Praska, Corinne

Abstract Diffuse hemispheric glioma, H3 G34‐mutant (DHG‐H3 G34) has been primarily molecularly characterized by methylation profiling and sequencing studies. We describe an integrated histomolecular evaluation including high‐resolution copy number profiling of a series of 60 DHG‐H3 G34 to further our understanding of the spectrum of genetic changes associated with this tumor type. Cases were clinically tested using an 187‐gene mutation and fusion targeted neuro‐oncology next‐generation sequencing panel ( n = 60) and Oncoscan chromosomal microarray ( n = 26) by a single laboratory (2018–2022). A subset of cases had immunohistochemical results for OLIG2 ( n = 42), p53 ( n = 48), and ATRX ( n = 46), and methylation array data ( n = 8). Median age at testing was 21 years (range, 12–50). No significant difference was noted in clinical, histopathological, and mutational profile between pediatric and adult patients. H3‐3A G34 mutations included G34R ( n = 56; 94%), G34V ( n = 3), and a non‐canonical G34E ( n = 1). Concurrent mutations most often involved TP53 ( n = 55; 92%), ATRX ( n = 50; 83%), and PDGFRA ( n = 34; 57%). A reportedly primary tumor was confirmed to be hypermutant and had a PMS2 mutation. A single case also showed an FGFR3::FAM184B fusion. All cases with available chromosomal microarray data had unbalanced genomes, which were often complex (14/26; 54%). The most frequent recurrent copy number abnormalities were losses involving 3q, 4q, 10q, 13q, and 18q, and 17p copy‐neutral loss of heterozygosity (cnLOH) encompassing TP53 . This copy number profile was reminiscent of that seen in Grade 4 IDH‐mutant astrocytomas. Collectively, a TP53 abnormality at copy number (12/26, all cnLOH), sequence (55/60) and protein expression (46/48) level was detected in all 60 cases. In conclusion, integrated high‐resolution copy number and histomolecular analysis expanded the spectrum of genetic changes associated with DHG‐H3 G34, including the presence of universal TP53 abnormalities with frequent cnLOH—a copy number abnormality that has been largely unrecognized—for this new 2021 World Health Organization central nervous system tumor type.

Abstract Background Glioblastoma IDH-wildtype (GBM) may be diagnosed histologically (hGBM) or based on molecular features when microvascular proliferation and histologic necrosis are absent (mGBM). Clinical and radiographic distinction between hGBM and mGBM remains unclear. Methods 101 hGBM cases were matched to 109 mGBM cases by age, sex, year of diagnosis, and TERT promoter mutation (TERTp) status. Clinical outcome, radiographic, and molecular features were compared across mGBM and hGBM. Results Median time from first MRI to diagnosis was longer for mGBM versus hGBM (34 vs 7 days, p < .001). mGBM more often presented with seizures (51% vs 26%, p < .001), gliomatosis pattern (12% vs 2%, p = .005), basal ganglia involvement (17% vs 0%, p < .001). Contrast enhancement appeared on MRI for 98% (96/98) of hGBM and 50% (54/107) of mGBM (p < .001). mGBM with non-enhancing MRI were rarely multifocal (2% vs 30%, p < .001). mGBM harbored fewer total copy number alterations (median 20 vs 16.5, p = .029), less often had EGFRamp (34% vs 48%, p = .051), isolated chromosome 10 loss (84% vs 96%, p = .013), and CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion (56% vs 77%, p = .005). Median overall survival was longer for mGBM (2.16 vs 1.44 years, p < .001), and for mGBM without MRI contrast enhancement versus hGBM with enhancement (3.11 vs 1.62 years, adjusted p = .003). mGBM without +7/−10 or without CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion had longer survival and time-to-progression versus hGBM with these alterations. Conclusion mGBM with MRI enhancement may represent undersampled or early/evolving hGBM. mGBM that are non-enhancing, present with seizures, prolonged time to diagnosis, absent CDKN2A/B alteration or +7/−10 may represent other IDH-wildtype entities.