Sturchio, Glenn M.

Radioactive seed localization (RSL) using 125 I is widely employed for the surgical resection of nonpalpable breast lesions due to its precision and scheduling flexibility. Although clinical experience supports its safety, quantifying radiation dose to surrounding healthy breast tissue remains important for establishing conservative operational guidelines, including acceptable implant duration prior to surgery. In this study, cumulative dose to healthy breast tissue from an implanted 125 I localization seed was evaluated using two independent computational approaches: a simplified hemispherical breast model implemented in MATLAB and a Monte Carlo simulation developed in Mathematica. Both models incorporated dosimetric parameters from AAPM Task Group 43, including the dose-rate constant, radial dose function, and two-dimensional anisotropy function, along with tissue properties consistent with International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations. Results from both models demonstrated that cumulative dose decreases rapidly with increasing distance from the seed and increases slowly with implantation time due to the low dose rate and long half-life of 125 I. At a distance of 1 cm, cumulative dose reached approximately 3–4 cGy after 5 d and approximately 50 cGy only after extended implantation times exceeding 200 d. Agreement between the MATLAB and Monte Carlo models was within expected limits given differences in deterministic and stochastic modeling approaches. These findings indicate that radiation dose to healthy breast tissue from RSL remains well below thresholds associated with deterministic effects for clinically relevant implantation times. The results support the use of a conservative “no later than” removal date while reaffirming the radiological safety and practical advantages of 125 I seed localization in breast cancer surgery.

After implementing a process for flagging readmitted radiopharmaceutical therapy patients, it was discovered that major assumptions for these patients were not correct, specifically the magnitude of patients and the location of the readmissions. Data collected from May to December 2024 revealed 501 post-therapy patient encounters out of 1,139 administrations. Analysis showed varying return rates across different radiopharmaceuticals and departments, highlighting the need for updated radiation safety response. Results indicated that most encounters occurred in outpatient settings, with contamination above action levels found in 61% of responses. The study underscores the importance of continuous assessment and collaboration among stakeholders to adapt to new radiopharmaceutical therapies and ensure effective radiation safety practices.

The radiopharmaceutical therapy field is experiencing a surge of novel treatments and expanded uses for existing treatments, broadening the range of patients that can be treated. This expansion presents new challenges for managing patient release due to new patient populations with additional comorbidities, increasing the incidence of patients requiring care shortly after administration. This paper outlines the challenges and potential solutions for managing readmitted radiopharmaceutical therapy patients. It discusses the importance of having radiation protection policies and procedures in place for staff who may be unfamiliar with radiation. The paper also highlights the need for just-in-time training and radiation monitoring equipment for care staff, as well as the development of a notification system within the electronic health record to ensure staff can safely care for these patients. Preparing for these eventualities is essential for implementing a radiopharmaceutical therapy program that is ready for the expansion of existing and novel treatments.

In radiation safety programs, particularly in large healthcare systems, personal dosimetry is often issued conservatively, leading to unnecessary monitoring of individuals with minimal exposure risk. This study describes a structured approach implemented at Mayo Clinic to evaluate the necessity and exchange frequency of dosimeters using two years of retrospective radiation dose data. Personnel were grouped based on job type and workplace conditions, then dosimetry data was analyzed at the 50th percentile, 95th percentile, and maximum levels against conservative thresholds. Regulatory requirements and managerial input were incorporated throughout the decision-making process. From 2020 to 2024, this method resulted in the reduction of dosimeter frequency for 82 individuals and complete removal for 1,067: reducing dosimeter issuance by 4,912 each year. The approach enabled a more efficient use of resources, allowing radiation safety efforts to be directed toward higher-risk groups and activities without compromising compliance or worker protection. This model provides a conservative, scalable framework for optimizing dosimetry programs in healthcare and potentially other radiation-using industries.

Abstract Many medical facilities across the United States use ionizing-radiation-producing machines and radioactive materials for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes on a regular basis. While institutions are required to ensure full-term fetal doses are below the regulatory limit, clear guidance on how pre-declaration fetal doses should be estimated is not available. This paper provides a process that can be used to estimate the pre-declaration fetal dose and provides a predictive screening tool for licensees to use to recommend workload adjustments prior to actual fetal dosimetry results that could exceed the institutions derived investigation levels. The evaluation process presented herein serves as a guide for medical licensees when performing fetal dose evaluations for declared pregnant workers.

Abstract Lutetium Dotatate radiopharmaceutical therapy (Lutathera) was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2018 and is used to treat somatostatin receptor positive neuroendocrine tumors. With all new radiopharmaceutical therapies, the radiation exposure to members of the public from the patient who received the therapy must be within regulatory limits and safe. If the patient will expose members of the public to too much radiation, the therapy must be performed on an inpatient basis. This paper shows that the administration of Lutathera can be done on an outpatient basis and provides safety and travel restrictions that should be communicated to the patient prior to leaving. The guidance presented herein serves as a basis for medical institutions looking to use Lutathera to treat patients.

Abstract Physicians performing x-ray guided interventional procedures have a keen interest in radiation safety. Radiation dose to tissues and organs of the head and neck are of particular interest because they are not routinely protected by wearable radiation safety devices. This study was conducted to facilitate estimation of radiation dose to tissues of the head and neck of interventional physicians based on the dose recorded by a personal dosimeter worn on the left collar. Scatter beam qualities maximum energy and HVL were measured for 40 scatter beams emitting from an anthropomorphic patient phantom. Variables of the scatter beams included scatter angle (35° and 90°), primary beam peak tube potential (60, 80, 100, and 120 kVp), and 5 Cu spectral filter thicknesses (0–0.9 mm). Four reference scatter beam qualities were selected to represent the range of scatter beams realized in a typical practice. A general radiographic x-ray tube was tuned to produce scatter-equivalent radiographic beams and used to simultaneously expose the head and neck of an anthropomorphic operator phantom and radiochromic film. The geometric relationship between the x-ray source of the scatter-equivalent beams and the operator phantom was set to mimic that between a patient and physician performing an invasive cardiovascular procedure. Dose to the exterior surface of the operator phantom was measured with both 3 × 3 cm 2 pieces of film and personal dosimeters positioned at the location of the left collar. All films were scanned with a calibrated flatbed scanner, which converted the film’s reflective density to dose. Films from the transverse planes of the operator phantom provided 2D maps of the dose distribution within the phantom. These dose maps were normalized by the dose at the left collar, providing 2D percent of left collar dose (LCD) maps. The percent LCD maps were overlain with bony anatomy CT images of the operator phantom and estimates of percent LCD to the left, right and whole brain, brain stem, lenses of the eyes, and carotid arteries were calculated. Per expectation, results indicated greater percent dose to superficial versus deep tissues and increasing percent dose to deep tissues with increasing scatter-equivalent beam energy and HVL. The results enable estimation of the scatter dose to tissues of the head and neck of interventional physicians based on occupational dose measured by a personal dosimeter worn at the collar outside the protective apron.