Agulnik, Mark

826 Background: After initial response to first line therapy with imatinib, GISTs commonly progress due to secondary resistance mutations in KIT. As the KIT mutation targeting profiles of bezuclastinib (type I TKI) and sunitinib are distinct, when combined they inhibit a broad spectrum of secondary KIT mutations. Herein we report extended experience of patients treated with 2 nd line combination bezuclastinib and sunitinib, including response assessment and safety. Methods: Peak (NCT05208047), a global randomized Phase 3, open-label study, aims to evaluate efficacy and safety of bezuclastinib + sunitinib vs sunitinib in GIST pts with imatinib intolerance or resistance. In Part 1a of the 3-part study, the dose of an optimized formulation of bezuclastinib was escalated in serial cohorts to achieve a target exposure comparable to that achieved at the RP2D established in the prior Phase 1b/2a study. Part 1b evaluated the interaction between bezuclastinib + sunitinib. Key inclusion: adult with locally advanced, metastatic and/or unresectable GIST, ≥1 measurable lesion according to modified RECIST v1.1, and ECOG PS 0 to 2. Part 1 completed enrollment in Apr 2023. Based upon PK and safety, a dose of bezuclastinib 600 mg QD + sunitinib 37.5 mg QD was selected for Part 2. All Part 1 data reported herein are as of Aug 2023; updated safety and efficacy will be presented. Results: Part 1 has completed enrollment with 19 pts in Part 1a and 23 in 1b. In Part 1a, Cohort 1 included 5 pts starting at bezuclastinib 300 mg QD + sunitinib 37.5 mg QD; Cohort 2 included 14 pts at bezuclastinib 600 mg QD + sunitinib 37.5 mg QD. Pt characteristics in Part 1a+1b: median age - 60 yrs (range: 33-77); 81% men; 98% ECOG PS 0-1; 98% metastatic and 2% locally advanced. The majority of TEAEs were low grade and reversible with low rate (38%) of Grade 3+ events. There were limited (24%) dose reductions and infrequent (n=2) discontinuations due to TEAEs. Three pts experienced serious AEs possibly associated with study medications. In pts evaluable for response (received ≥1 cycle of study treatment and had assessments at baseline and post-baseline [n=40]), the objective response rate (ORR) was 20% (6 confirmed PRs, 2 unconfirmed PRs). Data remain immature to estimate median PFS for Part 1 pts. In a subset of pts with prior imatinib only (n=6), the closest approximation for pts enrolling in Part 2, the ORR was 33% (2 confirmed PRs). The majority of 2nd-line pts remain on treatment past 12 months. Conclusions: Data from Peak Part 1 show an encouraging safety and tolerability profile generally consistent with published sunitinib monotherapy experience. ORR in evaluable pts from Part 1 was 20%; ORR in 2 nd line pts was 33%. Part 2 of the Peak study is actively enrolling pts globally at the selected dose of bezuclastinib 600 mg QD + sunitinib 37.5 mg QD versus sunitinib 37.5 mg QD. Clinical trial information: NCT05208047 .

Abstract Background This investigator-initiated phase II trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy of cabozantinib in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab (CaboNivoIpi) in previously treated patients with radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer. Methods Eligible patients with radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed on 1 prior line of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted therapy received a 2-week run-in of cabozantinib monotherapy followed by CaboNivoIpi for 4 cycles (cycle length = 6 weeks), followed by cabozantinib plus nivolumab (cycle length = 4 weeks) until disease progression. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) within the first 6 months of treatment. A Simon optimal 2-stage design allowed for an interim analysis after accrual of 10 evaluable patients. At least 5 responses were needed to proceed to stage 2. Results Among 11 patients enrolled, the median age was 69 years. Prior vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted therapies included lenvatinib, pazopanib, and sorafenib plus everolimus. Median follow-up was 13.4 months. Among 10 evaluable patients, ORR within the first 6 months of treatment was 10% (1 partial response). Median progression-free survival was 9 months (95% CI, 3.0–not reached) and median overall survival was 19.2 months (95% CI, 4.6–not reached). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were noted in 55% (6/11) and grade 5 AEs in 18% (2/11) of patients. The most common treatment-related AE was hypertension. The study did not reach its prespecified efficacy threshold. Conclusion CaboNivoIpi had low ORRs and a high rate of grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs. Clinical Trial Registration NCT03914300

