Almader‐Douglas, Diana

Background: The treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction has been the subject of numerous randomized controlled trials involving medications and cardiac implantable electronic device therapies. As newer effective pharmacological therapies suggest significant reductions in all-cause mortality, the role of additional device therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction deserves further scrutiny. Methods: A systematic review and network meta-analysis on the effect of medication and device therapies in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction on all-cause mortality was performed. Randomized controlled trials published between January 1980 and July 2017 were identified using Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials databases. Pcnetmeta package in R was used to calculate treatment arm–based estimated rates, rate ratios, and probability ranks with 95% credible intervals. Results: Combination therapy of ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitors or ARBs (angiotensin receptor blockers) with β-blockers (BBs) alone or in addition to implantable cardiac defibrillators or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillators demonstrated a significant reduction of all-cause mortality when compared with placebo. By probability rank, implantable cardiac defibrillator+ACE inhibitor or ARB+BB+mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, implantable cardiac defibrillator+ACE inhibitor or ARB+BB, and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor+BB+mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist combination therapies have the highest probability of being ranked the best treatment. There was no significant difference in the rate of mortality when comparing angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor+BB+mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist to implantable cardiac defibrillator+optimal pharmacological combination therapy. Conclusions: BB and renin-angiotensin system blockers alone or in combination with defibrillator device therapy have robust evidence for a reduction in mortality compared with placebo. The comparative efficacy of pharmacological therapy with angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors and device therapy deserves further investigation.

3524 Background: In mCRC, induction combination chemotherapy with targeted agents is considered the mainstay of treatment. This is typically followed by maintenance therapy vs. observation which had been examined in various trials. However, it remains unclear how best optimize maintenance strategy. We aim to evaluate comparative effectiveness to support best maintenance strategy. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating different maintenance strategies in previously untreated mCRC patients (pts): observation (obs), bevacizumab (bev), fluoropyrimidine (FP), FP+bev, or continuing induction regimen (CTX). Outcomes of interest included OS and PFS. The overall effect was pooled using the DerSimonian random effects model. We conducted network meta-analysis based on White’s multivariate meta-regression to pool evidence from direct and indirect comparisons. Agents were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities. Higher SUCRA scores correspond to greater efficacy. Results: Twelve trials at low risk of bias (5540 pts) were included. Network meta-analysis shows no benefit of CTX over obs in terms of PFS (HR 0.7; 95% CI 0.46-1.09) and OS (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.85-1.07). Compared to obs, maintenance therapy shows PFS benefit (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.43-0.77) with only a trend in OS (HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.83-1.009). All maintenance strategies (FP, FP+bev, and bev) show significant improvement in PFS over obs. On SUCRA analysis, maintenance treatment (FP or FP+bev) has the highest likelihood of achieving better PFS (67.1% for FP and 99.8% for FP+bev) and OS (81.3% for FP and 73.2% for FP+bev). Conclusions: A maintenance strategy with at least a FP with or without the addition of bevacizumab is preferred. However, given the lack of a clear OS benefit, obs is an acceptable alternative. Optimal maintenance strategies should be dependent on factors including patient preferences, cost and toxicities. [Table: see text]

AbstractBackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Our primary aim was to evaluate patient‐centered outcomes and surrogate outcomes following catheter ablation (CA) of AF among patients with HFrEF compared to standard medical therapy with or without device therapy (atrioventricular node ablation and cardiac resynchronization therapy).MethodsA systematic literature review was performed limiting our searches to randomized control trials reporting outcomes of CA compared to standard medical therapy with or without device therapy were included. Patient‐centered outcomes were relative reduction in all‐cause mortality, heart failure readmissions, and recurrence of AF. Surrogate outcomes of interest were change in ejection fraction, change in peak oxygen consumption, reduction in brain natriuretic peptide levels, change in 6‐minute walk distance, and change in Minnesota living with heart failure score.ResultsSeven randomized control trials (Patient n = 721) met our inclusion criteria. All trials used radiofrequency energy for CA of AF. CA for AF was associated with significantly lower all‐cause mortality (Risk ratio [RR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.35‐0.76, P = 0.001, I2 = 0%), lower rate of heart failure readmission (RR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.46‐0.74, P < 0.001, I2 = 0%) and lower rate of AF recurrence (RR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.22‐0.50, P < 0.001, I2 = 68%) as compared to standard medical therapy. Surrogate outcomes showed a similar benefit favoring CA.Conclusion and RelevanceCatheter ablation for AF in HFrEF is associated with improvement in patient‐centered outcomes and surrogate outcomes when compared to standard medical therapy with or without device therapy.

