Back to Authors

Piepoli, Massimo

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1124-234X

Mayo Clinic

University of Milan

Citations 3

International validation of the Metabolic Exercise test data combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes (MECKI) score in heart failure
Adamopoulos, Stamatis , Miliopoulos, Dimitrios , Piotrowicz, Ewa , Snoek, Johan A. , Panagopoulou, Niki , Niederseer, David , Mazaheri, Reza , Ma, Jing , Chen, Yundai , Popović, Dejana , Seferović, Petar , Girola, Davide, Metra, Marco , Rosano, Giuseppe , Piepoli, Massimo , Corrà, Ugo , Agostoni, Piergiuseppe , Metra, Marco , Nanas, Serafim , Corrà, Ugo , Coats, Andrew J.S. , Volterrani, Maurizio , Apostolo, Anna , Campodonico, Jeness , Salvioni, Elisabetta

European Journal of Preventive Cardiology | June 8, 2023 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 13 | Pages: 1371-1379

10.1093/eurjpc/zwad191 Get It

Abstract Aims Current European heart failure (HF) guidelines suggest the use of risk score: among them, the Metabolic Exercise test data combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes (MECKI) score has demonstrated to be one of the most accurate. However, the risk scores are still poorly implemented in clinical practice, also due to the lack of strong evidence regarding their external validation in different populations. Thus, the current study was designed as an external validation test of the MECKI score in an international multicentre setting. Methods and results The study cohort consisted of patients diagnosed with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) across international centres (not Italian), retrospectively recruited. Collected data included demographics, HF aetiology, laboratory testing, electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiographic findings, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) results as described in the original MECKI score publication. A total of 1042 patients across 8 international centres (7 European and 1 Asian) were included and followed up from 1998 till 2019. Patients were divided according to the calculated MECKI scores into three subgroups: (i) MECKI score <10%, (ii) 10–20%, and (iii) ≥ 20%. Survival analysis comparison among the three MECKI score subgroups showed a worse prognosis in patients with higher MECKI score value: median event-free survival times were 4396 days for MECKI score <10%, 3457 days for 10–20%, and 1022 days for ≥20% (P < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the ROC curves (AUC) were like those reported in the original internal validation studies. Conclusion In patients diagnosed with HFrEF, the power of the MECKI score was confirmed in terms of prognosis and risk stratification, supporting its implementation as advised by the HF guidelines.
Right Heart Dysfunction and Failure in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Mechanisms and Management. Position Statement on Behalf of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology
Gorter, Thomas M. , Veldhuisen, Dirk J. van , Borlaug, Barry A. , Čelutkienė, Jelena , Crespo‐Leiro, María G. , Guazzi, Marco , Harjola, Veli‐Pekka, Heymans, Stéphane , Hill, Loreena , Lund, Lars H. , Mebazaa, Alexandre , Mueller, Christian, Paulus, Walter J. , Pieske, Burkert , Piepoli, Massimo , Seferović, Petar , Solomon, Scott D. , Shah, Sanjiv J. , Wachter, Rolf , Tschöpe, Carsten , Boer, Rudolf A. de , de Boer, Rudolf A , Borlaug, Barry A , Shah, Sanjiv J , Heymans, Stephane , Bauersachs, Johann , Coats, Andrew J.S. , Harjola, Veli‐Pekka , Lainščak, Mitja , Lam, Carolyn S.P. , Lyon, Alexander R. , Ruschitzka, Frank T. , Rutten, Frans Hendrik , Solomon, Scott David , Triposkiadis, Filippos K. , Tschöpe, Carsten , Celutkiene, Jelena , Crespo-Leiro, Maria Generosa

European Journal of Heart Failure | October 17, 2017 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 16-37

10.1002/ejhf.1029 Get It

Abstract There is an unmet need for effective treatment strategies to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Until recently, attention in patients with HFpEF was almost exclusively focused on the left side. However, it is now increasingly recognized that right heart dysfunction is common and contributes importantly to poor prognosis in HFpEF. More insights into the development of right heart dysfunction in HFpEF may aid to our knowledge about this complex disease and may eventually lead to better treatments to improve outcomes in these patients. In this position paper from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, the Committee on Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction reviews the prevalence, diagnosis, and pathophysiology of right heart dysfunction and failure in patients with HFpEF. Finally, potential treatment strategies, important knowledge gaps and future directions regarding the right side in HFpEF are discussed.