Corey, Rebecca

ABSTRACT Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) prophylaxis can prevent Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) and other opportunistic infections (OI). We sought to assess the frequency, causative factors, and impact of early TMP/SMX discontinuation in abdominal solid organ transplant (SOT). This is a single‐center, retrospective cohort study of abdominal SOT recipients at Mayo Clinic Arizona (MCA) between January 2021 and June 2023. Primary study goals were to determine the rate and reasons behind early TMP/SMX discontinuation and whether TMP/SMX prophylaxis was reinitiated. Secondary outcomes included mean duration of therapy, alternative prophylactic agent utilized, and incidence of TMP/SMX‐preventable OI. A total of 930 abdominal SOT recipients were included (592 kidney, 253 liver, 85 multiorgan transplants). TMP/SMX was discontinued early in 184 (20%) patients: 77 kidney, 84 liver, 23 multiorgan. Predominant reasons for discontinuation were hyperkalemia (39%) and cytopenias (35%). Median duration of TMP/SMX prophylaxis before discontinuation was 54.5 (18.0, 93.2) days. TMP/SMX was not resumed in 62% of cases (36% kidney, 89% liver, 52% multi‐organ). The predominant reason for non‐resumption was alternative prophylaxis with no clear intent to rechallenge TMP/SMX (70%). Alternative prophylaxis included pentamidine (43%), none (30%), dapsone (22%), and atovaquone (5%). Of patients reinitiated, 86% (59/69) successfully remained on TMP/SMX through the prophylaxis period. One TMP‐SMX‐preventable OI (nocardiosis) was observed in the TMP/SMX discontinuation group. TMP/SMX is often discontinued prematurely in SOT recipients without resumption despite resolution of the offending cause. TMP/SMX prophylaxis should be maintained where possible, as alternative therapy may not offer the same broad spectrum of protection against OI.

Abstract Background Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TS) prophylaxis can prevent Pneumocystis jirovecii (PCP) and other opportunistic infections (OIs), such as intestinal protozoa, Toxoplasma, Listeria, and Nocardia. We sought to assess the frequency, causative factors, and impact of early TS discontinuation in abdominal SOT recipients. Methods This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adult abdominal SOT recipients at Mayo Clinic Arizona between 1/1/2021 and 6/30/2023. Objectives included the rate and reasons behind early TS discontinuation and whether TS prophylaxis was reinitiated. Early discontinuation was defined as cessation of TS prophylaxis within 6 months post-transplant for ≥7 days. Secondary outcomes included median duration of therapy, alternative prophylactic agent utilized, and incidence of TS preventable OI. Patients were excluded if they had no TS ordered, died <180 days from transplant, or received a thoracic organ transplant. Results 942 abdominal SOT recipients were identified. Thus far 171 liver, 11 Kidney, and 29 liver/kidney have been reviewed and included in the current analysis. TS was discontinued early in 60 (28%) patients. Predominant reasons for discontinuation were hyperkalemia (45%), cytopenias (17%), and acute kidney injury (15%). Allergy was the indication for discontinuation in 1 patient. Median duration of TS before discontinuation was 39 days (IQR 66). TS was not resumed in 78% of cases. The predominant reason for non-resumption was alternative prophylaxis with no clear intent to rechallenge TS (70%). The main discontinuation reason had resolved in 70% that stopped due to cytopenias, 67% that stopped due to liver injury, and 96% that stopped due to hyperkalemia. Alternative prophylaxis included pentamidine (50%), dapsone (32%), atovaquone (5%), none (13%). No patients developed PCP or other TS preventable OI during 9-month follow-up post-SOT. Conclusion TS is discontinued prematurely in a significant number of SOT recipients and is often not resumed despite resolution of the offending cause. Given its proven track record in preventing several OIs in SOT recipients, providers should document reason(s) for TS discontinuation and consider resumption of TS after reasons for discontinuation resolve. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Introduction: Eculizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to complement protein C5, inhibiting complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy. It is approved for several indications including atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Additionally, eculizumab is used off-label for antibody-mediated rejection and C3 glomerulopathy in renal transplant recipients. Due to limited data available, the purpose of this study was to describe the use of eculizumab treatment in renal transplant recipients. Design: This retrospective single-center study evaluated the safety and efficacy of eculizumab for on- and off-label indications in renal transplant recipients. Adult renal transplant recipients receiving at least 1 dose of eculizumab posttransplant between October 2018 and September 2021 were included. The primary outcome evaluated was graft failure in patients treated with eculizumab. Results: Forty-seven patients were included in analysis. The median age at eculizumab initiation was 51 years [IQR 38-60], with 55% being female. Indications for eculizumab included atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome/thrombotic microangiopathy (63.8%), antibody-mediated rejection (27.7%), C3 glomerulopathy (4.3%), and other (4.3%). Graft failure occurred in 10 patients (21.3%) with a median of 2.4 weeks [IQR 0.5-23.3] from transplant to graft failure. At last follow-up (median 56.1 weeks), 44 (93.6%) patients were alive. After eculizumab initiation, renal function improved at 1 week, 1 month, and last follow-up. Conclusion: Eculizumab treatment demonstrated a benefit on graft and patient survival compared to reported incidence in thrombotic microangiopathy and antibody-mediated rejection. Due to the small sample size and retrospective design, further research is warranted to confirm these results.

