Cummings, Nancy M.

AbstractPurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of preoperative patella alta on clinical outcomes, survivorship, and complication and reoperation rates on patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA).MethodsAll patients who underwent PFA for isolated patellofemoral arthritis by a single surgeon at our institution were identified. Preoperative radiographs were measured by two independent observers for patellar height using the Caton Deschamps (CD), Insall‐Salvati (IS), and Blackburne‐Peele (BP) methods. Patients were classified as either “patella alta” or “non‐patella alta” for all three measurement methods. Clinical scores including KSS Pain, KSS Function, and Tegner Activity Scores were collected pre‐ and post‐operatively. Failure was defined as conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Clinical outcomes and survivorship were compared between patients with “patella alta” and “non‐patella alta” height measurements.ResultsThere were 119 patients with 153 knees (86% female) included in the study with a mean age of 55.8 years. Outcome scores improved from pre‐operative to post‐operative for both patella alta and non‐patella alta patients for Tegner, KSS pain and KSS function scores. The mean change in Tegner scores for patella alta and non‐patella alta patients were not significantly different for CD (p = 0.24), IS (p = 0.25) or BP measurements (p = 0.39). The mean change in KSS pain scores between groups were not significantly different for CD (p = 0.33) or IS measurements (p = 0.22), but was improved more significantly in patella alta patients vs non‐patella alta patients (21.2 and 14.4; p = 0.02) for BP measurement. The mean change in KSS function scores between groups was not significantly different for CD (p = 0.61) IS (p = 0.90) or BP measurements (p = 0.79). The overall survivorship from conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was 94.1% at a mean follow‐up time of 5.0 (SD 2.6) years. There were no significant differences in survivorship from TKA between patella alta and non‐patella alta groups (CD: p = 0.72, IS: p = 0.63, BP: p = 0.66).ConclusionsThis study suggests that there are no significant differences in clinical outcome scores or survivorship from TKA between patella alta and non‐patella alta patients who underwent onlay design PFA. Both patella alta and non‐patella alta patients demonstrated excellent improvement in outcome scores from pre‐operative to post‐operative.Level of evidenceIV.

BackgroundChronic exertional compartment syndrome (CECS) is a type of leg pain related to elevated intracompartmental pressure with activity in one or more of the four compartments of the leg. Open fasciotomy is the definitive treatment for CECS but has a reported complication rate of up to 15.7% and return to full activity reported up to 16 weeks. Ultrasound‐guided (USG) fasciotomy of the anterior and lateral compartments has been translated into clinical practice.ObjectiveTo determine the safety and feasibility of a USG fasciotomy of the deep posterior compartment (DPC) and superficial compartment (SPC) of the leg in a fresh‐frozen cadaveric model.DesignProspective, cadaveric laboratory investigation.SettingProcedural skills laboratory at an academic institution.Cadaveric CohortTen fresh‐frozen cadaveric knee‐ankle‐foot specimens from five female and five male donors aged 58 to 93 years (mean 77.4 years) with body mass indexes of 18.1 to 33.5 kg/m2 (mean 25.1 kg/m2).Methods or InterventionsOne experienced operator performed 10 USG DPC and SPC fasciotomies. A clinical anatomist performed dissections of each.Main Outcome MeasuresAchievement of target length and continuity of release was recorded. Target lengths of 10 cm for the superficial posterior compartment (SPC) and 15 cm for the deep posterior compartment (DPC) were established based on previous studies. Tendinous and neurovascular structures were assessed for damage.ResultsNo tendon or neurovascular injuries were observed. In the SPC, target length was achieved in 90% and continuous release was observed in 80%. In the DPC, target length was achieved in 60% and continuity observed in 30%.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that SPC USG fasciotomies using the technique described in this study are feasible, may be safe, and warrant further translational research; however, DPC USG fasciotomies are more challenging and require more technical refinement prior to clinical translation.

Abstract: We present 2 cases where the initial history and examination were similar to a Morton's/interdigital neuroma. In both cases, however, diagnostic ultrasound revealed symptomatic snapping of the proper digital nerve of the fifth toe. The anatomy of the proper digital nerve of the fifth toe may predispose it to a snapping phenomenon. Clinical awareness of this atypical cause of forefoot pain can help guide the diagnosis and treatment in those patients with persistent and refractory lateral forefoot pain and paresthesias.

Purpose To compare patellar bone socket and cortical surface fixation techniques for isolated medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction and determine whether there was a difference in (1) complication rates, including fracture of the patella; (2) redislocation rates; or (3) patient‐reported outcomes. Methods A literature search was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We included patients who underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability. Patients with confirmed concomitant or prior ipsilateral knee procedures, multiligament injury, or less than 3 months of follow‐up were excluded. Risk‐of‐bias assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non‐randomized Studies (MINORS) system. Studies were classified by surgical technique (patellar bone socket group [group S] vs cortical fixation group [group F]), and complications, redislocations, and patient‐reported outcomes were collected. Results A total of 29 studies yielded 981 patients with MPFL reconstruction for inclusion. Of the patients, 620 underwent a patellar bone socket technique and 361 underwent a cortical fixation technique. Patients ranged in age from 11 to 68 years. Patellar fracture rates ranged from 0% to 17% in group S and were 0% in all group F studies. Mean Kujala scores ranged from 83.5 to 93.6 in group S and from 84.4 to 94.5 in group F. Mean Lysholm scores ranged from 84.6 to 91.7 in group S and from 83.5 to 95 in group F. Redislocation rates ranged from 0% to 21% in group S and from 0% to 13% in group F. Although heterogeneous in nature, complication rates ranged from 0% to 28% in group S and from 0% to 4% in group F. Conclusions MPFL reconstruction techniques with patellar bone sockets showed a larger range of complication rates than cortical fixation techniques, although overall, complications remained uncommon. Clinically, the bone socket group had comparable postoperative redislocation rates and patient outcomes to the group treated with cortical fixation techniques. Level of Evidence Level IV, systematic review of Level I through IV studies.

