Berchuck, Andrew

Abstract Background: Overexpression of mitotic kinases has been associated with prognosis, histologic grade, and clinical stage in ovarian cancer, but the relationship between inherited variation in these genes and ovarian cancer risk has not been well defined. Methods: We measured associations between 397 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 67 mitotic kinases and invasive epithelial ovarian cancer risk in two case–control studies (n = 671 cases; n = 939 controls). Thirty-six candidate SNPs (P < 0.05) were assessed in a replication analysis consisting of three additional studies (n = 1,094 cases; n = 829 controls). Results: In initial analysis, thirty-six SNPs were suggestive of association with risk of serous ovarian cancer, all subtypes of ovarian cancer, or both (P < 0.05). Replication analyses suggested an association between rs2125846 in the Nemo-like kinase (NLK) gene and ovarian cancer (serous OR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.11–1.67, P = 1.77 × 10−3; all subtypes OR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.08–1.56, P = 2.97 × 10−3). Furthermore, rs2125846 was associated with risk in the combined discovery and replication sets (serous OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.15–1.54; all subtypes OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.12–1.45). Conclusions: Variation in NLK may be associated with risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. Further studies are needed to confirm and understand the biologic relationship between this mitotic kinase and ovarian cancer risk. Impact: An association between SNPs in NLK and ovarian cancer may provide biologic insight into the development of this disease. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 21(3); 523–8. ©2012 AACR.

Abstract The importance of inflammation pathways to the development of many human cancers prompted us to examine the associations between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in inflammation-related genes and risk of ovarian cancer. In a multisite case–control study, we genotyped SNPs in a large panel of inflammatory genes in 930 epithelial ovarian cancer cases and 1,037 controls using a custom array and analyzed by logistic regression. SNPs with P < 0.10 were evaluated among 3,143 cases and 2,102 controls from the Follow-up of Ovarian Cancer Genetic Association and Interaction Studies (FOCI) post-GWAS collaboration. Combined analysis revealed association with SNPs rs17561 and rs4848300 in the interleukin gene IL1A which varied by histologic subtype (Pheterogeneity = 0.03). For example, IL1A rs17561, which correlates with numerous inflammatory phenotypes, was associated with decreased risk of clear cell, mucinous, and endometrioid subtype, but not with the most common serous subtype. Genotype at rs1864414 in the arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase ALOX5 was also associated with decreased risk. Thus, inherited variation in IL1A and ALOX5 seems to affect ovarian cancer risk which, for IL1A, is limited to rarer subtypes. Given the importance of inflammation in tumorigenesis and growing evidence of subtype-specific features in ovarian cancer, functional investigations will be important to help clarify the importance of inherited variation related to inflammation in ovarian carcinogenesis. Cancer Res; 72(5); 1064–9. ©2012 AACR.

Abstract Background: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in microRNA-related genes have been associated with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk in two reports, yet associated alleles may be inconsistent across studies. Methods: We conducted a pooled analysis of previously identified SNPs by combining genotype data from 3,973 invasive EOC cases and 3,276 controls from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. We also conducted imputation to obtain dense coverage of genes and comparable genotype data for all studies. In total, 226 SNPs within 15 kb of 4 miRNA biogenesis genes (DDX20, DROSHA, GEMIN4, and XPO5) and 23 SNPs located within putative miRNA binding sites of 6 genes (CAV1, COL18A1, E2F2, IL1R1, KRAS, and UGT2A3) were genotyped or imputed and analyzed in the entire dataset. Results: After adjustment for European ancestry, no overall association was observed between any of the analyzed SNPs and EOC risk. Conclusions: Common variants in these evaluated genes do not seem to be strongly associated with EOC risk. Impact: This analysis suggests earlier associations between EOC risk and SNPs in these genes may have been chance findings, possibly confounded by population admixture. To more adequately evaluate the relationship between genetic variants and cancer risk, large sample sizes are needed, adjustment for population stratification should be carried out, and use of imputed SNP data should be considered. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 20(8); 1793–7. ©2011 AACR.

