Borlaug, Barry A.

Abstract Understanding of the pathophysiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has advanced rapidly over the past two decades. Currently, HFpEF is recognized as a heterogeneous syndrome, and there is a growing movement towards developing personalized treatments based on phenotype-guided strategies. Left ventricular dysfunction is a fundamental pathophysiological abnormality in HFpEF; however, recent evidence also highlights significant roles for the atria, right ventricle, pericardium, and extracardiac contributors. Imaging plays a central role in characterizing these complex and highly integrated domains of pathophysiology. This review focuses on established evidence, recent insights, and the challenges that need to be addressed concerning the pathophysiology of HFpEF, with a focus on imaging-based evaluations and opportunities for further research.

Abstract Aims Patients with heart failure (HF) display metabolic alterations, including heightened ketogenesis, resulting in increased beta-hydroxybutyrate (β-OHB) formation. We aimed to investigate the determinants and prognostic impact of circulating β-OHB levels in patients with advanced HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and results A total of 867 patients with advanced HFrEF (age 57 ± 11 years, 83% male, 45% diabetic, 60% New York Heart Association class III), underwent clinical and echocardiographic examination, circulating metabolite assessment, and right heart catheterization (n = 383). The median β-OHB level was 64 (interquartile range [IQR] 33–161) μmol/L (normal 0–74 μmol/L). β-OHB levels correlated with increased markers of lipolysis (free fatty acids [FFA]), higher natriuretic peptides, worse pulmonary haemodynamics, and lower humoral regulators of ketogenesis (insulin/glucagon ratio). During a median follow-up of 1126 (IQR 410–1781) days, there were 512 composite events, including 324 deaths, 81 left ventricular assist device implantations and 107 urgent cardiac transplantations. In univariable Cox regression, increased β-OHB levels (T3 vs. T1: hazard ratio [HR] 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13–1.72, p = 0.002) and elevated FFA levels (T3 vs. T1: HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.09–1.79, p = 0.008) were both predictors of a worse prognosis. In multivariable Cox analysis evaluating the simultaneous associations of FFA and β-OHB levels with outcomes, only FFA levels remained significantly associated with adverse outcomes. Conclusions In patients with advanced HFrEF, increased plasma β-OHB correlate with FFA levels, worse right ventricular function, greater neurohormonal activation and other markers of HF severity. The association between plasma β-OHB and adverse outcomes is eliminated after accounting for FFA levels, suggesting that increased β-OHB is a consequence reflecting heightened lipolytic state, rather than a cause of worsening HF.

Abstract Aims Patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) are grouped based upon clinical and haemodynamic characteristics. Groups 2 (G2, left heart disease [LHD]) and 3 (G3, lung disease or hypoxaemia) are most common. Many patients display overlapping characteristics of heart and lung disease (G2–3), but this group is not well-characterized. Methods and results Patients with PH enrolled in the prospective, NHLBI-sponsored PVDOMICS network underwent intensive clinical, biomarker, imaging, gas exchange and exercise phenotyping. Patients with pure G2, pure G3, or overlapping G2–3 PH were compared across multiple phenotypic domains. Of all patients with predominant G2 (n = 136), 66 (49%) were deemed to have secondary lung disease/hypoxaemia contributors (G2/3), and of all patients categorized as predominant G3 (n = 172), 41 (24%) were judged to have a component of secondary LHD (G3/2), such that 107 had G2–3 (combined G2/3 and G3/2). As compared with G3, patients with G2 and G2–3 were more obese and had greater prevalence of hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and coronary disease. Patients with G2 and G2–3 were more anaemic, with poorer kidney function, more cardiac dysfunction, and higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide than G3. Lung diffusion was more impaired in G3 and G2–3, but commonly abnormal even in G2. Exercise capacity was severely and similarly impaired across all groups, with no differences in 6-min walk distance or peak oxygen consumption, and pulmonary vasoreactivity to nitric oxide did not differ. In a multivariable Cox regression model, patients with G2 had lower risk of death or transplant compared with G3 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30–0.86), and patients with G2–3 also displayed lower risk compared with G3 (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38–0.86). Conclusions Overlap is common in patients with a pulmonary or cardiac basis for PH. While lung structure/function is clearly more impaired in G3 and G2–3 than G2, pulmonary abnormalities are common in G2, even when clinically judged as isolated LHD. Further study is required to identify optimal systematic evaluations to guide therapeutic innovation for PH associated with combined heart and lung disease. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02980887.

