Abstract Disclosure: S. Ahmed: None. M. Vahidi Rad: None. S.A. Westphal: None. M.D. Whitaker: None. Introduction: Painful Hashimoto thyroiditis is a rare variant of Hashimoto thyroiditis that mostly affects women. Most cases are empirically treated as subacute thyroiditis with corticosteroids, levothyroxine, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. However, no medical treatment may provide sustained pain resolution, so optimal treatment remains unclear. We describe the case of a 40-year-old female with longstanding throbbing anterior neck discomfort that failed medical therapy and her symptoms completely resolved with total thyroidectomy. Case Report: A 40-year-old lady with anterior neck pain centered over the thyroid for more than 16 years, shortly after she delivered her last child. The pain is described as intense, it tends to wax and wane but there is a constant throbbing with occasional radiation to the angle of the jaw. Over the years the pain has gradually worsened and during its flares, the thyroid itself is very tender to the point where she experiences difficulty in swallowing and hoarseness of voice. Complicating the issue is her underlying diagnosis of fibromyalgia, as she tends to experience discomfort in many other areas of her body. However, the neck pain appears to be of a different character. No symptoms of hyper or hypothyroidism. The anterior neck pain has been difficult to alleviate, she has used chronic opioids for it which seems to have helped to some extent, in the past she was on prednisone for 1 month however this made no difference to it. On examination, the thyroid is tender and somewhat firm without lymphadenopathy. Thyroid levels have been consistently normal and the most recent of which was a TSH: 1.48, FT4: 1.4, FT3: 3.5 with negative TPO and thyroid stimulating antibodies. ESR and CRP were unremarkable. Thyroid ultrasound showed mildly heterogeneous parenchyma with no solid nodules or lymphadenopathy. Interestingly she had an elevated thyroid uptake in her scan dated April 1st 2022, 4 hour and 24-hour uptakes were abnormal at 23% and 49% respectively which can be seen with Hashimoto's. She underwent total thyroidectomy and her surgical pathology showed benign thyroid tissue with multiple foci of chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis and hyperplastic nodules. Her pain completely resolved after total thyroidectomy. Discussion: Painful Hashimoto thyroiditis is a rare diagnosis and optimal treatment remains unclear. The painful variant of Hashimoto's thyroiditis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of pain and tenderness of the thyroid which can be managed successfully by surgical treatment. Thyroidectomy not only can lead to alleviation of symptoms but also provides the definitive diagnosis. The risks of surgical intervention must be taken into consideration, especially because painful Hashimoto thyroiditis can be associated with a small fibrous gland; hence, the importance of access to highly skilled, experienced surgeons cannot be overemphasized. Presentation: 6/1/2024
Quantifying misdiagnosis rates from cross‐calibration biases and precision errors in dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry of the femoral neck
Abstract Background Dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) is an exam that measures areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and is regularly used to diagnose and monitor osteoporosis. Except for exam quality issues such as operator error, the quantitative results of an exam are not modified by a radiologist or other physician. DXA cross‐calibration errors can shift diagnoses, conceivably leading to alternate intervention decisions and patient outcomes. Purpose After identifying and correcting a cross‐calibration bias of 3.8% in our two DXA scanners’ aBMD measurements, we investigated misdiagnosis rates for given cross‐calibration errors in a single patient cohort to determine the impact on patient care and the value of cross‐calibration quality control. Methods The studied cohort was 8012 patients of all ages and sexes with femoral neck exams that were scanned on a single DXA unit from October 1, 2018 to March 31, 2021. There were six subcohorts delineated by age and sex, three female groups and three male groups. Data reporting focused on the highest risk subcohort of 2840 females aged 65 or older. The DXA unit had no calibration changes during that time. Only one femoral neck—left or right—was randomly chosen for analysis. Patients with multiple qualifying exams within the time interval had one exam randomly chosen. The proof‐of‐principle simulation shifted the aBMD values within a range of ±10%, ±8%, ±6%, ±4%, ±3.5%, ±3%, ±2.5%, ±2%, ±1.5%, ±1%, ±0.5%, and 0 (no shift); the cross‐calibration shifts were informed by published results and institutional experience. Measurement precision was modeled by randomly sampling a Gaussian distribution characterized by the worst acceptable least significant change (LSC) of 6.9%, with 100 000 samplings for each patient. T‐scores were recalculated from the shifted aBMD values, followed by reassigned diagnoses from the World Health Organization's T‐score‐based scheme. Results The unshifted original subcohort of women aged 65 and older had 599 normal diagnoses (21.1% of the cohort), 1784 osteopenia diagnoses (62.8%), and 455 osteoporosis diagnoses (16.1%). Osteoporosis diagnosis rates were highly sensitive to aBMD shifts. At the extrema, a −10% aBMD shift led to +161% osteoporosis cases, and a +10% aBMD shift led to −64.5% osteoporosis cases. Within the more plausible ±4% aBMD error range, the osteoporosis diagnosis rate changed −10.5% per +1% aBMD shift as indicated by linear regression ( R 2 = 0.98). Except for the men aged 49 years and younger subcohort, the total cohort and five subcohorts had fit line slopes ranging between −9.7% and −12.1% with R 2 ≥ 0.98. Cross‐calibration bias had greater influence for diagnosis count rates compared to measurement precision, that is, LSC. Conclusions These results quantify the degree of misdiagnosis that can occur in a clinically relevant cohort due to cross‐calibration bias. In medical practices where patients may be scanned on more than one DXA unit, ensuring cross‐calibration quality is a critical and high‐value quality control task with direct impact on patient diagnosis and treatment course. The clinical impact and incidence of poor DXA quality control practices, and cross‐calibration in particular, should be studied further.
