Sabbag, Orlando D.

Objectives: Little is known about the natural history and long-term outcome of a surgically treated symptomatic lateral discoid meniscus. The goals of this study were to describe the rate and factors associated with recurrent lateral meniscus tears and progression to symptomatic lateral compartment osteoarthritis (OA) in patients surgically treated for a symptomatic lateral discoid meniscus. Patients with surgically treated lateral discoid meniscus have a high incidence of meniscus re-tear and progression to lateral compartment OA. Methods: A large, geographic database was reviewed to identify and confirm patients presenting with symptomatic lateral discoid meniscus between 1998 and 2015. Charts were reviewed to document treatment and outcomes at a minimum clinical follow-up of two years. Results: 70 discoid meniscus patients (30 F, 40 M) with a mean age of 27 years (Range: 2.0-66.0) were followed for an average of 5.8 years (Range 2.0-23.7). Sixty patients underwent surgical management: 49 (82%) patients underwent partial lateral meniscectomy and 11 (18%) underwent meniscus repair (including saucerization). Tear-free survival following surgery was 93% at 2 years, 69% at 5 years, and 40% at 8 years. Overall progression to symptomatic lateral compartment OA in the surgical group was 10% at 2 years, 23% at 5 years, and 48% at 8 years. Of those patients who developed lateral compartment OA, 55% (11/20) had a Kellgren-Lawrence score 2 or greater at last radiographic follow-up. Young age and open growth plates were associated with increased incidence of postoperative re-tear (HR: 0.96, CI: 0.93-0.99, p = 0.01). Increased age at diagnosis and BMI ≥ 30 were associated with increased risk of progression to lateral compartment OA on final radiographs. Conclusion: Patients with a surgically treated lateral discoid meniscus tear had a high rate of recurrent meniscus tear at long-term follow-up (60% at 8 years) that was associated with young age. Approximately 48% of surgically treated patients developed symptomatic lateral compartment OA at eight years from initial presentation. The risk of progression to OA increased with older age at diagnosis and BMI ≥ 30.

Background: Little is known about the natural history of a surgically treated symptomatic lateral discoid meniscus. The goals of this study were to describe the rate and factors associated with recurrent lateral meniscal tears and progression to symptomatic lateral compartment osteoarthritis (OA) in patients surgically treated for a symptomatic lateral discoid meniscus. Hypothesis: Patients with surgically treated lateral discoid meniscus have a high incidence of meniscal retear and progression to lateral compartment OA. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A large geographic database was reviewed to identify and confirm patients presenting with symptomatic lateral discoid meniscus between 1998 and 2015. Charts were reviewed to document treatment and outcomes at a minimum clinical follow-up of 2 years. Results: A total of 59 patients (27 females, 32 males) with a mean age of 25.7 years (range, 4.0-66.0 years) underwent surgical management of a discoid lateral meniscus and were evaluated for a mean of 5.6 years (range, 2.0-23.7 years). Of these, 48 (82%) patients underwent partial lateral meniscectomy, with 24 patients undergoing concurrent saucerization. Eleven (18%) underwent meniscal repair. Tear-free survival following surgery was 41% at 8 years. Progression to symptomatic lateral compartment OA was 50% at 8 years. Young age (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99; P = .01) and open growth plates (hazard ratio, 3.19; 95% CI, 1.15-8.88; P = .03) were associated with increased incidence of postoperative retear. Older age at diagnosis and body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 were associated with increased risk of progression to lateral compartment OA on final radiographs. Conclusion: Patients with a surgically treated lateral discoid meniscal tear had a high rate of recurrent meniscal tear (59% at 8 years). Approximately 50% of surgically treated patients developed symptomatic lateral compartment OA at 8 years from diagnosis.

