Back to Authors

Toi, Masakazu

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1488-9958

Mayo Clinic

Kyoto University

Citations 22

MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib As Initial Therapy for Advanced Breast Cancer
Campone, Mario , Sohn, Joohyuk , Paluch–Shimon, Shani , Huober, Jens , Park, In Hae , Trédan, Olivier , Chen, Shin‐Cheh , Manso, Luís , Freedman, Orit, Jaliffe, Georgina Garnica, Forrester, Tammy , Frenzel, Martin, Barriga, Susana , Bourayou, Nawel, Leo, Angelo Di , Toi, Masakazu , Paluch-Shimon, Shani, Freedman, Orit C, Garnica Jaliffe, Georgina, Smith, Ian C., Di Leo, Angelo, Hae Park, In , Di Leo, Angelo , Goetz, Matthew P. , Smith, Ian C., Manso Sanchez, Luis , Sohn, Joohyuk

Journal of Clinical Oncology | October 2, 2017 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 32 | Pages: 3638-3646

10.1200/jco.2017.75.6155 Get It

Purpose Abemaciclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy as monotherapy and in combination with fulvestrant in women with hormone receptor (HR)–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative advanced breast cancer previously treated with endocrine therapy. Methods MONARCH 3 is a double-blind, randomized phase III study of abemaciclib or placebo plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor in 493 postmenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had no prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting. Patients received abemaciclib or placebo (150 mg twice daily continuous schedule) plus either 1 mg anastrozole or 2.5 mg letrozole, daily. The primary objective was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary objectives included response evaluation and safety. A planned interim analysis occurred after 189 events. Results Median progression-free survival was significantly prolonged in the abemaciclib arm (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.72; P = .000021; median: not reached in the abemaciclib arm, 14.7 months in the placebo arm). In patients with measurable disease, the objective response rate was 59% in the abemaciclib arm and 44% in the placebo arm ( P = .004). In the abemaciclib arm, diarrhea was the most frequent adverse effect (81.3%) but was mainly grade 1 (44.6%). Comparing abemaciclib and placebo, the most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (21.1% v 1.2%), diarrhea (9.5% v 1.2%), and leukopenia (7.6% v 0.6%). Conclusion Abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor was effective as initial therapy, significantly improving progression-free survival and objective response rate and demonstrating a tolerable safety profile in women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.
Trastuzumab Emtansine With or Without Pertuzumab Versus Trastuzumab Plus Taxane for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive, Advanced Breast Cancer: Primary Results From the Phase III MARIANNE Study
Perez, Edith A. , Barrios, Carlos H. , Eiermann, W., Im, Young‐Hyuck , Conte, PierFranco , Pieńkowski, Tadeusz , Burris, Howard A. , Petersen, Jennifer, Stanzel, S, Strasak, Alexander, Patre, Monika, Ellis, Paul, Barrios, Carlos, Eiermann, Wolfgang, Toi, Masakazu , Pivot, Xavier, Burris, Howard, Petersen, Jennifer A, Stanzel, Sven, Martín, Miguel , Pivot, Xavier B. , Ellis, Paul, Conte, Pierfranco

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 23, 2017 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 141-148

10.1200/jco.2016.67.4887 Get It

Purpose Trastuzumab and pertuzumab are human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –targeted monoclonal antibodies, and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is an antibody–drug conjugate that combines the properties of trastuzumab with the cytotoxic activity of DM1. T-DM1 demonstrated encouraging efficacy and safety in a phase II study of patients with previously untreated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Combination T-DM1 and pertuzumab showed synergistic activity in cell culture models and had an acceptable safety profile in a phase Ib and II study. Methods In the MARIANNE study, 1,095 patients with centrally assessed, HER2-positive, advanced breast cancer and no prior therapy for advanced disease were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to control (trastuzumab plus taxane), T-DM1 plus placebo, hereafter T-DM1, or T-DM1 plus pertuzumab at standard doses. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), as assessed by independent review. Results T-DM1 and T-DM1 plus pertuzumab showed noninferior PFS compared with trastuzumab plus taxane (median PFS: 13.7 months with trastuzumab plus taxane, 14.1 months with T-DM1, and 15.2 months with T-DM1 plus pertuzumab). Neither experimental arm showed PFS superiority to trastuzumab plus taxane. Response rate was 67.9% in patients who were treated with trastuzumab plus taxane, 59.7% with T-DM1, and 64.2% with T-DM1 plus pertuzumab; median response duration was 12.5 months, 20.7 months, and 21.2 months, respectively. The incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events was numerically higher in the control arm (54.1%) versus the T-DM1 arm (45.4%) and T-DM1 plus pertuzumab arm (46.2%). Numerically fewer patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events in the T-DM1 arms, and health-related quality of life was maintained for longer in the T-DM1 arms. Conclusion T-DM1 showed noninferior, but not superior, efficacy and better tolerability than did taxane plus trastuzumab for first-line treatment of HER2-positive, advanced breast cancer.