Vitamin D deficiency, parathyroid hormone levels, and bone disease among patients with end‐stage liver disease and normal serum creatinine awaiting liver transplantation
AbstractVitamin D deficiency is common among patients with end‐stage liver disease (ESLD). The primary aim of our study was to assess the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, secondary hyperparathyroidism, and bone disease in patients with ESLD awaiting LT.MethodsWe retrospectively studied 190 patients at our center. Serum total 25‐hydroxyvitamin D (25‐OH D), parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium, and bone mineral analysis (BMA) were recorded. Standard World Health Organization (WHO) criteria were used to diagnose osteopenia/osteoporosis. Only patients with normal serum creatinine were analyzed.ResultsThirty‐two of 190 patients were excluded from the final analysis (missing serum total 25‐OH D levels in three patients and elevated serum creatinine, 29 patients). 105 of 158 (66.4%) evaluable patients had 25‐OH D levels <25 ng/mL. Patients included in the analysis (n = 158) were divided according to serum total 25‐OH D levels: 0–10 ng/mL (n = 23), 11–20 ng/mL (n = 64), and >20 ng/mL (n = 71). There were no significant differences in mean serum PTH and corrected calcium levels among the three subgroups. Only three patients had elevated serum PTH. Patients with total 25‐OH D ≤ 10 ng/mL had higher model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD) scores vs. those with 25‐OH D > 20 ng/mL (13.3 ± 3, range 8–21, vs. 11.9 ± 3.4, range 6–29, p = 0.004). Irrespective of vitamin D status, bone disease was present in 64.6% of patients.ConclusionLow vitamin D levels and bone disease are common among patients with ESLD awaiting LT. Despite a high prevalence of low serum total 25‐OH D, our cohort maintained normal corrected calcium levels and did not develop secondary hyperparathyroidism. We propose that free serum 25‐OH D and vitamin D‐binding protein may be necessary to accurately establish the diagnosis of vitamin D deficiency in the setting of ESLD. Additional studies are needed to further define mechanisms of bone disease in patients with ESLD.
Oncogenic osteomalacia: Muscular weakness and multiple fractures
Abstract Raloxifene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator that in experimental animals acts as an estrogen receptor antagonist in breast and endometrium but as an estrogen receptor agonist in the skeletal and cardiovascular systems. We conducted a 1-year prospective, randomized, double-blind trial in 143 postmenopausal osteoporotic women (mean ± SD age, 68.4 ± 5.0 years) with at least one prevalent vertebral fractures and low bone mineral density (BMD), comparing groups receiving raloxifene at 60 mg/day (RLX60) or 120 mg/day (RLX120) and a control group receiving supplements of 750 mg/day of calcium and 400 IU/day of vitamin D. There were no differences among groups in the occurrence of uterine bleeding, thrombophlebitis, breast abnormalities, or increased endometrial thickness (assessed by ultrasonography). As compared with controls, the changes in values over 1 year for RLX60 and RLX120, respectively, were significant for serum bone alkaline phosphatase (−14.9%, −8.87%), serum osteocalcin (−20.7%, −17.0%), and urinary C-telopeptide fragment of type I collagen/creatinine (−24.9%, −30.8%), markers of bone turnover; for serum total cholesterol (−7.0% for RLX60) and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) (−11.4% for RLX60) and for the LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio (−13.2%, −8.3%). BMD increased significantly in the total hip (1.66% for RLX60) and ultradistal radius (2.92%, 2.50%). There were nonsignificant trends toward increases over controls in BMD for lumbar spine, total body, and total hip (for RLX120). Using a >15% cutoff definition, raloxifene had no effect on incident fractures, but using a >30% cutoff, there was a dose-related reduction (p = 0.047). We conclude that raloxifene therapy is well tolerated, reduces serum lipids, and does not stimulate the uterus or breasts. It has beneficial effects on bone, although, under the conditions of this study, these appear to be of a smaller magnitude than have been reported with estrogen therapy.