Key PointsWe identified CRBN-binding proteins and confirmed recent work implicating the Ikaros transcription factors as important members. Low IZKF1 levels predict lack of IMiD responsiveness and shorter OS; IZKF1 expression is a potential predictive biomarker for clinic application.
Where We Were, Where We Are, Where We Are Going: Progress in Multiple Myeloma
The celebration of the 50th anniversary of the founding of the American Society of Clinical Oncology provides the occasion to review the progress that has been made in the biology and treatment of multiple myeloma. With the advent of melphalan and cyclophosphamide in the early 1960s the median survival of patients with multiple myeloma more than doubled from 10 months to approximately 24 months. Throughout multiple clinical trials in the 1970s and 1980s, melphalan and prednisone remained the gold standard, with a 3-year survival of 42%. The use of high-dose melphalan with autologous hematopoietic stem cell support provided an incremental advance in the 1990s. The outlook for patients was dramatically improved in the 2000s with the introduction of thalidomide analogs and proteasome inhibitors, so that the 3-year survival of patients treated in 2008 with melphalan and prednisone had increased to 66%. The 2010s are dominated by studying the optimal combination, sequence, and duration of therapies. These clinical advances have occurred along with our evolving understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of myeloma. Myeloma can be divided into two main groups: hyperdiploid, with multiple trisomies of odd-numbered chromosomes, and nonhyperdiploid, with recurrent immunoglobulin heavy chain gene translocations. Disease progression is associated with rearrangements of MYC, the most common mutation in myeloma, present in nearly half of patients. Genomic studies have highlighted marked subclonal heterogeneity that poses one of the main challenges to successful control of the disease. This problem will be addressed in future studies in the 2020s, which will include a focus on immunologic approaches such as monoclonal antibodies, checkpoint inhibitors, engineered T-cells, and novel immunomodulators.
Repair of DNA double-strand breaks by templated nucleotide sequence insertions derived from distant regions of the genome
Significance We show that DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) can be repaired by insertion of 50- to 1,000-bp sequences termed “templated-sequence insertions” (TSIs) derived from distant regions of the genome. Additional experiments indicate that the source of template for repair was primarily nuclear RNA. This mode of DNA-DSB repair by insertion is not restricted to experimentally produced breaks but also occurs at the site of spontaneous DNA DSBs in human cells. These TSIs are polymorphic in the human genome, suggesting that some TSIs occur in germ cells or embryos. Recognition of these TSIs is important in interpreting structural variations in short-read sequencing studies and provides additional polymorphic markers for population and evolution studies. This error-prone form of DNA repair may play a role in genetic diseases.
CD28-mediated pro-survival signaling induces chemotherapeutic resistance in multiple myeloma
Key PointsCD28 delivers a pro-survival signal to MM cells via regulation of PI3K/Akt, FoxO3a, and Bim. Blockade of CD28:CD80/CD86 in vivo resensitizes MM cells to chemotherapy and significantly reduces tumor burden.
TPL2 kinase regulates the inflammatory milieu of the myeloma niche
Key PointsWe describe a novel, druggable pathway that controls myeloma growth through macrophages in the myeloma microenvironment. Macrophages are dominant orchestrators of the inflammatory milieu of the myeloma niche.
Complex IGH rearrangements in multiple myeloma: Frequent detection discrepancies among three different probe sets
Abstract Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) bridges the gap between monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (a mostly premalignant disorder) and active multiple myeloma (MM). Until recently, no interventional study in patients with SMM showed improved overall survival (OS) with therapy as compared with observation. A report from the PETHEMA-GEM (Programa Español de Tratamientos en Hematologica) group described both fewer myeloma-related events and better OS among patients with high-risk SMM who were treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. This unique study prompted us to review current knowledge about SMM and address the following questions: (1) Are there patients currently defined as SMM who should be treated routinely? (2) Should the definitions of SMM and MM be reconsidered? (3) Has the time come when not treating is more dangerous than treating? (4) Could unintended medical harm result from overzealous intervention? Our conclusion is that those patients with the highest-risk SMM (extreme bone marrow plasmacytosis, extremely abnormal serum immunoglobulin free light chain ratio, and multiple bone lesions detected only by modern imaging) should be reclassified as active MM so that they can receive MM-appropriate therapy and the paradigm of careful observation for patients with SMM can be preserved.