Chiu, Chia‐Yu

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) establishes lifelong latency following primary infection and can reactivate to cause severe illness in immunocompromised hosts. CMV DNAemia in non-HIV-infected, non-solid organ/bone marrow transplant (NHNT) hosts is poorly characterized, with limited clinical insights. We aim to describe the clinical presentation, prognostic indicators, and outcomes of CMV DNAemia among NHNT patients. We used the TriNetX international patient database to identify adult patients diagnosed with CMV DNAemia from 2016 until March 2023. We evaluated hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) level care, and all-cause mortality at 30 days and 1 year. We also completed a post-propensity score analysis comparing clinical characteristics of survivors versus non-survivors at 90 days. We identified 1123 NHNT patients with CMV DNAemia, most of whom had neoplasms (63%). Venous thromboembolism occurred in 31% of the population. The 30-day hospitalization and all-cause mortality rates were 35% and 14%, respectively. After propensity score matching and Bonferroni correction, weakness, purpura, acute respiratory failure, malnutrition, encephalopathy, and hypotension were associated with increased 90-day all-cause mortality. NHNT patients with CMV DNAemia carry a substantial morbidity and all-cause mortality. Further studies are warranted to clarify whether CMV DNAemia is a causative factor or an incidental finding in this population.

Background. Measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is rare. We aim to investigate the pretransplant seroprevalence, MMR infection posttransplant, and whether immediate pretransplant MMR vaccination is associated with MMR infection. Methods. We queried the TriNetX database in December 2024 to assess (1) pretransplant MMR seroprevalence, (2) characteristics and outcomes of posttransplant MMR infections, and (3) outcomes for recipients who received the MMR vaccine within 30 d pretransplant. Only US data were included. MMR infection was identified through International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. Results. Among 313 548 SOT recipients identified in the database (from 2009 to 2024), IgG positivity for MMR was 72%, 80%, and 78% when available (~5% each). Based on ICD codes, posttransplant MMR infections occurred in 107 (0.03%), 124 (0.04%), and 38 (0.01%) recipients, respectively. The 90-d rejection rates were 36%, 27%, and 42%, whereas mortality rates were 7%, 8%, and 5%, respectively, in patients with MMR infection. Among 114 recipients vaccinated within 30 d pretransplant, none developed posttransplant MMR infections. Conclusions. Overall, posttransplant MMR infections in adult SOT recipients were uncommon in this data set, and no vaccine-associated infections were documented among those who received the MMR vaccine within 30 d pretransplant in real-world practice. The primary limitation of this study is that most MMR infections were identified using ICD codes without confirmation through serological testing or polymerase chain reaction, and we were unable to further characterize the infections because the de-identified database lacked information on the patient’s ZIP code and transplant hospital. Our study highlights the need for improvement in MMR serology screening and pretransplant MMR vaccination.

ABSTRACTIntroductionVaccination is crucial to the thoracic solid organ transplant (SOT) population to reduce vaccine‐preventable infection. However, data on posttransplant hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination compliance and vaccine‐induced seroprotection are lacking.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of adult thoracic organ (heart and lung) transplant recipients at Mayo Clinic sites in Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida between January 2018 and August 2023. Recombivax HB was used before 2020, and Heplisav‐B was preferred after 2020. Recipients with posttransplant hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) < 10 IU/L were eligible for the HBV vaccine. HBV seroprotection was defined as an HBsAb ≥ 10 IU/L.ResultsA total of 1116 recipients were evaluated, all of whom underwent posttransplant HBsAb testing. Of these, 751 (67%) had an HBsAb level < 10 IU/L and were eligible for posttransplant HBV vaccination. Of the eligible recipients, 117 (16%) completed the HBV vaccine series during the study period. Among these 117 recipients, 40 (34%) had their HBsAb levels rechecked after completing the vaccine series, with a seroprotection rate of 37.5% (15/40). There was no statistically significant difference in the seroprotection rates between Heplisav‐B and Recombivax HB vaccines (39% [13/33] vs. 29% [2/7]; p = 0.691). In addition, HBsAb levels were lowest at week 2 but rebounded at week 4 posttransplant and pretransplant HBsAb levels of ≥100 IU/L ensured 5‐year seroprotection.ConclusionSuboptimal compliance with HBV vaccination and poor vaccine‐induced seroprotection occur in thoracic organ transplant recipients, regardless of the vaccine used. These findings underscore the necessity of enhancing vaccination strategies for SOT recipients. image