Background Adductor canal block (ACB) is an alternative method to femoral nerve block (FNB) for post-operative analgesia for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in pediatric and adolescent patients. Prior studies have suggested that FNB is associated with persistent strength deficits at 6 months after ACLR in this population. Proponents of the ACB consider that this method may result in a decreased incidence of quadriceps strength deficits during post-operative rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to compare knee strength and function at 6 and 9 months after ACLR in pediatric and adolescent patients who received FNB versus ACB peri-operatively. Methods Patients 18 years or younger who underwent primary ACLR between 2002 and 2017 at a single institution were identified. ACLR was performed with either a patellar tendon autograft or hamstring autograft. A transphyseal ACLR was performed in patients with open physes. All patients participated in a comprehensive rehabilitation program which included isokinetic strength testing and functional testing at 6 and/or 9 months postoperatively. Patients were excluded if they underwent multiligamentous knee reconstruction, concomitant cartilage restoration procedures, did not receive perioperative FNB or ACB, or if they did not complete isokinetic strength and functional testing at 6 or 9 months. The included cohort was separated into FNB group and ACB group for comparison. Isokinetic extension and flexion strength deficits and functional deficits in vertical jump, single hop, and triple hop between the two groups were compared at both time points. A strength deficit of 15% or less and a functional deficit of 10% or less compared to the contralateral side were considered satisfactory. Univariate analysis was performed to assess for differences in patient demographics and surgical variables. A 1:1 matched subgroup analysis between the two groups was performed to account for possible differences in outcomes associated to graft types, concomitant meniscus repair, and BMI. Results Of the 240 patients identified, 85 patients (64 FNB, 21 ACB) with a mean age of 15.9 years (Range: 11-18) met inclusion criteria for comparison at 6 months and 76 patients (40 FNB, 36 ACB) with a mean age of 15.5 years (Range: 12-17) met inclusion criteria for comparison at 9 months. Univariate analysis showed significantly greater deficits at 6 months in the FNB with respect to fast isokinetic flexion strength (7.7% vs. -4.9%; p = .03). There were no differences in slow isokinetic flexion (10.5% vs. 6.8%; p = .79) and fast isokinetic extension (11.9% vs. 13.9%; p = .68) strength deficits between the groups. There were clinically relevant greater deficits in the FNB group with respect to slow isokinetic extension (19.3% vs. 12.0%; p = .24), but this did not reach statistical significance. This clinical difference in satisfactory scores between the groups with respect to slow isokinetic extension was accentuated with the 1:1 matched outcome trial (23.9% vs. 12.1%; p = .20). With respect to function, there were no differences in deficits for vertical jump (8.4% vs. 4.3%; p = .55), single hop (7.4% vs. 9.3%; p = .65), or triple hop (6.0% vs. 7.1%; p = .77) between the two groups. Univariate analysis showed significant greater deficits at 9 months in the FNB with respect to slow isokinetic flexion strength (9.6% vs. 0.4%; p = .01). There were no differences in fast isokinetic flexion (-0.2% vs. 0.7%; p = .87) and fast isokinetic extension (6.0% vs. 2.7%; p = .51) strength deficits between the groups. There were clinically relevant greater deficits in the FNB group with respect to slow isokinetic extension (17.3% vs -14.0%, p = .19), but this did not reach statistical significance. With respect to function, there were no differences in deficits for vertical jump (5.2% vs. 6.5%, p = .85), single hop (7.7% vs. 6.2%; p = .79), or triple hop (1.9% vs. 3.9%; p = .35) between the two groups. Conclusion Because previous studies have shown a significant delay in return of strength with FNB, ACB began to be employed at our center for post-operative pain control following ACLR in pediatric and adolescent patients. This study showed that pediatric and adolescent patients treated with FNB as a method of post-operative analgesia after ACLR had significantly greater deficits in fast isokinetic flexion at 6 months and slow isokinetic flexion at 9 months compared to those who received ACB. These differences may or may not have clear clinical relevance. However, patients treated with FNB showed clinically relevant greater deficits in slow isokinetic extension strength at 6 and 9 months postoperatively compared to those who received ACB if 85% strength return is used as criteria to return to sport. Pediatric and adolescent patients could benefit from undergoing perioperative analgesia with ACB instead of FNB, but comparison between these two methods of regional anesthesia may require a prospective trial. Level of Evidence Retrospective cohort study, Level IV [Table: see text][Table: see text]