Kröner, Paul T.

INTRODUCTION: Gender in ulcerative colitis (UC) is a well-studied topic with contradicting results with a slight male predominance seen in large population based studies in Olmsted County, Minnesota, while other studies have shown a slight female predominance. Yet, the relationship between UC and gender is not well-understood. Hence, it is unclear what is responsible for differences in gender. The aim of this study is to assess the inpatient prevalence and inpatients outcomes of UC by gender. METHODS: Case-control study using the NIS 2016, the largest public inpatient database in the US. All patients with ICD9-10CM codes for UC were included. None were excluded. Female patients were identified within the database using the female gender indicator. The primary outcome was determining the odds of UC in female patients compared to males. Secondary outcomes included determining inpatient morbidity, mortality, resource utilization, colectomy rates, hospital length of stay (LOS), and inflation-adjusted total hospital costs and charges. Propensity score matching was used to create a matching population for Charlson Comorbidity Index and age. Multivariate regression analyses were used to adjust for income in patient zip code, hospital region, location, size and teaching status. RESULTS: A total of 38, 950 patients with UC were identified and propensity matched for selected covariates. The mean patient age was 45, and 47.2% were female. For the primary outcome, females had decreased adjusted odds (aOR: 0.92, P < 0.01) of being admitted for UC. For secondary outcomes, female patients displayed lower adjusted odds of multi-organ failure, being placed on TPN, and undergoing colectomy. Females also had lower adjusted mean hospital costs, charges, and length of stay (LOS). All adjusted odds and means are displayed in Table 1. CONCLUSION: Females have lower inpatient prevalence of UC, complications, and economic burden compared to males. This reinforces the slight male predominance that was seen in the older Olmstead County population-based studies. One can speculate that the difference in complications, costs, charges, and LOS indicate that females have less severe disease at hospital admission. Numerous studies have examined the effect of gender on disease severity and outcomes, and there continues to be conflicting data. Thus, future studies are needed to determine what contributes to the variation in disease prevalence and course by gender, and possibly better tailor treatment regimens by gender.

INTRODUCTION: Esophageal food impaction is a commonly encountered clinical scenario that may warrant emergent intervention, but epidemiological studies are lacking. No major studies have examined the inpatient prevalence of food impaction during the weekend. Therefore, the aim of our study is to assess the inpatient prevalence of food impaction during the weekend compared to week days. METHODS: Case-control study using the NIS 2016, the largest public inpatient database in the US. All patients with ICD10CM codes for food bolus impactions were included. None were excluded. The primary outcome was determining the odds of food bolus impaction during the weekend days as compared to the weekdays. Secondary outcomes included determining rates of esophageal perforation, hospital costs, charges and length of stay (LOS) when comparing admissions during a weekend to admissions during a weekday. Multivariate regression analyses were used to adjust for age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index, income in patient zip code, hospital region, location, size and teaching status. RESULTS: 7,025 patients with food bolus impaction were identified. 2,475 underwent emergent EGD (within 24 hours) and 1,935 were admitted during the weekend. Mean patient age was 66.7 years (47.9% were female). Primary outcome: after adjusting for confounders, patients admitted for food impaction displayed significantly higher odds of admission during the weekend days (aOR:1.5, P < 0.01) when compared to the weekdays. No significant difference in esophageal perforation was observed between the two cohorts. Patients admitted during the weekend displayed lower hospitalization costs compared to patients admitted during the weekdays (aMean: -$1,756, P = 0.02), but no differences in hospitalization charges or length of stay were observed. All outcomes are displayed in Table 1. CONCLUSION: The odds of being admitted for esophageal food impaction are higher on weekends than weekdays. There are no different odds of esophageal perforation. This may be reflecting the previous studies demonstrating increased odds of food impaction during leisure times, as weekends in the US are often reserved for leisure activities rather than work. Interestingly, patients admitted during the weekend actually have lower adjusted mean hospital costs. This may suggest that these patients are likely admitted for observation or stay longer periods of time in the ED and hence do not generate the same hospital bill as an admission.