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) diagnosis integrates morphology and tumor molecular alterations. Patients with classic morphology are designated as histologic GBM (hGBM). Patients without classic morphology harboring TERT promoter mutation (TERTp), or epidermal growth factor receptor amplification (EGFRamp), or combined gain of chromosome 7 and loss of 10 (+7/-10) designate molecular GBM (mGBM). We compared radiographic features, genomic alterations, and clinical outcome between hGBM and mGBM. 109 mGBM Mayo Clinic cases diagnosed between 1993-2021 were matched to 101 cGBM by age, sex, year of diagnosis, and TERT promoter (TERTp) status. Clinical and radiographic data abstraction was blinded. Progression-free and overall survival were compared across groups in the subset of patients who received standard of care. Contrast enhancement was present on index MRI (MRI at diagnosis) for 98% (96/98) hGBM and 50% (54/107) mGBM (p<0.0001) patients. mGBM tumors harbored fewer total copy number alterations (median of 16.5 vs 20, p=0.029) and were less likely to have CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion (56% vs 77%, p=0.005). Among the 87 mGBM and 82 hGBM receiving standard of care, median overall survival was longer for mGBM versus hGBM (2.24 vs 1.62 years, p=0.016). mGBM patients with +7/-10 (HR=2.60, p=0.035) or CDKN2A/B (HR=3.61, p=0.002) had poorer overall survival compared to mGBM patients without the corresponding alteration. On index MRI mGBM patients without contrast enhancement had better overall survival compared to hGBM (HR=0.50; p=0.003) whereas there was no survival difference between mGBM with enhancement and hGBM. mGBM with enhancement on index MRI likely represent undersampled, or early / evolving hGBM. mGBM patients with non-enhancing MRI, younger than 60, with long symptom profile including seizures, and some combination of non-anaplastic morphology, TERTp only, no homozygous deletion of CDKN2A/B, and low copy number complexity may represent other IDHwt glioma entities. Caution is advised in counseling, management, discussing prognosis, and inclusion in clinical trials.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM), IDH-wildtype (WT) is currently defined as an IDH-WT and H3-WT diffuse astrocytic glioma with molecular diagnostic features including whole +7/−10, TERT promoter (TERTp) mutation, and EGFR amplification and/or morphological diagnostic features such as necrosis and microvascular proliferation. To further understand the diversity of copy number signatures of GBM, IDHWT and evaluate the diagnostic utility of other recurrent copy number changes, we analyzed paired chromosomal microarray and next-generation sequencing mutational profiling data from 418 adult IDH-WT and H3-WT tumors with GBM morphological diagnostic features. The most common molecular features were TERTp mutations (85%), CDKN2A/B heterozygous/homozygous deletion (78%/66%), +7/-10 (63%), EGFR amplification (41%), +19 (36%), PTEN mutations (35%), partial -13 (33%), partial -14 (33%), +20 (32%), TP53 mutations (32%), and partial -22 (29%). At least one molecular diagnostic biomarker was present in 92% (n=385) of cases, and 29% (n=121) of cases had all three. The +7/-10 biomarker was the most frequent chromosomes 7/10 copy number change (68%, n=265). Other +7/-10 patterns were seen in 30% (n=125) of cases and included isolated +7 or -10, combinations of +7 and -10 with partial +7, partial -10 or 10 copy neutral loss of heterozygosity (cnLOH). Overall, 93% (390/418) of cases had whole and other chromosome 7/10 copy number changes. In comparison to tumors with +7/-10, tumors with other +7/-10 patterns were significantly enriched for partial 13 loss (Bonferroni adjusted p=0.04) but were not associated with significant difference in patient overall survival (p=0.30, 158/418 had available survival data). Our findings reiterate and expand the spectrum of copy number changes associated with GBM, IDH-WT. The similar overall survival rates between cases with the +7/-10 biomarker and those with other +7/-10 patterns suggest that other +7/-10 patterns may be functionally equivalent to +7/-10 and diagnostically relevant as a molecular diagnostic biomarker for this tumor type.