Kimball, Alexa B.

ABSTRACT Background Secukinumab, a fully human, monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin‐17A, is approved for moderate‐to‐severe HS in adults. This study evaluated pharmacokinetics (PK), high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hsCRP) changes, and safety of secukinumab over 52 weeks in SUNSHINE and SUNRISE Phase 3 trials. Methods An exploratory analysis of pooled Phase‐3 trials evaluated serum PK and safety of secukinumab 300 mg every 2 (SECQ2W) or 4 weeks (SECQ4W). A population PK model assessed the effects of body weight, disease severity, and baseline hsCRP on secukinumab serum concentration. Exposure–response analysis assessed the relationship between predicted PK and HS clinical response [HiSCR]. No confirmatory statistical testing was performed. Results Mean serum trough concentration at Weeks 16, 24, and 52 was ~2‐fold higher with SECQ2W vs. SECQ4W. At Week 16, exposure overlap was high, with an estimated numerical increase in HiSCR of ~3% for SECQ2W over SECQ4W. At Week 52, HiSCR levels plateaued. At Week 16, hsCRP decreased from 18.6 ± 26.3 mg/L to 12.8 ± 18.0 mg/L (SECQ2W), 15.9 ± 27.6 mg/L to 11.5 ± 18.4 mg/L (SECQ4W), and remained unchanged with placebo (14.4 ± 22.5 mg/L to 14.7 ± 23.8 mg/L); reductions were sustained through Week 52. Higher body weight, disease severity, and baseline hsCRP were associated with lower secukinumab serum concentrations. Secukinumab immunogenicity was low (< 1%), with no new safety signals. Conclusion Secukinumab serum concentrations in patients with HS varied with body weight, disease severity, and baseline hsCRP. SECQ2W may benefit certain patients. Secukinumab reduced hsCRP through Week 52. The safety profile of secukinumab was consistent with other approved indications, with no apparent dose–response relationship observed. Trial Registration NCT03713619 (Novartis study code CAIN457M2301). NCT03713632 (Novartis study code CAIN457M2302)

Abstract Background The SUNSHINE and SUNRISE phase III trials demonstrated sustained clinical efficacy of secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) through 52 weeks. Patients completing the core trials could enter a 4-year extension trial. Objectives To evaluate the long-term efficacy, safety/tolerability and maintenance of clinical response to secukinumab through week 104 in the extension trial. Methods Patients with a hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) clinical response (HiSCR) at week 52 of the core trials (extension trial baseline visit) entered a randomized withdrawal period. HiSCR responders receiving subcutaneous secukinumab 300 mg every 2 or 4 weeks (SECQ2W/SECQ4W) through week 52 in the core trials were randomized 2 : 1 to continue secukinumab (SECQ2W-R-Q2W or SECQ4W-R-Q4W) or receive placebo (SECQ2W-R-PBO or SECQ4W-R-PBO) through week 104. The primary endpoint was time to loss of response (LOR; newly defined for this trial) through week 104 in week 52 HiSCR responders (SECQ2W-R-Q2W vs. SECQ2W-R-PBO and SECQ4W-R-Q4W vs. SECQ4W-R-PBO). Time to LOR was tested at 1.25% (one-sided) for each comparison (one-sided familywise alpha of 2.5%) through week 104. If LOR was met, patients could remain in the trial on open-label secukinumab treatment. Additional endpoints included safety and HiSCR. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04179175). Results Overall, 84.3% of patients who completed the core trials entered the extension trial; 55.9% were week 52 HiSCR responders. The primary endpoint was not met for either secukinumab dosing regimen. The estimated risk reduction for LOR was 13% (SECQ2W-R-Q2W vs. SECQ2W-R-PBO; one-sided P = 0.25) and 30% (SECQ4W-R-Q4W vs. SECQ4W-R-PBO; one-sided P = 0.04). The median time to LOR was numerically longer in the secukinumab arms vs. placebo {SECQ2W-R-Q2W [283 days; 95% confidence interval (CI) 176, –] vs. SECQ2W-R-PBO [239 days; 95% CI 120, –]; SECQ4W-R-Q4W [365 days 95% CI 225, –] vs. SECQ4W-R-PBO [171 days; 95% CI 113–337]}. In week 52 HiSCR responders reporting LOR, 44% (SECQ2W-R-Q2W), 58% (SECQ2W-R-PBO), 40% (SECQ4W-R-Q4W) and 34% (SECQ4W-R-PBO) were achieving HiSCR at the time of LOR. Overall, the safety of secukinumab was consistent with the core trials. Conclusions The primary endpoint of this trial was not met. HiSCR was maintained in many patients at the time of LOR. The safety of secukinumab was consistent with the previously characterized safety profile in the core trials.

