Chadha, Ryan

Variations in liver allocation systems worldwide are presented, with a specific focus on regional differences and their potential impact on outcomes, with the goal of serving as a reference for future policy development. Summaries of liver allocation across multiple European, Scandinavian, and Asian systems, as well as the combined allocation system of Australia plus Canada, the United States, and the systems in Central America, South America, and the Caribbean are reviewed. A comprehensive comparison of how different regions address MELD exceptions, primarily focusing on hepatocellular carcinoma, along with the most common etiologies of liver disease requiring transplantation is presented. In addition, the adoption of living donation and donation after circulatory death is discussed. The study involves contributions from a diverse group of world experts in liver transplantation and may serve as an essential resource to foster international dialogue as countries strive to optimize organ allocation policies, including MELD exceptions.

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is common among liver transplantation (LT) candidates, yet whether pre-transplant percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves post-LT outcomes remains uncertain. Methods: We conducted a single-center, Institutional Review Board-approved cohort study of adults undergoing LT from 2005 to 2025. Asymptomatic candidates with significant stenosis on invasive angiography were included; prior coronary artery bypass grafting was excluded. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: myocardial infarction [MI], stroke/transient ischemic attack, new systolic dysfunction, post-LT coronary revascularization, or all-cause death). Results: Among 111 patients (median age 65 years; 84% male), 66 (59%) underwent PCI and 45 (41%) were managed medically. Over a median 32 months of follow-up, 61 patients (55%) experienced MACE. Composite MACE did not differ between PCI and non-PCI groups (52% vs. 60%, p = 0.40; log-rank p = 0.59). Fine–Gray modeling showed no association of PCI with MACE; independent predictors were prior MI (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.01–3.24) and pre-transplant dialysis (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.07–4.24). Major bleeding occurred in 7%. Matched and era-stratified analyses were concordant. Conclusions: In asymptomatic LT candidates with angiographically severe CAD, pre-LT PCI was not associated with a lower incidence of post-LT MACE.

Abstract Background Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often experience symptoms refractory to available treatments, prompting the use of alternative therapies like cannabis. Previous studies have shown cannabis users require higher levels of sedation for procedures. The anti-inflammatory effects of cannabis have been studied with mixed conclusions. We aimed to investigate if patients with IBD who reported cannabis use required more resources for endoscopic procedures and were more likely to have endoscopic inflammation. Methods This is a retrospective case–control study of adult patients with IBD between November 2018 and November 2022 at a tertiary academic medical center undergoing endoscopic evaluation of acute complaints related to IBD. Cases were matched for age, sex, and body mass index. Results There were 124 patients with IBD with 62 patients reporting cannabis use and 62 patients without reported cannabis use. There was a significant difference in endoscopy duration (P < .001) and endoscopic inflammation (P = .044) between groups. There was no significant difference in recovery room length of stay (P = .15), IBD treatment during time of endoscopy (P = .84), stricture (P = .53), propofol dose administered when adjusted for procedure duration (P = .082), or endoscopic duration between cannabis users with and without endoscopic inflammation (P = .194). Conclusions IBD cannabis users had longer endoscopic durations and were more likely to exhibit inflammation on endoscopic evaluation compared to cannabis non-users. Our study underscores the importance of medication reconciliation for more accurate resource allocation. Additionally, federal expansion of cannabis research is needed for randomized control trials to fulfill the presently unmet need for data on patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Rising US healthcare costs and the COVID-19 pandemic put increased pressure on hospitals to reduce patient length of stay (LOS) while maintaining high-quality care. We aimed to determine if implementing a pathway for same-day discharge after elective neuroendovascular procedures to a monitored hotel setting is safe, feasible, and cost-effective. METHODS: We evaluated patient outcomes after elective neuroendovascular procedures and same-day discharge to an on-campus Care Hotel. The study enrolled patients aged ≥18 years from October 1, 2020, to February 28, 2023. Exclusion criteria comprised major comorbidities, additional care necessitating hospitalization, absence of a caregiver, insurer-mandated hospitalization, or patient refusal of the Care Hotel model. Primary outcomes were readmission rate or prolonged LOS, new ischemic or hemorrhagic complications rate, and death rate from vascular causes within 6 months. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and deaths related to causes other than vascular complications within 6 months and changes in modified Rankin Scale score by 1 or more points at last follow-up. Healthcare cost savings associated with same-day discharge were analyzed using a control group. RESULTS: The study included 42 patients discharged to the Care Hotel and 84 controls. The average age was 61 years in the Care Hotel group and 64 years in the control group, and aneurysm treatment was the most frequent neuroendovascular procedure (83.3% and 79.8%, respectively). The readmission and extended LOS rates were 4.8% for the Care Hotel group. The rate of new ischemic or hemorrhagic complications was 4.8%. Cost analysis estimated savings of $7730.12 per procedure. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the Care Hotel model is a safe, feasible, and cost-effective option for carefully selected patients undergoing elective neuroendovascular interventions. Adherence to discharge readiness criteria and meticulous patient selection are critical to minimizing complications and readmissions.