Background: The risk of developing intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) after the administration of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke is well established in the general population. However, the risk associated with stroke thrombolysis in patients with a history of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) is undetermined. Objective: The main objective of this study was to critically assess current evidence with regard to the risk of development of ICH after the administration of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke in patients with CMBs. Methods: The objective was addressed through the development of a critically appraised topic that included a clinical scenario, structured question, literature search strategy, critical appraisal, assessment of results, evidence summary, commentary, and bottom-line conclusions. Participants included consultant and resident neurologists, a medical librarian, clinical epidemiologists, and content experts in the field of vascular and hospital neurology. Results: A recent individual patient data meta-analysis was selected for critical appraisal. Cohorts were analyzed with pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging to determine CMB burden and were followed-up to assess subsequent symptomatic ICH, hemorrhagic transformation, parenchymal hemorrhage (PH), and remote PH (PHr) following intravenous thrombolysis. Risk of symptomatic ICH, PH, and PHr was increased in the presence of CMBs, with PHr having the strongest association with increasing CMB burden. Only patients with >10 CMBs were found to have associations with poor outcome at 3 to 6 months, whereas there was no association with 3 to 6 months’ mortality. Conclusions: CMBs are associated with an increased risk of postthrombolysis ICH; however, the clinical implications have yet to be determined.

Introduction: Despite the recognized linkage between retinal microvascular abnormalities and cerebrovascular ischemic diseases (CVD), the retinal findings’ standardization and the degree of association remain unclear. We aimed to investigate the quantitative association between various retinal microvascular signs and CVD. Hypothesis: retinal microvascular abnormalities best predictive of CVD could be identified by synthesizing estimates of CVD risk from population-based studies. Methods: We followed MOOSE guidelines and systematically searched 6 databases through September 2016 for studies evaluating the association between retinal microvascular abnormalities and white matter hyperintense lesions (WMHI), lacunar infarcts (LI), and cerebral infarctions (CI). Adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals were pooled into the analyses using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model. Study quality and dissemination biases were assessed and integrated. Results: Thirty-four prospective studies encompassing 84,144 patients were eligible for meta-analysis. After adjustment for vascular risk factors, focal arteriolar narrowing was associated with WMHI (OR, 1.24 [1.01-1.79]), LI (OR, 1.77 [1.14-2.74]), and CI (OR, 1.75 [1.14-2.69]). Venular dilation was significantly associated with LI (OR, 1.46 [1.10-1.93]), whereas retinal hemorrhage was associated with WMHI (OR, 2.23 [1.34-3.70]). Arteriovenous nicking was associated with WMHI (OR, 1.51 [1.22-1.88]) and LI (OR, 1.70 [1.05-2.76]). Any retinopathy exhibited significant association with WMHI, LI, and CI. Heterogeneity was significant ( I 2 >50%) for all syntheses except retinal hemorrhages and WMHI, retinopathy and CI ( I 2 =0.0%) and respectively LI ( I 2 =45.80%). Conclusions: Retinal hemorrhages were most highly associated with WMHI. Focal arteriolar narrowing and retinopathy were associated with WMHI, LI, and CI. Our findings may assist in the development of a noninvasive retinal microvascular tool for routine use in CVD research and clinical practice.

