Bielinski, Suzette J.

Introduction: Coronary disease is the most common cause of heart failure (HF). HF is classified as ischemic (IHF) or non-ischemic (NIHF) based on this etiology. IHF and NIHF have distinct mechanisms not accounted for by ejection fraction (EF) and an improved understanding of the differences could drive the discovery of novel therapeutic targets. We therefore sought to identify proteomic signatures between IHF and NIHF. Methods: Proteomic profiling using the SomaScan®1.7K was performed using plasma samples from HF patients in a community cohort (Rochester Epidemiology Project, 2003-2012). IHF was defined by prior myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft, or obstructive disease in at least 1 vessel on coronary angiography. We compared the protein expression levels between IHF and NIHF using t-test and applied the Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery rate (FDR) procedure for multiple comparisons. We explored pathway analysis for functional annotations using the biological process component of the Gene Ontology Resource (Panther 17v). Results: Among 1,388 patients, there were 518 IHF patients (age: 75±12years, 39.4% female, NYHA Class III/IV: 72.5%, EF:45±15%), and 870 NIHF patients (age: 75±14years, 53.6% female, NYHA Class III/IV: 66.9%, EF:49±17%). Among 7335 plasma proteins quantified, 63 unique proteins (FDR < 0.05) were differentially expressed between IHF and NIHF. Thirty-seven proteins including Troponin-I and T, and Myoglobin showed increased expression in IHF compared to NIHF and 26 including IGFBP-3 showed decreased expression. Pathophysiologic pathways including angiogenesis, coagulation, and lipid metabolism were represented in IHF, while inflammation and remodeling signaling pathways were dominant in relation to NIHF. Conclusions: High-throughput proteomic techniques are able to delineate IHF versus NIHF patients based on distinct biomarkers and pathophysiologic processes.

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) is a complex syndrome with high mortality often associated with impaired kidney function. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is central to kidney function assessment in HF. However, novel proteins related to kidney function (lipocalin 2 [LCN2], macrophage inhibitory cytokine 1 [MIC1], T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 1 [TIM1]) may improve risk stratification of HF patients, beyond eGFR. Their prognostic contribution remain to be fully explored. Hypothesis: Proteomic assessment of kidney function biomarkers improves risk stratification in HF. Methods: Clinical data and biospecimens were collected from a HF community cohort in Southeastern Minnesota from 2003-2012. Serum creatinine was measured in 1,388 patients and eGFR was calculated with the 2021 Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Epidemiology Collaboration equation. CKD was defined as an eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m 2 . Plasma proteins were measured using the SomaLogic aptamer-based technology SomaScan®. In HF patients with and without CKD, Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the association between kidney function biomarkers and mortality, after adjustment for Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic HF (MAGGIC) risk score. Results: At HF index, patients were on average 75±13 years of age and 48% female. Patients had a median eGFR of 57 mL/min/1.73m 2 and 64% had CKD. Adjusted geometric mean levels of LCN2, MIC1, and TIM1 levels were 20-30% higher in patients with CKD. Patients with CKD were at higher risk of dying (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.4-1.8). Patients with above median levels of LCN2, TIM1, MIC1 were at higher risk of dying, irrespective of CKD (See Figure). Conclusions: In a HF community cohort, several novel kidney function biomarkers provided further risk stratification in patients with and without CKD.

Objective Ceramides have been associated with several ageing-related conditions but have not been studied as a general biomarker of multimorbidity (MM). Therefore, we determined whether ceramide levels are associated with the rapid development of MM. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Mayo Clinic Biobank. Participants 1809 persons in the Mayo Clinic Biobank ≥65 years without MM at the time of enrolment, and with ceramide levels assayed from stored plasma. Primary outcome measure Persons were followed for a median of 5.7 years through their medical records to identify new diagnoses of 20 chronic conditions. The number of new conditions was divided by the person-years of follow-up to calculate the rate of accumulation of new chronic conditions. Results Higher levels of C18:0 and C20:0 were associated with a more rapid rate of accumulation of chronic conditions (C18:0 z score RR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.53; C20:0 z score RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.49). Higher C18:0 and C20:0 levels were also associated with an increased risk of hypertension and coronary artery disease. Conclusions C18:0 and C20:0 were associated with an increased risk of cardiometabolic conditions. When combined with biomarkers specific to other diseases of ageing, these ceramides may be a useful component of a biomarker panel for predicting accelerated ageing.