Abstract Aims This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods and results We conducted a prospective study enrolling consecutively evaluated patients with HFpEF undergoing invasive haemodynamic exercise testing with simultaneous echocardiography. Compared to HFpEF without MR (n = 145, 79.7%), those with mild or moderate MR (n = 37, 20.3%) were older, more likely to be women, had more left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, and more likely to have left atrial (LA) myopathy reflected by greater burden of atrial fibrillation, more LA dilatation, and poorer LA function. Pulmonary artery (PA) wedge pressure was higher at rest in HFpEF with MR (17 ± 5 mmHg vs. 20 ± 5 mmHg, p = 0.005), but there was no difference with exercise. At rest, only 2 (1.1%) patients had moderate MR, and none developed severe MR. Pulmonary vascular resistance was higher, and right ventricular (RV)-PA coupling was more impaired in patients with HFpEF and MR at rest and exercise. LV and LA myocardial dysfunction remained more severe in patients with MR during stress compared to those without MR, characterized by greater LA dilatation during all stages of exertion, lower LA emptying fraction and compliance, steeper and rightward-shifted LA pressure–volume relationships, and reduced LV longitudinal contractile function. Conclusions Patients with HFpEF and mild or moderate MR have more severe LV systolic dysfunction, LA myopathy, RV-PA uncoupling, and more severe pulmonary vascular disease. Mitral valve incompetence in this setting is a phenotypic marker of more advanced disease but is not a causal factor in development of HFpEF.

Abstract Background and Aims In the STEP-HFpEF trial programme, treatment with semaglutide resulted in multiple beneficial effects in patients with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Efficacy may vary according to baseline diuretic use, and semaglutide treatment could modify diuretic dose. Methods In this pre-specified analysis of pooled data from the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF-DM trials (n = 1145), which randomized participants with HFpEF and body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 to once weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo for 52 weeks, we examined whether efficacy and safety endpoints differed by baseline diuretic use, as well as the effect of semaglutide on loop diuretic use and dose changes over the 52-week treatment period. Results At baseline, across no diuretic (n = 220), non-loop diuretic only (n = 223), and loop diuretic [<40 (n = 219), 40 (n = 309), and >40 (n = 174) mg/day furosemide equivalents] groups, there was progressively higher prevalence of hypertension and atrial fibrillation; and greater severity of obesity and heart failure. Over 52 weeks of treatment, semaglutide had a consistent beneficial effect on change in body weight across diuretic use categories (adjusted mean difference vs. placebo ranged from −8.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) −10.3, −6.3] to −6.9% [95% CI −9.1, −4.7] from no diuretics to the highest loop diuretic dose category; interaction P = .39). Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score improvement was greater in patients on loop diuretics compared to those not on loop diuretics (adjusted mean difference vs. placebo: +9.3 [6.5; 12.1] vs. +4.7 points [1.3, 8.2]; P = .042). Semaglutide had consistent beneficial effects on all secondary efficacy endpoints (including 6 min walk distance) across diuretic subgroups (interaction P = .24–.92). Safety also favoured semaglutide vs. placebo across the diuretic subgroups. From baseline to 52 weeks, loop diuretic dose decreased by 17% in the semaglutide group vs. a 2.4% increase in the placebo group (P < .0001). Semaglutide (vs. placebo) was more likely to result in loop diuretic dose reduction (odds ratio [OR] 2.67 [95% CI 1.70, 4.18]) and less likely dose increase (OR 0.35 [95% CI 0.23, 0.53]; P < .001 for both) from baseline to 52 weeks. Conclusions In patients with obesity-related HFpEF, semaglutide improved heart failure-related symptoms and physical limitations across diuretic use subgroups, with more pronounced benefits among patients receiving loop diuretics at baseline. Reductions in weight and improvements in exercise function with semaglutide vs. placebo were consistent in all diuretic use categories. Semaglutide also led to a reduction in loop diuretic use and dose between baseline and 52 weeks. Clinical Trial Registration NCT04788511 and NCT04916470.

