Barton, Debra L.

526 Background: Antidepressants do not adequately alleviate all HFs. Based on placebo-controlled data demonstrating that GABA is an alternative therapy for HFs, this trial was initiated to test whether the combination of an antidepressant and GABA was better than GABA alone in PTS with inadequate HF control on an antidepressant alone. Methods: Eligible PTS on antidepressants with bothersome HFs were randomized to two groups. PTS kept a daily HF diary during a baseline wk (while continuing their antidepressant). Following the baseline wk, all PTS were given GABA 300 mg at hs for 3 days, then BID for 3 days, and then TID for 22 days. One group continued their antidepressant while the other group was weaned off it over several days. PTS continued a daily HF diary during this 4-wk period. Efficacy was measured using the mean daily HF number and score; the latter measured by assigning points (1–4, for mild to very severe) to each HF and then adding the points for a given time. The study design provided 80% power to detect a difference in the changes from baseline at 4 wks between the two groups of 1.2 HFs/day, or 3 points/day in HF scores. Results: 115 PTS were randomized and given GABA. PTS continuing their antidepressant reported a 48% mean reduction in HF score after 4 wks, vs 49% for PTS stopping it (p=0.97). Mean HF numbers were reduced 50% and 47%, respectively (p=0.54). 16 other symptoms and quality of life items were measured by PT-completed weekly questionnaires, with the only suggestive changes from baseline between the two arms being more mood troubles after 2 wks of treatment (p=0.06) and more nervousness after 4 wks of treatment (p=0.01) in PTS stopping their antidepressant. Also, a mild temporary increase in dizziness after 1 wk of treatment was observed in the same group (p=0.08) suggestive of an antidepressant withdrawal reaction. Conclusion: This trial failed to provide any evidence that the combination of GABA and an antidepressant decreased HFs any more than did GABA alone in PTS who had inadequate HF control with an antidepressant alone. The 50% reduction in HFs in both arms is commensurate with the efficacy of GABA delineated in other published reports. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

9116 Background: Hot flashes affect 75 % to 90 % of women transitioning to menopause and are a major cause of morbidity among breast cancer survivors. Levetiracetam, a popular anticonvulsant, is a centrally active agent that anecdotally appeared to reduce hot flashes in clinical practice. This phase II trial sought to evaluate the efficacy of levetiracetam in reducing hot flashes among women with a history of breast cancer or women who did not wish to take estrogen therapy for fear of an increased risk of breast cancer. Methods: Women who were experiencing bothersome hot flashes (≥ 14 times per week, for ≥ 1 month) were eligible. A single arm pilot study design based on previous work was used with a planned sample size of 30 patients. The patients did not receive any study medication during the first week (baseline week). At the beginning of the second week, patients were started on levetiracetam (500 mg), and were to increase the dose by 500 mg each week to a goal of 1,000 mg twice daily. Hot flash diaries were completed daily. The primary endpoint was hot flash score (frequency times average severity). The change from week 1 (baseline) to week 5, the last treatment week, was analyzed by paired t-test and related Wilcoxon procedures. Results: A total of 30 women were enrolled onto this study in eight months. All patients were eligible. 19 women completed all 4 weeks of the study treatment and provided complete data. After treatment with levetiracetam for 4 weeks, mean hot flash scores were reduced by 57% (95% CI 39%-75%), while mean hot flash frequencies were reduced by 53% (95% CI 38%-68%), reductions being greater than what would be expected with a placebo. There were significant improvements, compared to baseline week data, in sweating, hot flash distress, and satisfaction with hot flash control. Eight subjects stopped the study drug due to treatment related adverse events (grade I/II), with the most frequently reported being somnolence, fatigue and dizziness. Conclusions: While levetiracetam appears to be a promising therapy for the treatment of hot flashes, further study is needed to better substantiate the toxicity and efficacy of this drug before it can be more definitively recommended for use in clinical practice. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

9005 Background: Hot flashes can be a major problem in men with prostate cancer; effective non-hormonal options are needed. Methods: A four-arm, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial was developed to evaluate gabapentin for hot flashes. Men with bothersome hot flashes (at least 14/week) related to androgen deprivation therapy were randomized to receive either a placebo or gabapentin doses of 300 mg qd, 300 mg bid or 300 mg tid; men were treated for 4 weeks. Hot flashes numbers and scores (hot flash number times mean severity) were measured using a validated daily hot flashes diary. A one-week baseline period preceded initiation of study tablets. The primary endpoint was the average intrapatient difference in hot flash score between baseline and treatment termination. With the planned sample size of 50 evaluable patients per arm, the study provided 80% power to detect a difference in change from baseline at 4 weeks between each gabapentin arm and the placebo arm of 1.3 hot flashes per day or 3.3 points in hot flash score. Results: 223 patients were randomized between 12/21/2001 and 11/10/2006. The study arms were well balanced. The following table illustrates the percentage of baseline hot flash scores and frequencies during the fourth treatment week, compared to the baseline week for 179 eligible patients, utilizing the data available at time of this abstract preparation. Patients receiving 900 mg/d dose of gabapentin also reported significantly less hot flash distress and more hot flash control satisfaction than did the placebo group. The gabapentin was remarkably well tolerated, without any statistically significantly worse patient-reported side effects on the gabapentin arms. Conclusion: Gabapentin at the 900 mg/d dose can reduce hot flashes, in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose. [Table: see text]