11526 Background: There are no FDA-approved treatments for advanced cCS. Chemotherapy provides limited benefit. IDH1/2 mutations (m) occur in 50% of cCS. Both IDHm and wild-type cCS harbor epigenetic dysregulation. In preclinical models, HDAC + DNMT inhibition (i) suppressed growth by inducing apoptosis, reversing the hypermethylated state, and upregulating expression of interferon (IFN) response genes including PDL1(1). This prompted a phase 2 study of HDACi + DNMTi in cCS, which failed to meet the 1° endpoint of ORR. The majority of pts had a best response of stable disease, with a trend towards improved mPFS in IDHm (2). Here we report correlative analysis of NCI 10330. Methods: NCI 10330 is a single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 study of belinostat with SGI-110 or ASTX727 in advanced cCS. All pts were required to have pre- and on-treatment (tx) biopsies (Cycle 2, Day 3-5). Tissue was evaluated with whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNA sequencing (RNAseq). From RNAseq, Tumor Inflammation Signature Scores (TISS) and Tumor Microenvironment functional Gene Set Enrichment Analysis scores (TME GSEA) were calculated as the mean of the log2 normalized counts of 18 signature genes (Danaher et al. J Imm Can 2018) and pre-defined gene sets (3), respectively. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to analyze TME GSEA between pre- and on-tx samples. Differential expression was significant if |FC| > 1.33, adjusted P <0.01. Results: 19 pts were treated; all received paired biopsies. WES was adequate in 7/19 (37%) pts, with IDHm identified in 3/7 (43%) pts. All pts were MSI-stable, TMB: 1.01-3.57 mut/Mb. RNAseq was adequate in 7/19 (37%) pts at pre-tx and 5/19 (26%) pts at on-tx. TISS ranges trended higher for pre-tx (8.77-10.14) vs on-tx (7.36-9.51) samples. TME GSEA identified significantly enriched tumor immune infiltration (p < 0.05) in pre- vs on-tx samples. Differential analysis identified several gene sets related to inflammation overexpressed in pre-tx samples only, including IFN response. On-tx samples were enriched in myogenesis and coagulation gene sets. Conclusions: This is the first study to describe transcriptomic changes following epigenetic tx in cCS. Contradictory to our preclinical data, HDACi + DNTMi resulted in low expression of inflammation. Prior studies reported that the immune infiltrate of CS at progression is immunosuppressive; higher immune infiltrate is correlated with worse outcomes (4). Loss of inflammation may have implications for disease stability experienced by most pts on NCI 10330. Further analyses are planned to correlate TME (pro- vs anti-inflammatory infiltrates) and outcomes. Analyses are limited by small sample size, highlighting the challenges in collecting adequate CS specimens. 1. Sheikh, Schwartz et al. Mol Cancer Ther 2021. 2. Lacuna et al. ASCO 2023: #11531. 3. Bagaev et al. Can Cell 2021. 4. Richert et al. J Bone Onc 2020. Clinical trial information: NCT04340843 .

11533 Background: After initial response to first line therapy with imatinib, GISTs commonly progress due to secondary resistance mutations in KIT. As the KIT mutation targeting profiles of bezuclastinib (type I TKI) and sunitinib are distinct, when combined they inhibit a broad spectrum of secondary KIT mutations. Herein we report extended experience of patients treated with 2nd line combination bezuclastinib and sunitinib, including response assessment and safety. Methods: Peak (NCT05208047), a global randomized Phase 3, open-label study, aims to evaluate efficacy and safety of bezuclastinib + sunitinib vs sunitinib in GIST pts with imatinib intolerance or resistance. In Part 1a of the 3-part study, the dose of an optimized formulation of bezuclastinib was escalated in serial cohorts to achieve a target exposure comparable to that achieved at the RP2D established in the prior Phase 1b/2a study. Part 1b evaluated the interaction between bezuclastinib + sunitinib. Key inclusion: adult with locally advanced, metastatic and/or unresectable GIST, ≥1 measurable lesion according to modified RECIST v1.1, and ECOG PS 0 to 2. Part 1 completed enrollment in Apr 2023. Based upon PK and safety, a dose of bezuclastinib 600 mg QD + sunitinib 37.5 mg QD was selected for Part 2. All Part 1 data reported herein are as of Aug 2023; updated safety and efficacy will be presented. Results: Part 1 has completed enrollment with 19 pts in Part 1a and 23 in 1b. In Part 1a, Cohort 1 included 5 pts starting at bezuclastinib 300 mg QD + sunitinib 37.5 mg QD; Cohort 2 included 14 pts at bezuclastinib 600 mg QD + sunitinib 37.5 mg QD. Pt characteristics in Part 1a+1b: median age - 60 yrs (range: 33-77); 81% men; 98% ECOG PS 0-1; 98% metastatic and 2% locally advanced. The majority of TEAEs were low grade and reversible with low rate (38%) of Grade 3+ events. There were limited (24%) dose reductions and infrequent (n=2) discontinuations due to TEAEs. Three pts experienced serious AEs possibly associated with study medications. In pts evaluable for response (received ≥1 cycle of study treatment and had assessments at baseline and post-baseline [n=40]), the objective response rate (ORR) was 20% (6 confirmed PRs, 2 unconfirmed PRs). Data remain immature to estimate median PFS for Part 1 pts. In a subset of pts with prior imatinib only (n=6), the closest approximation for pts enrolling in Part 2, the ORR was 33% (2 confirmed PRs). The majority of 2nd-line pts remain on treatment past 12 months. Conclusions: Data from Peak Part 1 show an encouraging safety and tolerability profile generally consistent with published sunitinib monotherapy experience. ORR in evaluable pts from Part 1 was 20%; ORR in 2nd line pts was 33%. Part 2 of the Peak study is actively enrolling pts globally at the selected dose of bezuclastinib 600 mg QD + sunitinib 37.5 mg QD versus sunitinib 37.5 mg QD. Clinical trial information: NCT05208047 .