Background: Diagnostic uncertainty caused by the low positive predictive value of HEV-specific IgM antibody (Ab) testing in a low-prevalence setting. We investigated the utility of a two-step HEV IgM Ab testing approach for diagnosing HEV infection. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all adults who underwent HEV IgM Ab and/or HEV RNA testing from July 2013 through June 2023 at Mayo Clinic. Two-step HEV IgM testing involved initial testing using recomWell HEV IgM ELISA (Mikrogen, Neuried, Germany), with reflex to recomLine HEV IgM Strip (Mikrogen, Neuried, Germany) on all recomWell HEV IgM-reactive or IgM-equivocal specimens, as recomLine HEV IgM has higher specificity than recomWell HEV IgM but is more labor-intensive. Results: A total of 1640 patients had HEV IgM Ab or HEV RNA testing, including 1293 (79%) with only HEV IgM Ab testing, 213 (13%) with only HEV RNA testing, and 134 (8%) with both HEV IgM Ab and HEV RNA testing. Eighteen HEV infections were diagnosed with acute (N=16) and chronic (N=2) infections. Two-step IgM Ab testing did not identify 2 solid organ transplant recipients with chronic HEV infection. In acute HEV infection with HEV viremia, 3 out of 4 patients (2 solid organ transplant recipients and 1 patient with Guillain-Barre syndrome) were treated with ribavirin. Conclusions: A two-step HEV IgM Ab test may accurately diagnose acute HEV infection in immunocompetent persons. However, this approach fails to identify chronic HEV infection in immunocompromised individuals who need HEV RNA testing to establish the diagnosis.

ABSTRACT Introduction Hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination is recommended for solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates. However, there is a lack of data on the HBV vaccine compliance, serologic response, and durability of HBV seroprotection in thoracic organ transplantation recipients. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of adult thoracic organ (heart and lung) transplant candidates who received HBV vaccination at Mayo Clinic sites in Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida between January 2018 and August 2023. Conventional recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (Recombivax HB) was used before 2020, and Heplisav‐B was preferred after 2020. HBV seroprotection was defined as hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) ≥ 10 IU/L. Furthermore, we compared characteristics between recipients who maintained HBV seroprotection and those who lost HBV seroprotection (HBsAb < 10 IU/L) at 30 days posttransplantation (D30). Results Among 922 candidates who were eligible for HBV vaccination, 430 (47%) completed the HBV vaccine series. Patients receiving Heplisav‐B were more likely to complete the series than Recombivax HB (81% vs. 60%, p < 0.001) and Heplisav‐B had a higher seroprotection rate than Recombivax HB (75% vs. 64%, p = 0.023). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified receiving Heplisav‐B as an independent predictor for HBV seroprotection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.723; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.056–2.810; p = 0.029). A total of 145 thoracic organ transplant recipients achieved HBV seroprotection at the date of transplantation. Loss of HBV seroprotection occurred in 38 (26%) patients at D30. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified two predictors for HBV seroprotection loss at D30: age ≥ 60 years (aOR, 2.503; 95% CI 1.026–6.107; p = 0.044), and pretransplant HBsAb level between 10 and 100 IU/L (aOR, 18.575; 95% CI 5.211–66.209; p < 0.001). Conclusions Although less than half of thoracic organ transplant candidates completed HBV vaccine series pretransplant, Heplisav‐B provided a higher vaccine completion rate and seroprotection than the 3‐dose Recombivax HB. Clinicians should also be aware of the increased loss of HBV seroprotection in thoracic organ transplant recipients with age ≥ 60 years and pretransplant HBsAb between 10 and 100 IU/L. Assessment of seroprotection after HBV vaccination should be prioritized during the pretransplant period.