INTRODUCTION: Solid organ transplant recipients are at increased risk of de novo malignancies, in some cases up to 15.6%. Data regarding pancreatic cancer following liver transplantation is limited. We aim to evaluate the incidence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma among liver transplant recipients in the United States. Describe survival in those patients and identify subgroup of patients at increased risk. METHODS: We examined the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) database and identified patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent liver transplant between 1988 and 2016. Patients 18 years of age and older were included. Demographics, primary diagnosis and survival data were recorded. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and log-rank tests were performed. RESULTS: In the UNOS database, survival data regarding 142,488 patients was available and the cause of death was identified in 14,533 liver transplant recipients. A total of 140 patients developed pancreatic adenocarcinoma after liver transplantation. Most common indications for transplantations were Hepatitis C, alcohol cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (25 [17.9%], 24 [17.1%] and 9 [6.4%] respectively). Annual incidence was 16 pancreatic cancer cases per 100,000 transplant recipients. Compared to national annual incidence of 12.9 cancer cases per 100,000 patients, the relative risk was 1.23 (95% CI 0.59–2.56). Compared to other liver transplant recipients, those who developed pancreatic cancer were older and transplanted earlier in the time period evaluated ( P < 0.001 and P = 0.002 respectively). Gender, ethnicity, BMI, and primary diagnosis (i.e., transplant indication) were not significantly different among groups. Patient survival was significantly lower in patients who developed pancreatic adenocarcinoma (Log-rank test P < 0.001) (Figure 1). CONCLUSION: Analysis of the UNOS database showed that pancreatic adenocarcinoma is increased among liver transplant recipients without reaching statistical significance. Primary indications for transplantation and demographics were similar among both groups. Our findings suggest that pancreatic adenocarcinoma is more likely associated to long-standing immunosuppression and non-traditional risk factors rather than alcohol consumption or obesity. Further studies describing the natural history of pancreatic cancer after solid organ transplantation are suggested.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a debilitating chronic disease and significantly impacts patient's quality of life. There is evidence that cannabinoids reduce markers of inflammation and fibrosis in pancreatic stellate cells; Cannabis is becoming increasingly popular and there are currently 33 states in the US that have approved medical cannabis while 10 states have approved cannabis for recreational use. We investigated the national trends in prevalence, mortality, length of stay (LOS), hospitalization charges and cost of chronic pancreatitis patients and compared between cannabis-exposed (CE) and non-cannabis-exposed (non-CE). METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2005 to 2014 was queried for all patients with a primary discharge diagnosis of CP as per the International Classification of Diseases 9 th revision (ICD-9) code 5771. Active exposure to cannabis was ascertained based on ICD-9 code 304.3X and 305.2X. We compared CE vs. non-CE patients. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), inflation adjusted charges and cost. Propensity match analysis for age, gender, race, median income quartile, hospital characteristics and Elixhauser comorbidity index and multivariable logistic regression models were performed using STATA 14 software. RESULTS: Over 31,481 patients with CP as the primary diagnosis were analyzed. Cannabis-exposure prevalence was 1.4% (447 patients). The mean age of CP patients was 49. Patients exposed to cannabis were younger (42 vs 49-year-old, P < 0.001) and mostly males (69% vs 49.7%, P < 0.001). After adjusting for these factors, CE patients had lower total charges compared to non-CE (US$ 21,589 vs. 30,291 P < 0.001) (Figure 1a). CE patients were also hospitalized for fewer number of days when compared to non-CE patients (3.84 vs 5.19 days). There was a significant downward trend in the prevalence of chronic pancreatitis admissions ( P < 0.001) amongst non-CE patients while there was an upward trend in the prevalence of chronic pancreatitis admissions amongst CE patients (Figure 2a, b). Interestingly, after matching for age, gender and comorbidities – CE patients had lower inpatient mortality ( P = 0.059). CONCLUSION: In patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of CP, CE patients had fewer length of stay, hospitalization cost and inpatient mortality. The interplay of these factors remains unknown and studies looking at cannabis strength/dose, route and consumption frequency are needed.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) does not currently have a cure and it leads to multiple complications (pain, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, steatorrhea, bone disease), its management is still a challenge. There is evidence that stimulating the endocannabinoid system may reduce inflammation and fibrosis in pancreatic stellate cells. Cannabis is the most frequently used recreational drug in the US and in recent years its legalization has increased. There are currently multiple States in the US that have approved medical cannabis for CP. We investigate the prevalence and outcomes of CP-related complications amongst cannabis-exposed (CE) and non-cannabis-exposed (non-CE) CP patients. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2005 to 2014 was queried for all patients with a primary or secondary discharge diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis as per the International Classification of Diseases 9 th revision (ICD-9) code 577.1 and a complication related to chronic pancreatitis. Active exposure to cannabis was ascertained based on ICD-9 code 304.3X and 305.2X. We compared CE vs. non-CE patients. Outcomes included pancreatic cancer diagnosis, biliary stricture, pancreatic duct stricture, cholangitis, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) use for either diagnostic or therapeutic purpose. Propensity match analysis for age, gender, race, median income quartile, hospital characteristics and Elixhauser comorbidity index and multivariable logistic regression models were performed using SAS software (STATA 14). RESULTS: 109,326 patients with CP were analyzed (Figure 1). Prevalence of CE was 2.2% (2360 patients). The mean age of CP patients was 49. When comparing CE vs. non-CE, the CP-related complications amongst matched cohorts were as follows chronic abdominal pain 5.2% vs 0.3% ( P < 0.001), steatorrhea/diarrhea 1.2% vs 13.5% ( P < 0.001), biliary stricture 0.3% vs. 7.1% ( P < 0.001), pancreatic cancer 0.4% vs. 11.8% ( P < 0.001), cholangitis (0.1% vs 2.6%; P < 0.001), pancreatic cancer (0.4 vs 11.8; P < 0.001). Cannabis users also required less diagnostic ERCP (1.4% vs 5.5%; P < 0.001) and therapeutic ERCP (3.5% vs 9.3%; P < 0.001) (Figure 2). CONCLUSION: In CP patients admitted to the hospital, CE patients had lower rates of CP-related complications and importantly pancreatic cancer. These effects could possibly be through the effect of cannabis in the endocannabinoid system as previously shown in mice studies in Germany. More studies are needed to corroborate our findings.

