Mallikethi‐Reddy, Sagar

AbstractBackgroundEvidence suggests that medical service offerings vary by hospital teaching status. However, little is known about how these translate to patient outcomes. We therefore sought to evaluate this gap in knowledge in patients undergoing Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in the United States.MethodsThis study was conducted using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) in the United States from 2011 to 2014. Teaching status was classified, as teaching vs. nonteaching and endpoints were clinical outcomes, length of stay and cost. Procedure‐related complications were identified via ICD‐9 coding and analysis was performed via mixed effect model.ResultsAn estimated 33,790 TAVR procedures were performed in the U.S between 2011 and 2014, out of which 89.3% were in teaching hospitals. Mean (SD) age was 81.4 (8.5) and 47% were females. There was no significant difference between teaching versus nonteaching hospitals in regards to the primary outcome of in‐hospital mortality and secondary outcomes of several cardiovascular and other end points except for a high rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) (OR: 1.34 [95% CI, 1.04–1.72]) and lower rate for use of mechanical circulatory support devices in teaching vs. nonteaching centers. The mean length of stay was significantly higher in teaching hospitals (7.7 days) vs. nonteaching hospitals (6.8 days) (P = 0.002) and so was the median cost of hospitalization (USD 50,814 vs. USD 48, 787, P = 0.02) for teaching vs. nonteaching centers.ConclusionMost TAVR related short‐term outcomes including all cause in‐hospital mortality are about the same in teaching and nonteaching hospitals. However, AKI, length of hospital stay and TAVR related cost were significantly higher in teaching than nonteaching hospitals. There was more use of mechanical circulatory support in nonteaching than teaching hospitals.

BACKGROUNDThere is a concerted push for adopting a minimalist strategy with emphasis on early hospital discharge for patients undergoing Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, studies on discharge patterns and predictors of early discharge (≤3 days post‐TAVI) are sparse, in the United States.METHODSWe analyzed using Healthcare Utilization Project, Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, 2011‐2012. A total of 7321 TAVI procedures were identified. We compared in‐hospital outcomes between early and late discharge cohorts, and determined the predictors of early discharge. Correlation of costs and post‐TAVI length of stay was also performed.RESULTSEarly discharge rate post‐TAVI was about 21% in the United States, in 2011‐2012. Overall mean age was 81 years. In‐hospital adverse outcomes post‐TAVI were higher in late discharge cohort (P < 0.001). Mean length of stay post‐TAVI (7.7 days vs 2.6 days) and costs ($208 752 vs $157 663) were significantly higher in late discharge than early discharge cohort. Females, bleeding, blood transfusions, stroke, permanent pacemakers, mechanical circulatory support, acute kidney injury were associated with significantly lower adjusted odds for early discharge. Transfemoral TAVI approach, prior aortic valvuloplasty, and procedure year 2012 were associated with significantly higher odds for early discharge. We observed positive correlation between costs of hospitalization and post‐TAVI length of stay (R = 0.58; P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONSFemales, bleeding, blood transfusions, stroke, permanent pacemakers, mechanical circulatory support devices, renal failure were associated with lower odds for early discharge. Transfemoral approach and prior aortic valvuloplasty increased the likelihood for early discharge. Post‐TAVI length of stay was associated with significantly higher hospitalization costs.