Background. Identification and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) mitigate the risk of tuberculosis (TB) reactivation after transplantation. TB reactivation is higher in those with indeterminate QuantiFERON (QFT) than those with negative results. Management of indeterminate QFT results in the pretransplant period remains unclear. Methods. We conducted a retrospective study of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, 18 y and older, who were screened with QFT assay pretransplantation at Mayo Clinic between January 2010 and June 2023. We examined the frequency of indeterminate QFT results, results of repeat LTBI screening, treatment decisions, and rate of posttransplant TB infection. Results. Of 13 008 patients screened for LTBI before SOT, 736 (6%) patients had indeterminate QFT results. Among these, 247 (34%) underwent a second LTBI screening test, and 39 (5%) received LTBI treatment. Among 247 patients with a repeat LTBI screening test, 185 (75%), 48 (19%), and 14 (6%) were tested by QFT, T-SPOT.TB, or TST, respectively. The repeat QFT remained indeterminate in 160 (86%) patients, whereas all T-SPOT.TB results were negative. Posttransplant TB infection occurred in 2 (0.3%) patients; neither had a second TB screening test pretransplant nor received LTBI treatment. Conclusions. In SOT recipients with indeterminate QFT results at pretransplant evaluation, opting for T-SPOT.TB as a second test may be preferable over repeat QFT. TB infection after transplantation in patients with a pretransplant indeterminate QFT result was rare. Patient management and LTBI treatment in those with indeterminate QFT pretransplant should account for epidemiological risk factors, and shared decision-making is recommended.

ABSTRACTIntroductionHepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) can occur in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with previously inactive hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Previous studies have reported that HBVr is generally less than 10% in nonliver SOT recipients with past HBV infection.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study from January 2018 to August 2023 at Mayo Clinic sites in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota. We examined the antiviral prophylaxis strategy used and the characteristics of HBVr in hepatitis B core antibody‐positive (HBcAb +) nonliver SOT adult recipients. Past HBV infection was defined as HBcAb + / hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) –. Chronic HBV infection was defined as HBcAb + / HBsAg +.ResultsA total of 180 nonliver SOT recipients were identified during the study period. Indefinite antiviral prophylaxis was utilized in 77 recipients, and none developed HBVr after transplantation. In 103 recipients without antiviral prophylaxis, the incidence of HBVr was 12% (12/97) and 33% (2/6) in those with past HBV infection and chronic HBV infection. The incidence of HBVr in patients with past HBV infection is 16% (8/50), 15% (3/20), and 5% (1/22) in kidney, heart, and lungs, respectively. HBVr was more frequent in those who received alemtuzumab. Among 14 recipients with HBVr, none had HBV‐associated liver failure or death.ConclusionsOur study observed a higher rate of HBVr (12%) in nonliver SOT recipients with past HBV infection compared to the previous studies. Further studies are needed to identify predictors of HBVr in nonliver SOT recipients and optimize antiviral prophylaxis guidance.

Background. Solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates should be screened and treated for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) to prevent tuberculosis (TB) reactivation after transplantation. We aimed to assess the steps from positive QuantiFERON (QFT) through LTBI treatment (cascade of care) in the SOT population. Methods. We conducted a retrospective study of SOT recipients older than 18 y with a positive QFT during pretransplant evaluation at the Mayo Clinic from January 2010 to June 2023. We analyzed each cascade step to determine associated drop-out factors for LTBI management. Results. Of 629 patients who had positive QFT results, 587 (93%) were evaluated by an infectious disease (ID) specialist, 478 (76%) were recommended to start LTBI treatment, 473 (75%) initiated LTBI treatment, and 457 (73%) completed LTBI treatment. LTBI treatment was not recommended in 109 patients evaluated by infectious disease, most of whom had previously received either LTBI (n = 72) or TB (n = 14) treatment. LTBI treatment was initiated before or after transplantation for 45% and 55% of patients, respectively. Isoniazid monotherapy was the most common regimen (92%), and adverse events were rare (7%). Seven patients developed active TB infection posttransplantation under various circumstances (3 without LTBI treatment, 1 during LTBI treatment, and 3 after completing LTBI treatment). Conclusions. Our findings demonstrate the variability of LTBI management in SOT recipients with positive QFT. When recommended, most patients completed LTBI treatment successfully. Nonetheless, active TB was noted regardless of whether patients received LTBI treatment. This study highlights the importance of optimizing LTBI management in this population.