Hakaim, Albert G.

Purpose: To analyze the 2-year outcomes of female patients after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) with the Zenith AAA Endovascular Graft. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of data from the US Zenith multicenter trial and the Zenith female registry on 40 women (10.9%, study group) and 326 men (89.1%, control group) enrolled. All patients had completed their 2-year follow-up. Primary study endpoints were survival, aneurysm rupture, and conversion rate. Significance was assumed if p<0.05. Results: Overall rates of mortality (12.5% for women versus 13.2% for men, p=0.94) and aneurysm rupture (2.5% for women versus 0% for men, p=0.11) were comparable between groups. Conversion to open repair within 2 years was significantly more frequent in women compared to men (7.5% versus 0.6%, p=0.01). The incidence of endoleaks of any type was equivalent between groups at 2 years (13.3% for women versus 6.9% for men, p=0.30). No difference was observed in the need for secondary interventions (15% for women versus 13.5% for men, p=0.81) or aneurysm dilatation >5 mm (10.5% for women versus 2.3% for men, p=0.10). None of the patients developed device migration .10 mm or required intervention for migration. Conclusion: While women underwent conversion to open repair more frequently compared to men at 2 years post EVAR, there was no difference in survival, freedom from aneurysm rupture, or need for secondary interventions between groups. As in men, the Zenith AAA Endovascular Graft provides reliable protection from aneurysm rupture and aneurysm-related death in women in a midterm follow-up.

Purpose: Mycotic aortic aneurysms are rare but are associated with high morbidity and mortality due to their propensity for rupture. Traditional therapy consists of open surgical repair with resection and aortic reconstruction or extra-anatomic bypass combined with long-term antibiotic therapy. Case report: An 85-year-old male with persistent bacteremia was found to have a descending mycotic aortic aneurysm. Surgical options were discussed and endovascular treatment was recommended with stent-graft placement followed by intra-aortic rifampin infusion. This approach led to resolution of the aneurysm and eradication of bacteremia at 4-month follow-up. Conclusion: By combining traditional surgical strategies with a contemporary endovascular approach, the perioperative mortality and long-term risk of infection associated with mycotic thoracic aneurysms can potentially be decreased.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and durability of additional proximal cuffs during endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). A retrospective review of 90 EVAR patients was conducted. Postoperative survival, proximal sealing zone–related complications, and secondary procedures were analyzed. Additional proximal cuffs were used in 11%. Their use did not affect postoperative survival ( p = .58), type I endoleak rate (4.4%; p = .19), or the need for sealing zone–related secondary procedures (6.3%; p = .38) compared with patients without cuff placement but was related to a higher cumulative graft migration rate (2.2% overall p = .02). Two patients (2.5%; p = .79) underwent conversion to open surgery, both for proximal sealing zone–related complications. Application of proximal cuffs appears to be an effective intraoperative adjunctive procedure to achieve a proximal seal during EVAR, with favorable midterm results. However, the risk of late endograft migrations may be elevated in this group.

The purpose of this study was to review the outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) using custom-made aortouni-iliac (AUI) devices with femorofemoral bypass. Between June 1999 and March 2001, 23 consecutive patients (1 female, 22 male) at high risk of open aortic aneurysm repair underwent EVAR with custom devices in an AUI configuration. The mean follow-up was 37 months (range 2–72 months), and the mean age was 76.8 years (range 67.5–88.7 years). Increased surgical risk was evidenced by 92% and 69% of patients with significant pulmonary or cardiac disease, respectively. The preoperative mean aneurysm diameter ( n = 23) 62 ± 8.2 mm was significantly greater than the postoperative diameter, ( n = 23) 54 ± 16.4 mm. Ten endoleaks occurred. Migration of the stent graft occurred in 9% ( n = 2). Secondary interventions were necessary in 23%, whereas tertiary interventions were required in 9%. Patients at high risk of open aneurysm repair received sufficient protection from aneurysm rupture with custom-made AUI devices.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the applicability of paravertebral blockade (PVB) for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair compared with general anesthesia (GA). Data from patients who underwent elective infrarenal endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair between August 2001 and July 2002 using PVB or GA were retrospectively reviewed and compared with respect to risk factors, intraoperative hemodynamic characteristics, operative outcome, and complications. Ten patients underwent elective infrarenal endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair under PVB, whereas 15 patients were operated on under GA. One conversion from PVB to GA was necessary for block failure. The perioperative (< 30 days) cardiovascular morbidity and overall mortality were zero in both groups. The PVB group benefited significantly with respect to the incidence of intraoperative hypotension ( p < .05) and blood pressure lability ( p < .01), as well as postoperative nausea ( p < .01). Our preliminary results indicate that PVB is feasible and can be performed safely in a patient population with significant comorbidities.

The middle mesenteric artery is a rare anomalous mesenteric vessel that may supply variable segments of the colon. Occlusion of this artery during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair may bear a significant risk of bowel ischemia. We report the successful interventional treatment of a patient with a 5.3 cm infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm, sparing a dominant middle mesenteric artery.

