Romero, Yvonne

Abstract Background and Aims: In patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE), reflux-induced injury promotes esophageal adenocarcinoma, presumably through cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) related pathways. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may interrupt reflux-associated carcinogenesis by reducing acid exposure and subsequent inflammation. However, clinical trial data regarding the chemopreventive efficacy of a PPI + NSAID combination are limited. The aim of this multi-center, randomized, phase II trial was to assess the effects of a 28-day intervention with esomeprazole 40 mg bid and aspirin 81 mg qd, 325 mg qd, or placebo qd on tissue prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) concentrations in BE patients. Methods: Using the infrastructure of the Cancer Prevention Network, participants (> 18 years) with histologically confirmed non dysplastic BE were randomly assigned to receive one of three interventions for 28 days: (arm A) esomeprazole 40 mg bid+ aspirin 81 mg placebo qd + aspirin 325 mg placebo qd (n=42); (arm B) esomeprazole 40 mg bid+ aspirin 81 mg qd + aspirin placebo 325 qd (n=63); (arm C) esomeprazole 40 mg bid + aspirin 81 mg qd placebo + aspirin 325 mg qd (n=63). Esophageal biopsies were obtained pre- and post-intervention to assess change in PGE2 concentration as the primary endpoint. Results: In total, 122 participants were randomized, 121 (99%) completed the trial per protocol, and 115 (94%) were evaluated for the primary endpoint. Baseline characteristics were similar across intervention arms. The absolute change (mean + SD) in tissue PGE2 concentration was −67.6 (229.68) in Arm A, −120.9 (281.28) in Arm B (p = 0.10 vs Arm A) and −174.9 (263.62) in Arm C (p = 0.02 vs Arm A). Conclusions: In combination with esomeprazole 40 mg twice per day, aspirin 325 mg per day significantly reduced tissue PGE2 concentration in BE patients after a 28-day intervention, as compared to aspirin placebo. Given the relevance of PGE2 pathways in BE-associated carcinogenesis, further evaluation of this chemoprevention strategy in larger, more definitive phase III trials is warranted. Citation Information: Cancer Prev Res 2011;4(10 Suppl):CN06-03.

Abstract Esophageal adenocarcinoma risk in Barrett's esophagus (BE) is increased 30- to 125-fold versus the general population. Among all BE patients, however, neoplastic progression occurs only once per 200 patient-years. Molecular biomarkers are therefore needed to risk-stratify patients for more efficient surveillance endoscopy and to improve the early detection of progression. We therefore performed a retrospective, multicenter, double-blinded validation study of eight BE progression prediction methylation biomarkers. Progression or nonprogression were determined at 2 years (tier 1) and 4 years (tier 2). Methylation was assayed in 145 nonprogressors and 50 progressors using real-time quantitative methylation-specific PCR. Progressors were significantly older than nonprogressors (70.6 versus 62.5 years; P < 0.001). We evaluated a linear combination of the eight markers, using coefficients from a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Areas under the ROC curve (AUC) were high in the 2-year, 4-year, and combined data models (0.843, 0.829, and 0.840; P < 0.001, <0.001, and <0.001, respectively). In addition, even after rigorous overfitting correction, the incremental AUCs contributed by panels based on the 8 markers plus age versus age alone were substantial (Δ-AUC = 0.152, 0.114, and 0.118, respectively) in all 3 models. A methylation biomarker–based panel to predict neoplastic progression in BE has potential clinical value in improving both the efficiency of surveillance endoscopy and the early detection of neoplasia. [Cancer Res 2009;69(10):4112–5]

OBJECTIVESTo develop and validate a questionnaire for supraesophageal manifestations of reflux (SER) that will facilitate its study in clinical and research settings.STUDY DESIGNThe Supraesophageal Reflux Questionnaire (SERQ) and previously validated Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) were subjected to multiple types of validity testing, including content validity, concurrent validity, reproducibility, and predictive validity.RESULTSThe concurrent validity and reproducibility of both instruments was good to excellent for most items tested. The predictive validity of the SERQ was superior to the RSI when it included the covariates of history of sinusitis, use of over‐the‐counter antacid medications, age, gender, and body mass index.CONCLUSIONSThe SERQ will serve as both a useful clinical and research tool by offering not only SER symptom information, like the RSI, but also information about the patient's medical history and medication usage that will facilitate use of the SERQ in research protocols.EBM rating: B‐2b