Portopulmonary hypertension (POPH), pulmonary arterial hypertension that develops in the setting of portal hypertension, has long been of significant interest to the pulmonary, cardiology, and hepatology communities. Optimal management of POPH has been challenging to define due to a lack of evidence from clinical trials regarding pulmonary arterial hypertension therapies and uncertainty regarding the role of liver transplantation (LT). Initially, the high risk of intraoperative and early post-transplant death in predominantly untreated patients with POPH tempered consideration of LT. More recently, the observation that POPH can improve, and sometimes even resolve, following LT, has led to reconsideration of the role of LT in selected patients. The first International Liver Transplantation Society (ILTS) POPH and hepatopulmonary syndrome practice guideline was a multidisciplinary consensus of expert opinions based on available evidence. Since that publication, hemodynamic definitions, management approaches, and POPH MELD exception criteria have evolved, and there have been new randomized controlled trials in POPH as well as studies regarding long-term outcomes. In order to ensure the guidelines remained current and reflected recent evidence, the original writing committee of the 2016 guidelines, leaders of the ILTS Cardiovascular Special Interest Group, and colleagues active in POPH research were invited to participate in the writing committee. In this document, approved for publication by the ILTS executive council, we provide an update to the prior guidelines with expert recommendations to guide and advance POPH management. Recommendations in these guidelines are based on expert opinion and available evidence and were agreed upon by consensus.

Background. Liver transplantation (LT) is the standard treatment for liver failure secondary to alcohol-associated liver disease, but limited literature and best practices exist for post-LT treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD). This study explores current AUD management practices and providers’ perceived barriers to effective post-LT AUD management. Methods. A 45-item survey on post-LT AUD treatment practices was distributed to members of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, the Association of Consult/Liaison Psychiatry Transplant Special Interest Group, and both the American Society of Transplantation’s Liver and Intestine Community of Practice and Psychosocial and Ethics Community of Practice discussion boards, between December 2021 and April 2022. Univariate analysis of categorical variables was performed using the chi-square test. Data were analyzed using center volume tertiles, country region, and provider professional activity. Results. Two hundred thirty-two respondents from 70 LT centers across all 11 United Network for Organ Sharing regions completed the survey. Half of the them were attending physicians and 16.4% were nurse coordinators. Most centers (84%) aimed for alcohol abstinence for all post-LT patients. Perceived barriers to AUD treatment efficacy included ongoing desire to drink (18%), denial about alcohol misuse (14.9%), and lack of posttransplant support (14%). Additionally, 62.1% of centers had no policy for prescribing medication-assisted therapy to treat AUD, and 32.7% of centers reported no center-level changes in AUD care. Providers identified primary needs as hiring additional mental health professionals (30.8%), dedicating specific staff to AUD care (24.7%), and standardizing psychiatric/psychological care in transplant clinics (17.2%). Conclusions. Despite the increasing volume of LT for alcohol-associated liver disease, significant perceived barriers to effective AUD treatment remain.

