Powell, Steven

3507 Background: Overexpression of GSK-3β, a serine/threonine kinase, is associated with advanced stage malignancies, aggressive tumor growth, and chemotherapy resistance. 9-ING-41 is a GSK-3β inhibitor with significant broad spectrum pre-clinical antitumor activity, including chemotherapy-resistant models. This first-in-human study (NCT03678883) is evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of 9-ING-41 monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy in patients (pts) with refractory malignancies. Methods: 9-ING-41 is given intravenously (IV) twice-weekly as a single-agent (21-day cycle) or combined with gemcitabine, gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, carboplatin, carboplatin/paclitaxel, doxorubicin, lomustine or irinotecan in patients previously treated with the same chemotherapy. Results: As of Jan 2020, 101 pts were enrolled. Tumor types: 25 pancreatic (PDAC), 14 colorectal (CRC), 10 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 8 GBM and other gliomas, 7 melanoma, 5 appendiceal, 4 breast (BC), 30 others. Seven single agent dose levels (DL) completed (1, 2, 3.3, 5, 7, 9.3, 12.4 mg/kg) without any 9-ING-41-attributable SAEs. 9-ING-41 attributable AEs include: transient visual change (color perception; n = 29), starting at DL 3 (3.3mg/kg), all G1/2; infusion reactions (n = 14), all G1/2, starting at DL 5 (7mg/kg). 9-ING-41’s mean terminal half-life is 12-20 hrs. Cmax and AUC0-72, are dose proportional with no accumulation. One BRAFV600K-mutated melanoma with > 20 brain metastases, post checkpoint/BRAF/MEK failure has an ongoing CR starting at cycle 2 and sustained after 9 months on treatment. 32 (31%) pts had SD as best response (6 PDAC, 6 CRC, 3 appendiceal, 2 BC, 2 salivary gland, 2 melanoma, 1 Merkel cell, 2 GBM/glioma, 1 RCC, 1 HCC, 1 NSCLC, 1 esophageal, 1 parotid gland, 1 nasopharyngeal, 1 peritoneal, 1 T cell-ALL). 8 pts remained on study treatment > 5 months (1 melanoma, 3 PDAC, 1 appendiceal, 1 GBM, 1 peritoneal, 1 salivary gland) with median treatment duration of 198 days (range 163-261). 32 pts continue to receive 9-ING-41. Conclusions: 9-ING-41 has dose-proportional PK, is well tolerated with significant antitumor activity as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy in pts with refractory tumors. 1 ongoing CR was observed in a refractory BRAF-mutated melanoma. A biologically active dose has been reached, although MTD has not been determined. Enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03678883 .

TPS3161 Background: VV1 is an oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus engineered to express human IFNβ to enhance cellular anti-tumor immune responses and tumor selectivity, and the human sodium iodide symporter (NIS) for virus tracking by SPECT imaging. Cancer cells are often hyporesponsive to IFNβ, enabling the efficient spread of VV1 and resulting in increased oncolysis. Differently from other oncolytic viruses, VV1 is suitable for both intra-tumoral (IT) and/or intra-venous (IV) administration. Despite considerable anti-tumor activity with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) among some malignancies, long term survival and overall cures remain elusive. Prior Ph 1 studies have shown significant anti-tumor activity among several malignancies when VV1 was administered either as monotherapy or in combination with a CPI, despite progression on prior CPI monotherapy. Furthermore, pre- and post-treatment biopsy evaluations after VV1 treatment have demonstrated T cell infiltration and inflammation in both IT injected and non-injected lesions. Among IV treated patients (pts), IFNβ was detectable in the serum correlating with viral replication, making it an effective biomarker. C is a high-affinity potent human IgG4 anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody. Though approved for use in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, C has shown anti-tumor activity, similar to other CPI, in several other indications. Therefore, VV1 and C could be an attractive combination for the immunotherapy for several solid tumors. This study represents the first clinical evaluation of VV1 in combination with C in pts with advanced solid tumors. Methods: The Ph 2 Simon 2 stage five-arm study of IV administration VV1 in combination with IV C will enroll pts with advanced NSCLC, HCC, melanoma & endometrial cancer. Enrolled pts with NSCLC & melanoma will be recent CPI-progressors, whereas enrolled HCC & endometrial cancer will be CPI-naïve. The study’s objectives include assessment of preliminary anti-tumor activity, safety, & immuno-regulatory activity of the combination. Pts will receive IV VV1 once on D1 and IV C once every 3 weeks until confirmed disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Pts enrolled in one melanoma cohort will also receive IT VV1 administered to palpable lesions. Response will be assessed every 9 weeks per RECIST v1.1. The null hypothesis of each cohort’s ORR will be tested versus a one-sided alternative yielding a Type I error rate of 5% and power of 80%. Cohorts will be expanded based on signal of activity. Clinical trial information: NCT .