AbstractDrug screening during pre-transplant evaluations can have major implications for patient care, particularly because drug abuse has been associated with poor transplant outcomes. Although urine drug screening is usually preferred, serum testing is available for situations such as anuria due to end stage renal disease. However, there are few studies evaluating serum drug screening in specific populations such as patients undergoing kidney transplant evaluation. All serum drug screens ordered between January 2015 and November 2017 on patients being evaluated for renal transplant were compared against a large population of serum drug screens ordered from other institutions. Cocaine screening and confirmation results were evaluated to determine false positives. Cocaine screens were positive in 23 of 537 (4.3%) pre-transplant samples, and 211 of 5,115 (4.1%) comparison samples. Confirmation testing demonstrated that 14 (60.9%) pre-transplant samples were false positives, which was significantly (P < 0.01) higher than the rate of false positives in the comparison group (47/211, 22.3%). No common medication or other cross-reacting substance could be identified in the pre-transplant cohort to explain the false-positive results. Although serum cocaine screening had a low overall false-positive rate, the proportion of false positives was significantly higher in pre-transplant patients. Given the poor transplant outcomes associated with drug abuse, failure to properly interpret screening results as being false positives could negatively affect patient care. All members of the transplant team should recognize the importance of confirmation testing in this setting, to avoid unintended consequences due to false-positive screening results.

AbstractVitamin D deficiency is common among patients with end‐stage liver disease (ESLD). The primary aim of our study was to assess the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency, secondary hyperparathyroidism, and bone disease in patients with ESLD awaiting LT.MethodsWe retrospectively studied 190 patients at our center. Serum total 25‐hydroxyvitamin D (25‐OH D), parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium, and bone mineral analysis (BMA) were recorded. Standard World Health Organization (WHO) criteria were used to diagnose osteopenia/osteoporosis. Only patients with normal serum creatinine were analyzed.ResultsThirty‐two of 190 patients were excluded from the final analysis (missing serum total 25‐OH D levels in three patients and elevated serum creatinine, 29 patients). 105 of 158 (66.4%) evaluable patients had 25‐OH D levels <25 ng/mL. Patients included in the analysis (n = 158) were divided according to serum total 25‐OH D levels: 0–10 ng/mL (n = 23), 11–20 ng/mL (n = 64), and >20 ng/mL (n = 71). There were no significant differences in mean serum PTH and corrected calcium levels among the three subgroups. Only three patients had elevated serum PTH. Patients with total 25‐OH D ≤ 10 ng/mL had higher model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD) scores vs. those with 25‐OH D > 20 ng/mL (13.3 ± 3, range 8–21, vs. 11.9 ± 3.4, range 6–29, p = 0.004). Irrespective of vitamin D status, bone disease was present in 64.6% of patients.ConclusionLow vitamin D levels and bone disease are common among patients with ESLD awaiting LT. Despite a high prevalence of low serum total 25‐OH D, our cohort maintained normal corrected calcium levels and did not develop secondary hyperparathyroidism. We propose that free serum 25‐OH D and vitamin D‐binding protein may be necessary to accurately establish the diagnosis of vitamin D deficiency in the setting of ESLD. Additional studies are needed to further define mechanisms of bone disease in patients with ESLD.