Rozell, Shaina

Abstract Abstract 5158 Background: Vitamin D insufficiency is commonly observed in clinical practice. Observational studies have suggested an association of vitamin D insufficiency with increased risk of cancer development. Further, vitamin D insufficiency has been associated with poorer prognosis in solid tumors as well as hematologic malignancies, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. In this study, we examined the clinical and prognostic correlates of low plasma levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D), which reflects whole-body vitamin D stores, in a cohort of myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients. Methods: We studied a total of 409 patients: 247 (60%) had primary myelofibrosis (PMF), 74 (18%) de novo MDS, 63 (15%) polycythemia vera (PV) and 25 (6%) essential thrombocythemia (ET). Inclusion criteria required availability of archived plasma, bone marrow aspirate and biopsy and cytogenetic information at the time of first referral to our institution. Vitamin D measurements were performed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). For the purposes of this study, plasma 25(OH)D levels <10 ng/mL indicated severe deficiency, <25 ng/mL insufficiency, and 25–80 ng/mL optimal levels. Results: Patient characteristics were as follows: (i) PMF: median age=63 years, >65 years=41%, males=68% and serum creatinine above the upper normal limit (UNL)=15%; (ii) MDS: median age=72 years, >65 years=77%, males=69% and creatinine >UNL=12%; (iii) PV median age=61 years, >65 years=37% and males=50%; and (iv) ET: median age=48 years, >65 years=10% and males=28%. Median (range) plasma 25(OH)D levels (ng/mL) were as follows: PMF 25 (0–60), PV 27 (6.8–51), ET 31 (6–50) and MDS 30 (7.7–72) (p=0.005). The proportion of patients with 25(OH)D insufficiency were: PMF 48%, PV 43%, ET 28% and MDS 28% (p=0.01). Similarly, the proportion of patients with severe 25(OH)D deficiency were: PMF 9%, PV 3%, ET 12% and MDS 1% (p=0.05). In PMF and MDS, 25(OH)D insufficiency was not significantly correlated with age (≤65 vs. >65 years), gender, red cell transfusion need, DIPSS-plus/IPSS category, hemoglobin (<10 vs. ≥10 g/dL), thrombocytopenia (<100 vs. ≥100 × 109/L), circulating blasts, unfavorable karyotype, serum creatinine >UNL, or JAK2V617F (PMF only) (p>0.05). 25(OH)D insufficiency was not predictive of inferior overall survival (OS) in PMF, MDS, PV, or ET (p>0.05). Similarly, in PMF and MDS, 25(OH)D insufficiency was not predictive of inferior leukemia-free survival (LFS) (p>0.05). Severe 25(OH)D deficiency was infrequently observed in MDS or PV patients; in PMF or ET patients, there was no prognostic impact of severe 25(OH)D deficiency on OS or LFS (p>0.05). Conclusions: Vitamin D insufficiency is relatively common in PMF, PV, ET and de novo MDS however this finding had no prognostic value for OS in the aforementioned patients. In PMF and MDS patients, low 25(OH)D levels had no clearly identifiable clinical correlates and further did not have prognostic value for LFS. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 3850 Background: We have recently shown that primary myelofibrosis (PMF) was associated with increased plasma levels of IL-1b/IL-1RA/IL-2R/IL-6/IL-8/IL-10/IL-12/IL-13/IL-15/TNF-α/G-CSF/INF-α/MIP-1α/MIP-1b/HGF/IP-10/MIG/MCP-1/VEGF in PMF (J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 1356). In addition, increased levels of IL-8, IL-2R, IL-12, IL-15 and IP-10 were independently associated with inferior survival. In the current study, we focused on the plasma cytokine profile in polycythemia vera (PV) and examined how it compares with PMF or in a cohort of PV patients whose samples were collected during follow-up. We also looked for phenotypic and prognostic correlates. Methods: Study inclusion for patients with PV required availability of archived plasma within one year of diagnosis. Samples from PV patients seen at different points post-diagnosis were also collected, in order to compare their cytokine profile with that of patients whose samples were collected within one year of diagnosis. Standard procedures were followed to centrifuge peripheral blood samples at 4°C and store aliquots at −80°C. Concentrations of 30 plasma cytokines/chemokines were analyzed in duplicates using Multiplex Bead-based Luminex Technology (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA): IL-1β, IL-1RA, IL-2, IL-2R, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-15, IL-17, EGF, eotaxin, FGF-b, GM-CSF, G-CSF, HGF, IFN-α, IFN-γ, IP-10, MCP-1, MIG, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, RANTES, TNF-α, and VEGF. Measurements were performed on a Luminex 200 analyzer (Luminex Corporation, Austin, TX, USA) and resulting data were evaluated using STarStation Software Version 2.3 (Luminex Corporation, Austin, TX, USA). Results I: Plasma cytokines in PV (n=36 for samples collected within one year of diagnosis and n=40 for samples collected beyond that time point) vs. PMF (n=92) vs. normal controls (n=35) There was no significant difference between the three groups in the plasma levels of the following cytokines: IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, EGF, and IL-17. PV and normal controls had similar levels of IL-2R, IL-5, FGF-b, and TNF-α; all four cytokines were elevated in PMF. The levels of the following cytokines were equally increased in PV and PMF: IL-1RA, IL-7, HGF, MIG, and VEGF. The following cytokines were also elevated in both PMF and PV but predominantly so in PV (MIP-1α) or PMF (IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, IL-13, IL-15, MIP-1β, IP-10, and MCP-1). Eotaxin and GM-CSF were elevated in PV but not PMF. Compared to normal controls, significantly lower levels were noted for IL-10 in PV and IFN-α and IFN-γ for PMF. IFN-α and IFN-γ levels were both elevated in PV. Comparison of PV samples collected within one year of diagnosis (n =36) vs. those collected beyond that time point (n =40) showed significantly increased levels of IL-8 (p=0.0005) and borderline significant increases in IP-10 (p=0.09) and IL-2R (p=0.09). Results II: Clinical correlates of plasma cytokines in PV Among the above-listed