AbstractEnhanced recovery protocols consist of a bundle of concepts including early feeding, opioid‐sparing multimodal pain management, and euvolemia, with the overarching goal of hastening postoperative recovery. Enhanced recovery after surgery has been shown to reduce hospital length of stay, reduce costs, and decrease perioperative opioid requirements in benign and oncologic gynecologic surgery. Interventions without supporting evidence of benefit, such as the use of mechanical bowel preparation, routine use of nasogastric tubes and surgical drains, caloric restriction, routine use of intravenous opioid analgesics, and over‐vigorous intravenous hydration should be discouraged to improve broader endpoints such as patient satisfaction and overall recovery. Successful implementation requires engagement from a multidisciplinary team including surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, and pharmacists.
Abstract 3544: Assessment of chemo-response in cells derived from patients with malignant ascites
Abstract Objectives. To assess chemo-response of patient derived ovarian cancer cells to first line chemotherapeutic agents as well as targeted therapies. Methods. Ascites was obtained at laparotomy from 14 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Short term cultures were established in 11 of these and the cells characterized by morphology and immuno-staining to cytokeratin AE1/AE3 and E-cadherin. MTT assays were done on the 11 samples after 48 hours of exposure to Cisplatin, Paclitaxel, Vandetanib and Flavopiridol. Results. Three samples did not grow well and ultimately showed senescence or were over-run by fibroblasts. In the remaining 11 samples, morphology showed the cells to be arranged in a cobble-stone or rosette pattern. Most of the cells stained positive for cytokeratin AE1/AE3 and E-cadherin. The majority of samples (8/11, 73%) were sensitive to either Cisplatin or Paclitaxel. Of the three resistant samples, one was sensitive to Vandetanib, one to Flavopiridol and one was resistant to all four drugs. Two patients did not receive chemotherapy due to morbidity or mortality. Among those who were treated, 4 (50%) had complete response and are currently free of disease. Conclusions. Short term cultures may be a good method of studying chemo-response of tumor cells ex-vivo. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3544.
Abstract 4718: Inherited variants in relapse-associated genes and risk of ovarian cancer
Abstract Background: We previously identified a panel of genes associated with outcome of ovarian cancer. The purpose of the current study was to assess whether variants in these genes correlated with ovarian cancer risk. Methods and Findings: Women with and without invasive ovarian cancer (749 cases, 1,041 controls) were genotyped at 136 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within 13 candidate genes. Risk was estimated for each SNP and for overall variation within each gene. At the gene-level, variation within MSL1 (male-specific lethal-1 homolog) was associated with risk of serous cancer (p=0.03); haplotypes within PRPF31 (PRP31 pre-mRNA processing factor 31 homolog) were associated with risk of invasive disease (p=0.03). MSL1 rs7211770 was associated with decreased risk of serous disease (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.66-0.98; p=0.03). SNPs in MFSD7, BTN3A3, ZNF200, PTPRS, and CCND1A were inversely associated with risk (p<0.05), and there was increased risk at HEXIM1 rs1053578 (p=0.04, OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.02-1.91). Conclusions: Tumor studies can reveal novel genes worthy of follow-up for cancer susceptibility. Here, we found that inherited markers in the gene encoding MSL1, part of a complex that modifies the histone H4, may decrease risk of invasive serous ovarian cancer. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4718.