Rbia, Nadia

Background: Mesenchymal stem cells have the potential to produce neurotrophic growth factors and establish a supportive microenvironment for neural regeneration. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of undifferentiated and differentiated mesenchymal stem cells dynamically seeded onto decellularized nerve allografts on functional outcomes when used in peripheral nerve repair. Methods: In 80 Lewis rats, a 10-mm sciatic nerve defect was reconstructed with (1) autograft, (2) decellularized allograft, (3) decellularized allograft seeded with undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells, or (4) decellularized allograft seeded with mesenchymal stem cells differentiated into Schwann cell–like cells. Nerve regeneration was evaluated over time by cross-sectional tibial muscle ultrasound measurements, and at 12 and 16 weeks by isometric tetanic force measurements, compound muscle action potentials, muscle mass, histology, and immunofluorescence analyses. Results: At 12 weeks, undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells significantly improved isometric tetanic force measurement and compound muscle action potential outcomes compared to decellularized allograft alone, whereas differentiated mesenchymal stem cells significantly improved compound muscle action potential outcomes. The autografts outperformed both stem cell groups histologically at 12 weeks. At 16 weeks, functional outcomes normalized between groups. At both time points, the effect of undifferentiated versus differentiated mesenchymal stem cells was not significantly different. Conclusions: Undifferentiated and differentiated mesenchymal stem cells significantly improved functional outcomes of decellularized allografts at 12 weeks and were similar to autograft results in the majority of measurements. At 16 weeks, outcomes normalized as expected. Although differences between both cell types were not statistically significant, undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells improved functional outcomes of decellularized nerve allografts to a greater extent and had practical benefits for clinical translation by limiting preparation time and costs.

AbstractPurposeAdipose derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are hypothesized to supplement tissues with growth factors essential for regeneration and neovascularization. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of MSCs with respect to neoangiogenesis when seeded onto a decellularized nerve allograft in a rat sciatic nerve defect model.MethodsAllograft nerves were harvested from Sprague–Dawley rats and decellularized. MSCs were obtained from Lewis rats. 10 mm sciatic nerve defects in Lewis rats were reconstructed with reversed autograft nerves, decellularized allografts, decellularized allografts seeded with undifferentiated MSC or decellularized allografts seeded with differentiated MSCs. At 16 weeks, the vascular surface area and volume were evaluated.ResultsThe vascular surface area in normal nerves (34.9 ± 5.7%), autografts (29.5 ± 8.7%), allografts seeded with differentiated (38.9 ± 7.0%) and undifferentiated MSCs (29.2 ± 3.4%) did not significantly differ from each other. Unseeded allografts (21.2 ± 6.2%) had a significantly lower vascular surface area percentage than normal nonoperated nerves (13.7%, p = .001) and allografts seeded with differentiated MSCs (17.8%, p = .001). Although the vascular surface area was significantly correlated to the vascular volume (r = .416; p = .008), no significant differences were found between groups concerning vascular volumes. The vascularization pattern in allografts seeded with MSCs consisted of an extensive nonaligned network of microvessels with a centripetal pattern, while the vessels in autografts and normal nerves were more longitudinally aligned with longitudinal inosculation patterns.ConclusionsNeoangiogenesis of decellularized allograft nerves was enhanced by stem cell seeding, in particular by differentiated MSCs. The pattern of vascularization was different between decellularized allograft nerves seeded with MSCs compared to autograft nerves.

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the molecular mechanisms underlying nerve repair by a decellularized nerve allograft seeded with adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and compare it to the unseeded allograft and autograft nerve. Methods: Undifferentiated MSCs were seeded onto decellularized nerve allografts and used to reconstruct a 10 mm gap in a rat sciatic nerve model. Gene expression profiles of genes essential for nerve regeneration and immunohistochemical staining (IHC) for PGP9.5, NGF, RECA-1, and S100 were obtained 2 weeks postoperatively. Results: Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis showed that the angiogenic molecule VEGFA was significantly increased in seeded allografts, and transcription factor SOX2 was downregulated in seeded allografts. Seeded grafts showed a significant increase in immunohistochemical markers NGF and RECA-1, when compared with unseeded allografts. Conclusions: MSCs contributed to the secretion of trophic factors. A beneficial effect of the MSCs on angiogenesis was found when compared with the unseeded nerve allograft, but implanted MSCs did not show evidence of differentiation into Schwann cell-like cells.

Background: The addition of adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells to decellularized nerve allografts may improve outcomes of nerve reconstruction. Prior techniques used for cell seeding are traumatic to both the mesenchymal stromal cells and nerve graft. An adequate, reliable, and validated cell seeding technique is an essential step for evaluating the translational utility of mesenchymal stromal cell–enhanced decellularized nerve grafts. The purpose of this study was to develop a simple seeding strategy with an optimal seeding duration. Methods: A dynamic bioreactor was used to seed rat and human mesenchymal stromal cells separately onto rat and human decellularized nerve allografts. Cell viability was evaluated by MTS assays and cellular topology after seeding was determined by scanning electron microscopy. Cell density and distribution were determined by Live/Dead assays and Hoechst staining at four different time points (6, 12, 24, and 72 hours). The validity and reliability of the seeding method were calculated. Results: Cells remained viable at all time points, and mesenchymal stromal cells exhibited exponential growth in the first 12 hours of seeding. Seeding efficiency increased significantly from 79.5 percent at 6 hours to 89.2 percent after 12 hours of seeding (p = 0.004). Both intrarater reliability (r = 0.97) and interrater reliability (r = 0.92) of the technique were high. Conclusions: This study describes and validates a new method of effectively seeding decellularized nerve allografts with mesenchymal stromal cells. This method is reproducible, distributes cells homogenously over the graft, and does not traumatize the intraneural architecture of the allograft. Use of this validated seeding technique will permit critical comparison of graft outcomes.

