Das, Avash

Introduction: Neutropenic diets are commonly prescribed to cancer patients with neutropenia with the intention of reducing rates of infection. These diets are restrictive and are associated with lower patient satisfaction and possibly malnutrition. Further, it is unclear if these restrictive diets are effective in reducing infection. We performed a meta-analysis on the rates of infection reported in trials comparing the neutropenic diet to unrestricted diets in cancer patients with neutropenia. Methods and Materials: A comprehensive database search for all published randomized controlled trials comparing infection rates in cancer patients receiving a neutropenic diet versus an unrestricted diet was performed for all publications in English language from database’s inception until September 12, 2017. The search strategy, study selection, and subsequent analysis adhered to PRISMA guidelines. Random effects modeling was used to obtain pooled relative risks. The primary outcome measure was the rate of infection. Results: Five randomized controlled trials with a total of 388 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients mostly had acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), or sarcoma. Infection was noted in 53.7% patients in the neutropenic diet group, as compared with 50% in the unrestricted diet group. No significant difference in infection rate was observed between the neutropenic diet versus unrestricted diet groups, pooled risk ratio (RR) 1.13 (95% CI, 0.98-1.30; P=0.10). Conclusions: This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials suggests that the use of neutropenic diet was not associated with decreased risk of infection in neutropenic cancer patients. The continued use of neutropenic diets should be questioned.

69 Background: Due to improved survival, an increasing number of patients with advanced cancer are eligible for aggressive ICU care, including intubation. The American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends early integration of palliative care in patients with advanced cancer. We analyzed 10-year trends in the utilization of palliative care, and predictors of palliative care use in patients with metastatic cancer undergoing intubation using the National Hospital Discharge Survey database from 2001-2010. Methods: Diagnosis and procedure codes were utilized to identify adult patients with metastatic cancer who underwent intubation, and received palliative care. Demographics, diagnoses, length of stay (LOS), and discharge information were extracted. T-tests and χ^2 tests were used to compare medians and proportions respectively in patients that did or did not receive palliative care. Multivariate regression models with weighted analysis were conducted to study predictors of palliative care use. Results: Over the 10-year study period, 200,350 patients with metastatic cancer and intubation were identified, mean age 65.3 years, 46.2% male. Of these, 6690 (3.3%) received palliative care. There was a significant increase in the use of palliative care from 2001 (0%) to 2010 (17.4%), p for trend < 0.001. In multivariate analysis, patients who received palliative care were more likely to have age > 65 years, be white vs non-white, be hospitalized in 2009-2010 vs 2000-2001, and be admitted to hospitals in the Western part of the US. The overall inpatient mortality rate was 57.3%, discharge to a care facility (DTCF) rate was 15.2%, and mean LOS was 11.1 days. The LOS and DTCF rates were similar in patients with and without palliative care. Patients with palliative care had higher rates of inpatient mortality (adjusted OR 9.6, 95% CI 2.2- 42.0). Conclusions: There was a dramatic increase in the use of palliative care in intubated patients with metastatic cancer. Studies to address the racial and geographic discrepancies in palliative care use are warranted. The higher mortality in palliative care group suggests it is being used for the sickest patients. Early (vs end of life) palliative care may be more beneficial.