Objectives Recent studies have suggested that small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) could be a predisposing factor for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) although the results were inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with the aim to summarize all available data. Methods A comprehensive literature review was conducted utilizing MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through September 2018 to identify all studies that compared the risk of NAFLD among patients with SIBO versus those without SIBO. Effect estimates from each study were extracted and combined together using the random effect, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird. Results A total of 10 studies with 1093 participants fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. A significant association between NAFLD and SIBO was observed with the pooled odds ratio of 3.82 (95% confidence interval, 1.93–7.59; I 2 65%). Funnel plot is relatively symmetric and is not suggestive of the presence of publication bias. Conclusion A significant association between NAFLD and SIBO was observed in this meta-analysis.

Rheumatological diseases (RDs) represent a diverse group of diseases that are inherited or related to environmental factors. RDs frequently affect the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, and gastroenterologists are often asked to evaluate patients with symptoms thought to represent an underlying or coexisting RD. GI manifestations of RDs vary based on the organ involved as well as the extent and duration of involvement. Although most manifestations of RD are nonspecific and not life-threatening, the chronicity and severity of symptoms can be debilitating and may lead to serious injury. This narrative review discusses the most common RD encountered by gastroenterologists: systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis (scleroderma), dermatomyositis/polymyositis, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren syndrome, overlap syndromes, mixed connective tissue disease, Ehlers-Danlos syndromes, and other vasculitides. Each section begins with a brief overview of the condition, followed by a discussion of the etiopathophysiology, physical examination findings, GI manifestations, diagnostic tools (i.e., serologic, imaging, endoscopic, and functional), and treatment options.