Abstract Background: We previously identified a panel of genes associated with outcome of ovarian cancer. The purpose of the current study was to assess whether variants in these genes correlated with ovarian cancer risk. Methods and Findings: Women with and without invasive ovarian cancer (749 cases, 1,041 controls) were genotyped at 136 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within 13 candidate genes. Risk was estimated for each SNP and for overall variation within each gene. At the gene-level, variation within MSL1 (male-specific lethal-1 homolog) was associated with risk of serous cancer (p=0.03); haplotypes within PRPF31 (PRP31 pre-mRNA processing factor 31 homolog) were associated with risk of invasive disease (p=0.03). MSL1 rs7211770 was associated with decreased risk of serous disease (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.66-0.98; p=0.03). SNPs in MFSD7, BTN3A3, ZNF200, PTPRS, and CCND1A were inversely associated with risk (p<0.05), and there was increased risk at HEXIM1 rs1053578 (p=0.04, OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.02-1.91). Conclusions: Tumor studies can reveal novel genes worthy of follow-up for cancer susceptibility. Here, we found that inherited markers in the gene encoding MSL1, part of a complex that modifies the histone H4, may decrease risk of invasive serous ovarian cancer. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4718.

Abstract Genome-wide association analyses have identified an ovarian cancer susceptibility locus near BNC2 at 9p22.2 (OR 0.82, p 5.1 × 10−19, Nat Genet 41:996-1000, 2009), based on 1,772 and 2,354 Stage I cases and controls, 4,803 and 5,237 Stage 2 cases and controls, and extensive Stage 3 analysis in independent samples. Here, we report on Stage 3 analysis of nine additional regions with Stage 2 results at p < 10−4. Stage 1 samples were genotyped using the Illumina 610Quad and imputed at up to 2 million SNPs; Stage 2 samples were genotyped on an Illumina iSelect of 22,790 SNPs. Stage 3 samples from 4,335 cases (including 2,197 serous subtype) and 5,951 controls (14 studies) were genotyped using Illumina or Sequenom at up to 32 SNPs on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 11, and 17. No evidence of heterogeneity by study site was observed. Logistic regression revealed four regions with ordinal p ≤ 10−7 in all cases or serous subtype only. The most significant finding for all cases was for rs2072590 at 2q31.1 (all cases OR 1.15, p=8.1 × 10−13; serous only OR 1.19 p=9.0 × 10−13) which is located 3.8 kb 3-prime of HOXD3, a homeobox gene which also had an intronic SNP (rs2301301) with p=3.1 × 10−5 (all cases). Second, we observed a locus at 8q24.21 highlighted by rs10088218 (all cases OR 0.84, p=1.3 × 10−9; serous only OR 0.75 p=2.2 × 10−14). This locus resides on the opposite side of MYC and 1.3 Mb from the 8q24 regions harboring loci for other cancers, and is independent of the other cancer-associated variants (r2 < 0.02). Third, at 3q25.31, promising results were observed at rs2665390, a SNP intronic to TIPARP (TiPARP, TCDD-inducible poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; all cases OR 1.19, p=8.7 × 10−7; serous only OR 1.26, p=3.2 × 10−8). Finally, at 17q21.32, rs9303542 was associated with risk particularly among serous cases (all cases OR 1.13, p=1.5 × 10−6; serous only OR 1.16 p=4.3 × 10−7); this SNP is intronic to SKAP1 (src kinase associated phosphoprotein 1). We evaluated the functional role of genes at these loci in ovarian cancer and normal ovarian epithelial cells and in an in vitro model of neoplastic initiation and progression from normal ovarian epithelial cells after CYMC and KRAS activation. Both BNC2 and TiPARP were down regulated in cancer versus normal cells (p=5 × 10−9 and p=3.4 × 10−5, respectively) suggesting that loss of function is required for cancer development. Over-expressing CMYC (at 8q24) induced neoplastic transformation of normal ovarian cells. Both BNC2 and TiPARP were down-regulated following CMYC over-expression and showed significant loss of function with further transformation after mutant KRAS activation (p=7.8 × 10−7 and p=6.3 × 10−4, respectively). These results emphasize the importance of genome-wide association studies and consortia for the identification of moderate-risk alleles in rare cancers. Importantly, our findings unravel the genetic components of this disease and suggest functionally-significant novel targets. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3860.

