Kircher, Michelle F.

We sought to identify predictors of failed ulnar nerve fascicle (to flexor carpi ulnaris) to biceps motor branch transfer. A retrospective review of adult brachial plexus patients treated with flexor carpi ulnaris to biceps transfer with a minimum 1-year follow-up was performed. Failure, defined as modified British Medical Research Council grade <3 elbow flexion was compared with randomly selected controls (M ≥ 4−). Ninety-one patients, of which 80% regained >M3 flexion met criteria. Eighteen failures and 18 controls, with similar follow-up (20 vs 23 months) were evaluated. Preoperative flexor carpi ulnaris weakness (M < 5) was significantly more common in failures (78% vs 33%). The rate of flexor carpi ulnaris recovery after operation was significantly higher in controls (86% vs 7%). Increased failure risk can be expected with impaired preoperative flexor carpi ulnaris function. The challenge is how to identify which patients will regain near normal flexor carpi ulnaris strength as excellent outcomes can be obtained. Level of evidence: III

Background: There is controversy regarding the effectiveness of brachial plexus reconstruction for elbow function in older patients, as reported outcomes are generally poor. The purpose of this study was to evaluate elbow function outcomes in patients older than 50. Methods: Fifty-eight patients older than 50 years underwent nerve grafting, transfers, or free functioning muscle transfer to improve elbow function after traumatic brachial plexus injury. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively for elbow flexion strength and range of motion; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores; pain; concomitant trauma; severity of trauma; and type of reconstruction. Results: The average age of the patients was 57.8 years, and the average follow-up was 24.0 months. The average modified British Medical Research Council elbow flexion grade improved significantly from 0.26 to 2.63. Thirty-three patients (60 percent) achieved functional flexion greater than or equal to M3 postoperatively, compared to zero patients preoperatively. There was no correlation between age and modified British Medical Research Council grade. Active elbow range of motion improved significantly postoperatively, with no effect of age on flexion motion. More patients achieved greater than or equal to M3 flexion with nerve transfers (69 percent) compared to free functioning muscle transfer (43 percent). Patients had worse outcomes with high-energy injuries. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score decreased from 51.5 to 49.6 postoperatively, and the average pain score decreased from 5.0 to 4.3. Conclusion: Brachial plexus reconstruction for elbow function in patients older than 50 can yield useful flexion. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

OBJECTIVEReconstructive options for brachial plexus lesions continue to expand and improve. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and quality of restored elbow extension in patients with brachial plexus injuries who underwent transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to the motor branch of the radial nerve to the long head of the triceps muscle with an intervening autologous nerve graft and to identify patient and injury factors that influence functional triceps outcome.METHODSA total of 42 patients were included in this retrospective review. All patients underwent transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to the motor branch of the radial nerve to the long head of the triceps muscle as part of their reconstruction plan after brachial plexus injury. The primary outcome was elbow extension strength according to the modified Medical Research Council muscle grading scale, and signs of triceps muscle recovery were recorded using electromyography.RESULTSWhen evaluating the entire study population (follow-up range 12–45 months, mean 24.3 months), 52.4% of patients achieved meaningful recovery. More specifically, 45.2% reached Grade 0 or 1 recovery, 19.1% obtained Grade 2, and 35.7% improved to Grade 3 or better. The presence of a vascular injury impaired functional outcome. In the subgroup with a minimum follow-up of 20 months (n = 26), meaningful recovery was obtained by 69.5%. In this subgroup, 7.7% had no recovery (Grade 0), 19.2% had recovery to Grade 1, and 23.1% had recovery to Grade 2. Grade 3 or better was reached by 50% of patients, of whom 34.5% obtained Grade 4 elbow extension.CONCLUSIONSTransfer of the spinal accessory nerve to the radial nerve branch to the long head of the triceps muscle with an interposition nerve graft is an adequate option for restoration of elbow extension, despite the relatively long time required for reinnervation. The presence of vascular injury impairs functional recovery of the triceps muscle, and the use of shorter nerve grafts is recommended when and if possible.

PurposeOur objective was to determine the prevalence and quality of restored external rotation (ER) in adult brachial plexus injury (BPI) patients who underwent spinal accessory nerve (SAN) to suprascapular nerve (SSN) transfer, and to identify patient and injury factors that may influence results.MethodsFifty‐one adult traumatic BPI patients who underwent SAN to SSN transfer between 2000 and 2013, all treated less than 1 year after injury with >1 year follow‐up. The primary outcome measured was shoulder ER. The outcomes we utilized included “clinically useful ER” (motion ≥ −35° with ≥MRC 2 strength), modified British Medical Research Council (MRC) grading, and electromyographic (EMG) reinnervation.ResultsEMG evidence of re‐innervation was found in 85% of patients. Surgery resulted in improved ER in 41% (21/51) of shoulders at an average of 28 months follow‐up. Of these, only 31% (17/51) had clinically useful ER. The average ER active range of motion was 12° from full internal rotation (Range: −60° to 90°) and MRC grade 2.2 (2–4). The only predictor of ER improvement was an isolated upper trunk (C5‐C6) injury. Improved ER was clinically evident in 76%, 37% and 26% of upper trunk (UT), C5‐C6‐C7 and panplexus injuries, respectively (P < 0.03).ConclusionsAlthough 85% had EMG signs of recovery, the SAN to SSN transfer failed to provide useful recovery of ER through reinnervation of the infraspinatus muscle in injuries involving more levels than a C5‐C6 root/upper trunk pattern. In patients with greater than C5‐6 level injuries alternatives to SAN to SSN transfer should be considered to restore shoulder ER. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 37:365–370, 2017.

OBJECT Transfer of the triceps motor branch has been used for treatment of isolated axillary nerve palsy in the adult population. However, there are no published data on the effectiveness of this procedure in the pediatric population with traumatic injuries. The authors reviewed demographics and outcomes in their series of pediatric patients who underwent this procedure. METHODS Six patients ranging in age from 10 to 17 years underwent triceps motor branch transfer for the treatment of isolated axillary nerve injuries between 4 and 8 months after the inciting injury. Deltoid muscle strength was evaluated using the modified British Medical Research Council (MRC) grading system. Shoulder abduction at last follow-up was measured. RESULTS The mean duration of follow-up was 38 months. The average postoperative MRC grading of deltoid muscle strength was 3.6 ± 1.3. The median MRC grade was 4. One patient who did not achieve an MRC grade of 3 suffered multiple injuries from high-velocity trauma. Unlike in the adult population, age, body mass index of the patient, and delay from injury to surgery were not significant factors affecting the outcome of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS In the pediatric population with traumatic injuries, isolated axillary nerve injury treated with triceps motor branch transfer can result in good outcomes.