Back to Authors

Hokenstad, Alexis

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 3

Abstract PR09: Postmenopause as a key factor in the composition of the Endometrial Cancer Microbiome (ECbiome): Putative role of Porphyromonas somerae in the disease
Walsh, Dana M. , Hokenstad, Alexis, Sung, Jayeun, Jenkins, Gregory D. , Nelson, Heidi D , Mariani, Andrea , Walther-António, Marina , Chen, Jun , Chia, Nicholas , Mariani, Andrea

Cancer Research | December 3, 2020 | Volume: 80 | Issue: 8_Supplement | Pages: PR09-PR09

10.1158/1538-7445.mvc2020-pr09 Get It

Abstract Incidence rates for endometrial cancer (EC) are rising, particularly in postmenopausal and obese women. Our previous work has showed that the uterine and vaginal microbiome distinguishes patients with EC from those without. We now examine the impact of patient factors (such as menopause status, body mass index, and vaginal pH) in the microbiome in the absence of EC and how these might contribute to the microbiome signature in EC. We find that each factor independently alters the microbiome and identified postmenopausal status as the main driver of a polymicrobial network associated with EC (ECbiome). Of the 17 taxa we found enriched in EC patients, 8 were also enriched by postmenopause. Because postmenopausal status is a main risk factor for endometrial cancer, this system can be thought of as an ecological succession towards a disease state. Organisms within the ECbiome have been previously identified as polymicrobial associations in chronic soft tissue infections, ulcers, morbid obesity, and bacterial vaginosis. This suggests that this microbiome network is likely involved in mechanisms of host disease. Within the ECbiome, Porphyromonas somerae stands out because of its very significant and specific association with EC (p = 5.73E-6; Q = 0.009). We had previously identified this species as significantly associated with EC, and hereby validate that finding. Because the association of P. somerae with EC was robust and specific enough to potentially be considered as a biomarker for the disease (AUC 76.7%, CI: 67.9-85.5%), we developed a P. somerae-specific qPCR assay to detect this species in vaginal swabs. This becomes of particular interest because the lower tract and uterine microbiome are significantly correlated in these patients (p = 0.01), indicating that the vaginal microbiome can be used as a proxy for the uterine environment in EC. In agreement with the 16S rRNA gene sequencing data, P. somerae was detected significantly more frequently in vaginal swabs of patients with EC than those without EC (p = 3.02E-7). Overall, the test achieved a sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 63%, with a positive predictive value of 0.86 for obese and postmenopausal patients. In summary, we identify Porphyromas somerae presence as the most predictive microbial marker of EC, and we confirm this using targeted qPCR, which could be of use in detecting EC in high-risk, asymptomatic women. Given the established pathogenic behavior of P.somerae, we have also explored mechanistic routes through which this microbe and associated consortia may be involved in the mechanisms of disease. Citation Format: Marina Walther-Antonio, Dana Walsh, Alexis Hokenstad, Jun Chen, Jayeun Sung, Gregory Jenkins, Nicholas Chia, Heidi Nelson, Andrea Mariani. Postmenopause as a key factor in the composition of the Endometrial Cancer Microbiome (ECbiome): Putative role of Porphyromonas somerae in the disease [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on the Microbiome, Viruses, and Cancer; 2020 Feb 21-24; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(8 Suppl):Abstract nr PR09.
Opioid education for early gynecologic oncology practitioners, filling a much-needed gap.
Hokenstad, Alexis, Lefkowits, Carolyn , Phippen, Neil T., Bunch, Kristen , Wheeler, Lindsay, Wheeler, Lindsay, Kumar, Amanika

Journal of Clinical Oncology | November 28, 2018 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 34_suppl | Pages: 131-131

