Iyer, Revathy B.

5595 Background: Endometrial cancer is the most common cancer of the female genital tract. It affected 41,200 women in the year 2006 and caused 7,350 deaths. Therapy options for recurrent/advanced endometrial cancer are limited. Treatment with radiation and chemotherapy has shown only limited success. Methods: In a phase II IRB approved trial, Mifepristone was given to patients with progesterone receptor positive advanced or recurrent endometrioid adenocarcinoma or low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma at a dose of 200mg/day orally. Patients were evaluated every 4 weeks to assess treatment-related toxicities and response. Imaging was obtained initially at 8 weeks then every 12 weeks for evaluation of response. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3.0 was used to assess toxicity. Results: Twelve of 13 enrolled patients were evaluable for response in the first phase of accrual. Stable disease was noted in 3/12 (16, 20, and 44+ weeks). Two were endometrioid endometrial cancer and one with LGESS. No complete responses were seen, one patient remains in treatment. The most frequently reported grade 1–2 tumor related toxicities were anorexia, mood alterations, and fatigue (55%). Twenty-seven percent had asymptomatic elevations of ACTH. The most common Grade 3 toxicities were fatigue and dyspnea (27% and 18%). Only one patient experienced a Grade 4 dyspnea. No serious treatment-related adverse events occurred. Conclusions: Single agent mifepristone in patients with recurrent endometrioid adenocarcinoma or low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma showed no complete responses. Stable disease was reported 25%, one patient remains stable at 44 weeks. Recent reports suggests that mifepristone may also work via non hormonal targets while single agent mifepristone has minimal activity in this setting. Further evaluation in combination therapy in endometrial cancer should be considered. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Purpose To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) with each other and to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) clinical staging in the pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer, using surgicopathologic findings as the reference standard. Patients and Methods This prospective multicenter clinical study was conducted by the American College of Radiology Imaging Network and the Gynecologic Oncology Group from March 2000 to November 2002; 25 United States health centers enrolled 208 consecutive patients with biopsy-confirmed cervical cancer of FIGO stage ≥ IB who were scheduled for surgery based on clinical assessment. Patients underwent FIGO clinical staging, helical CT, and MRI. Surgicopathologic findings constituted the reference standard for statistical analysis. Results Complete data were available for 172 patients; surgicopathologic findings were consistent with FIGO stages IA to IIA in 76% and stage ≥ IIB in 21%. For the detection of advanced stage (≥ IIB), sensitivity was poor for FIGO clinical staging (29%), CT (42%), and MRI (53%); specificity was 99% for FIGO clinical staging, 82% for CT, and 74% for MRI; and negative predictive value was 84% for FIGO clinical staging, 84% for CT, and 85% for MRI. MRI (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.88) was significantly better than CT (AUC, 0.73) for detecting cervical tumors (P = .014). For 85% of patients, FIGO clinical staging forms were submitted after MRI and/or CT was performed. Conclusion CT and MRI performed similarly; both had lower staging accuracy than in prior single-institution studies. Accuracy of FIGO clinical staging was higher than previously reported. The temporal data suggest that FIGO clinical staging was influenced by CT and MRI findings.