AbstractMantle cell lymphoma is characterized by relapse and progressive disease, despite initial response to chemoimmunotherapy. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to determine the efficacy of rituximab maintenance (RM) therapy in patients with mantle cell lymphoma. We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from database inception through November 1, 2017. Only full‐text articles were included. Prespecified data elements were extracted from each trial. Outcomes of interest included progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The overall effect was pooled using the Der Simonian‐Laird random effects model. Three randomized controlled trials and four observational studies met our inclusion criteria and were identified in the analyses. Six studies compared RM therapy to observation, and one compared RM therapy to interferon alfa. Meta‐analysis evaluating outcomes of patients treated after ASCT revealed that RM improved for both PFS (HR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.23‐0.49) and OS (HR of death = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.17‐0.69). A second meta‐analysis of studies evaluating outcomes of patients who are ASCT‐ineligible treated with anthracycline‐based induction therapy revealed that RM improved PFS (HR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.25‐0.58). There is a paucity of data on the role of RM in ASCT‐ineligible patients and those with relapsed disease. Overall, RM therapy appears to improve PFS and OS in previously untreated patients with mantle cell lymphoma who undergo induction chemoimmunotherapy followed by ASCT.

Background: Catamenial epilepsy refers to cyclic seizure exacerbation in relation to the menstrual cycle. Three distinct patterns have been described: C1-perimenstrual, C2-periovulatory, and C3-inadequate luteal. There is experimental and clinical evidence that gonadal steroid hormones affect neuronal excitability with estrogens being mainly proconvulsant and progesterone anticonvulsant. If reproductive steroids have a role in seizure occurrence, they may also have a role in treatment. Objective: The objective of this study was to critically assess current evidence regarding the efficacy of progesterone as adjunctive therapy in women with intractable catamenial epilepsy. Methods: The objective was addressed through the development of a structured critically appraised topic. This included a clinical scenario with a clinical question, literature search strategy, critical appraisal, results, evidence summary, commentary, and bottom line conclusions. Participants included consultant and resident neurologists, medical librarian, and content experts in the fields of epilepsy and gynecology. Results: A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial was selected for critical appraisal. This trial compared the efficacy of adjunctive cyclic natural progesterone therapy versus placebo for seizures in women with intractable partial epilepsy, stratified by catamenial and noncatamenial status. There was no significant difference in proportions of responders between progesterone and placebo in the catamenial and noncatamenial strata. Prespecified secondary analysis showed that the level of perimenstrual seizure exacerbation is a significant predictor of the responder rate for progesterone therapy. Conclusions: Cyclic natural progesterone is not superior to placebo in reducing seizure frequency in women with intractable partial epilepsy. Posthoc findings suggest that progesterone may benefit a subset of women with perimenstrually exacerbated seizures.

BACKGROUNDThere are limited therapeutic options for treatment‐refractory pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), with a paucity of data to support the best option after progression on gemcitabine‐based regimens. The authors performed a meta‐analysis to determine the effectiveness of adding oxaliplatin (OX) or various irinotecan formulations to a fluoropyrimidine (FP) after first‐line treatment progression in patients with PDAC.METHODSDifferent databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane, were searched to identify randomized controlled trials comparing FP monotherapy versus FP combination therapy that included either oxaliplatin (FPOX) or various irinotecan formulations (FPIRI) in patients with PDAC who progressed after first‐line treatment. Secondary analyses were planned to assess the effectiveness of FPOX and FPIRI compared with FP. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS).RESULTSFive studies with 895 patients were identified. Patients randomized to receive FPIRI/FPOX had a significantly improved PFS and a trend toward improved OS compared with those who received FP monotherapy. When comparing FPIRI with FP, there was an improvement in both PFS (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.47‐0.87; P = .005) and OS (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.55‐0.89; P = .004) in patients who received the combination. Conversely, FPOX produced only a modest improvement in PFS with no improvement in OS.CONCLUSIONSCombination chemotherapy with OX or various IRI formulations appears to improve PFS compared with single‐agent FP. FPIRI, but not FPOX, appears to confer an OS advantage. The combination of FP with irinotecan formulations appears to be the appropriate next line of treatment upon progression after gemcitabine‐based chemotherapy regimens. Cancer 2017;123:4680‐4686. © 2017 American Cancer Society.