Introduction: Reduced peak oxygen consumption (VO 2 ) is common and associated with adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). According to the Fick principle, VO 2 is equal to the product of cardiac output (CO) and arterial-venous O 2 difference (AVO 2 diff). Patients with HFpEF display abnormalities each component, but no study has yet evaluated their prognostic impacts. Methods: Patients with HFpEF (n=501) and controls without HF (n=207) underwent invasive hemodynamic exercise testing with expired gas analysis and clinical follow up for the composite event of HF hospitalization or death. Results: Compared to controls, patients with HFpEF displayed slightly lower CO at rest with higher pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). On exercise, subjects with HFpEF displayed blunted increases in CO and greater increase in PCWP (Figure A). As compared with controls, the slope of the increase in CO relative to VO 2 was lower in HFpEF (6.4 ± 3.3 vs 5.4 ± 3.2 L/L; P =0.0004), while augmentation in AVO 2 diff relative to VO 2 was greater in HFpEF (7.7 ± 5.4 vs 10.0 ± 5.6 min/dL; P <0.0001). Over a median 2.8 (1.1-4.6) years of follow up, 101 patients experienced the composite event. Patients with CO reserve below the median and increases in AVO 2 diff below median displayed higher risk of the composite endpoint (Figure B-C). After adjustments for age, sex, BMI, atrial fibrillation, LV mass, and EF, CO reserve remained strongly associated with the primary outcome (HR [95%CI] = 0.51 [0.38-0.68]; P <0.0001, per 1 SD increase) and the change of AVO 2 diff remained significant, but was less predictive (HR [95%CI] = 0.74 [0.60-0.92]; P =0.007, per 1 SD increase) in patients with HFpEF. Conclusions: Impaired ability to augment CO and peripheral O 2 delivery are associated with increasing risk of adverse events in HFpEF. Further study is required to identify therapeutic interventions targeting these hemodynamic perturbations to improve outcomes in HFpEF.

Introduction: Many patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) display normal N-terminal-pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP)levels. Mortality and hospitalization rates are lower in this group compared to patients with high NTproBNP, but it remains unclear whether these patients represent a fundamentally different phenotype or an earlier stage of disease. Methods: 213 subjects with HFpEF defined by invasive hemodynamics underwent serial echocardiographic examinations &gt;1 year apart. Clinical, cardiac structural, functional, and hemodynamic characteristics were examined. Results: Exam 2 was performed a median of 3.2 years (IQR 2.2-5.1) following Exam 1. From this cohort, 66 (33%) displayed normal NT-proBNP levels (≤125pg/ml, nBNP) and 147 (67%) displayed high NTproBNP (hBNP). Compared to hBNP, nBNP patients were younger (62±10 vs 71±9 years, p&lt;0.0001) and more obese (35±8 vs 32±7 kg/m 2 , p=0.005). At Exam 1, approximately 50% of nBNP displayed left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction defined as LV longitudinal strain (GLS)&lt;16% ( Figure A ) and LA dysfunction defined as left atrial (LA) reservoir strain&lt;26% ( Figure B ), but right ventricular (RV) systolic function as relatively preserved ( Figure C ). At Exam 2, LV, LA, and RV strain decreased in both groups (Panels A-C), with no difference between nBNP and hBNP in the velocity of change (p&gt;0.6 for all). More patients crossed the threshold definition for LV systolic and LA dysfunction in nBNP compared to hBNP ( Figure D and E ), but the prevalence of RV dysfunction increased more in hBNP ( Figure F ). Conclusions: In patients with HFpEF with normal NT-proBNP, biventricular systolic function and LA function deteriorate over time at similar pace. These data suggest that patients with HFpEF are not a fundamentally different disorder, but rather represent an earlier stage of disease that progresses from LV and LA dysfunction in early stages to RV dysfunction in advanced stages.