Introduction: Over 6 million people in the U.S. have heart failure (HF), less than half are expected to survive beyond 5 years. The need to better stratify mortality risk in HF is recognized. Frailty is associated with mortality in HF but not routinely measured clinically. As frailty is linked to inflammation and malnutrition, we hypothesized that the Metabolic Vulnerability Index (MVX) a multimarker score of systemic inflammation (small HDL particles, GlycA) and malnutrition (leucine, valine, isoleucine, citrate), could serve as a biomarker of frailty to predict mortality risk. Methods: Clinical data and plasma were collected from 1,389 patients from a HF community cohort between 2003-2012. We measured frailty using the Rockwood Index as the proportion of deficits present out of 32 physical limitations and comorbidities. MVX was calculated from the nuclear magnetic resonance LipoProfile® test. Patients were categorized by frailty (0-0.15; 0.16-0.27; 0.28-0.78) and MVX (33.4-50, 50-60, 60-70, 70-85.8) cutpoints. Cox models estimated the association of frailty and MVX assignment with mortality, adjusted for Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic HF (MAGGIC) score, a validated clinical risk score for HF mortality. Results: Frailty and MVX scores were available in 985 patients (median age 77, IQR: 67-84; 48% women). Higher frailty was associated with higher MVX (p-trend < 0.001). The highest frailty and MVX groups experienced large increases in risk of death, after adjustment for MAGGIC score (HR=3.3, 95% CI=2.6-4.2) and (HR=2.7, 95% CI=2.1-3.5), respectively. When adjusted for one another and MAGGIC score, MVX and frailty associations with death were only minimally attenuated: frailty (HR=3.2, 95% CI=2.5-4.0) and MVX (HR=2.4, 95% CI=1.9-3.2) (Figure 1). Conclusion: In this community cohort of patients with HF, frailty and MVX are positively associated with one another. However, both indicators are independently associated with an increased risk of death and can contribute to risk stratification.

Introduction: Heart Failure (HF) is a syndrome of high comorbidity and mortality. The impact of comorbidities on life expectancy in HF is well studied, but guideline-recommended disease-centric risk scores such as the Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) score may not fully account for the effect of comorbidities. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (Charlson) is a validated measure that quantifies the prognostic impact of comorbidities. Objective: To examine the incremental value of Charlson over MAGGIC in predicting death in HF. Methods: In a population-based HF cohort, we computed MAGGIC and Charlson scores using electronically linked medical records. Patients were divided based on ejection fraction (EF) into reduced [EF <50%, HFrEF] or preserved [EF ≥50%, HFpEF]. Cox regression was performed to assess the association between the risk scores and mortality. The incremental value of Charlson over MAGGIC was tested by calculating the area under the ROC [receiver operating characteristic] curves (AUCs) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: We studied 1,388 patients with HF validated using the Framingham criteria (mean age, 75±13 years, 48% female, mean EF, 49±17%). The median Charlson was 7.0 (interquartile range 5.0-9.0) and was higher in HFpEF than HFrEF (7.0 [5.0-9.0] vs. 6.0 [4.0-8.3] respectively. Over a median follow-up of 13.9 years (13.3-14.2), mortality was 17.4% (95% CI, 15.4 -19.3%) and 36.8% (95% CI, 34.2-39.3%) at 1, and 3 years respectively. In regression analysis, increasing MAGGIC and Charlson were independently associated with death (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.08-1.11 and HR,1.22, 95% CI 1.20-1.24, both p <0.001) irrespective of EF. Discrimination ability was improved by adding Charlson over MAGGIC (Table), reaching statistical significance at 3 years. Conclusion: In this HF cohort, the Charlson index provided an added value over MAGGIC in predicting the risk of death at 3 years. These findings emphasize the importance of accounting for comorbidities in mid-term risk stratification in HF.

Background: Heart failure (HF) is associated with metabolic alterations, including ketogenesis. However, determinants of ketogenesis and risk of mortality in HF is not defined. Total ketone bodies (KB) include β-hydroxybutyrate, acetoacetate, and acetone and can be measured in plasma by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between KB and clinical characteristics in a community HF cohort and to assess the association between KB and all-cause mortality. Methods: A population-based cohort of 1,389 HF patients was prospectively enrolled between 2003 and 2012. Plasma KB was measured by LP4 NMR LipoProfile ® assay/test on the Vantera® NMR analyzer platform. A conditional inference tree method (ctree R Package) was used to determine optimal KB group cut points. Associations between clinical characteristics and KB were measured with Wilcoxon rank sum test and Pearson’s Chi-squared test. Kaplan-Meier method estimated survival. Cox regression analyses were used to estimate associations between KB concentrations and mortality. Results: Among the 1,382 HF patients with KB measurements, the median age was 78 years (IQR 68-84) and 52% were men. Median KB was 180 μM (IQR 134-308). Patients were divided into two groups with lower KB (≤471.5 μM) and higher KB (>471.5 μM). Patients with higher KB (N=210) had lower BMI, higher BNP, and were more likely to be in the New York Heart Association class III-IV; however, these patients were less likely to have hyperlipidemia, coronary disease, or diabetes mellitus (P < 0.05). Age, sex, creatinine, ejection fraction, or Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic HF (MAGGIC) score did not differ by KB group. Higher KB was associated with worse survival (figure). After adjustment for the MAGGIC score, higher KB was associated with increased risk of mortality (HR 1.3; 95% CI, 1.08-1.48). Conclusions: In this community HF cohort, higher KB was associated with increased mortality, independent of the MAGGIC score.