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Prior to 2021, (classic) glioblastoma (GBM) required absence of IDH mutation and histologic features of hypercellularity, nuclear atypia, microvascular proliferation (MVP), and necrosis. Absence of histologic features can be a result of undersampling, with molecular, radiologic, and clinical features consistent with GBM. Accordingly, WHO 2021 defined molecular glioblastoma as diffuse glioma IDHwt, H3wt, with one or more of MVP, necrosis, TERT promoter mutation, EGFR gene amplification (EGFRamp), and/or +7/−10. We hypothesized that there is clinical and radiographic heterogeneity among tumors defined as molecular GBM. METHODS We identified 121 patients that met the criteria for molecular GBM. 121 Classic GBM, defined as IDHwt with hypercellularity, MVP or necrosis, were matched to molecular GBM cases by age, sex, and diagnosis date. All cases were reviewed for relevant histologic features and molecular features. Examined clinical variables included: first symptom, time from first symptom to date of pathological diagnosis, date of first MRI, tumor location, radiographic features of enhancement, diffusion or mass effect, time to progression and overall survival. Clinical, radiologic, and molecular features were compared between classic and molecular GBM. RESULTS Currently,160 cases have been reviewed. Preliminary results show that there is a longer time from first symptom to diagnosis for molecular GBM. Molecular GBM is significantly more likely to be discovered coincidentally, and without enhancement or radiographic necrosis. Classic GBM is significantly more likely to present with focal neurologic deficit as first symptom, regional mass effect on index imaging and have monosomy 10. CONCLUSION While pathologic undersampling accounts for a significant proportion of molecular GBM, our data suggest that there are significant clinical, radiographic, and outcome differences between classical and molecular GBM. Final analysis of the entire cohort will help better define this clinical spectrum.

Abstract Diffuse hemispheric glioma, H3 G34-mutant (DHG_H3G34) is a novel tumor type in the 2021 WHO CNS classification. We describe a comprehensive sequencing and high-resolution genome-wide copy number analysis of a series of cases clinically tested by a single laboratory (2018-2022). Cases included tumors from 47 unique patients (1 reportedly recurrent) that had an H3-3A G34 mutation detected using an 187-gene mutation and fusion targeted neuro-oncology NGS panel (n=47). A subset (n=18) of cases was also tested Oncoscan chromosomal microarray. Median age at testing was 20 years (range, 12-50). H3-3A G34 mutations included G34R (n=44; 94%), G34V (n=2) and a novel G34E variant considered to be likely clinically relevant (n=1). All DHG_H3G34 were hemispheric tumors, and one tumor was multifocal with midline involvement. Concurrent mutations recurrently involved ATRX (n=38), TERT promoter (n=3; mutually exclusive with ATRX mutations), TP53 (n=43), PDGFRA (n=26), PTEN (n=5), NF1 (n=4, all patients over 20 years), PIK3CA (n=4) and CDKN2A (n=3). The single recurrent tumor also had an MSH6 mutation, and in addition to 3 other cases, had increased number of sequence variants suggestive of a high tumor mutational burden. A single case also showed an FGFR3::FAM184B (exon 17::exon 2) fusion. All cases with available chromosomal microarray data had unbalanced genomes with multiple chromosomal gains/losses, and regions of copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity. The most frequent recurrent (at least 50% of cases) abnormalities were losses involving 3q, 4q, 10q, 13q and 18q, and 17p copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity encompassing TP53 (all but one case had concomitant TP53 mutation), a pattern reminiscent of IDH-mutant astrocytomas. Oncogene amplifications (PDGFRA and PIK3CA) were detected in 3 (of 18) cases. CDKN2A/B deletion was observed in 8 cases (2 homozygous). In conclusion, we describe additional sequence and copy-number abnormalities in DHG_H3G34, expanding the spectrum of genetic changes associated with this novel tumor type.

