Back to Authors

Kleerekoper, Michael

Mayo Clinic

Wayne State University

Citations 4

Clinical Applications for Vitamin D Assays: What Is Known and What Is Wished for
Kleerekoper, Michael, Schleicher, Rosemary L. , Eisman, John A. , Bouillon, Roger , Holick, Michael F. , Singh, Ravinder J.

Clinical Chemistry | April 18, 2011 | Volume: 57 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1227-1232

10.1373/clinchem.2010.154997 Get It

Incidence of hip fractures in osteoporotic women treated with sodium fluoride
Riggs, B. Lawrence, Baylink, David J. , Kleerekoper, Michael, Lane, Joseph M. , Melton, L. Joseph, Meunier, Pierre J.

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research | February 3, 2010 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 123-126

10.1002/jbmr.5650020207 Get It

Abstract It has been suggested recently that, although fluoride therapy may decrease the occurrence of vertebral fractures, it could increase the risk of hip fractures. To evaluate this possibility, we combined retrospective data from five medical centers that have had a large experience with this therapeutic regimen. In 416 osteoporotic patients who were followed for more than 1,000 patient-years of fluoride treatment, there were 17 nontraumatic hip fractures. This incidence of 1.6% per year is similar to the incidence, 1.9% per year, for 120 of the patients in this series who had been followed prospectively for 3 years prior to initiation of fluoride therapy. The expected incidence for women of the same age in the general community is 0.5% per year. Thus, untreated osteoporotic women are at increased risk for hip fracture, but treatment with fluoride seems neither to decrease nor to increase the incidence of hip fracture substantially.
Measurement of vertebral area on spine X-rays in osteoporosis: Reliability of digitizing techniques
Nelson, Dorothy A., Peterson, Edward L. , Tilley, Barbara C. , Otallon, W.M., Chao, Edmund Y.S., Riggs, B. Lawrence, Kleerekoper, Michael

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research | February 3, 2010 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 707-716

10.1002/jbmr.5650050707 Get It

Abstract Much of the clinical research in osteoporosis is directed toward documenting a reduction in vertebral fracture rate, but there is considerable disagreement about defining and quantifying vertebral fractures. We have evaluated the technique of digitizing landmarks identified on lateral radiographs of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae and computing vertebral body area. Reduction in area indicates that fractures occurred. Radiographs from 10 patients with osteoporosis and vertebral fractures were obtained from each of two centers, Henry Ford Hospital (HFH) and Mayo Clinic (MC), and vertebral area for each individual in the complete set of 20 radiographs was calculated at each center. Measurements at the two centers differed by a multiplicative constant related to the method of recording landmarks on the radiographs that was estimated using 300 x-rays from HFH. After adjusting the MC areas for this multiplicative relationship, the average ratio of the HFH areas to the transformed MC areas of individual vertebrae (T4-L5) ranged from 0.98 to 1.06. The correlation between HFH and transformed MC areas for individual vertebrae averaged 0.85, with slopes between 0.87 and 1.00, intercept average -0.57. Within-patient rank correlation averaged 0.97. We conclude that radiographic digitization is a reliable and reproducible method of determining vertebral body dimensions that is suitable for evaluating radiographs obtained at different clinical sites and for comparison with normal data. This technique should prove useful for documenting the presence of a vertebral fracture that may not be readily apparent on visual inspection of radiographs and for monitoring serial changes in vertebral body dimensions in long-term epidemiologic and therapeutic studies.
Osteology: Further Debate
Drezner, Marc K. , Kleerekoper, Michael, Deftos, Leonard J., Marcus, Robert , Maricic, Michael, McClung, Michael R. , Rosen, Clifford J. , Shane, Elizabeth , Khosla, Sundeep

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research | April 27, 2006 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1017-1017

10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.6.1017.1 Get It