Background Limited data exist regarding the effects of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on acute pancreatitis (AP). This study aimed to evaluate the association between ESRD and outcomes and resource utilization of AP. Materials and methods The 2014 National Inpatient Sample database was used to identify all hospitalized patients with a principal diagnosis of AP. Propensity score matching was performed to create a matched cohort of ESRD and non-ESRD patients. The in-hospital mortality, morbidity, resource utilization and expenditures of AP in ESRD patients were compared to non-ESRD patients. Multivariate analysis was performed for further adjustment for potential confounders. Results Of 382 595 AP patients, 7380 ESRD patients and 8050 non-ESRD patients were created after propensity score matching. ESRD patients had more tendency to have hypercalcemia-related or AP-related to other/unspecified causes, whereas non-ESRD patients had more tendency to have alcohol-related, gallstone-related, and hypertriglyceridemia-related AP. In multivariate analysis, ESRD was associated with increased in-hospital mortality, increased length of hospital stay, and increased hospitalization costs and charges. No differences were observed in inpatient morbidity, imaging study use, and procedures performed during hospitalization. Conclusion In this large nationwide study using inpatient USA database, we demonstrate higher AP-related mortality, and resource utilization among ESRD patients when compared with non-ESRD patients.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the hospitalization rates for subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) among renal transplant patients with adult polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) and its outcomes, when compared to non-ADPKD renal transplant patients. Methods: The 2005–2014 National Inpatient Sample databases were used to identify all hospitalized renal transplant patients. The inpatient prevalence of SAH as a discharge diagnosis between ADPKD and non-ADPKD renal transplant patients was compared. Among SAH patients, the in-hospital mortality, use of aneurysm clipping, hospital length of stay, total hospitalization cost and charges between ADPKD and non-ADPKD patients were compared, adjusting for potential confounders. Results: The inpatient prevalence of SAH in ADPKD was 3.8/1000 admissions, compared to 0.9/1000 admissions in non-ADPKD patients (p < 0.01). Of 833 renal transplant patients with a diagnosis of SAH, 30 had ADPKD. Five (17%) ADPKD renal patients with SAH died in hospitals compared to 188 (23.4%) non-ADPKD renal patients (p = 0.70). In adjusted analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality, use of aneurysm clipping, hospital length of stay, or total hospitalization costs and charges between ADPKD and non-ADPKD patients with SAH. Conclusion: Renal transplant patients with ADPKD had a 4-fold higher inpatient prevalence of SAH than those without ADPKD. Further studies are needed to compare the incidence of overall admissions in ADPKD and non-ADPKD patients. When renal transplant patients developed SAH, inpatient mortality rates were high regardless of ADPKD status. The outcomes, as well as resource utilization, were comparable between the two groups.

Background: The study’s aim was to summarize the incidence and impacts of post-liver transplant (LTx) acute kidney injury (AKI) on outcomes after LTx. Methods: A literature search was performed using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Databases from inception until December 2018 to identify studies assessing the incidence of AKI (using a standard AKI definition) in adult patients undergoing LTx. Effect estimates from the individual studies were derived and consolidated utilizing random-effect, the generic inverse variance approach of DerSimonian and Laird. The protocol for this systematic review is registered with PROSPERO (no. CRD42018100664). Results: Thirty-eight cohort studies, with a total of 13,422 LTx patients, were enrolled. Overall, the pooled estimated incidence rates of post-LTx AKI and severe AKI requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) were 40.7% (95% CI: 35.4%–46.2%) and 7.7% (95% CI: 5.1%–11.4%), respectively. Meta-regression showed that the year of study did not significantly affect the incidence of post-LTx AKI (p = 0.81). The pooled estimated in-hospital or 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality rates of patients with post-LTx AKI were 16.5% (95% CI: 10.8%–24.3%) and 31.1% (95% CI: 22.4%–41.5%), respectively. Post-LTx AKI and severe AKI requiring RRT were associated with significantly higher mortality with pooled ORs of 2.96 (95% CI: 2.32–3.77) and 8.15 (95%CI: 4.52–14.69), respectively. Compared to those without post-LTx AKI, recipients with post-LTx AKI had significantly increased risk of liver graft failure and chronic kidney disease with pooled ORs of 3.76 (95% CI: 1.56–9.03) and 2.35 (95% CI: 1.53–3.61), respectively. Conclusion: The overall estimated incidence rates of post-LTx AKI and severe AKI requiring RRT are 40.8% and 7.0%, respectively. There are significant associations of post-LTx AKI with increased mortality and graft failure after transplantation. Furthermore, the incidence of post-LTx AKI has remained stable over the ten years of the study.