Background Adductor canal block (ACB) is an alternative method to femoral nerve block (FNB) for post-operative analgesia for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in pediatric and adolescent patients. Prior studies have suggested that FNB is associated with persistent strength deficits at 6 months after ACLR in this population. Proponents of the ACB consider that this method may result in a decreased incidence of quadriceps strength deficits during post-operative rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to compare knee strength and function at 6 and 9 months after ACLR in pediatric and adolescent patients who received FNB versus ACB peri-operatively. Methods Patients 18 years or younger who underwent primary ACLR between 2002 and 2017 at a single institution were identified. ACLR was performed with either a patellar tendon autograft or hamstring autograft. A transphyseal ACLR was performed in patients with open physes. All patients participated in a comprehensive rehabilitation program which included isokinetic strength testing and functional testing at 6 and/or 9 months postoperatively. Patients were excluded if they underwent multiligamentous knee reconstruction, concomitant cartilage restoration procedures, did not receive perioperative FNB or ACB, or if they did not complete isokinetic strength and functional testing at 6 or 9 months. The included cohort was separated into FNB group and ACB group for comparison. Isokinetic extension and flexion strength deficits and functional deficits in vertical jump, single hop, and triple hop between the two groups were compared at both time points. A strength deficit of 15% or less and a functional deficit of 10% or less compared to the contralateral side were considered satisfactory. Univariate analysis was performed to assess for differences in patient demographics and surgical variables. A 1:1 matched subgroup analysis between the two groups was performed to account for possible differences in outcomes associated to graft types, concomitant meniscus repair, and BMI. Results Of the 240 patients identified, 85 patients (64 FNB, 21 ACB) with a mean age of 15.9 years (Range: 11-18) met inclusion criteria for comparison at 6 months and 76 patients (40 FNB, 36 ACB) with a mean age of 15.5 years (Range: 12-17) met inclusion criteria for comparison at 9 months. Univariate analysis showed significantly greater deficits at 6 months in the FNB with respect to fast isokinetic flexion strength (7.7% vs. -4.9%; p = .03). There were no differences in slow isokinetic flexion (10.5% vs. 6.8%; p = .79) and fast isokinetic extension (11.9% vs. 13.9%; p = .68) strength deficits between the groups. There were clinically relevant greater deficits in the FNB group with respect to slow isokinetic extension (19.3% vs. 12.0%; p = .24), but this did not reach statistical significance. This clinical difference in satisfactory scores between the groups with respect to slow isokinetic extension was accentuated with the 1:1 matched outcome trial (23.9% vs. 12.1%; p = .20). With respect to function, there were no differences in deficits for vertical jump (8.4% vs. 4.3%; p = .55), single hop (7.4% vs. 9.3%; p = .65), or triple hop (6.0% vs. 7.1%; p = .77) between the two groups. Univariate analysis showed significant greater deficits at 9 months in the FNB with respect to slow isokinetic flexion strength (9.6% vs. 0.4%; p = .01). There were no differences in fast isokinetic flexion (-0.2% vs. 0.7%; p = .87) and fast isokinetic extension (6.0% vs. 2.7%; p = .51) strength deficits between the groups. There were clinically relevant greater deficits in the FNB group with respect to slow isokinetic extension (17.3% vs -14.0%, p = .19), but this did not reach statistical significance. With respect to function, there were no differences in deficits for vertical jump (5.2% vs. 6.5%, p = .85), single hop (7.7% vs. 6.2%; p = .79), or triple hop (1.9% vs. 3.9%; p = .35) between the two groups. Conclusion Because previous studies have shown a significant delay in return of strength with FNB, ACB began to be employed at our center for post-operative pain control following ACLR in pediatric and adolescent patients. This study showed that pediatric and adolescent patients treated with FNB as a method of post-operative analgesia after ACLR had significantly greater deficits in fast isokinetic flexion at 6 months and slow isokinetic flexion at 9 months compared to those who received ACB. These differences may or may not have clear clinical relevance. However, patients treated with FNB showed clinically relevant greater deficits in slow isokinetic extension strength at 6 and 9 months postoperatively compared to those who received ACB if 85% strength return is used as criteria to return to sport. Pediatric and adolescent patients could benefit from undergoing perioperative analgesia with ACB instead of FNB, but comparison between these two methods of regional anesthesia may require a prospective trial. Level of Evidence Retrospective cohort study, Level IV [Table: see text][Table: see text]

Background: A symptomatic discoid lateral meniscus is an uncommon orthopaedic abnormality, and the majority of information in the literature is limited to small case series. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of symptomatic discoid menisci in a geographically determined population and to describe treatment trends over time. The hypothesis was that the incidence of symptomatic discoid menisci would be highest among adolescent patients, and thus, the rate of surgical treatment would be high compared with nonoperative treatment. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: The study population included 79 patients in Olmsted County, Minnesota, identified through a geographic database, who were diagnosed with a symptomatic discoid lateral meniscus between 1998 and 2015. The complete medical records were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis and evaluate the details of injury and treatment. Age- and sex-specific incidence rates were calculated and adjusted to the 2010 United States population. Results: The overall annual incidence of symptomatic discoid lateral menisci was 3.2 (95% CI, 2.5-3.9) per 100,000 person-years; 12.6% of the patients in the cohort had bilateral symptomatic discoid lateral menisci. The overall annual incidence was similar between male (3.5 per 100,000 person-years) and female patients (2.8 per 100,000 person-years). The highest incidence of symptomatic discoid lateral menisci was noted in adolescent male patients aged 15-18 years (18.8 per 100,000 person-years). A majority (72.2%) of patients presented with a symptomatic tear of the discoid meniscus. The remaining patients presented with mechanical symptoms, including catching/locking or effusion, with no demonstrable meniscus tear on imaging or diagnostic arthroscopic surgery. Additionally, 20.0% of patients were observed to have peripheral instability of the meniscus at the time of diagnostic arthroscopic surgery. The mean age of those with peripheral instability was significantly younger than of those who did not have peripheral instability. Sixty patients (75.9%) received surgical treatment during the study period, including 49 (81.7%) patients who underwent partial lateral meniscectomy and 11 (18.3%) patients who underwent lateral meniscus repair in addition to saucerization. Conclusion: With an overall annual incidence of 3.2 per 100,000 person-years, a symptomatic discoid meniscus is an uncommonly encountered orthopaedic abnormality. However, the incidence of symptomatic discoid lateral menisci is highest in adolescent male patients. Because of the high rate of meniscus tears in patients presenting with symptoms, the majority are treated surgically.

Abstract A varus‐producing distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) is an effective technique for the treatment of lateral patellar instability (LPI) in patients with concomitant moderate to severe valgus malalignment. Patellar maltracking and subluxation are corrected via neutralization of some of the laterally directed forces on the patella due to the valgus deformity. This can be accomplished with a distal femoral lateral opening‐wedge or medial closing‐wedge osteotomy and medial soft tissue stabilization. A medial closing‐wedge osteotomy offers the advantages of immediate weight bearing and a single incision in cases requiring patellofemoral soft tissue stabilization. In this article, we describe our preferred operative technique for a medial closing‐wedge DFO using a femoral locking plate and medial patellofemoral ligament imbrication for the correction of LPI. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.