Abstract BACKGROUND Molecular parameters have been incorporated into the 2016 WHO Classification of CNS Tumors and subsequent cIMPACT-NOW updates to facilitate clinical management of glioma patients. However, there have been few reports of the overall clinical utility of comprehensive genetic testing in adult glioma patients. We report the results of sequencing and chromosomal microarray analysis of adult gliomas seen at the Mayo Clinic and through the Mayo Clinic Laboratories (MCL) reference practice. METHODS A consecutive series of 379 Mayo Clinic adult glioma patients were consented to receive targeted next generation sequencing and chromosomal microarray analysis, regardless of standard clinical ordering practices. Known diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive alterations were annotated for each case. These results were compared to the larger MCL reference practice of 2400 adult glioma samples that received one or both tests clinically. RESULTS Of the consecutive Mayo Clinic cases, 67% had alterations that fell into at least one of the diagnostic, prognostic, and/or predictive categories. Molecular testing generated diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive information in 44%, 34%, and 36% of cases, respectively. Diagnostically, molecular testing mainly aided in arriving at a final integrated diagnosis, and only a small number of cases (n= 5; 1%) had a change in diagnosis. The consecutive cases represent the typical distribution of adult glioma types (47% IDH-wildtype glioblastoma/astrocytoma, 22% IDH-mutant astrocytoma/glioblastoma, 13% IDH-mutant 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendroglioma, and 18% other tumor types). The MCL practice is enriched in tumors with atypical molecular patterns (37% IDH-wildtype glioblastoma/astrocytoma, 17% IDH-mutant astrocytoma/glioblastoma, 18% IDH-mutant 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendroglioma, and 29% other tumor types). CONCLUSIONS Molecular testing provides useful diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive information for the clinical management of adult glioma patients. While the current guidelines for ordering molecular testing are effective for diagnostic purposes, additional prognostic and predictive information can be gleaned from comprehensive molecular testing of adult gliomas.

AbstractBackgroundOligodendroglioma is genetically defined by concomitant IDH (IDH1/IDH2) mutation and whole-arm 1p/19q codeletion. Codeletion of 1p/19q traditionally evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) cannot distinguish partial from whole-arm 1p/19q codeletion. Partial 1p/19q codeletion called positive by FISH is diagnostically a “false-positive” result. Chromosomal microarray (CMA) discriminates partial from whole-arm 1p/19q codeletion. Herein, we aimed to estimate the frequency of partial 1p/19q codeletion that would lead to a false-positive FISH result.MethodsFISH 1p/19q codeletion test probe coordinates were mapped onto Oncoscan CMA data to determine the rate of partial 1p/19q codeletion predicted to be positive by FISH. Diffuse astrocytic gliomas with available CMA data (2015–2018) were evaluated and classified based on IDH1-R132H/ATRX/p53 immunohistochemistry, IDH/TERT promoter targeted sequencing, and/or CMA according to classification updates. Predicted false-positive cases were verified by FISH whenever possible.ResultsThe overall estimated false-positive FISH 1p/19q codeletion rate was 3.6% (8/223). Predicted false positives were verified by FISH in 6 (of 8) cases. False-positive rates did not differ significantly (P = .49) between IDH-mutant (4.6%; 4/86) and IDH-wildtype (2.9%; 4/137) tumors. IDH-wildtype false positives were all WHO grade IV, whereas IDH-mutant false positives spanned WHO grades II-IV. Testing for 1p/19q codeletion would not have been indicated for most false positives based on current classification recommendations.ConclusionSelective 1p/19q codeletion testing and cautious interpretation for conflicting FISH and histopathological findings are recommended to avoid potential misdiagnosis.