3090 Background: VV1 (Voyager V1) is derived from VSV, an RNA virus with low human seroprevalence, engineered to replicate selectively in and kill human cancer cells. In Part 1 of this study, we demonstrated the safety of intratumoral VV1 and dose-response, using serum IFNβ as a biomarker; we observed viral replication in tumor and concomitant lymphocyte/neutrophil trafficking (SITC 2018). 2 other studies suggested greater efficacy and higher IFNβ levels with IV administration. Longer infusion durations were reported to mitigate infusion reactions (IRRs) for another oncolytic. Methods: We studied 3 different infusion durations of VV1 monotherapy at the recommended phase 2 IV dose (1.7 x 1010 TCID50) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Endpoints included safety, preliminary anti-tumor activity, viral titers, IFNβ PD and shedding. Patients received IV VV1 once on D1 and were monitored for DLT over 21 days with efficacy assessments every 6 weeks. IRRs were classified using Lee 2014 criteria for CRS as either constitutional symptoms only (G1) or involving hypotension (G2). Results: 18 patients were treated at 30, 60 and 180-minute durations (n = 7, 5 and 6, respectively). No DLTs, deaths or G3-4 related IRR AEs were observed. Most pts were female (67%), white (100%), with ECOG PS 0 (61%) and median 4 lines of prior systemic therapy (range 1-14) for colorectal (CRC; 56%), squamous cell carcinoma (11%), pheochromocytoma (11%), sarcoma (11%) or other (11%) cancers. The table shows results (number of patients) by infusion duration. Conclusions: There was no difference in safety between the 3 infusion durations, while efficacy and PD markers suggested better anti-tumor effect with 30-minute infusion. VV1 is safe for caregivers, with no viral shedding. Part 3 of this study will now treat CRC patients with VV1 in combination with a checkpoint inhibitor (avelumab). A 5-arm phase 2 basket study in combination with cemiplimab is proceeding with 30-minute infusions. Clinical trial information: NCT02923466 . [Table: see text]

827 Background: 9-ING-41 is a selective GSK-3β inhibitor with significant pre-clinical antitumor activity in a broad spectrum of malignancies as a single agent and in combination with cytotoxic agents. GSK-3β is a serine/threonine kinase whose overexpression is associated with advanced stage, aggressive tumor growth, and chemotherapy resistance. We report the preliminary results of patients (pts) with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. Methods: Phase 1b/2 study evaluating safety and efficacy of 9-ING-41 as monotherapy and combination therapy in pts with refractory cancers. 9-ING-41 is administered intravenously twice-weekly as a single agent (21-day-cycle) or combined with chemotherapy agents, including gemcitabine (GEM), nab-paclitaxel + GEM, carboplatin, or paclitaxel. Study parts 1 and 2 evaluate the safety, describe dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), determine the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended phase 2 study dose (RP2D) for 9-ING-41 as monotherapy (Part 1) and as combination therapy (Part 2). Part 3 (Simon 2-Stage Phase 2) assess clinical benefit in pts treated with 9-ING-41-based combinations at the RP2D established in Part 2. Response is assessed by RECIST 1.1 criteria in the evaluable lesions. Results: To date, the study accrued 63 pts. Five dose levels (1, 2, 3.3, 5 and 7 mg/kg) have been completed without DLTs. Part 2 of the study evaluating 9-ING-41-based chemotherapy combinations is ongoing. Five out of nine pts with pancreas cancer (PCa) enrolled had stable disease (SD) as the best response; 2 out of 9 pts had a 40-45% decline of CA 19-9. One pt completed 6 cycles with 9-ING-41, two pts completed 4 cycles with 9-ING-41/GEM. Two active pts are receiving 9-ING-41/GEM with SD after 3 and 4 cycles. Three out of four pts with adenocarcinoma of the appendix enrolled had SD as the best response; two pts in active treatment are receiving cycles 5 and 6. One out of 13 pts with colorectal cancer had SD. 9-ING-41-attributable AE to date are reversible grade 1 transient visual changes (color perception). Conclusions: 9-ING-41 is well-tolerated with encouraging SD among heavily pretreated pts with carcinoma of the pancreas and appendix. Clinical trial information: NCT03678883.

