Rimm, David L.

Assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in histopathologic specimens can provide important prognostic information in diverse solid tumor types, and may also be of value in predicting response to treatments. However, implementation as a routine clinical biomarker has not yet been achieved. As successful use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and other forms of immunotherapy become a clinical reality, the need for widely applicable, accessible, and reliable immunooncology biomarkers is clear. In part 1 of this review we briefly discuss the host immune response to tumors and different approaches to TIL assessment. We propose a standardized methodology to assess TILs in solid tumors on hematoxylin and eosin sections, in both primary and metastatic settings, based on the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group guidelines for TIL assessment in invasive breast carcinoma. A review of the literature regarding the value of TIL assessment in different solid tumor types follows in part 2. The method we propose is reproducible, affordable, easily applied, and has demonstrated prognostic and predictive significance in invasive breast carcinoma. This standardized methodology may be used as a reference against which other methods are compared, and should be evaluated for clinical validity and utility. Standardization of TIL assessment will help to improve consistency and reproducibility in this field, enrich both the quality and quantity of comparable evidence, and help to thoroughly evaluate the utility of TILs assessment in this era of immunotherapy.

Assessment of the immune response to tumors is growing in importance as the prognostic implications of this response are increasingly recognized, and as immunotherapies are evaluated and implemented in different tumor types. However, many different approaches can be used to assess and describe the immune response, which limits efforts at implementation as a routine clinical biomarker. In part 1 of this review, we have proposed a standardized methodology to assess tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in solid tumors, based on the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarkers Working Group guidelines for invasive breast carcinoma. In part 2 of this review, we discuss the available evidence for the prognostic and predictive value of TILs in common solid tumors, including carcinomas of the lung, gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary system, gynecologic system, and head and neck, as well as primary brain tumors, mesothelioma and melanoma. The particularities and different emphases in TIL assessment in different tumor types are discussed. The standardized methodology we propose can be adapted to different tumor types and may be used as a standard against which other approaches can be compared. Standardization of TIL assessment will help clinicians, researchers and pathologists to conclusively evaluate the utility of this simple biomarker in the current era of immunotherapy.

Abstract Background: Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR, HER1) is known to heterodimerize with HER2 and may impact the effectiveness of trastuzumab. Historically, EGFR has been difficult to measure; thus there is no evidence regarding its effects on trastuzumab clinical therapy. Here we use a new, standardized, quantitative immunofluorescence assay and a novel EGFR antibody to evaluate the correlation between EGFR expression and clinical outcome in a cohort from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG, Alliance) N9831 trial. Methods: Of the 3505 women in the N9831 trial, tissue microarrays were constructed that allowed analysis of 1,444 patients randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy alone (Arm A), sequential trastuzumab after chemotherapy (Arm B) or concurrent trastuzumab with chemotherapy (Arm C). Fluorescence-based, standardized measurement of EGFR was done using the rabbit monoclonal EGFR antibody D38B1 on the AQUA platform (HistoRx). EGFR expression levels were analyzed as a continuous variable and dichotomized using recursive partitioning to define an optimal cut point. The cut point was validated on an independent retrospective cohort comprised of 130 patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who received trastuzumab. Results: EGFR assessed as a continuous variable shows an association with disease free survival (DFS) in Arm C (p = 0.002) but not in Arms A or B. Dichotomizing EGFR expression shows that high level expression is associated with worse outcome (HR = 2.2; 95% CI 1.33–3.59, p = 0.002) in arm C. Five year DFS within the low level EGFR expression group was 71%, 74% and 90% for Arms A, B and C, respectively (log-rank p-value=0.02) and within the high level EGFR expression (n = 213) group was 62%, 76% and 74% respectively (log-rank p-value 0.22). As validation, the same cut-point was used to define high EGFR expression in a retrospective metastatic breast cancer cohort. The median progression free survival difference between EGFR high group and EGFR low group was 6.1 months (p = 0.0063) and the hazard ratio of high EGFR was 1.92 (p = 0.0073). Conclusions: High expression of EGFR by the AQUA platform appears to be associated with decreased benefit from adjuvant concurrent (not sequential) trastuzumab and shorter PFS in the metastatic setting. The biological underpinning for these observations is being considered. Since there are other treatment options for HER2-driven tumors, this marker, once validated, could help select patients for alternative or additive therapy. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr S5-4.

Abstract A group of investigators met at a Specialized Programs of Research Excellence Workshop to discuss key issues in the translation of biomarker discovery to the development of useful laboratory tests for cancer care. Development and approval of several new markers and technologies have provided informative examples that include more specific markers for prostate cancer, more sensitive tests for ovarian cancer, more objective analysis of tissue architecture and an earlier indication of response to treatment in breast cancer. Although there is no clear paradigm for biomarker development, several principles are clear. Marker development should be driven by clinical needs, including early cancer detection, accurate pretreatment staging, and prediction of response to treatment, as well as monitoring disease progression and response to therapy. Development of a national repository that uses carefully preserved, well-annotated tissue specimens will facilitate new marker development. Reference standards will be an essential component of this process. Both hospital-based and commercial laboratories can play a role in developing biomarkers from discovery to test validation. Partnering of academe and industry should occur throughout the process of biomarker development. The National Cancer Institute is in a unique position to bring together academe, industry, and the Food and Drug Administration to (a) define clinical needs for biomarkers by tumor type, (b) establish analytic and clinical paradigms for biomarker development, (c) discuss ways in which markers from different companies might be evaluated in combination, (d) establish computational methods to combine data from multiple biomarkers, (e) share information regarding promising markers developed in National Cancer Institute–supported programs, and (f) exchange data regarding new platforms and techniques that can accelerate marker development.