Pennington, Kelly M.

Background. Invasive fungal infections are associated with high morbidity in solid organ transplant recipients. Risk factor modification may help with preventative efforts. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors for the development of fungal infections within the first year following solid organ transplant. Methods. We searched for eligible articles through February 3, 2023. Studies published after January 1, 2001, that pertained to risk factors for development of invasive fungal infections in solid organ transplant were reviewed for inclusion. Of 3087 articles screened, 58 were included. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model to evaluate individual risk factors for the primary outcome of any invasive fungal infections and invasive candidiasis or invasive aspergillosis (when possible) within 1 y posttransplant. Results. We found 3 variables with a high certainty of evidence and strong associations (relative effect estimate ≥ 2) to any early invasive fungal infections across all solid organ transplant groups: reoperation (odds ratio [OR], 2.92; confidence interval [CI], 1.79-4.75), posttransplant renal replacement therapy (OR, 2.91; CI, 1.87-4.51), and cytomegalovirus disease (OR, 2.97; CI, 1.78-4.94). Both posttransplant renal replacement therapy (OR, 3.36; CI, 1.78-6.34) and posttransplant cytomegalovirus disease (OR, 2.81; CI, 1.47-5.36) increased the odds of early posttransplant invasive aspergillosis. No individual variables could be pooled across groups for invasive candidiasis. Conclusions. Several common risk factors exist for the development of any invasive fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients. Additional risk factors for invasive candidiasis and aspergillosis may be unique to the pathogen, transplanted organ, or both.

Context.— Respiratory infections complicate lung transplantation and increase the risk of allograft dysfunction. Allograft lungs may have different susceptibilities to infection than native lungs, potentially leading to different disease severity in lungs of single lung transplant recipients (SLTRs). Objective.— To study whether infections affect allograft and native lungs differently in SLTRs but similarly in double LTRs (DLTRs). Design.— Using an institutional database of LTRs, medical records were searched, chest computed tomography studies were systematically reviewed, and histopathologic features were recorded per lung lobe and graded semiquantitatively. A multilobar-histopathology score (MLHS) including histopathologic data from each lung and a bilateral ratio (MLHSratio) comparing histopathologies between both lungs were calculated in SLTRs and compared to DLTRs. Results.— Six SLTRs died of infection involving the lungs. All allografts showed multifocal histopathologic evidence of infection, but at least 1 lobe of the native lung was uninvolved. In 4 of 5 DLTRs, histopathologic evidence of infection was seen in all lung lobes. On computed tomography, multifocal ground-glass and/or nodular opacities were found in a bilateral distribution in all DLTRs but in only 2 of 6 SLTRs. In SLTRs, the MLHSAllograft was higher than MLHSNative (P = .02). The MLHSratio values of SLTR and DLTR were significantly different (P < .001). Conclusions.— Allograft and native lungs appear to harbor different susceptibilities to infections. The results are important for the management of LTRs.

Abstract Background/Objective A subset of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) develops highly fatal, rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD). Treatment strategies consist of glucocorticoid and adjunctive immunosuppressive therapies. Plasma exchange (PE) is an alternative therapy, but its benefit is unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine whether PE benefited outcomes for patients with RP-ILD. Methods In this medical records review study, we compared baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes for 2 groups of patients with IIM-related RP-ILD: those who received and did not receive PE. Results Our cohort consisted of 15 patients, 9 of whom received PE. Baseline demographic characteristics and severity of lung, skin, and musculoskeletal disease between the 2 groups of patients were not significantly different. Five patients required mechanical ventilation (2, PE; 3, no PE). Plasma exchange was generally a third-line adjunctive treatment option. The PE group had a longer median (interquartile range) hospitalization (27.0 [23.0–36.0] days) than the non-PE group (12.0 [8.0–14.0] days) (p = 0.02). There was a potential benefit in 30-day mortality improvement in those receiving PE (0% vs 33%, p = 0.14), with a statistically significant improvement in 2 important composite end points including 30-day mortality or need for lung transplant (0% vs 50%, p = 0.04) and 1-year mortality or need for lung transplant or hospital readmission for RP-ILD in those receiving PE (22% vs 83%, p = 0.04). Conclusions Plasma exchange may be an underutilized, safe salvage therapy for patients with IIM-related RP-ILD when other immunosuppressive therapies fail.