Currently available aortic stent-grafts require bilateral femoral incisions for device deployment. The incidence of morbidity (infection, lymphatic complications, breakdown) of vertical, infrainguinal incisions used in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) was assessed, and the natural history of asymptomatic groin fluid collections following such procedures was determined. Between June 1999 and February 2001, 77 consecutive patients underwent EVAR for AAAs utilizing bilateral vertical femoral incisions. Fifty-nine (77%) bifurcated stent-grafts (BSGs), and 18 (23%) aortouniiliac (AUI) devices, with femorofemoral bypass were performed. Patients returned at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 6 months for physical examination, and 1 month and 6 months for abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans. The presence of fluid collections was determined from the dictation report of the attending radiologist. Data are reported as (n) mean ± SE. Patient characteristics were compared using Fisher's exact test; p <0.05 considered significant. There were 72 males and 5 females, age 75 ±6.4 years and aneurysm size (77) 5.6 ±0.8 cm. There were no cases of wound breakdown or lymph fistula. Wound infections occurred in 3/150 incisions (2%), 2/34 AUI incisions (6%), and 1/1 16 BSG incisions (0.86%). There was no statistical difference (p =0.13) between graft types (BSG vs AUI). All infections were diagnosed clinically before the 1-month CT scan, treated without operative intervention or hospitalization, and resolved. There was a significant decrease in the BSG group and overall in asymptomatic wound fluid collections from 1 to 6 months postoperatively. At 1 and 6 months, respectively, the BSG group had 17 (14.6%) and 3 (2.6%) fluid collections out of 116 incisions (p = 0.003); the AUI group had 6 (17.6%) and 1 (2.9%) fluid collection(s) out of 34 incisions (p = 0. 13); and overall 23 (15.3%) and 4 (2.6%) out of 150 incisions (p = 0.004). The present study demonstrates that bilateral vertical femoral incisions used in EVAR have a wound infection rate of 2.0%. Infections are usually detected and treated clinically and empirically without the need for hospitalization or surgery. Asymptomatic groin wound fluid collections resolve significantly within 6 months without intervention. Therefore, surgical femoral artery exposure adds little morbidity to the endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is frequently associated with cardiovascular disease. Epidemiological data on the frequency of ED in vascular surgery patients is rarely reported. We evaluated the prevalence of this comorbidity in patients consulting the vascular surgery outpatient clinic. Over a 6-month period, a short version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire consisting of six EDrelevant questions was handed out to 440 vascular surgery outpatients. Clinical data were collected from patients' records. Linear regression models with forward selection were used to investigate associations between erectile function score and possible risk factors. The return rate was 31% (137 patients). Eight patients (6%) were taking phosphodiesterase inhibitors. ED, as defined by an erectile function score of 25 or less and/or use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors, was found in 90% (95% CI: 84% to 95%) of cases. Moderate or severe ED, as defined by an erectile function score of 16 or less and/or use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors, was found in 70% (95% CI: 62% to 78%) of cases. Increased age, abdominal aortic aneurysm, peripheral arterial disease, urologic disease, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and use of beta-blockers were significantly associated with a lower erectile function score. In conclusion, erectile dysfunction is a frequent and often missed comorbidity in vascular surgery patients. While ED may have a profound impact on the patient's quality of life, attention should also be paid to the patient's preoperative sexual function, considering the availability of oral pharmacotherapies and possible consequences concerning liability in postoperative patients in whom pre-existing ED was not identified properly.

AbstractBackgroundThe purpose of the present study was to compare surgical and endovascular revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI).MethodsForty‐nine patients underwent surgical (SG) or endovascular (EG) treatment. Relief of symptoms was considered the primary endpoint; patency, morbidity, and mortality were secondary endpoints. For statistical analysis, significance was assumed if P values ≤ 0.05.ResultsTwenty‐six patients (53%) underwent surgical revascularization; 23 patients (47%), endovascular repair. Mean follow‐up was 25 ± 21 months (SG) versus 10 ± 10 (EG) months (P = 0.07). Except for body mass indices (SG 18.9 ± 2.7 versus EG 23.6 ± 4.8; P = 0.001), preoperative data were comparable. Freedom from symptoms was 100% (SG) versus 90% (EG) after intervention (P = 0.194), and 89% (SG) versus 75% (EG) at the end of follow‐up. Reocclusion or re‐stenosis occurred in 8% (SG) versus 25% (EG) (log‐rank test: P = 0.003), and mesenteric ischemia developed in 0% (SG) versus 9% (EG) (P = 0.04). Reintervention for CMI was required in 0% (SG) versus 13% (EG) (P = 0.01). Surgical patients experienced more early complications (42% versus EG 4%; P = 0.02) and longer hospital stays (11.6 ± 10.9 days versus EG 1.3 ± 0.5 days; P < 0.001). Overall mortality at the end of follow‐up was 31% (SG) versus 4% (EG) (log‐rank test: P = 0.08), including all patients with combined open mesenteric and aortic reconstruction (P = 0.001).ConclusionsSurgical treatment has superior long‐term patency and requires fewer reinterventions, but it is also more invasive with greater morbidity and mortality compared to endovascular treatment. Endovascular techniques may be preferable in patients with significant co‐morbidities, concomitant aortic disease, or indeterminate symptoms.