Abstract Introduction. Voyager-V1 (VV1) is an oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus engineered to express human interferon beta (IFNβ) to enhance cellular antitumor immune responses and tumor selectivity. VV1 also contains the human sodium iodide symporter (NIS) as an imaging gene. We report here the novel use of virus-encoded IFNβ as a PD marker using correlative data from three Phase I trials of VSV-IFNβ-NIS in patients with refractory cancers (n=46). Methods. 46 patients with solid tumors (n=34) and hematological malignancies (n=12) received 1 dose of VV1 either intratumorally (ITu) or intravenously (IV) at doses ranging from 3 x 106 to 5 x 1010 TCID50. Plasma IFNβ levels were collected pre-treatment, 4 hours post-infusion, Day 2 (24-hour), Day 3, 8, 15 and 29 (IT only). Samples were processed using a standard IFNβ specific ELISA kit. Results. ITu dose escalation is complete with 27 patients treated and no DLTs. IV escalation is ongoing at 5 x 1010 TCID50 with 19 patients treated to date. In the ITu study, plasma IFNβ levels at 24h were undetected at the lowest dose levels (up to 1 x 107 TCID50), and became detectable from 3 x 107 TCID50. In the IV patients, IFNβ was detectable at all dose levels (5 x 109 through 5 x 1010 TCID50) with the highest peak and longest duration in a patient with metastatic endometrial cancer coincident with shrinkage of multiple tumors. The IFNβ produced by virus-infected cells can be differentiated from the acute innate antiviral responses by magnitude of response and AUC as the majority of the inflammatory cytokines returned to baseline by 48h. Peak IFNβ levels were variable between patients, likely reflecting heterogeneity in tumor susceptibility to VV1, ranging from 1.4pg/mL to 656pg/mL across 6 patients (mean 153pg/ml) at the highest ITu dose. Plasma IFNβ 24 hours post-therapy of >20pg/mL appears to predict for RECIST 1.1-evaluated SD vs PD, p=0.048 in the ITu patients. Peak IFNβ ranged from 18 to 1700 pg/mL across 9 patients (mean=442pg/ml) at 1.7 x 1010 in the IV study. Peak IFNβ was highest in two cases of endometrial cancer (1500 and 1700 pg/ml). The patient with the highest IFNβ levels on the IV trial showed 16.7% tumor shrinkage at the first tumor evaluation. SPECT imaging, which shows location of viral replication, was positive in 50% of ITu injected tumors, also validating of VV1 infection of target cells. To date, SPECT images were negative in the IV trial despite IFNβ positivity, reflecting IFNβ as a more sensitive PD marker of viral infection. IHC staining of tumor biopsies collected pre-treatment and 1 month after VSV showed increased numbers of CD3, CD8, CD68, PDL1 or PD1 in some injected or noninjected tumors. Other immune markers and tumor gene signatures are also being evaluated. Conclusions. Plasma IFNβ has emerged as a simple and convenient biomarker of viral replication in tumors. IFNβ will be used in future studies as a PD marker to assess the impact of immune-modulating combination drugs with VV1. Citation Format: Timothy P. Cripe, Jamie Bakkum-Gamez, Jaime R. Merchan, Martha Q. Lacy, Manish R. Patel, Steven Powell, James Strauss, Lianwen Zhang, Toshie Sakuma, Memy Diaz, Nandakumar Packiriswamy, Deepak Upreti, Bethany Brunton, Dragan Jevremovic, Stephen J. Russell, Alice Bexon, Kah-Whye Peng. Rational design of an oncolytic virus permits use of interferon beta as a pharmacodynamic marker for clinical application [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT090.