cytokines that were abnormally increased or decreased in PV, significant correlations were seen with sex (IP-10 and GM-CSF), age (IP-10, eotaxin), platelet count (MIG), hemoglobin level (IL-6), arterial thrombosis (IFN-γ, IL-1RA, VEGF, MIP-1α), and abnormal karyotype (IL-13, MIP-1α). None of the cytokines correlated with leukocyte count, venous thrombosis, pruritus or microvascular symptoms. The following, treated as continuous variables, were associated with inferior survival: IL-7, HGF, IFN-α, MCP-1, GM-CSF and IL-10 (p<0.05 for all). The number of events and sample size were too small to perform multivariable analysis. Conclusions: Plasma cytokine levels in PV are markedly abnormal and show both similarities and differences with PMF; the similarities became more pronounced in patients whose samples were examined at later stages of their disease. The current study suggests prognostic implications that warrant validation in a larger number of patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 1742 Background Karyotype is one of the most potent and reproducible risk factors for both overall (OS) and leukemia-free (LFS) survival in primary myelofibrosis (PMF) (Blood 2011;118:4595). It is currently not clear if the number of metaphases studied or the abnormal metaphase percentage alters this prognostic impact. Methods: An updated Mayo Clinic database of karyotypically- and DIPSS-plus-annotated patients with PMF was used to identify a consecutive series of patients and their cytogenetic information obtained at time of referral was centrally re-reviewed. Cytogenetic results were interpreted and reported according to the International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature; abnormal karyotype was defined by the presence of at least 2 metaphases with structural abnormalities or monosomy or 3 metaphases with polysomy, regardless of number of metaphases examined. For this particular study, the presence of less than 20 evaluable metaphases did not disqualify patients. “Very high risk” karyotype included monosomal karyotype, inv(3) or i(17q) abnormalities (Blood 2011;118:4595). “unfavorable” karyotype included complex or any sole or two abnormalities that included +8, −7/7q-, -5/5q-, inv(3), i(17q), 12p-, or 11q23 rearrangement (Blood 2011;118:4595). All other cytogenetic abnormalities were considered “favorable” Results: A total of 590 patients (median age 65 years; range 19–89 years) including 424 (72%) males. The DIPSS-plus (JCO 2011;29:392) risk distribution was 40% high, 39% intermediate-2, 12% intermediate-1 and 9% low. Cytogenetic findings included 17 (3%) very high risk, 69 (12%) unfavorable, 165 (28%) favorable and 339 (57%) normal karyotypes. The number of bone marrow metaphases studied to report these cytogenetic findings were ≥20 in 468 (79%) patients, 11 to 19 in 71 (12%) patients and ≤10 in 51 (9%) patients; the proportion of cases studied with ≥20 metaphases were 53% for very high risk, 74% for unfavorable, 83% for favorable and 80% for normal karyotype (p=0.006). Among patients with abnormal karyotype, the abnormal metaphase percentage was ≥75% in 148 (59%) patients, 50 to 74% in 36 (15%) patients, 26 to 49% in 27 (11%) patients and ≤25% in 38 (15%) patients; the proportion of patients with ≥75% was 59% for very high risk, 67% for unfavorable and 56% for favorable karyotypes (p=0.70). As expected, OS was significantly different among very high risk, unfavorable, favorable and normal karyotype patients with respective median survivals of 8, 23, 41 and 57 months (p<0.0001). The number of metaphases studied (p=0.62) or the abnormal metaphase percentage (p=0.12), by themselves, did not affect survival. Similarly, the survival difference among the aforementioned cytogenetic risk groups was equally apparent when patients with ≥20 metaphases studied (n=468; P<0.0001) and those with <20 metaphases studied (n=122; p<0.0001) were separately analyzed. Analysis of patients with very high risk or unfavorable karyotype (n=86) revealed no significant effect of abnormal metaphase percentage on survival (Figure; p=0.80). A similar scenario was demonstrated for patients with favorable karyotype (Figure; p=0.24). Conclusions: Neither the number of metaphases examined nor the abnormal metaphase percentage appear to influence the currently recognized cytogenetic risk stratification in PMF. The current study has implications for both clinical practice and clinical research involving cytogenetic prognostication in hematological malignancies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

AbstractBackgroundCentral nervous system (CNS) relapse in non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a rare but serious complication that carries a poor prognosis. The use of infusional etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab (EPOCH‐R) for frontline treatment of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is increasing, though little is known about incidence of and risk factors for CNS relapse with this regimenPatients and methodsWe completed a chart review of patients with NHL who received EPOCH‐R as front line therapy. Data obtained included baseline and treatment characteristics including if patients received CNS directed therapy. We measured overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and progression to CNS involvement.ResultsWe identified 223 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 72% had DLBCL. Of all the patients, 5.8% experienced CNS relapse, and 38.6% were treated with CNS prophylaxis. There was no difference in rate of CNS relapse, OS, or PFS between patients who had and had not received CNS prophylaxis. Patients whose serum lactate dehydrogenase was greater than twice the upper limit of normal at diagnosis and those with extranodal disease were significantly more likely to have CNS relapse (P = .0247 and 0.022, respectively) than their counterparts.ConclusionsThe rate of CNS relapse in this patient population approaches 6%, not significantly different from reports on those receiving R‐CHOP. The results of this study suggest that CNS prophylaxis might be more selectively used among patients treated with EPOCH‐R with certain high‐risk features.