TPS766 Background: Imatinib is the worldwide standard for first-line therapy of advanced KIT-mutant GIST. However, secondary resistance mutations in the KIT ATP-binding domain (exons 13, 14), activation loop (exons 17, 18), or both develop and result in loss of imatinib-sensitivity. While no single tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) inhibits all KIT mutations, the combination of bezuclastinib + sunitinib targets commonly occurring primary (exons 9, 11) and secondary (exons 13, 14, 17, and 18) KIT mutations. In a Phase 1/2 clinical study, pts with relapsed and/or refractory GIST and a median of 3 prior lines of therapy treated with bezuclastinib + sunitinib (n=15) experienced clinical benefit and an acceptable safety profile, warranting further evaluation in a randomized trial. Methods: Peak (NCT05208047) is a global, randomized, open-label, multi-part Phase 3 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of bezuclastinib + sunitinib versus sunitinib as second-line treatment in adult pts who were intolerant to imatinib or whose tumors had imatinib-resistance. The lead-in portion, to test a new formulation of bezuclastinib, (Part 1) has completed enrollment. Based upon PK and safety, a dose of bezuclastinib 600 mg QD + sunitinib 37.5 mg QD has been determined for Part 2 of the Peak study. Part 2 will enroll ~388 pts to be randomized (1:1) to bezuclastinib 600 mg QD + sunitinib 37.5 mg QD or sunitinib 37.5 mg QD alone. Key inclusion: >1 measurable lesion per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) v1.1, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0-2, adequate organ function, and prior imatinib therapy (no other prior therapy). Key exclusion: PDGFR mutations or succinate dehydrogenase deficiency, clinically significant cardiac disease, and use of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) confirmed by blinded independent central review per mRECIST v1.1. Additional efficacy (including overall survival and objective response rate) and safety endpoints will be evaluated. Clinical trial information: NCT05208047 .

11531 Background: Conventional chondrosarcoma (cCS) is the 2nd most common primary bone tumor and is resistant to chemotherapy and radiation. IDH1/2 mutations (m) occur in 50% of cCS. Both IDHm and wild-type (wt) cCS harbor epigenetic dysregulation. In preclinical models of IDHm and wt cCS, combination treatment with HDAC and DNMT inhibitors (i) suppressed growth in vitro and in vivo by reversing the hypermethylated state and inducing tumor suppressors, interferon response genes and apoptosis (Sheikh T, Schwartz G. Mol Cancer Ther 2021;20). Methods: NCI 10330 is a single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 study evaluating the HDACi belinostat (B) with the DNMTi SGI-110 (S) or ASTX727 (A). A replaced S due to drug availability (pts were replaced). Pts had advanced cCS, ECOG PS ≤ 2 and could be treatment naïve. Progression was required for grade 1 cCS. Pts received B 1000mg/m2 IV + S 45mg/m2 SC both days 1-5 or B (same dosing) + A (cedazuridine 100mg/decitabine 35mg) PO both days 1-5, in 28-day cycles. 1° endpoint was objective response. A Simon 2-stage design was used. If ≥ 2/13 responses occurred in stage 1, the study would proceed to full accrual. Design had 85% power with α = 0.05 to test ORR 8% vs 28%. 2° endpoints included safety, PFS and OS. A safety lead-in was performed. Paired biopsies were collected. Results: Stage 1 is complete. 19 pts were treated: 6 on B+S and 13 on B+A. Median age was 50 and 67 years, respectively. All pts had prior surgery. 17% (B+S) and 38% (B+A) had prior radiation. 33% (B+S) and 55% (B+A) were IDHm. 67% (B+S) and 75% (B+A) were histologic grade ≥ 2. There were no objective responses. Best response (at 8 weeks) was stable disease (SD) in 4/6 pts (67%) on B+S and 6/10 pts (60%) on B+A. mPFS was 4.2 mos (95% CI 1.97-NR) for B+S and 3.8 mos (95% CI 2.17-NR) for B+A. mOS has not been reached. For B+A, mPFS for IDHm vs wt pts was 4.7 and 3.1 mos, respectively (p=0.21). One pt with IDHm grade 2 cCS who progressed on FT-2102 (IDH1i) remains on B+A > 1 year. There were no DLTs during either safety lead-in. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 17% (B+S) and 69% (B+A). For B+A, the most common grade 3/4 TRAE was neutropenia (54%) and the most common all-grade TRAEs were nausea (69%), leukopenia (61%), neutropenia (54%), anemia (46%) and fatigue (46%). Paired tumor biopsies are being evaluated with whole exome sequencing, RNAseq, methylation array and multiplex IHC with results forthcoming. Conclusions: Combination HDACi + DNMTi was well-tolerated in advanced cCS. There were no objective responses; however, a subset of pts experienced prolonged SD with a trend towards improved mPFS in IDHm pts. Correlative work is ongoing with a focus on differential effects on IDHm tumors and whether modulation of the immune microenvironment might support combinations with immunotherapy. Support: UM1CA186689. Clinical trial information: NCT04340843 .

