Bonnevialle, Nicolas

Background: Suprascapular nerve (SSN) block using bone reference points (BARO) is a technique that in principle is accessible to practitioners without experience in locoregional anesthesia or ultrasound guidance. The primary objective was to validate the feasibility of SSN BARO by an orthopedic surgeon. The secondary objective was to provide a description of the path of the sensory branches from the SSN to the shoulder. Methods: A BARO was performed on 15 cadaveric shoulders by an intern in orthopedic surgery. Ten ml of methylene blue and 0.75% ropivocaine were injected around the SSN. 2.5ml of a red latex solution were also injected to identify the injection site. The distribution of the sensory branches of the NSS was also described. Results: The average distance between the SSN and the injection site was 1.5cm (0-4.5cm). The most frequent injection site was the proximal third of the scapular neck. Fifteen SSNs were marked upstream of the origin of the sensory branches. The 15 SSN produced 3 sensory branches that innervate the posterior glenohumeral capsule, the subacromial bursa, and the coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments. Conclusion: SSN BARO by an orthopedic surgeon is a simple, reliable, and accurate technique. Injection near the suprascapular notch is recommended to mark the SSN upstream of its three sensory branches.

Abstract Based on the currently available literature, total denervation of the elbow joint is considered impossible. However, consensus with respect to the anatomic location of sensory branches is lacking. The aim of this literature review was to establish consensus with respect to the anatomic features of the articular branches innervating the elbow joint, as well as the distribution of sensory receptors about its capsule. Four electronic databases were queried, between January 1945 and June 2019. Twenty‐one original articles providing a detailed description of the distribution of sensory receptors about the elbow joint capsule (5) and its articular branches (16) were reviewed. The posterior capsule was found to be primarily innervated by the ulnar and radial nerves via combined articular branches and sensory branches of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve. The anterior capsule was found to be primarily innervated by a plexus of articular ramifications from muscular branches of mixed nerves (ulnar, musculocutaneous, radial, and median nerves). A higher density of nociceptors and mechano‐receptors was identified within the posterior and anterior capsules, respectively. Thorough denervation, via the technique proposed herein, is likely to be sufficient in eliminating pain from degenerative conditions of the elbow joint.

Purpose To compare the accuracy of distal suprascapular nerve (dSSN) blockade performed with the use of ultrasound‐guided regional anesthesia (USRA) versus with a landmark‐based approach (LBA). A secondary aim was to describe the anatomic features of the sensory branches of the dSSN. Methods USRA and LBA were performed in 15 shoulders each from 15 cadavers (total of 30 shoulders). Then, 10 mL of methylene blue‒infused ropivacaine 0.75% was injected into the dSSN. Simultaneously, 2.5 mL of red latex solution was injected to identify the position of the needle tip. The division and distribution of the sensory branches originating from the SSN were described. Results The tip of the needle was identified at 1.3 cm (range, 0‐5.2 cm) and 1.5 cm (range, 0‐4.5 cm) with USRA and the LBA, respectively ( P = .90). Staining diffused past the origin of the most proximal sensory branch in 27 cases. The most proximal sensory branch arose 2.5 cm from the suprascapular notch. Among the 3 failures that occurred in the USRA group, the sensory branches also failed to be marked. All 30 dSSNs gave off 3 sensory branches, which innervated the posterior glenohumeral capsule, the subacromial bursa, and the coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments. Conclusions An LBA is as reliable and accurate as US guidance for anesthetic blockade of the dSSN. Marking of the suprascapular nerve must be proximal to the suprascapular notch to involve the 3 sensory branches in the anesthetic blockade. Clinical Relevance The present study demonstrates that a landmark‐based approach to anesthetic blockade of the distal suprascapular nerve is accurate and can be performed by orthopaedic surgeons lacking experience in ultrasound‐guided anesthetic techniques.

Introduction The EVOLVE implant (Wright Medical Technology, Arlington, TN, USA) is a modular loose-fitting radial head prosthesis. The primary objective was to synthesize all available literature investigating the midterm clinical outcomes of the EVOLVE implant. Materials and methods An electronic literature search in Pubmed/Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane library was performed querying for studies published in 2000–2017. Articles describing clinical and radiographical outcomes as well as reoperation were included. Outcomes of interest included range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand, radiographic outcome, and reason for reoperation. Results A total of five articles consisting of 146 patients with EVOLVE implants were included. Mean patient age was 57.4 years (range 22–84), and 43.8% were males (n = 64). Mean follow-up was 4.8 years (range 1–14). Mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score and Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand score were 87.6 (range 30–100) and 18.9 (range 0–82), respectively. Midterm clinical results were good or excellent (Mayo Elbow Performance Score > 74) in 94 patients. Reoperation was observed in 12 patients, with implant revision required in 2 patients. The primary reason for reoperation was persistent stiffness (n = 9). Conclusion Midterm outcomes of EVOLVE radial head prosthesis are satisfactory, and associated complication rates are low. Loose-fit implant method appears to be a reliable approach to avoid failure of radial head prosthesis by painful loosening.

AimsThe primary aim of this study was to define the standard minimum follow-up required to produce a reliable estimate of the rate of re-operation after radial head arthroplasty (RHA). The secondary objective was to define the leading reasons for re-operation.Materials and MethodsFour electronic databases, between January 2000 and March 2017 were searched. Articles reporting reasons for re-operation (Group I) and results (Group II) after RHA were included. In Group I, a meta-analysis was performed to obtain the standard minimum follow-up, the mean time to re-operation and the reason for failure. In Group II, the minimum follow-up for each study was compared with the standard minimum follow-up.ResultsA total of 40 studies were analysed: three were Group I and included 80 implants and 37 were Group II and included 1192 implants. In Group I, the mean time to re-operation was 1.37 years (0 to 11.25), the standard minimum follow-up was 3.25 years; painful loosening was the main indication for re-operation. In Group II, 33 Group II articles (89.2%) reported a minimum follow-up of < 3.25 years.ConclusionThe literature does not provide a reliable estimate of the rate of re-operation after RHA. The reproducibility of results would be improved by using a minimum follow-up of three years combined with a consensus of the definition of the reasons for failure after RHA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1561–70.