Berbari, Elie F.

Abstract Background Infectious diseases (ID) consultation is associated with improved outcomes for patients hospitalized with infection. Provision of this service is not practical for many smaller hospitals, particularly critical access facilities. We sought to evaluate the impact of an electronic, asynchronous consultative service (“eConsults”) at two rural hospitals without on-site ID support. Methods Beginning July 2018, ID physicians at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, began performing asynchronous eConsults for patients hospitalized at Mayo Clinic Health System (MCHS) Albert Lea and MCHS Austin Hospitals. The first 100 consecutive patients receiving eConsults (cases) were compared with patients admitted for infection at the same facilities prior to pilot initiation (controls). Cases were matched to controls using 1:3 propensity match based on age, gender, race, and weighted Charlson comorbidity index. The primary outcome was readmission or death within 30 days after hospital discharge. Results Cases (n = 100) were more likely to have been hospitalized in the 6 months prior to the index hospitalization than controls (n = 300) (P < 0.0001). Patients with ID eConsult had a significantly decreased odds of death at 30 days (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2–0.7, P = 0.003) and there was a trend toward decreased readmission at 30 days (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2–1.1, P = 0.07). The mean length of stay was significantly longer for cases (5.7 days vs. 3.8 days, P =0.003). However, ID eConsult did not occur until 2.6 days into hospitalization, on average. Conclusion ID eConsultation was associated with lower odds of 30-day mortality. The increased length of stay may be mitigated by encouraging ID eConsults earlier during hospitalization. Inpatient ID eConsults represent a high-value proposition for patients and providers and a feasible means of expanding the reach of ID physicians. This novel care delivery model warrants further investigations. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Background: Surgical-site infection after implant-based breast reconstruction adversely affects surgical outcomes and increases health care costs. This 11-year case-control study examines risk factors specific for surgical-site infection after immediate tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective review to identify all consecutive patients with breast implant infections between 2006 and 2016. Patients who developed surgical-site infection after immediate tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction were included. Surgical-site infection was defined using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria; specifically, infections requiring hospital admission, intravenous antibiotics, or surgical intervention were included. The authors matched a control patient to each infection case by patient age and date of surgery. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, and perioperative surgical variables were examined. Univariate and multivariable conditional logistic regression models were constructed. Results: A total of 270 breasts in 252 patients were evaluated. On multivariate analysis, patients with a higher body mass index (OR, 1.1 per 1 body mass index point increase; 95 percent CI, 1.0 to 1.2; p = 0.02), hypertension (OR, 6.5; 95 percent CI, 1.9 to 22.3; p = 0.002), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR, 2.6; 95 percent CI, 1.0 to 6.3; p = 0.04), axillary lymph node dissection (OR, 7.1; 95 percent CI, 1.7 to 29.2; p = 0.006), seroma formation (OR, 15.34; 95 percent CI, 3.7 to 62.5; p = 0.0001), and wound healing complications (OR, 23.91; 95 percent CI, 6.1 to 93.4; p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with surgical-site infection. Conclusions: Women with obesity, women with hypertension, and those treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy are at increased risk of surgical-site infection. Further risks are also associated with postoperative seroma and wound complications. This may help patient selection and counseling, adjusted based on risk factors regarding complications of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Purpose of review Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is still a rare but potentially very morbid infection of the spine. In recent years, the incidence has risen sharply but the condition remains a medical conundrum wrought with unacceptably long diagnostic delays. The outcome depends on timely diagnosis and missed opportunities can be associated with catastrophic consequences. Management and outcomes have improved over the past decade. This review focuses on risk factors and markers that can aid in establishing the diagnosis, the radiological characteristics of SEA on MRI and their clinical implications, as well as the importance of establishing clear indications for surgical decompression. Recent findings This once exclusively surgically managed entity is increasingly treated conservatively with antimicrobial therapy. Patients diagnosed in a timely fashion, prior to cord involvement and the onset of neurologic deficits can safely be managed without decompressive surgery with targeted antimicrobial therapy. Patients with acute cord compression and gross neurologic deficits promptly undergo decompression. The greatest therapeutic dilemma remains the group with mild neurological deficits. As failure rates of delayed surgery approach 40%, recent research is focused on predictive models for failure of conservative SEA management. In addition, protocols are being implemented with some success, to shorten the diagnostic delay of SEA on initial presentation. Summary SEA is a potentially devastating condition that is frequently missed. Protocols are put in place to facilitate early evaluation of back pain in patients with red flags with appropriate cross-sectional imaging, namely contrast-enhanced MRI. Efforts for establishing clear-cut indications for surgical decompression of SEA are underway.

Abstract Background Chronic Coxiella burnetii infections such as vertebral osteomyelitis caused by contiguous spread from an infected abdominal aortic graft or aneurysm have been rarely reported and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Methods We present the first four reported US acquired cases of Coxiella burnetii vertebral osteomyelitis caused by contiguous spread from an infected abdominal aortic graft or aneurysm. Results Presenting symptoms included progressive back pain, malaise, and weight loss with recent or remote animal exposure. Typical imaging findings demonstrated a peri-aortic collection with extension to the paraspinal muscles and vertebrae. Antibiotic regimens included doxycycline with either hydroxychloroquine or a quinolone for at least 2 years or as chronic suppression. Conclusions C. burnetii vertebral osteomyelitis is rare and can occur by contiguous spread from an abdominal aneurysm or vascular graft infection. It should be suspected in patients where pre-antibiotic cultures are negative with animal/farming exposure.

Abstract Background While several studies have identified risk factors for PJI using insurance claims data, these data sets have been limited to a single regional insurance dataset or to the Medicare population. We sought to investigate risk factors for early PJI among patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty (THKA). Methods All patients who underwent primary THKA between January 1, 2004 and July 31, 2014 with 12 months of continuous preceding medical and pharmacy insurance coverage were included in the study. The primary outcome of PJI required both a compatible procedure code and a diagnostic code during an inpatient stay from the time of THKA through 90 days after discharge. Comorbidities were based on ICD-9 codes in the preceding 12 months and patients with a prior diagnosis of PJI during that time period were excluded. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression. Results A total of 147,053 patients underwent THKA during the study period, including 97,448 patients with TKA and 49,605 with THA. PJI occurred in 754 (0.5%) patients. Female gender was independently associated with lower odds of PJI (Figure). A number of biologically plausible factors were associated with increased risk, including chronic skin ulcer, obesity, substance use disorders, joint sarcoma, and malnutrition. The adjusted odds of PJI increased in a stepwise fashion with each increase in the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), with those with a score of 4 or more having a nearly 2-fold adjusted odds of PJI compared with a score of 0 (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.29 −2.82). Previously observed risk factors diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, and chronic renal failure were associated with increased odds of PJI on univariate analysis, but not after adjustment. Conclusion These data identify several potentially modifiable risk factors for preoperative optimization, including obesity, malnutrition, chronic skin ulcers, and substance-use disorders. The level of comorbidity as assessed by the CCI provides a rough estimate of the increasing risk of PJI. The pathobiology of additional risk factors observed here deserves further study. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.