Thomashow, Byron

Abstract Introduction Burkholderia, Achromobacter, and Stenotrophomonas species are associated with worse clinical outcomes in cystic fibrosis (CF),1 though little is known about their prevalence or pathogenicity in non-CF bronchiectasis (pwBE). Herein we describe the prevalence and clinical characteristics of pwBE who isolated each of these three organisms. Methods We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the US Bronchiectasis and Nontuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM) Research Registry (BRR). Adult bronchiectasis patients with known Achromobacter, Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC), or Stenotrphomonas maltophilia culture results were included. Patients were stratified according to the presence of at least one positive culture among the gram-negative species. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and first annual follow-up culture results were summarized descriptively for the overall study population and between groups. No inferential analyses or hypothesis testing was performed. Results 5003 pwBE met the inclusion criteria, of which 39 (0.78%) isolated Achromobacter species, 11 isolated Burkholderia (0.22%), and 288 isolated Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (5.8%). Patients with Achromobacter were older, with a median age (interquartile range) of 76 (73.0-79.0) years, compared to the overall bronchiectasis cohort (69.0 years). Those with Burkholderia or Stenotrophomonas were younger, at 69.0 (53.0-75.0) and 71.0 (63.0-77.0) years, respectively. A high proportion of those with Achromobacter were male (31%) versus those with Burkholderia (9%) and Stenotrophomonas (24%), were current or former smokers (46%), were more likely to have had one or more exacerbations in the 2 years prior to enrollment (87%) than the overall BE cohort (57%), and were more likely to have had pulmonary-related hospitalization than those with either Burkholderia or Stenotrophomonas (46% vs. 27% and 19%, respectively). PwBE who isolated Burkholderia were less likely to have co-colonization with Pseudomonas aeruginosa or NTM species (9% each). At first annual follow-up, no patients with baseline Burkholderia isolated them at follow-up, and only 31% with baseline Stenotrophomonas isolated it at follow-up. Conclusion Overall prevalence of Achromobacter, Burkholderia, and Stenotrophomonas species in the BE cohort was low. Patients who isolated Achromobacter species were older, more likely to be current or former smokers, and more likely to experience pulmonary exacerbation and hospitalization. 15 patients who had not previously isolated Achromobacter, and 3 patients who had not previously isolated Burkholderia did so at annual follow-up. Interestingly, no patients with baseline Burkholderia isolates went on to isolate it at annual follow-up, which contradicts earlier studies in pwCF.2 The number of patients isolating Burkholderia in the U.S. BRR is very low, thereby limiting interpretation. This abstract is funded by: None

Abstract Rationale Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are prevalent among patients with bronchiectasis. However, the long-term natural history of patients with NTM and bronchiectasis is not well described. Objectives To assess the impact of NTM on 5-year clinical outcomes and mortality in patients with bronchiectasis. Methods Patients in the Bronchiectasis and NTM Research Registry with ⩾5 years of follow-up were eligible. Data were collected for all-cause mortality, lung function, exacerbations, hospitalizations, and disease severity. Outcomes were compared between patients with and without NTM at baseline. Mortality was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models and the log-rank test. Measurements and Main Results In total, 2,634 patients were included: 1,549 (58.8%) with and 1,085 (41.2%) without NTM at baseline. All-cause mortality (95% confidence interval) at Year 5 was 12.1% (10.5%, 13.7%) overall, 12.6% (10.5%, 14.8%) in patients with NTM, and 11.5% (9.0%, 13.9%) in patients without NTM. Independent predictors of 5-year mortality were baseline FEV1 percent predicted, age, hospitalization within 2 years before baseline, body mass index, and sex (all P < 0.01). The probabilities of acquiring NTM or Pseudomonas aeruginosa were approximately 4% and 3% per year, respectively. Spirometry, exacerbations, and hospitalizations were similar, regardless of NTM status, except that annual exacerbations were lower in patients with NTM (P < 0.05). Conclusions Outcomes, including exacerbations, hospitalizations, rate of loss of lung function, and mortality rate, were similar across 5 years in patients with bronchiectasis with or without NTM.

Abstract Rationale Staphylococcus aureus is commonly cultured from the sputum of patients with bronchiectasis; however, little is known about the prevalence of the organism in these patients, the characteristics of patients who have grown the organism, or its implications. Objectives Determine the relationship between S. aureus and pulmonary function, frequency of exacerbations, and frequency of hospitalization in patients with bronchiectasis Methods The Bronchiectasis Research Registry is a database of adults with non–cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis identified from 13 sites within the United States. Baseline and follow-up demographic, spirometric, microbiologic, and therapeutic data were entered into a central web-based database. Patients were grouped into three cohorts based on their previous respiratory cultures at the time of entry into the Registry: 1) no prior S. aureus or glucose-nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli (NF-GNB) (Pseudomonas, Stenotrophomonas, or Burkholderia spp.); 2) prior S. aureus at least once; or 3) no prior S. aureus but prior NF-GNB at least once. The association between S. aureus isolation and pulmonary function and frequency of exacerbations and hospital admissions was assessed, both at baseline and after 1 year of follow-up. Results S. aureus was cultured from 94 of 830 patients (11.3%) included in the analysis. Patients who had grown S. aureus before entry into the Registry had a frequency of prior exacerbations and baseline pulmonary function that was between that of patients who had grown NF-GNB and those who had grown neither NF-GNB or S. aureus. Similarly, at the first follow-up visit after study entry, patients who had grown S. aureus had a frequency of exacerbations and hospitalizations that was between those of patients who had grown NF-GNB and those who had grown neither NF-GNB nor S. aureus. However, in multivariate analysis, S. aureus was not associated with pulmonary function, frequency of exacerbation, or hospital admissions. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics or outcomes between patients who had methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Conclusions Staphylococcus aureus does not appear to be an independent risk factor for severe disease in patients with bronchiectasis enrolled in the Bronchiectasis Research Registry.