The 2024 Annual Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society (ILTS) was from May 1–4 in Houston, Texas, USA, under the theme “Liver Disease and Transplantation: Breaking Barriers and Exploring New Frontiers.” In addition to a robust scientific program, the congress also hosted a hands-on cadaveric robotic liver surgery course, a machine perfusion workshop, and a transesophageal echocardiography course. In this report, the ILTS Vanguard and Basic Sciences Committees present a summary of the congress proceedings.

ABSTRACTRobotic‐assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) has improved lung nodule evaluation, but its feasibility to biopsy aortopulmonary lymph nodes remains underexplored. This study explored the safety and effectiveness of RAB for sampling aortopulmonary lymph nodes suspected of malignancy. We conducted a literature review on RAB for aortopulmonary lymph node biopsy and present a case of a patient with a history of malignancy. Using the Ion Endoluminal System, we navigated to the anterior segment of the left upper lobe to access a subaortic lymph node in a patient with a history of mantle cell lymphoma. Biopsy confirmed disease recurrence. Our literature review identified seven patients who underwent RAB to assess aortopulmonary lymph nodes, with most findings showing small‐cell lung cancer. Our study reports an 88% diagnostic yield, and no complications associated with the procedure. RAB is a safe and effective approach for biopsying aortopulmonary lymph nodes.

Abstract Disclosure: A. Verma: None. F. Elli: None. S. Rao: None. M. Smith: None. A. Shapiro: None. C. Moshe: None. R. Chadha: None. Introduction: Pheochromocytomas are rare, neuroendocrine tumors derived from chromaffin cells of the neural crest, typically within the adrenal medulla. The pathophysiologic effect of primary concern is the uncontrolled release of catecholamines into the bloodstream, which carry risk for episodic hypertension, palpitations, and life-threatening crises. Preoperative preparation with drugs that block adrenergic receptors is utilized to improve hemodynamic oscillation force and surgical outcomes. Widely used premedication include alpha-blockers, beta-blockers, and calcium channel blockers. Despite adequate pretreatment, hemodynamic instability continues to evoke massive risk. The objective of this study was to assess the incidence of intraoperative hypertensive episodes in patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Methods: This study is an observational retrospective analysis of patients who underwent elective laparoscopic robotic-assisted adrenalectomies from February 2019 to April 2023. 17 patients total patients were included. Preoperative information included age, BMI, ASA physical classification, preoperative blockade regiment, and urine metanephrines. Intraoperative information included operation duration, tumor size, intraoperative anti-hypertensives, and hypertensive spikes defined as a SBP greater than 175 mmHg for 5 consecutive minutes. Data analysis was performed to obtain frequency counts (%), means (standard deviations), and median (range) as appropriate. Results: The mean age at the time of surgery was 57.12 ± 17.2 years. The majority of patients (76%) were ASA status class III. 7 of the 17 patients did not have active pheochromocytoma based on symptomatology, the incidental diagnoses being made by imaging and workup. The average tumor diameter was 3.90 ± 1.8, with a range of 2.0 - 8.0. Mean operative time was 153.76 ± 53.9 minutes. Preoperative urinary metanephrines were observed to have a mean of 1,248.44 ± 2,866.9 pg/mL. In terms of preoperative preparation, 65% of patients received Doxazosin, and 29% of patients received an alternative anti-hypertensive. Yet, 64.7% of patients were found to have at least 1 intraoperative hypertensive spike Conclusion: Despite premedication with anti-hypertensives, a significant percentage of patients experienced intraoperative hemodynamic instability. This emphasizes the importance of anesthesiologist preparation for intraoperative hypertension management to aggressively prevent hypertensive crises. In addition, it questions the routine use of alpha blockade for all cases preoperatively as has been suggested in certain studies, and whether or not it should be driven by other patient characteristics. Presentation: 6/1/2024