Kratzsch, Jüergen

Abstract Objectives Results can vary between different free thyroxine (FT4) assays; global standardization would improve comparability of results between laboratories, allowing development of common clinical decision limits in evidence-based guidelines. Content We summarize the path to standardization of FT4 assays, and challenges associated with FT4 testing in special populations, including the need for collaborative efforts toward establishing population-specific reference intervals. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Committee for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests has undertaken FT4 immunoassay method comparison and recalibration studies and developed a reference measurement procedure that is currently being validated. Further studies are needed to establish common reference intervals/clinical decision limits. Standardization of FT4 assays will change test results substantially; therefore, a major education program will be required to ensure stakeholders are aware of the benefits of FT4 standardization, planned transition procedure, and potential clinical impact of the changes. Assay recalibration by manufacturers and approval process simplification by regulatory authorities will help minimize the clinical impact of standardization. Summary Significant progress has been made toward standardization of FT4 testing, but technical and logistical challenges remain. Outlook Collaborative efforts by manufacturers, laboratories, and clinicians are required to achieve successful global standardization of the FT4 assays.

Abstract BACKGROUND The objective of this study is the validation and proof of clinical relevance of a novel electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) for the determination of serum calcitonin (CT) in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) and in different diseases of the thyroid and of calcium homeostasis. METHODS This was a multicenter prospective study on basal serum CT concentrations performed in 9 US and European referral institutions. In addition, stimulated CT concentrations were measured in 50 healthy volunteers after intravenous calcium administration (2.5 mg/kg bodyweight). RESULTS In total, 1929 patients and healthy controls were included. Limits of blank, detection, and quantification for the ECLIA were 0.3, 0.5, and 1 ng/L, respectively. Highest intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were 7.4% (CT concentration, 0.8 ng/L) and 7.0% (1.1 ng/L), respectively. Medians (interval) of serum CT concentrations in 783 healthy controls were 0.8 ng/L (<0.5–12.7) and 3 ng/L (<0.5–18) for females and males, respectively (97.5th percentile, 6.8 and 11.6 ng/L, respectively). Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 100%/97.1% and 96.2%/96.4%, for female/males, respectively. Patients (male/female) with primary hyperparathyroidism, renal failure, and neuroendocrine tumors showed CT concentrations >97.5th percentile in 33%/4.7%, 18.5%/10%, and 8.3%/12%, females/males, respectively. Peak serum CT concentrations were reached 2 min after calcium administration (161.7 and 111.8 ng/L in males and females, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Excellent analytical performance, low interindividual variability, and low impact of confounders for increased CT concentrations in non-MTC patients indicate that the investigated assay has appropriate clinical utility. Calcium-stimulated CT results suggest good test applicability owing to low interindividual variability.