Introduction: Over six million U.S. adults have heart failure (HF). Evaluation of kidney function is critical to the care of patients with HF but may not be fully captured by traditional measures, such as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic HF (MAGGIC) risk score. Identifying patients at highest risk of progressive chronic renal insufficiency (PCRI) may improve risk stratification in HF, beyond these traditional measures. High-throughput proteomics has allowed for the development of PCRI risk scores based on novel kidney function biomarkers. However, the prognostic value of a proteomic-based PCRI risk score in HF has not been explored. Hypothesis: Proteomic-based PCRI risk scores will improve risk stratification in HF. Methods: Clinical data and plasma were collected from 1,389 patients in a HF community cohort from Southeastern Minnesota (2003-2012). Results from the aptamer-based technology SomaScan® were used to derive PCRI risk scores using the SomaSignal™ Kidney Prognosis test, a protein-based algorithm developed to predict risk of PCRI within four years. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the association between quintiles of PCRI and mortality, after adjustment for the MAGGIC score. Results: PCRI risk scores were available for 1,349 patients who were on average 75±13 years of age, 48% female, and had a median eGFR of 57 mL/min/1.73m 2 . There was a positive association with mortality across PCRI risk quintiles, after adjustment for the MAGGIC score. (Figure). Overall, the highest quintile was associated over a two-fold higher risk of mortality compared with the lowest quintile (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.8,2.8). The higher risk of mortality remained in analyses stratified by patients with (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1,2.1) and without (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.4,3.5) an eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Conclusions: In this community HF cohort, proteomic-based PCRI risk scores improve risk stratification, independent of traditional measures of kidney function.

Background Larger within‐patient variability of lipid levels has been associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD); however, measures of lipid variability require ≥3 measurements and are not currently used clinically. We investigated the feasibility of calculating lipid variability within a large electronic health record–based population cohort and assessed associations with incident CVD. Methods and Results We identified all individuals ≥40 years of age who resided in Olmsted County, MN, on January 1, 2006 (index date), without prior CVD, defined as myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, percutaneous coronary intervention, or CVD death. Patients with ≥3 measurements of total cholesterol, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, or triglycerides during the 5 years before the index date were retained. Lipid variability was calculated using variability independent of the mean. Patients were followed through December 31, 2020 for incident CVD. We identified 19 652 individuals (mean age 61 years; 55% female), who were CVD‐free and had variability independent of the mean calculated for at least 1 lipid type. After adjustment, those with highest total cholesterol variability had a 20% increased risk of CVD (Q5 versus Q1 hazard ratio, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.06–1.37]). Results were similar for low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol and high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol. Conclusions In a large electronic health record–based population cohort, high variability in total cholesterol, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol was associated with an increased risk of CVD, independent of traditional risk factors, suggesting it may be a possible risk marker and target for intervention. Lipid variability can be calculated in the electronic health record environment, but more research is needed to determine its clinical utility.

Abstract Context Metformin is the first-line drug for treating diabetes but has a high failure rate. Objective To identify demographic and clinical factors available in the electronic health record (EHR) that predict metformin failure. Methods A cohort of patients with at least 1 abnormal diabetes screening test that initiated metformin was identified at 3 sites (Arizona, Mississippi, and Minnesota). We identified 22 047 metformin initiators (48% female, mean age of 57 ± 14 years) including 2141 African Americans, 440 Asians, 962 Other/Multiracial, 1539 Hispanics, and 16 764 non-Hispanic White people. We defined metformin failure as either the lack of a target glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (&lt;7%) within 18 months of index or the start of dual therapy. We used tree-based extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models to assess overall risk prediction performance and relative contribution of individual factors when using EHR data for risk of metformin failure. Results In this large diverse population, we observed a high rate of metformin failure (43%). The XGBoost model that included baseline HbA1c, age, sex, and race/ethnicity corresponded to high discrimination performance (C-index of 0.731; 95% CI 0.722, 0.740) for risk of metformin failure. Baseline HbA1c corresponded to the largest feature performance with higher levels associated with metformin failure. The addition of other clinical factors improved model performance (0.745; 95% CI 0.737, 0.754, P &lt; .0001). Conclusion Baseline HbA1c was the strongest predictor of metformin failure and additional factors substantially improved performance suggesting that routinely available clinical data could be used to identify patients at high risk of metformin failure who might benefit from closer monitoring and earlier treatment intensification.