10.1200/jco.2018.36.34_suppl.131 Get It

131 Background: Gynecologic oncologists report a lack of knowledge and comfort with palliative care topics including opioid management, despite their clinical importance. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of an online opioid educational module among gynecologic oncologists. Methods: A 25-minute video module was developed to provide an overview and example cases for opioid initiation, titration, and conversion. Fellows and early career gynecologic oncologists were invited to participate in a 24-question online survey addressing demographics, palliative care education in training, and preparedness and opioid-related knowledge. After viewing the module, participants completed a post-intervention survey, which was comprised of the same six knowledge-based questions and an assessment of the module. Responses were anonymous. A 3 month follow up survey will be sent to assess knowledge retention. Results: A total of 38 participants completed the initial and post-module survey, including 14 residents, 12 fellows, and 12 candidate members. Nineteen (50%) respondents had been previously taught to calculate a 24-hour oral morphine equivalent (OME) and to titrate opioids, but only 7 (18%) had received formal teaching on opioid rotation. Twenty four (63%) participants rated the quality of teaching overall in their fellowship as good, very good, or excellent, but only 15 (39%) rated palliative care education as at least good. Eleven (30%) respondents had a palliative care rotation in fellowship. Knowledge scores improved from pre-module to post-module, 49.5% correct answers compared to 74.6% (p<0.001). Thirty five (92%) of respondents were satisfied or very satisfied with this module and are interested in additional palliative care modules. Conclusions: A single online palliative care education module was associated with significantly improved participant knowledge on opioid management. Over 90% of respondents were satisfied with the module demonstrating an opportunity for improvement in palliative care education in gynecologic oncology via online education.
Abstract B45: Endometrial cancer microbiome signature and its implications for carcinogenesis
Hokenstad, Alexis, Distad, Tammy, Cheek, Heidi, Keeney, Gary L., Creedon, Douglas J., Nelson, Heidi D , Mariani, Andrea , Walther-António, Marina , Chen, Jun , Multinu, Francesco , Mariani, Andrea , Chia, Nicholas

Clinical Cancer Research | May 8, 2017 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 1_Supplement | Pages: B45-B45

10.1158/1557-3265.pmccavuln16-b45 Get It

Abstract Endometrial cancer studies have led to a number of well-defined but mechanistically unconnected genetic and environmental risk factors. One of the emerging modulators between environmental triggers and genetic expression is the microbiome. Because of the inflammatory display in endometrial cancer, we set out to inquire about the composition of the uterine microbiome and its putative role in endometrial cancer. We undertook a pilot study of the microbiome in 238 samples taken from different locations along the entire female reproductive tract in hysterectomy patients with endometrial cancer (n=17), patients with endometrial hyperplasia (n=4) and patients afflicted with a benign uterine condition (n=10). Samples were collected aseptically both in the operating room and the pathology laboratory. Following DNA extraction, the 16S rDNA (V3-V5 region) microbial gene was amplified and sequenced to identify the microbiota present. The microbiome sequencing revealed a structural microbiome shift in the cancer and hyperplasia cases, distinguishable from the benign cases (p=0.01). Several taxa were found to be significantly enriched in samples belonging to the endometrial cancer cohort: Firmicutes (Anaerostipes, ph2, Dialister, Peptoniphilus, 1-68, Ruminococcus, and Anaerotruncus), Spirochaetes (Treponema), Actinobacteria (Atopobium), Bacteroidetes (Bacteroides and Porphyromonas), and Proteobacteria (Arthrospira). Of particular relevance, the simultaneous presence of Atopobium vaginae and an uncultured representative of the Porphyromonas sp. (99% match to P.somerae) were found to be predictive of the disease status (sensitivity 73-93%; specificity 67-90%, AUC 0.918). Sensitivity is increased to 100% if combined with a high vaginal pH (&gt;4.5), although specificity is decreased to 60%. Although our numbers are low, the microbiome signature of hyperplasia was even more distinct from benign disease than endometrial cancer itself. This is suggestive of an early microbiome role in the disease. Given the pathogenic profile of the identified microorganisms these findings raise the possibility of a microbiome role in the etiology or progression of endometrial cancer that should be further investigated. Citation Format: Marina Walther-Antonio, Jun Chen, Francesco Multinu, Alexis Hokenstad, Tammy Distad, Heidi Cheek, Gary Keeney, Douglas Creedon, Heidi Nelson, Andrea Mariani, Nicholas Chia. Endometrial cancer microbiome signature and its implications for carcinogenesis. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Precision Medicine Series: Targeting the Vulnerabilities of Cancer; May 16-19, 2016; Miami, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2017;23(1_Suppl):Abstract nr B45.