9001 Background: Fatigue is one of the most common symptoms in people diagnosed with cancer. Ginseng is a popular herb for treatment of this. It has been termed an “adaptogen”, felt to be able to restore balance to the body; its potential anti-fatigue efficacy is supported by animal data. The purpose of this pilot trial was to evaluate three doses of American Ginseng versus placebo for cancer-related fatigue. Methods: Patients with a life expectancy = 6 months and a history of cancer-related fatigue who had been experiencing fatigue = 1 month were eligible. Exclusion criteria included prior use of ginseng, chronic systemic steroids and brain malignancies. Other etiologies for fatigue, such as pain, were also excluded. Participants were randomized to receive, in a double blind manner, placebo, 750 mg/d, 1,000 mg/d or 2,000 mg/d of American Ginseng in BID dosing for 8 weeks. Endpoints included The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), the Vitality Subscale of the SF-36 and several numeric analogue questions of perceived benefit; endpoints were measured at baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks. Area under the curve (AUC) and change from baseline were calculated. Results: Two hundred eighty two patients (69–72 per arm) were enrolled from 10/21/2005 to 07/05/2006. Available 8-week data are provided in the table below; higher numbers are better. There were no statistically significant differences in any grade of toxicity between active and placebo arms, and an equivalent number of patients discontinued the study due to adverse events in each arm. Conclusion: This randomized pilot trial provided data to suggest that American Ginseng doses of 1000–2000 mg/d may be effective for alleviating cancer related fatigue. Therefore, further study of American Ginseng in cancer survivors appears warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose. [Table: see text]

Abstract Although recent scientific advances have improved our understanding of basic biological mechanisms underlying chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), few interventions are available to prevent or treat CIPN. Although some biological targets from preclinical studies show promise in nonhuman animal models, few targets have been translated to successful clinical trials. To address this problem, the National Cancer Institute’s Symptom Management and Health-Related Quality of Life Steering Committee convened a meeting of experts in the CIPN and oncology symptom management fields to participate in a Clinical Trials Planning Meeting (CTPM). Investigators presented data from preclinical and translational studies for possible CIPN interventions; these were evaluated for readiness of randomized clinical trial testing by experts, and recommendations were provided. Breakout sessions were convened to discuss and develop future studies. The CTPM experts concluded that there is compelling evidence to move forward with selected pharmacological and nonpharmacological clinical trials for the prevention and treatment of CIPN. Several key feasibility issues need to be addressed, however. These include identification of optimal outcome measures to define the CIPN phenotype, establishment of parameters that guide the evaluation of clinically meaningful effects, and adoption of approaches for inclusion of translational and biomarker and/or genetic measures. The results of the CTPM provide support for conducting clinical trials that include both pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches, alone or in combination, with biomarkers, genetics, or other measures designed to inform underlying CIPN mechanisms. Several working groups were formed to design rigorous CIPN clinical trials, the results of which are ongoing.

Early detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) is crucial for averting AF-related stroke and heart failure, but treatment is delayed when AF is not recognized. The critical need for early detection and treatment requires education to promote AF awareness. Knowledge deficits, attitudes, and beliefs about AF that should be addressed to improve awareness and reduce treatment-seeking delay in older adults at risk for developing AF have not been well documented. The purpose of this study was to describe knowledge, treatment-seeking attitudes, and beliefs about AF in adults ≥65 years old and identify demographic characteristics associated with knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs. Patients with no history of AF recruited from an academic medical center were interviewed using the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs about Atrial Fibrillation Survey. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and independent t tests. Participants ( N = 180) were 63% male with a mean age of 73.7 ± 6.0 years, and 52% held ≥ 4-year college degree. About one third could not identify common symptoms of AF including palpitations (31%), chest pain (36%), dyspnea (30%), and fatigue (35%). A majority (84%) lacked confidence to recognize AF, and 58% were not sure when they should seek care for AF symptoms. Nearly a third (32%) believed palpitations are always present with AF, and 74% believed that low energy would not be their only symptom of AF. Higher scores for AF Symptom Knowledge ( p = .02) were observed in females, and General Knowledge about AF was greater for younger participants ( p < .001). Participants lacked knowledge and confidence to aid decision-making for treatment-seeking for symptoms of AF and held inaccurate beliefs about AF that could hinder early treatment-seeking. Programs to promote AF awareness should explain the spectrum of symptoms that may be manifested by AF and include action plans for responding to symptoms.