11505 Background: Potentiation of chemotherapy, without increased toxicity, to improve outcome is an area of interest. Preclinical and clinical evidence shows simultaneous utilization of antiangiogenic agents and chemotherapy have a synergistic effect. We hypothesized that the dual targeting of VEGF and c-MET pathways with cabozantinib (CAB) would result in clinical benefit for patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) when combined with temozolomide (TMZ), an alkylating agent. Utilization of CAB/TMZ is anticipated to produce a synergistic antitumor effect worthwhile to explore in STS. Methods: A multicenter phase II study of CAB/TMZ in patients with unresectable/metastatic leiomyosarcoma (LMS) and other STS was conducted by the Midwest Sarcoma Trials Partnership. Age ≥ 18, adequate performance status, organ function, measurable disease (RECIST 1.1), and 0-5 prior chemotherapy regimens were required. CAB 40 mg PO daily plus TMZ 150-200 mg/m2 PO 1-5 days were given in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients enrolled in 2 cohorts: 1. Uterine and non-uterine LMS 2. Other STS. The first 14 subjects to be enrolled in the study in either cohort served as a safety lead in. The primary endpoint was progression-free rate (PFR) at 12 weeks for cohort 1. Secondary endpoints include overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate, median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety and tolerability. The exploratory endpoint was to estimate the correlation of PFR and OS to expression levels of VEGF, amongst others. A Simon 2-stage design was used. Results: A total of 42 patients were enrolled in Cohort 1, and 30 in Cohort 2, across 5 sites. For Cohort 1, median age was 59 years (range 35-86), 85.7% were non-Hispanic, 73.8% were female, 61.9% had ECOG of 0. The PFR at 12 weeks was 45.9% (for 37 evaluable patient) with a median PFS of 6.4 months (95% CI 4.6-6.7). Five PR were observed for an ORR of 13.5%. For Cohort 2, median age was 63 (20-86), 83.3% were non-Hispanic, 36.7% were female, 53.3% had ECOG of 0. The PFR at 12 weeks was 50% (for 28 evaluable patients) with a median PFS of 3.2 months (95% CI 1.4-4.6). One PR was observed. Reported grade 3-4 adverse events attributed to one or both intervention drugs affecting ≥10% of patients (n = 70) included hypertension (10%), decreased neutrophils (18.7%), decreased platelets (31%). Conclusions: The combination therapy of CAB/TMZ in patients with unresectable or metastatic LMS exceeded its primary endpoint with a PFR at 12 weeks > 39%. The PFS of 6.4 months in Cohort 1 exceeds rates achieved with second line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and alkylators in LMS patients. Treatment was feasible and did not reveal any previously unreported toxicities. The combination with CAB with TMZ demonstrated meaningful clinical benefit and is worth further exploration in LMS. Clinical trial information: NCT04200443 .

The treatment of sarcoma necessitates a collaborative approach, given its rarity and complex management. At a single institution, multidisciplinary teams of specialists determine and execute treatment plans involving surgical, radiation, and medical management. Treatment guidelines for systemic therapies in advanced or nonresectable soft tissue sarcoma have advanced in recent years as new immunotherapies and targeted therapies become available. Collaboration between institutions is necessary to facilitate accrual to clinical trials. Here, we describe the success of the Midwest Sarcoma Trials Partnership (MWSTP) in creating a network encompassing large academic centers and local community sites. We propose a new model utilizing online platforms to expand the reach of clinical expertise for the treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma.