G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are among the most common drug targets, with numerous agonists and antagonists approved for clinical use. More recently, it has been appreciated that drugs can also modulate the action of natural agonists of these receptors, thus providing unique clinical advantages. Here, we describe the identification and characterization of a small molecule positive allosteric modulator (PAM) of secretin action at the class B G protein-coupled secretin receptor. This phenyl(trifluoromethyl)-pyrimidine can occupy the secretin receptor without stimulating its internalization, yet priming it to enhance both the potency and efficacy of the action of natural secretin. This is also shown to exhibit its effects on cells expressing low numbers of these receptors, without enhancing the effects of other structurally related hormones acting at other class B GPCRs. The mechanism responsible for this PAM effect is the slowing of the off-rate of receptor-bound secretin. This compound can serve as a lead to the development of other drugs that enhance the action of natural endogenous secretin and can be utilized to explore the potential therapeutic utility of such compounds.
Targeting of a Bile Acid Receptor, Takeda G Protein Receptor 5 [TGR5], by a Novel First-in-Class Competitive Antagonist, SBI-364, Diminishes Hepatic and Renal Cystogenesis in Polycystic Liver and Kidney Disease
Class B G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a highly important group of therapeutic targets with strong physiologic implications in cardiovascular, metabolic, or gastrointestinal systems. Endogenously activated by moderate‐length peptide hormones, class B GPCRs entertain a complex binding mechanism to induce stimulatory signaling processes. The secretin receptor (SCTR) is a prototypical member of this receptor family, having clinical relevance in multiple diseases including heart failure, digestive disorders, diabetes and obesity. [1‐4] However, its endogenous ligand secretin and peptide‐based analogs are the only ligands known to interact with SCTRs, likely due to challenges in class B GPCR drug discovery [5]. To find orally available therapeutic leads targeting this “undruggable” receptor, we focused on identifying positive allosteric modulators (PAMs), which act via structurally distinct binding pockets and potentiate hormonal signaling of native agonists. Thus, we developed a testing funnel tailored to discover SCTR small molecule modulators. After screening a 12,000‐compound library with a unique primary assay that used a mixture of stimulators, we identified three structurally related scaffolds (A‐C) enhancing peptidic SCTR activation [5]. Applying a comprehensive toolbox with binding and functional assays, we studied structure‐activity relationships of a well‐considered set of commercially available analogs incorporating these three scaffolds. Our investigations afforded an optimized analog B2, which showed substantial positive cooperativity to low‐potent peptide agonists and significantly decelerated secretin dissociation. Due to the innate electrophilicity of scaffold set A, we recognized a structural similarity to PAMs acting on glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor (GLP‐1R), a prominent member of class B GPCR family. We further demonstrated that a subset of SCTR PAMs was able to augment not only SCTR signaling but also GLP‐1R functions. A recent study described that dual activation of SCTRs and GLP‐1Rs was benefiting glucose homeostasis and appetite regulation while avoiding proliferative effects on pancreas mass [6]. Determining cooperativity between PAMs and selected orthosteric peptides, we established distinct selectivity and probe dependency profiles. To decipher reversible and covalent mechanisms‐of‐action as well as potential binding sites of novel PAMs, we conducted glutathione reactivity, cAMP‐washout and receptor mutational studies. [7] To conclude, we discovered a unique class of SCTR modulators providing useful pharmacologic tools to study SCTR‐ or GLP‐1R‐specific activation pathways and explore novel allosteric binding sites with potential to instigate the development of first‐in‐class therapeutics for treating comorbid conditions obesity and diabetes. [7] References [1] Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol, 2020 , 60 , 89‐107; [2] Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 2017 , 12 , 946‐960; [3] Experimental Physiology, 2013 , 5 , 973‐987; [4] Current Neuropharmacology, 2007 , 3 , 168‐179; [5] SLAS Discovery, 2021 , 26 , 1‐16; [6] Journal of Peptide Science, 2017 , 12 , 845‐854; [7] submitted to Biochemical Pharmacology 2021 .
TGR5 contributes to hepatic cystogenesis in rodents with polycystic liver diseases through cyclic adenosine monophosphate/Gαs signaling
Hepatic cystogenesis in polycystic liver disease is associated with increased levels of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) in cholangiocytes lining liver cysts. Takeda G protein receptor 5 (TGR5), a G protein–coupled bile acid receptor, is linked to cAMP and expressed in cholangiocytes. Therefore, we hypothesized that TGR5 might contribute to disease progression. We examined expression of TGR5 and Gα proteins in cultured cholangiocytes and in livers of animal models and humans with polycystic liver disease. In vitro, we assessed cholangiocyte proliferation, cAMP levels, and cyst growth in response to (1) TGR5 agonists (taurolithocholic acid, oleanolic acid [OA], and two synthetic compounds), (2) a novel TGR5 antagonist (m‐tolyl 5‐chloro‐2‐[ethylsulfonyl] pyrimidine‐4‐carboxylate [SBI‐115]), and (3) a combination of SBI‐115 and pasireotide, a somatostatin receptor analogue. In vivo, we examined hepatic cystogenesis in OA‐treated polycystic kidney rats and after genetic elimination of TGR5 in double mutant TGR5−/− ;Pkhd1del2/del2 mice. Compared to control, expression of TGR5 and Gαs (but not Gαi and Gαq) proteins was increased 2‐fold to 3‐fold in cystic cholangiocytes in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, TGR5 stimulation enhanced cAMP production, cell proliferation, and cyst growth by ∼40%; these effects were abolished after TGR5 reduction by short hairpin RNA. OA increased cystogenesis in polycystic kidney rats by 35%; in contrast, hepatic cystic areas were decreased by 45% in TGR5‐deficient TGR5−/−;Pkhd1del2/del2 mice. TGR5 expression and its colocalization with Gαs were increased ∼2‐fold upon OA treatment. Levels of cAMP, cell proliferation, and cyst growth in vitro were decreased by ∼30% in cystic cholangiocytes after treatment with SBI‐115 alone and by ∼50% when SBI‐115 was combined with pasireotide. Conclusion: TGR5 contributes to hepatic cystogenesis by increasing cAMP and enhancing cholangiocyte proliferation; our data suggest that a TGR5 antagonist alone or concurrently with somatostatin receptor agonists represents a potential therapeutic approach in polycystic liver disease. (Hepatology 2017;66:1197‐1218).