Back to Authors

Garnica Jaliffe, Georgina

Mayo Clinic

Matthew P. Goetz, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Masakazu Toi, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Mario Campone, Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Angers Cedex; Olivier Trédan, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon; Nawel Bourayou, Eli Lilly, Paris, France; Joohyuk Sohn,

Citations 1

MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib As Initial Therapy for Advanced Breast Cancer
Campone, Mario , Sohn, Joohyuk , Paluch–Shimon, Shani , Huober, Jens , Park, In Hae , Trédan, Olivier , Chen, Shin‐Cheh , Manso, Luís , Freedman, Orit, Jaliffe, Georgina Garnica, Forrester, Tammy , Frenzel, Martin, Barriga, Susana , Bourayou, Nawel, Leo, Angelo Di , Toi, Masakazu , Paluch-Shimon, Shani, Freedman, Orit C, Garnica Jaliffe, Georgina, Smith, Ian C., Di Leo, Angelo, Hae Park, In , Di Leo, Angelo , Goetz, Matthew P. , Smith, Ian C., Manso Sanchez, Luis , Sohn, Joohyuk

Journal of Clinical Oncology | October 2, 2017 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 32 | Pages: 3638-3646

10.1200/jco.2017.75.6155 Get It

Purpose Abemaciclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy as monotherapy and in combination with fulvestrant in women with hormone receptor (HR)–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative advanced breast cancer previously treated with endocrine therapy. Methods MONARCH 3 is a double-blind, randomized phase III study of abemaciclib or placebo plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor in 493 postmenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had no prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting. Patients received abemaciclib or placebo (150 mg twice daily continuous schedule) plus either 1 mg anastrozole or 2.5 mg letrozole, daily. The primary objective was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary objectives included response evaluation and safety. A planned interim analysis occurred after 189 events. Results Median progression-free survival was significantly prolonged in the abemaciclib arm (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.72; P = .000021; median: not reached in the abemaciclib arm, 14.7 months in the placebo arm). In patients with measurable disease, the objective response rate was 59% in the abemaciclib arm and 44% in the placebo arm ( P = .004). In the abemaciclib arm, diarrhea was the most frequent adverse effect (81.3%) but was mainly grade 1 (44.6%). Comparing abemaciclib and placebo, the most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (21.1% v 1.2%), diarrhea (9.5% v 1.2%), and leukopenia (7.6% v 0.6%). Conclusion Abemaciclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor was effective as initial therapy, significantly improving progression-free survival and objective response rate and demonstrating a tolerable safety profile in women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.