Harrell, Anna

This study evaluated the effectiveness of using a traditional computed tomography (CT) simulation scan in the Leksell Gamma Knife® Icon™ workflow for stereotactic radiosurgery. We compared two workflows, one involving a traditional CT simulation co-registered with the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) (MRI-CT-CBCT) and another without the CT scan, co-registering the MRI directly with CBCT (MRI-CBCT). The cohort included 50 frame-based (54 targets) and 55 frameless (124 targets) patients treated between August 2020 and December 2022. Target coverage was assessed by the percentage of each target covered by the prescription isodose line. The mean coverage differences for the frame-based and frameless cohorts were −1.20% ± 1.43% and −1.06% ± 1.51%, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals of −1.59, −0.81 and −1.32, −0.79. The MRI-CBCT workflow was deemed noninferior to the MRI-CT-CBCT workflow. Our data indicate that both workflows yield similar results, suggesting that a traditional CT simulation scan is unnecessary.

Surgical treatment of pelvic sarcoma involving the bone is the standard of care but is associated with several sequelae and reduced functional quality of life (QOL). Treatment with photon and proton radiotherapy is associated with relapse. Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) may reduce both relapse rates and treatment sequelae. The PROSPER study is a tricontinental, nonrandomized, prospective, three-arm, pragmatic trial evaluating treatments of pelvic sarcoma involving the bone. Patients aged at least 15 years are eligible for inclusion. Participants must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score of two or less, newly diagnosed disease, and histopathologic confirmation of pelvic chordoma, chondrosarcoma, osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma with bone involvement, rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) with bone involvement, or non-RMS soft tissue sarcoma with bone involvement. Treatment arms include (1) CIRT (n = 30) delivered in Europe and Asia, (2) surgical treatment with or without adjuvant radiotherapy (n = 30), and (3) proton therapy (n = 30). Arms two and three will be conducted at Mayo Clinic campuses in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota. The primary end point is to compare the 1-year change in functional QOL between CIRT and surgical treatment. Additional comparisons among the three arms will be made between treatment sequelae, local control, and other QOL measures.

Abstract PURPOSE: Preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for symptomatic brain metastases has arisen as a therapeutic option for patients with brain lesions, potentially reducing radionecrosis risk, leptomeningeal disease risk, as well as delays in systemic therapy after craniotomy. The purpose of our work is to analyze the current evidence regarding 1-year local control (LC) and RN rates in the preoperative and postoperative settings. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes, Study Design/Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines were used to select articles in which patients had “large” brain metastases (>4 cm3 or >2 cm in diameter) solely treated with preoperative or postoperative SRS and 1-year LC and/or rates of RN reported. Radiosurgery was stratified by timing: preoperatively or postoperatively. Random effects meta-analyses using timing of SRS relative to surgery as covariates were conducted. Meta-regression and Wald-type tests were used to determine the effect of increasing tumor size on the summary estimate, where the null hypothesis was rejected for p < 0.05. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included (of 314 screened), published between 2012 and 2018 with 854 brain metastases. Preoperative SRS was delivered in 229 lesions. The 1-year LC random effects estimate was 79.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 55.9–95.0%; I 2 = 80%) for preoperative SRS and 80.5% (95% CI: 66.3–91.5%; I 2 = 93%) for postoperative SRS (p=0.9). Radionecrosis incidence random effects estimate was 2.1% (95% CI: 0.1–8.6%; I 2 = 36%) for preoperative SRS and 6.3% (95% CI: 1.1–15.4%; I 2 = 90%) for postoperative SRS (p=0.52). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of 1-year LC and RN incidence are similar after preoperative SRS as compared to postoperative SRS for large brain metastases. Results from ongoing prospective clinical trials studying preoperative SRS are important to further investigate these two techniques.