Abstract Introduction Voyager-V1TM is derived from VSV, a bullet-shaped negative sense RNA virus with very low human seroprevalence; it is engineered to selectively replicate in and kill human cancer cells. Voyager-V1 encodes the human IFNβ gene to boost antitumoral immune responses and the thyroidal sodium iodide symporter NIS gene to permit noninvasive imaging of virus spread. FIH studies are underway via both IV and IT routes. Here we report safety and preliminary correlative data from the FIH IT study. Methods and objectives This is a classical 3+3 phase 1 design, using escalating single IT viral doses from 3 x 106 to 3 x 109 TCID50 into one target lesion. The primary objective is safety and tolerability, monitored by committee. Other objectives include PK by RT-PCR for viral genomes, serum IFNβ levels, Tc-99m SPECT/CT imaging to monitor virus infection in injected lesions, peripheral blood immunophenotyping with 11-color flow cytometry for activation markers on T cells, T-regs, NK cells, and MDSCs, and serial biopsies to assess the tumor microenvironment (TME). IHC was performed on tumor biopsies for CD3, CD8, CD4, FoxP3, CD68, PD-1 and PDL-1 pre and post treatment in non-injected and injected lesions. CD45 staining is ongoing. Results Dose level 3 is ongoing (n=8+). No DLTs have been observed to date. Most patients were male (75%), white (100%), with ECOG PS1 (75%) and a median of >6 lines of prior systemic therapy. AEs (in 63% patients) reported as related to study drug were mild-moderate, short-lived, and consisted of G1 fever, chills, hot flashes, nausea, vomiting, hyperhidrosis and G2 fatigue. Most patients had some mild AEs (pain, bruising, subclinical pneumothorax) related to biopsy and IT injection procedures and one had an SAE related to biopsy (G2 pneumothorax). There was no difference in incidence, intensity or duration of related AEs between dose levels so far. In patients analyzed to date, at the first three dose levels of 3 x 106, 1 x 107 and 3 x 107 TCID50 (n=7), viremia and serum IFNβ were below levels of detection after IT injection. There is evidence in all patients of an increase in PD-1 expression on CD4 and CD8 T cells, suggesting T cell activation post- single virus injection. One patient at dose level 2 had increased CD4 and CD8 T cells in the peripheral blood. TME analysis revealed increased infiltration of CD3 and CD8 cells in tumors of some patients. In addition, there are changes in numbers of FoxP3 and CD68 positive cells in the injected lesions compared to the pre-treatment and non-injected lesion. Two patients at dose level 3, one with an injected adrenal metastasis of colorectal cancer and another with a chest wall lesion from a head of pancreas primary, have positive SPECT/CTs on days 3-15 showing viral replication in tumor plus concomitant lymphocyte/neutrophil trafficking in the periphery. Conclusions IT injection of a single dose of the novel oncolytic virotherapy Voyager-V1 has proven safe at doses up to 3 x 107 TCID50. There was evidence of T cell activation with increased PD-1 expression in peripheral blood lymphocytes after a single IT injection. Tumor biopsies indicate increased lymphocyte infiltration. Two patients at the highest dose tested show signs of viral replication in the injected lesion plus evidence of systemic impact on leukocyte populations. Citation Format: Steven Powell, Manish R. Patel, Jaime R. Merchan, Timothy P. Cripe, James Strauss, Rosa M. Diaz, Nandakumar Packiriswamy, Bethany A. Brunton, Deepak Upreti, Rehan Khan, Lukkana Suksanpaisan, Rianna Vandergaast, Stephen J. Russell, Alice S. Bexon, Kah Whye Peng. Preliminary correlative and clinical data from a first-in-human (FIH) study of the intratumoral (IT) oncolytic virotherapy, Voyager-V1, in patients with solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT051.