OBJECTIVEReconstructive options for brachial plexus lesions continue to expand and improve. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and quality of restored elbow extension in patients with brachial plexus injuries who underwent transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to the motor branch of the radial nerve to the long head of the triceps muscle with an intervening autologous nerve graft and to identify patient and injury factors that influence functional triceps outcome.METHODSA total of 42 patients were included in this retrospective review. All patients underwent transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to the motor branch of the radial nerve to the long head of the triceps muscle as part of their reconstruction plan after brachial plexus injury. The primary outcome was elbow extension strength according to the modified Medical Research Council muscle grading scale, and signs of triceps muscle recovery were recorded using electromyography.RESULTSWhen evaluating the entire study population (follow-up range 12–45 months, mean 24.3 months), 52.4% of patients achieved meaningful recovery. More specifically, 45.2% reached Grade 0 or 1 recovery, 19.1% obtained Grade 2, and 35.7% improved to Grade 3 or better. The presence of a vascular injury impaired functional outcome. In the subgroup with a minimum follow-up of 20 months (n = 26), meaningful recovery was obtained by 69.5%. In this subgroup, 7.7% had no recovery (Grade 0), 19.2% had recovery to Grade 1, and 23.1% had recovery to Grade 2. Grade 3 or better was reached by 50% of patients, of whom 34.5% obtained Grade 4 elbow extension.CONCLUSIONSTransfer of the spinal accessory nerve to the radial nerve branch to the long head of the triceps muscle with an interposition nerve graft is an adequate option for restoration of elbow extension, despite the relatively long time required for reinnervation. The presence of vascular injury impairs functional recovery of the triceps muscle, and the use of shorter nerve grafts is recommended when and if possible.

Objective: Successful repair of segmental peripheral nerve defects remains a clinical challenge. The current clinical gold standard for such injuries is to use an autologous nerve graft, but this creates donor site morbidity with loss of sensation and potential scarring. Processed nerve allografts have been used to bridge segmental nerve gaps experimentally and clinically. However, in large nerve defects, functional outcomes are not comparable with autograft reconstruction yet; the longer the nerve gap, the poorer the outcome. Nerve architecture and the extracellular matrix (ECM) are preserved after processing; however, all cellular material including Schwann cells and axons are removed. The addition of supporting cells has been proposed to improve the decellularized allograft. Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (AMSC) can potentially provide the necessary support for nerve regeneration due to local production of essential growth factors. While the mechanisms underlying the neurotrophic potential of AMSC remains unknown, it is postulated that the remaining ECM still has biological activity that influences the AMSC and their differentiation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to quantitate the changes in gene expression profiles of the cells and quantify the actual produced growth factors after seeding the allograft with AMSC in vitro. Method: A total of 35 human nerve allografts were decellularized and seeded with human AMSC. At each time point (1, 3, 14, 21, and 28 days), total RNA was extracted, reverse transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA), and quantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed in combination with gene specific assays for genes essential for nerve regeneration including nerve growth factor (NGF), Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), pleiotrophin vascular endothelial growth factor (PTN VEGF), and growth associated protein 43 (GAP43).Additional genes were analyzed to map AMSC characteristics including proliferation, apoptosis, myelinization, and ECM molecules. Production of growth factors was evaluated and quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). All samples were analyzed in triplicates and data were compared with AMSC cultured in media only. Results: Semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis showed that the interaction of the processed allograft and AMSC enhanced the expression of the neurotrophic factors NGF, BDNF, and GAP43. The expression of the angiogenic molecules, vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) was also increased and remained significantly elevated at 28 days post seeding. Analysis of ECM-related gene expression showed that laminin subunit beta-2 (LAMB2), collagen type I alpha 1 (COL1A1), collagen type III alpha 1 (COL3A1), fibulin 1 (FBLN1), were significantly elevated until 21 days post seeding while after 28 days, these levels were normalized. Angiogenic factor cluster of differentiation 31 (CD31) and neurotrophic factor PTN expression were down regulated in the seeded cells. Quantitative results of the ELISA analysis are pending. We anticipate differences in growth factor levels released by the seeded allograft compared with the control expression levels. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the remaining ECM of the decellularized nerve allograft has a stimulating effect on AMSC. Upon the seeding, secretion of neurotrophic and angiogenic factors were triggered; the cells cultured on the allograft showed enhanced levels of neurotrophic genes. This is hypothesized to be a consequence of specific cell-ECM interactions within the allograft. The combination of patient’s own easily accessible, abundant supply of stem cells harvested from adipose tissue and the readily available processed nerve allograft is potentially a promising method for individualized peripheral nerve repair.