Passeron, Thierry

Abstract Background Patients with lichen planus (LP) refractory to available therapies often experience a high disease burden, representing a population with a clear unmet need for new treatments. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab 300 mg over 32 weeks in adult patients with biopsy-proven cutaneous LP (CLP), mucosal LP (MLP) or lichen planopilaris (LPP) that is inadequately controlled by topical corticosteroids. Methods PRELUDE was a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase II proof-of-concept study that enrolled patients with CLP, MLP or LPP. Eligible patients were randomized to either secukinumab 300 mg every 4 weeks for 32 weeks (SECQ4W) or placebo for 16 weeks followed by secukinumab 300 mg every 2 weeks (SECQ2W) for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was achievement of the newly designed Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score ≤ 2 at week 16. Results Overall, 111 patients were randomized (n = 37 each) to CLP, MLP and LPP cohorts. As the proof-of-concept criteria were not met for any of the three cohorts, the primary objective was not met. A numerically higher proportion of patients achieved IGA ≤ 2 response at week 16 with SECQ4W vs. placebo in the MLP {37.5% [95% credibility interval (Crl) 20.3–57.2] vs. 23.1% (95% Crl 6.5–49.2)} and LPP cohorts [37.5% (95% Crl 20.2–57.3) vs. 30.8% (95% Crl 10.8–57.6)]. In the LPP cohort, a sustained response for IGA ≤ 2 from week 16 to week 32 was achieved with SECQ4W (week 16, 37.5%; week 32, 45.8%), and a substantial improvement was observed in IGA ≤ 2 response in patients from this cohort who switched from placebo (week 16, 30.8%) to SECQ2W after week 16 (week 32, 63.6%). The safety profile was consistent with the known profile of secukinumab and showed no new or unexpected signals. Conclusions PRELUDE is the first randomized controlled basket trial evaluating interleukin (IL)-17A inhibition with secukinumab across three subtypes of LP. Secukinumab was well tolerated and safe, showing different response rates across the three subtypes, with numerical IGA improvements in MLP and LPP, and no response in CLP. The study raises the question of a differential role of IL-17A across LP subtypes. The novel IGA score showed significant correlation with both patient- and physician-reported outcome measurements.

AbstractBackgroundHidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that causes substantial physical, emotional and psychological burdens. Guselkumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds to the p19 subunit of interleukin‐23, has demonstrated high levels of efficacy in the treatment of inflammatory diseases, including psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of guselkumab on the treatment of HS, a phase 2, multicentre, randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, proof‐of‐concept study was conducted.MethodsPatients ≥18 years of age with moderate‐to‐severe HS for ≥1 year were randomized to (1) guselkumab 200 mg by subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) through Week 36 (guselkumab SC); (2) guselkumab 1200 mg intravenously (IV) q4w for 12 weeks, then switched to guselkumab 200 mg SC q4w from Weeks 12 through 36 (guselkumab IV); or (3) placebo for 12 weeks, with re‐randomization to guselkumab 200 mg SC q4w at Weeks 16 through 36 (placebo → guselkumab 200 mg) or guselkumab 100 mg SC at Weeks 16, 20, 28 and 36 and placebo at Weeks 24 and 32 (placebo → guselkumab 100 mg). End points included HS clinical response (HiSCR) and patient‐reported outcomes.ResultsAlthough guselkumab SC or guselkumab IV resulted in numerically higher HiSCR versus placebo at Week 16 (50.8%, 45.0%, 38.7%, respectively), statistical significance was not achieved. Numerically greater improvements in patient‐reported outcomes were also observed for guselkumab SC and guselkumab IV versus placebo at Week 16. Through Week 40, no clear differences to suggest a dose response were observed for HiSCR and patient‐reported outcomes.ConclusionsDespite modest improvements, the primary end point was not met and the overall findings do not support the efficacy of guselkumab in the treatment of HS. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT 03628924.