Abstract Introduction: Alterations in components of the stromal tissue that underlie the epithelium can initiate, promote or inhibit epithelial tumorigenesis. Decorin (DCN) and lumican (LUM) are stromal genes with reduced expression in serous ovarian cancer. We hypothesized that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in these genes may influence susceptibility to serous ovarian cancer. Methods: To test this hypothesis, we compared genotype frequencies of 11 tagSNPs in DCN and LUM between 397 Caucasian cases with primary serous ovarian cancer and 920 Caucasian controls in two studies conducted at Mayo Clinic and Duke University (discovery set). Associations were evaluated further in a third Caucasian population of 436 cases and 1,098 controls in Australia (replication set). TagSNPs were selected from unrelated Caucasian samples within HapMap based on the following criteria: (i) minor allele frequency ≥ 0.05, (ii) pairwise linkage disequilibrium (LD) of r2 ≥ 0.8, and (iii) location within, and 5kb upstream and downstream of, each gene region. Genotyping was performed using the Illumina GoldenGate™ assay and associations between SNPs and serous cancer were evaluated using unconditional logistic regression to estimate per allele odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Untyped genotypes for DCN rs13312816 in the discovery set, and for DCN rs3138165 and LUM rs17018765 in the replication set, were imputed using the MACH software. Results: In the discovery set, we observed inverse associations between DCN rs3138165 (OR=0.7; 95%CI=0.5-1.0), DCN rs13312816 (OR=0.7; 95%CI=0.5-1.0), DCN rs516115 (OR=0.8; 95%CI=0.7-1.0) and LUM rs17018765 (OR=0.7; 95%CI=0.5-1.0) and risk of serous ovarian cancers (all Ptrend=0.06). Associations were confirmed in the replication set for DCN rs3138165 (OR=0.6; 95%CI=0.4-0.9; Ptrend=0.009), DCN rs13312816 (OR=0.7; 95%CI=0.5-0.9; Ptrend=0.01) and LUM rs17018765 (OR=0.6; 95%CI=0.4-0.9; Ptrend=0.008), but not for DCN rs516115 (Ptrend=0.20). To increase statistical power, data from the discovery and replication sets were combined (833 cases and 2,013 controls) following confirmation of no statistical heterogeneity in the ORs between study sites. In the combined sample, associations were strengthened for DCN rs3138165 (OR=0.7; 95%CI=0.5-0.9; Ptrend=0.002), DCN rs13312816 (OR=0.7; 95%CI=0.5-0.9; Ptrend=0.002), DCN rs516115 (OR=0.9; 95%CI=0.8-1.0; Ptrend=0.03) and LUM rs17018765 (OR=0.6; 95%CI=0.5-0.8; Ptrend=0.001). All four SNPs were in the same LD block on chromosome 12, suggesting that serous ovarian cancer susceptibility may be driven by a single, correlated variant in the region. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that genetic variation in DCN and LUM may influence susceptibility to serous ovarian cancer and contribute to the mounting evidence that supports the role of the stroma in epithelial ovarian cancer. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2854.