Abstract Rationale Candida albicans (CA) is ubiquitous and individuals are often immunized against it. However, skin testing reactivity with CA-antigens (CAAg) have been variable during latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) screening. We hypothesized that the use of a CAAg in an ELISPOT assay would provide a positive control to study tuberculosis (TB)-antigen specific immune responses. Objective To test an ELISPOT with TB-antigens and control conditions, including a purified protein derivative of CA, CAAg, that differentiates subjects with LTBI from unexposed subjects. Methods An ELISPOT that detects interferon-γ from PBMCs (2×105 cells) after 2-day incubation with TB antigens, controls, including CAAg, and co-stimulatory antibodies. We studied two independent cohorts of subjects with LTBI diagnosis based on TST and IGRA results per clinical guidelines. Results One-hundred thirty-nine subjects were studied in 2010–12, including 27 patients with LTBI and 21 IGRA(−) unexposed subjects. ELISPOT with TB-antigens but also CAAg - nil (78 [21 – 182] vs. 9 [1 – 50] cfu) differentiated LTBI subjects from unexposed ones (P<0.005). A second cohort of 76 subjects were studied in 2015–17, including 14 patients with LTBI and 24 unexposed controls, which showed similar statistical results. Positive control (SEAB/antiCD3) did not differentiate these study groups. ELISPOT results with CAAg correlated with results of ELISPOT with TB antigens in all subjects (P<0.001), and in the LTBI and unexposed groups independently. Conclusion An ELISPOT assay that includes CAAg revealed immune reactivity that is prevalent in LTBI. The immune subsets that react to both CA and mycobacterial antigens are unclear, but may be relevant for both TB and candida immunity.

AbstractBackgroundThe incidence and impact of de novo fungal airway colonization and infection in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) with known chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) has not been established. We aimed to determine the 1‐year cumulative incidence and risk factors of de novo fungal colonization or infection in LTRs with CLAD and assess the impact of colonization or infection on post‐CLAD survival.MethodsProspectively collected Toronto Lung Transplant Program database and chart review were used for double‐LTRs who were diagnosed with CLAD from January 1, 2016 to January 1, 2020 and who were free of airway fungi within 1 year prior to CLAD onset. International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation definitions were used to define clinical syndromes. Cox‐Proportional Hazards Models were used for risk‐factor analysis. Survival analysis could not be completed secondary to low number of fungal events; therefore, descriptive statistics were employed for survival outcomes.ResultsWe found 186 LTRs diagnosed with CLAD meeting our inclusion criteria. The 1‐year cumulative incidence for any fungal event was 11.8% (7.0% for infection and 4.8% for colonization). Aspergillus fumigatus was a causative pathogen in eight of 13 (61.5%) patients with infection and six of nine (66.7%) patients with colonization. No patients with fungal colonization post‐CLAD developed fungal infection. Peri‐CLAD diagnosis (3 months prior or 1 month after) methylprednisolone bolus (hazards ratio: 8.84, p = .001) increased the risk of fungal events. Most patients diagnosed with fungal infections (53.8%) died within 1‐year of CLAD onset.ConclusionDe novo IFIs and fungal colonization following CLAD onset were not common. Fungal colonization did not lead to fungal infection. Methylprednisolone bolus was a significant risk factors for post‐CLAD fungal events. image

AbstractBackgroundLung transplant recipients are at increased risk of candidemia, especially in the early posttransplant period. However, the specific predisposing factors have not been established. The natural history of candidemia after lung transplantation, in the absence of universal antifungal prophylaxis, is not known.MethodsWe retrospectively examined the epidemiology of candidemia at any time posttransplant in patients who underwent lung transplantation at our center between 2016 and 2019. We undertook a case‐control study and used logistic regression to evaluate the risk factors for candidemia during the first 30 days posttransplantation.ResultsDuring the study period 712 lung transplants were performed on 705 patients. Twenty‐five lung transplant recipients (LTRs) (3.5%) experienced 31 episodes of candidemia. The median time to candidemia was 19.5 days (IQR 10.5–70.5), with 61.2% (n = 19) episodes of candidemia occurring within the first 30 days posttransplantation. Pretransplant hospitalization, posttransplant ECMO, and posttransplant renal replacement therapy were associated with an increased risk of candidemia in the first 30 days posttransplant. Of those with candidemia in the first 30 days, 31.2% died within 30 days of the index positive blood culture. Candidemia was associated with decreased survival within 30 days posttransplant.ConclusionThis study highlights the greatest risk period of lung transplant recipients for development of candidemia and identifies several factors associated with increased risk of candidemia. These findings will help guide future studies on antifungal prophylaxis.