Chesdachai, Supavit

Abstract Background There remains a lack of consensus regarding the postoperative treatment regimen in patients with native valve Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis who undergo surgical valve replacement or repair. Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective review of patients with S aureus native valve endocarditis who underwent surgical valve replacement or repair at Mayo Clinic Enterprise (Minnesota, Florida, Arizona, and Mayo Clinic Health Systems) between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2022. Postoperative treatment regimens were classified as either monotherapy with a methicillin-sensitive or methicillin-resistant S aureus active agent or combination therapy that included rifampin and/or gentamicin with either active agent. Results Of the 339 patients diagnosed with S aureus native valve endocarditis, 61 underwent surgical valve replacement or repair within the initial 6 weeks of antimicrobial therapy. A total of 12 (20.2%) patients died during the 1-year follow-up period. Between patients postoperatively treated with monotherapy (n = 33) and combination therapy (n = 28), a propensity score–weighted analysis revealed that combination therapy was associated with increased risk of 1-year mortality (P = .039), 6-month relapse (P = .016), and treatment-related adverse events (P < .001). Conclusions Among patients treated for native valve infective endocarditis caused by S aureus after valvular surgical intervention, all study outcomes—adverse events and drug-drug interactions, 6-month infective endocarditis relapse, and 1-year mortality—were higher in the combination therapy group than the monotherapy group.

Abstract Cardiac implantable electronic device infections (CIEDIs) present substantial challenges for infectious diseases specialists, encompassing diagnosis, management, and complex decision making involving patients, families, and multidisciplinary teams. This review, guided by a common clinical case presentation encountered in daily practice, navigates through the diagnostic process, management strategies in unique scenarios, long-term follow-up, and critical discussions required for CIEDIs.

Abstract Cardiac implantable electronic device infections (CIEDIs) present substantial challenges for infectious diseases specialists, encompassing diagnosis, management, and complex decision-making involving patients, families, and multidisciplinary teams. This review, guided by a common clinical case presentation encountered in daily practice, navigates through the diagnostic process, management strategies in unique scenarios, long-term follow-up, and critical discussions required for CIEDIs.

Background Echocardiographic evaluation of vegetations is crucial in infective endocarditis ( IE ). Although several studies have noted a link between larger vegetations and an increased risk of embolization, a more comprehensive evaluation of vegetation characteristics in a contemporary cohort has not been conducted. Our study aimed to define the short‐term risk of symptomatic embolization in patients with IE . Methods and Results The Mayo Clinic IE registry was screened to identify patients from 2015 to 2021 who had undergone transesophageal echocardiography. Multivariable subdistribution hazards regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with the cumulative incidence of symptomatic embolism over 30 days accounting for the competing risk of death. Overall, 779 patients with IE were included, of whom 517 (66.4%) were men, median age was 65.0 ( interquartile range, 52.9–74.8) years, and 89.3% were White. In total, 234 patients had a symptomatic embolic event, a 30‐day cumulative incidence of 30.2%. In multivariable analysis, a highly mobile vegetation was the strongest predictor of embolism ( P <0.001). Vegetation length with interaction of IE type was also associated with embolic risk ( P <0.001), with a stronger effect in native valve IE ( P interaction=0.001). Other associated factors included multiple vegetations, younger age, and Staphylococcus aureus . A nomogram that incorporated these factors was constructed to facilitate the prediction of embolic risk. Conclusions Highly mobile, larger vegetations are associated with embolic events. Embolic risk could be assessed by evaluating length as a continuous variable, alongside other echocardiographic findings, using a newly developed scoring tool; external validation is warranted.

Abstract A distinction between infections of left ventricular assist devices and cardiac implantable electronic devices is warranted as they differ markedly in incidence, microbiologic profiles, clinical presentations, and extraction feasibility. These differences necessitate tailored suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT) strategies. This commentary highlights the need for device-specific SAT approaches.

Background: Diagnostic uncertainty caused by the low positive predictive value of HEV-specific IgM antibody (Ab) testing in a low-prevalence setting. We investigated the utility of a two-step HEV IgM Ab testing approach for diagnosing HEV infection. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all adults who underwent HEV IgM Ab and/or HEV RNA testing from July 2013 through June 2023 at Mayo Clinic. Two-step HEV IgM testing involved initial testing using recomWell HEV IgM ELISA (Mikrogen, Neuried, Germany), with reflex to recomLine HEV IgM Strip (Mikrogen, Neuried, Germany) on all recomWell HEV IgM-reactive or IgM-equivocal specimens, as recomLine HEV IgM has higher specificity than recomWell HEV IgM but is more labor-intensive. Results: A total of 1640 patients had HEV IgM Ab or HEV RNA testing, including 1293 (79%) with only HEV IgM Ab testing, 213 (13%) with only HEV RNA testing, and 134 (8%) with both HEV IgM Ab and HEV RNA testing. Eighteen HEV infections were diagnosed with acute (N=16) and chronic (N=2) infections. Two-step IgM Ab testing did not identify 2 solid organ transplant recipients with chronic HEV infection. In acute HEV infection with HEV viremia, 3 out of 4 patients (2 solid organ transplant recipients and 1 patient with Guillain-Barre syndrome) were treated with ribavirin. Conclusions: A two-step HEV IgM Ab test may accurately diagnose acute HEV infection in immunocompetent persons. However, this approach fails to identify chronic HEV infection in immunocompromised individuals who need HEV RNA testing to establish the diagnosis.

Background: Isavuconazole (ISA) has a favorable side effect profile that makes it attractive for treatment of invasive fungal infections (IFI). It carries FDA approval for invasive aspergillosis and mucormycosis, but there are fewer data for other organisms and non-pulmonary infections. We conducted this review to investigate how ISA performed at treating IFI, with an especial interest in these non-approved indications. Methods: We retrospectively identified and reviewed 131 patients who received ISA as treatment for IFI at our institution, some of whom received ISA as their first anti-fungal therapy and others who received ISA as either step-down therapy or salvage therapy. We identified the microbiologic cause of infection as well as the anatomic site involved for each patient. We then classified patients according to their response to ISA: namely cured, partially responded, or stabilized. Results: The majority of patients were immunocompromised (n = 76, 58%). ISA was used primarily as a secondary therapy (n = 116, 89%); either as a step-down/switching from other agents, or as salvage therapy. The most common reasons for switching to ISA were toxicities with prior agents followed by QT prolongation. Although pulmonary aspergillosis and mucormycosis were represented in more than half of the cohort, ISA was also used off-label for treatment of other organisms such as endemic fungi (n = 19, 15%) as well as central nervous system (CNS) infections (n = 15, 11%). We have described the detailed clinical characteristics of these CNS infections cases. The overall clinical response rate varied by type of infection and site involved (57–73% response rate). Conclusions: We demonstrated encouraging clinical responses, particularly outside the FDA-approved indications, as well as good tolerability. This report highlights the critical need for expanded scope of prospective studies to delineate the efficacy of this better-tolerated agent, especially in central nervous system infections.

Abstract Cardiac implantable electronic device infection in the context of corynebacterial bloodstream infection (BSI) remains poorly understood. From 2012 to 2023 at Mayo Clinic, 4 of 12 patients with corynebacterial BSI had cardiac implantable electronic device infection: 1 patient was diagnosed during a relapsing BSI episode. Undefined source, persistent BSI, and the presence of a prosthetic cardiac valve were common characteristics.