Abstract There is increasing evidence that neighboring stromal cells are not uninvolved bystanders in the pathway to cancer. We hypothesized that SNPs in genes expressed as a consequence of interactions between ovarian cancer cells and the host micro-environment could contribute to ovarian cancer susceptibility. We therefore used a two-stage approach to comprehensively evaluate common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC) for 173 genes involved in stromal-epithelial interactions. Cases with epithelial ovarian cancer (n=675) and controls (n=1,162) were genotyped at 1536 SNPs using an Illumina GoldenGate™ BeadArray array. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and adjust for potential confounders. Based on Positive Predictive Value estimates, three SNPs - PODXL rs1013368, ITGA6 rs13027811 and MMP3 rs522616 - were selected for replication using TaqMan genotyping in 3,734 serous invasive cases and 10,067 controls from 16 OCAC case-control studies. An additional 18 SNPs with Pper-allele <0.05 in the test set, and which fitted into an iPLEX design, were selected for replication by a subset of five OCAC studies (n=1771 serous invasive cases; n=4022 controls). The associations observed in the test set for the PODXL, ITGA6 and MMP3 SNPs were completely attenuated in the replication set (adj. Pper-allele ≥0.5). However, TERT rs7726159 showed evidence of a log additive association with ovarian cancer risk in the replication study (Pper-allele =0.03). Combined analysis of the test and replication sets for this SNP showed a significant association with risk of serous ovarian cancer among non-Hispanic whites [adj. ORper-allele 1.14 (1.04 - 1.24) p = 0.003]. A stronger association was observed for serous invasive cases when data for all ethnicities were included [adj. ORper-allele 1.18 (1.09 - 1.28) p = 2.46 × 10−5]. Stratification by histological subtype and malignant potential showed that TERT rs7726159 was also associated with risk of serous borderline tumors, but not with any other subtypes. Although TERT variants have not been previously reported to be associated with ovarian cancer, multiple genome-wide association studies have reported associations with this locus and risk of glioma, basal cell carcinoma, and several cancer types that are known to originate in the epithelium, including lung, bladder, prostate and cervical cancer. Further analysis of this locus is necessary to definitively identify the causal SNP(s). Our study adds to the growing evidence that, as well as 8q24, the TERT locus at 5p15.33, is a general cancer susceptibility locus. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4727.

Abstract Aberrant glycosylation is a well-described hallmark of cancer. In a previous ovarian cancer case control study that examined polymorphisms in 26 glycosylation-associated genes, we found strong statistical evidence (P = 0.00017) that women who inherited two copies of a single-nucleotide polymorphism in the UDP-N-acetylgalactosamine:polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase, GALNT1, had decreased ovarian cancer risk. The current study attempted to replicate this observation. The GALNT1 single-nucleotide polymorphism rs17647532 was genotyped in 6,965 cases and 8,377 controls from 14 studies forming the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. The fixed effects estimate per rs17647532 allele was null (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.07). When a recessive model was fit, the results were unchanged. Test for hetero geneity of the odds ratios revealed consistency across the 14 replication sites but significant differences compared with the original study population (P = 0.03). This study underscores the need for replication of putative findings in genetic association studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 19(2); 600–4

Abstract We genotyped 13 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the estrogen receptor alpha gene (ESR1) region in three population-based case-control studies of epithelial ovarian cancer conducted in the United States, comprising a total of 1,128 and 1,866 non-Hispanic white invasive cases and controls, respectively. A SNP 19 kb downstream of ESR1 (rs2295190, G-to-T change) was associated with invasive ovarian cancer risk, with a per-T-allele odds ratio (OR) of 1.24 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.06-1.44, P = 0.006]. rs2295190 is a nonsynonymous coding SNP in a neighboring gene called spectrin repeat containing, nuclear envelope 1 (SYNE1), which is involved in nuclear organization and structural integrity, function of the Golgi apparatus, and cytokinesis. An isoform encoded by SYNE1 has been reported to be downregulated in ovarian and other cancers. rs2295190 was genotyped in an additional 12 studies through the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, with 5,279 invasive epithelial cases and 7,450 controls. The per-T-allele OR for this 12-study set was 1.09 (95% CI, 1.02-1.17; P = 0.017). Results for the serous subtype in the 15 combined studies were similar to those overall (n = 3,545; OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.18; P = 0.025), and our findings were strongest for the mucinous subtype (n = 447; OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.11-1.58; P = 0.002). No association was observed for the endometrioid subtype. In an additional analysis of 1,459 borderline ovarian cancer cases and 7,370 controls, rs2295190 was not associated with risk. These data provide suggestive evidence that the rs2295190 T allele, or another allele in linkage disequilibrium with it, may be associated with increased risk of invasive ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 19(1); 244–50