covariates. Results: The median age was 52 years (interquartile range, 35-66 y), 51.8% were male individuals, 18 (21.2%) had lung cancer, and 1 patient (1%) met all National Cancer Institute criteria for exceptional response. The most common treatment resulting in exceptional response was a form of chemotherapy (49.2%) followed by targeted therapy (26.8%) and radiation therapy (7.7%). The median time from diagnosis to initiation of ERT was 7.92 months (interquartile range, 0-24.72 mo). On multivariate analysis of survival after initiation of ERT, there were no predictors of exceptional response. On multivariate analysis of survival since diagnosis, predictors of prolonged survival included time between diagnosis and ERT initiation (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.87; P=0.0124) and single prior surgery versus none (0.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.98; P=0.04853). Conclusions: There were no clinically apparent patient or treatment factors that predicted favorable survival following ERT; instead, reporting of exceptional response appears to be biased.

6633 Background: Quality based payment programs in medicine are currently being introduced nationally, aimed to improve care and reduce cost. This study aimed to evaluate the top spenders (TS) after cancer diagnosis and predict TS at two separate time points using predictive analytics. Methods: Patient characteristics, cancer details, treatments, adverse events, and outcomes were collected for patients treated for cancer at Mayo Clinic from 2007 - 2017. Standardized costs over a 2 year period after first treatment were obtained from the Mayo Clinic Cost Data Warehouse with Medicare reimbursements assigned to all services and adjusted to the 2017 GDP Implicit Price Deflator for inflation. TS were identified as those with greater than 93rd percentile costs (≥$113,158) due to a sharp rise in cost at that level. Descriptive statistics and univariate analysis were used for comparison. A prediction model with a training (80%) and validation set (20%) using multivariate selection was used to predict TS and was repeated using information available at 1) the time of consultation and 2) at last follow-up. Results: A total of 80,385 patients were included and 5,626 TS were identified. Mean cost (25th, 75th percentile) overall was $44,953 ($16,776, $51,889). Prediction models at time 1 and 2 had ROC AUC statistics of 0.82 and 0.89 in training and 0.82 and 0.88 in the validation indicating good prediction of high costs. Factors most predictive of TS included need for blood transfusions within 90 days of treatment (OR 5.3), bone marrow transplant (OR 4.0), mild liver disease (OR 3.5), hemiplegia (OR 3.4), weight loss > 10% within 90 days of treatment (OR 3.3), upper GI cancer (OR 3.0), ‘other’ cancer type (OR 2.8), immunotherapy use (OR 2.7), and hospitalizations within 90 days (OR 2.4), all p < 0.001, among others. The largest costs were due to hospital services in the TS and non-TS groups, mean costs $114,258 and $13,185 respectively. Conclusions: This is the first study to predict with high accuracy the top spenders in Oncology. Patient comorbidities and toxicities were among the strongest predictors of high costs, along with certain treatments (bone marrow transplant and immunotherapy). Our findings suggest that quality payment programs should adjust for comorbidities, and that reducing toxicity may be an effective method at reducing costs.

625 Background: Leverage the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to evaluate trends in management of squamous cell cancer (SCC) of the rectum and their effect on survival for this uncommon tumor. Methods: Data was obtained from the NCDB for patients diagnosed with SCC of the rectum between 2004 and 2014, including cT1-4, cN0-2, cM0 (cohort A, n = 2,296) tumors. A subgroup analysis was performed on locally advanced tumors (cT1-T2, N+ or cT3, N any, subcohort B, n = 883), treated with chemoradiation (n = 706) or trimodality therapy (n = 177) including chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery. Pathological complete response rate following neoadjuvant therapy was obtained. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to generate hazard ratios (HR) investigating factors associated with overall survival. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method was used to estimate overall surviving proportion at 5 and 10 years. Results: The median age was 60 years with a strong female predilection (71% female). Among patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy, 36% achieved a complete pathological response at a median interval of 67 days from completion of radiation therapy to surgery. The K-M estimated 5 and 10 year overall survival for stage I disease was 71.3% and 57.8%, respectively; stage II disease was 57.0% and 38.9%, respectively; stage III disease was 57.8% and 41.5%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, increased age, male gender, more co-morbidities, and higher cT category ( P < 0.001 for each) resulted in worse survival. For locally advanced tumors (subcohort B), there was no difference in survival between chemoradiation alone compared to trimodality therapy ( P = 0.909 on multivariate analysis). Conclusions: Most providers manage locally advanced SCC of the rectum similar to anal cancer, which results in equivalent overall survival and spares patients from the additional morbidity associated with surgical resection. [Table: see text]