Abstract Background Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with a considerable disease burden. Existing treatment options are limited and often suboptimal; a high unmet need exists for effective targeted therapies. Objectives To explore the effects of spesolimab treatment in patients with HS. Methods This randomized double-blind placebo-controlled proof-of-clinical-concept (PoCC) study was conducted at 25 centres across 12 countries from 3 May 2021 to 21 April 2022. Patients had moderate-to-severe HS for ≥ 1 year before enrolment. Patients were randomized (2 : 1) to receive a loading dose of 3600-mg intravenous spesolimab (1200 mg at weeks 0, 1 and 2) or matching placebo, followed by maintenance with either 1200-mg subcutaneous spesolimab every 2 weeks from weeks 4 to 10 or matching placebo. The primary endpoint was the percentage change from baseline in total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count at week 12. Secondary endpoints were the absolute change from baseline in the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), percentage change from baseline in draining tunnel (dT) count, the proportion of patients achieving a dT count of 0, absolute change from baseline in the revised Hidradenitis Suppurativa Area and Severity Index (HASI-R), the proportion of patients achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR50), the proportion of patients with ≥ 1 flare (all at week 12) and patient-reported outcomes. Results In this completed trial, randomized patients (n = 52) received spesolimab (n = 35) or placebo (n = 17). The difference vs. placebo in least squares mean is reported. At week 12, the percentage change in total AN count was similar between treatment arms: –4.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) –31.7 to 23.4]. There was greater numerical improvement in the spesolimab arm, as measured by IHS4 (13.9, 95% CI –25.6 to –2.3); percentage change from baseline in dT count (–96.6%, 95% CI –154.5 to –38.8); and the proportion of patients achieving a dT count of 0 (18.3%, 95% CI –7.9 to 37.5). Spesolimab treatment also improved HASI-R and HiSCR50 vs. placebo. Spesolimab demonstrated a favourable safety profile, similar to that observed in trials in other diseases. Conclusions This exploratory PoCC study supports the development of spesolimab as a new therapeutic option in HS.

AbstractBackgroundHidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that causes substantial physical, emotional and psychological burdens. Guselkumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds to the p19 subunit of interleukin‐23, has demonstrated high levels of efficacy in the treatment of inflammatory diseases, including psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of guselkumab on the treatment of HS, a phase 2, multicentre, randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, proof‐of‐concept study was conducted.MethodsPatients ≥18 years of age with moderate‐to‐severe HS for ≥1 year were randomized to (1) guselkumab 200 mg by subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 36 (guselkumab SC); (2) guselkumab 1200 mg intravenously (IV) q4w for 12 weeks, then switched to guselkumab 200 mg SC q4w from Weeks 12 through 36 (guselkumab IV); or (3) placebo for 12 weeks, with re‐randomization to guselkumab 200 mg SC q4w at Weeks 16 through 36 (placebo → guselkumab 200 mg) or guselkumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 16, 20, 28 and 36 and placebo at Weeks 24 and 32 (placebo → guselkumab 100 mg). End points included HS clinical response (HiSCR) and patient‐reported outcomes.ResultsAlthough guselkumab SC or guselkumab IV resulted in numerically higher HiSCR versus placebo at Week 16 (50.8%, 45.0%, 38.7%, respectively), statistical significance was not achieved. Numerically greater improvements in patient‐reported outcomes were also observed for guselkumab SC and guselkumab IV versus placebo at Week 16. Through Week 40, no clear differences to suggest a dose response were observed for HiSCR and patient‐reported outcomes.ConclusionsDespite modest improvements, the primary end point was not met and the overall findings do not support the efficacy of guselkumab in the treatment of HS. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT 03628924.