Gartner, Michelle L

Abstract Background Quantitative nucleic acid amplification (QNAT) tests are cornerstone for the management of CMV disease after organ transplantation. We assessed the potential impact of viral load results obtained by two commercial WHO international standard-calibrated NAT in solid-organ (SOT) and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. Methods Sixty-four patients (36 SOT and 28 HSCT) had plasma CMV viral load assessed using the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan CMV Test (CAP/CTM; lower limit of quantification [LLoQ] at 137 IU/mL) and cobas 6800 System (cobas CMV; LLoQ at 35 IU/mL). Viral load values were correlated with clinical course and outcomes. Results Forty-three of 64 patients (67.2%) had CMV infection or disease (asymptomatic, 67.4%; gastrointestinal disease, 16.3%; pneumonitis 4.7%) at median of 4.4 months (IQR 1.4 to 7.7) from transplantation. At CMV infection diagnosis, viral load results (mean ± SD) were almost two-fold higher when measured by cobas CMV (19,456 ± 51,618 IU/mL) compared with CAP/CTM (10,504 ± 27,744 IU/mL; P = 0.04). Time to onset of CMV viremia was significantly shorter (11.5 days; P < 0.001) while viral clearance was significantly longer (12.75 days; P < 0.001) by cobas CMV when compared with CAP/CTM. Persistent viremia was observed with cobas CMV in 44% of patients at the time of first negative results by CAP/CTM. Patients with negative results by cobas CMV at the end of antiviral treatment had a significantly lower need for re-treatment (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.99, P = 0.05). Conclusion Our study highlights significant differences between CMV QNAT assays despite calibration to the WHO-international standard. The significant differences in the degree (almost two-fold), time to onset (12 days difference) and clearance (13 days difference) of CMV viremia between two automated commercial QNAT assays have direct implications in the care of transplant recipients. Persistence of low-level viremia was observed in samples that reached negative threshold by CAP/CTM, when tested using the more sensitive cobas CMV. Clearance of CMV viremia, when assessed by the more sensitive cobas CMV, was significantly associated with a lower need for re-treatment. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

AbstractCytomegalovirus (CMV) viral loads overall were 0.29 log IU/mL higher with cobas CMV for use on the cobas 6800/8800 System (cobas CMV) compared with Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan CMV Test (CAP/CTM CMV). Cytomegalovirus DNAemia was detected 11.5 days earlier by cobas CMV, whereas clearance was delayed by 12.8 days. Cytomegalovirus remained detectable by cobas CMV in 44.2% of patients at the time of viral clearance as determined by CAP/CTM CMV. Undetectable viral load by cobas CMV at end of treatment was associated with reduced risk for retreatment (odds ratio, 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.04–0.99; P = .05).The use of different quantitative cytomegalovirus nucleic acid tests may affect direct patient care as a result of significant differences in reporting the degree of CMV DNAemia and the time to first detection and clearance of CMV DNAemia.

Abstract Background Quantification of cytomegalovirus (CMV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) has important diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications in the management of transplant recipients. We aimed to assess a viral load in plasma and whole blood that distinguishes CMV disease from asymptomatic infection in a cohort of solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Methods We prospectively measured and compared CMV viral load in paired plasma and whole blood samples collected from transplant recipients with CMV infection and disease. Cytomegalovirus viral loads were determined by a commercially available US Food and Drug Administration-approved quantitative assay (COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan CMV Test [CAP/CTM CMV]) calibrated to the first World Health Organization International Standard for CMV DNA quantification. Results Moderate agreement of CMV viral load was observed between plasma and whole blood, with 31% of samples having discordant findings, particularly among samples with low DNA levels. Among the subset of samples where both paired samples had quantifiable levels, we observed a systematic bias that reflected higher viral load in whole blood compared with plasma. Based on receiver operating curve analysis, an initial plasma CMV viral load threshold of 1700 IU/mL in solid organ transplant recipients (sensitivity 80%, specificity 74%) and 1350 IU/mL in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients (sensitivity 87%, specificity 87%) distinguished CMV disease and asymptomatic infection. Conclusions This study identifies standardized viral load thresholds that distinguish CMV disease from asymptomatic infection using CAP/CTM CMV assay. We propose these thresholds as potential triggers to be evaluated in prospective studies of preemptive therapy. Plasma was better than whole blood for measuring viral load using the CAP/CTM CMV assay.