Jordan, Barbara L.

Abstract Purpose This study examines sense of belonging (belongingness) in a large population of medical students, residents, and fellows and associations with learner burnout, organizational recruitment retention indicators, and potentially modifiable learning environment factors. Method All medical students, residents, and fellows at Mayo Clinic sites were surveyed between October and November 2020 with items measuring sense of belonging in 3 contexts (school or program, organization, surrounding community), burnout (2 Maslach Burnout Inventory items), recruitment retention indicators (likelihood of recommending the organization and accepting a job offer), potentially modifiable learning environment factors, and demographics (age, gender, race and ethnicity, LGBTQ+ identification, disability, socioeconomic background). Results Of 2,257 learners surveyed, 1,261 (56%) responded. The percentage of learners reporting a somewhat or very strong sense of belonging was highest in the school or program (994 of 1,227 [81%]) followed by the organization (957 of 1,222 [78%]) and surrounding community (728 of 1,203 [61%]). In adjusted analyses, learners with very strong organization belongingness had lower odds of burnout (odds ratio [OR], 0.05; 95% CI, 0.02–0.12) and higher odds of being likely to recommend the organization (OR, 505.23; 95% CI, 121.54–2,100.18) and accept a job offer (OR, 38.68; 95% CI, 15.72–95.15; all P < .001). School or program and community belongingness also correlated strongly with these outcomes. In multivariable analyses, social support remained associated with higher odds of belongingness in all 3 contexts; favorable ratings of faculty relationships and leadership representation remained associated with higher odds of belongingness in 2 contexts (school or program and organization); and favorable ratings of diversity, equity, and inclusion learning climate remained associated with belongingness in 1 context (community). Conclusions Sense of belonging among medical students, residents, and fellows varies across contexts, correlates strongly with burnout and organizational recruitment retention indicators, and is associated with multiple potentially modifiable learning environment factors.

This editorial comments on an important study by Williams and colleagues. Their study provides direction for future research and for the next steps in clinical cancer care.

Diversity initiatives in U.S. medical education, following the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, were geared toward increasing the representation of African Americans—blacks born in the United States whose ancestors suffered under slavery and Jim Crow laws. Over time, blacks and, subsequently, underrepresented minorities in medicine (URMs), became a proxy for African Americans, Puerto Ricans, Mexican Americans, and Native Americans, thus obscuring efforts to identify and recruit specifically African Americans. Moreover, demographic shifts resulting from the recent immigration of black people from Africa and the Caribbean have both expanded the definition of “African American medical students” and shifted the emphasis from those with a history of suffering under U.S. oppression and poverty to anyone who meets a black phenotype. Increasingly, research indicates that African American patients fare better when their physicians share similar historical and social experiences. While all people of color risk discrimination based on their skin color, not all have the lived experience of U.S.-based, systematic, multigenerational discrimination shared by African Americans. In the high-stakes effort to increase URM representation in medical school classes, admissions committees may fail to look beyond the surface of phenotype, thus missing the original intent of diversity initiatives while simultaneously conflating all people of color, disregarding their divergent historical and social experiences. In this Perspective, the authors contend that medical school admissions committees must show greater discernment in their holistic reviews of black applicants if historical wrongs and continued underrepresentation of African Americans in medicine are to be redressed.