Heidenreich, Axel

Purpose of review Although radical cystectomy represents the gold standard treatment for patients with high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) whose disease does not respond to bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), many patients are unable or unwilling to undergo surgery. The need remains for effective bladder-preserving therapies. This review aims to describe existing treatments, contemporary research in this field and ongoing trials of salvage therapies for patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. Recent findings Intravesical chemotherapy has been utilized frequently in this setting. Emerging data on combination regimens such as intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel and intravesical cabazitaxel, gemcitabine and cisplatin are promising; nevertheless, larger, prospective trials are needed. Meanwhile, the intravenous checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab was recently FDA-approved for patients BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. Encouraging clinical trial results for intravesical nadofaragene firadenovec, oportuzumab monatox and ALT-803 + BCG have been released, while data from trials of other treatment strategies, including novel chemotherapy and drug delivery, augmented BCG immunotherapy, adenoviral and gene therapy, targeted therapy, and combination systemic immunotherapy with intravesical agents, are eagerly awaited. Summary Several novel salvage therapies offer promise for patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. Patient selection, efficacy, safety, cost and ease of administration must be carefully considered to determine the optimal treatment approach.

PURPOSE BRCA1 or BRCA2 ( BRCA) alterations are common in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and may confer sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. We present results from patients with mCRPC associated with a BRCA alteration treated with rucaparib 600 mg twice daily in the phase II TRITON2 study. METHODS We enrolled patients who progressed after one to two lines of next-generation androgen receptor–directed therapy and one taxane-based chemotherapy for mCRPC. Efficacy and safety populations included patients with a deleterious BRCA alteration who received ≥ 1 dose of rucaparib. Key efficacy end points were objective response rate (ORR; per RECIST/Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 in patients with measurable disease as assessed by blinded, independent radiology review and by investigators) and locally assessed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (≥ 50% decrease from baseline) rate. RESULTS Efficacy and safety populations included 115 patients with a BRCA alteration with or without measurable disease. Confirmed ORRs per independent radiology review and investigator assessment were 43.5% (95% CI, 31.0% to 56.7%; 27 of 62 patients) and 50.8% (95% CI, 38.1% to 63.4%; 33 of 65 patients), respectively. The confirmed PSA response rate was 54.8% (95% CI, 45.2% to 64.1%; 63 of 115 patients). ORRs were similar for patients with a germline or somatic BRCA alteration and for patients with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 alteration, while a higher PSA response rate was observed in patients with a BRCA2 alteration. The most frequent grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse event was anemia (25.2%; 29 of 115 patients). CONCLUSION Rucaparib has antitumor activity in patients with mCRPC and a deleterious BRCA alteration, but with a manageable safety profile consistent with that reported in other solid tumor types.

Objectives To develop and externally validate a risk calculator for prediction of any cancer recurrence in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) and inguinal lymph node metastases (ILNM), as to date no validated prognostic tool is available for patients with pSCC and ILNM. Patients and Methods The development cohort included 234 patients from seven referral centres. The external validation cohort included 273 patients from two additional referral centres. Cox regression identified predictors of any recurrence, which were used to develop a risk calculator. The risk‐calculator grouped the development and the validation cohorts according to the individual risk of any recurrence at 24 months (24m‐R). Adjuvant treatment effects were tested on overall survival (OS) according to the derived tertiles, within the development and validation cohorts. Results Positive surgical margins, pN 3 , and ILNM ratio were associated with higher recurrence rate. The 2‐year OS rates were lower for patients with high (>37%) and intermediate (19–37%) compared to low (<19%) 24m‐R risk of recurrence, for both the development (43% and 58% vs 83%, P < 0.001) and validation cohort (44% and 50% vs 85%, P < 0.001). Results were confirmed in the subgroup of patients who did not receive adjuvant treatment ( P < 0.001), but not in patients who did receive adjuvant treatments in both the development and validation cohorts ( P > 0.1). Conclusion Adjuvant treatment planning is crucial in patients with pSCC with ILNM, where only weak evidence is available. The current tool proved to successfully stratify patients according to their individual risk, potentially allowing better tailoring of adjuvant treatments.

241 Background: Androgen deprivation represents the standard treatment for PCA with osseous metastases. We explored the role of cRP in the largest cohort of contemporary patients with mPCA treated in 4 tertiary referral centres. Methods: A total of 114 patients with mPCA, lymph node, osseous or visceral metastases underwent cRP. Surgery related complications (Clavien-Dindo classification) and functional outcome were analysed. Oncologic outcome parameters such as cancer specific & overall survival as well as biochemical and clinical-free survival were evaluated using descriptive statistical analysis. Results: Mean patient age was 61 (42-69) years. Mean and median follow-up was 39.7 months (7-75) and 47 months (28-96), resp. 93 (81.6%) and 21 (18.4%) patients had low volume and high volume mets, resp.,. 80(70.2%) pts underwent neoadjuvant ADT with LHRH analogues. Surgical approach was open retropubic RP in 104 (92%) pts and 2 (1.8%), 10 (8.8%) and 101 (89.4%) pts underwent no, limited or extended pelvic LAD, resp. Adjuvant therapy was delivered in 99 (86.8%) pts. Pathohistology revealed significant vital PCA in 100% of cases: n = 16 (14.0%) exhibited pT4a, n = 21 (18.4%) had pT2 and the remainder had pT3a/b PCA. Positive lymph nodes or positive surgical margins were identified in 61.6% and 36.8%, resp.. 110 (96.5%) are alive and 66.7% are relapse-free. 74 (64.9%) pts did not experience any surgery related complications; 15 (13.1%) pts experienced Clavien Dindo grade IIIb/IV complications and underwent reintervention. Low versus high volume (32.2% vs 50%, p = 0.03), PSA at cRP < 1ng/ml vs PSA > 4 ng/ml, (18.9% vs 45.6%, p = 0.02) were associated with relapse. Low vs high volume disease (7.1% vs 32.1%), PSA < 4ng/ml vs PSA > 4 ng/ml (6.1% vs 47.8%) and neoadjuvant vs no neoadjuvant therapy (8.75% vs 24.2%) were associated with Clavien-Dindo IIIB complications (p < 0.05). Conclusions: cRP is feasible in men with mPCA independent on the extent of disease with a low rate of significant complications and good functional outcome. About two thirds of the patients remain relapse-free after a median follow-up of close to 4 years. cRP might be an individualized treatment option in the multimodality management of mPCA.