Abstract Background Esthesioneuroblastoma (ENB), also known as olfactory neuroblastoma, is a rare malignant neoplasm of the olfactory mucosa. Despite surgical resection combined with radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy, ENB often relapses with rapid progression. Current multimodality, nontargeted therapy for relapsed ENB is of limited clinical benefit. Materials and Methods We queried whether comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of relapsed or refractory ENB can uncover genomic alterations (GA) that could identify potential targeted therapies for these patients. CGP was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections from 41 consecutive clinical cases of ENBs using a hybrid-capture, adaptor ligation based next-generation sequencing assay to a mean coverage depth of 593X. The results were analyzed for base substitutions, insertions and deletions, select rearrangements, and copy number changes (amplifications and homozygous deletions). Results Clinically relevant GA (CRGA) were defined as GA linked to drugs on the market or under evaluation in clinical trials. A total of 28 ENBs harbored GA, with a mean of 1.5 GA per sample. Approximately half of the ENBs (21, 51%) featured at least one CRGA, with an average of 1 CRGA per sample. The most commonly altered gene was TP53 (17%), with GA in PIK3CA, NF1, CDKN2A, and CDKN2C occurring in 7% of samples. Conclusion We report comprehensive genomic profiles for 41 ENB tumors. CGP revealed potential new therapeutic targets, including targetable GA in the mTOR, CDK and growth factor signaling pathways, highlighting the clinical value of genomic profiling in ENB.

176 Background: The purpose of the study was to determine the effectiveness of olanzapine (OLN) for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). Methods: A randomized, double-blind, phase III trial was performed in chemotherapy-naïve patients receiving cisplatin, > 70 mg/m2, or cyclophosphamide-anthracycline-based chemotherapy, comparing OLN to placebo in combination with aprepitant (APR), a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (5-HT3), and dexamethasone (DEX). The OLN regimen was 10 mg of oral OLN, 125 mg APR, a 5-HT3, and oral DEX 12 mg pre-chemotherapy, day 1, and 10 mg/day of oral OLN and 8 mg DEX on days 2-4 post-chemotherapy plus 80 mg APR on days 2, 3 post-chemotherapy. The placebo (PLA) regimen was oral placebo, pre-chemotherapy, day 1, and on days 2-4 post-chemotherapy; the APR, 5-HT3, and DEX pre- and post-chemotherapy were identical to that used in the OLN regimen. Fosaprepitant (150 mg IV), day 1 was allowed for substitution for the oral aprepitant. Palonosetron, ondansetron, or granisetron were the permitted 5-HT3 options. Nausea was measured on a 0-10 visual analogue scale, with 0 being “no nausea at all” and 10 being “nausea as bad as it can be”. No nausea was the primary endpoint and, complete response (no emesis and no use of rescue medications) was a secondary endpoint. Results: 401 patients (202 OLN, 199 PLA) were enrolled in the study. The proportion of patients who had no nausea was significantly greater for the OLN regimen compared to the PLA regimen for the acute period (24h post-chemotherapy) (74% vs. 45%, p < 0.0006), for the delayed period ( 24-120 h post-chemotherapy) (43% vs. 26%, p < 0.0006), and for the overall period (0-120 h) (39% vs. 22%, p < 0.0006). Complete response was significantly improved for the OLN patients compared to PLA patients for the acute (85% vs. 65%, p < 0.0001), the delayed (67% vs. 53%, p < 0.0078), and the overall periods (64% vs. 41%, p < 0.0001). There were no grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Conclusions: No nausea, the primary endpoint, and complete response, a secondary endpoint, were significantly improved with OLN, compared to PLA. Clinical trial information: NCT02116530.