Ginos, Brenda

Background: Oncolytic virotherapy, an innovative immunomodulatory therapeutic approach, is currently being investigated for its potential in treating relapsed refractory (R/R) hematologic malignancies. This study focuses on the use of an engineered Vesicular Stomatitis Virus called VSV-IFNβ-NIS, a bullet-shaped rhabdovirus which encodes both interferon beta (IFNβ) and sodium iodine symporter (NIS) with particular tumor cell tropism. Viral IFNβ serves as an indicator of viral proliferation and boosts the host's anti-tumor immune response. This is a phase 1 clinical trial with the identifier NCT03017820, wherein patients (pts) with R/R multiple myeloma (MM), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) are treated with a single systemic administration of VSV-IFNβ-NIS. Study Design and Methods: Patient Eligibility Criteria: The Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board approved the protocol. The study includes adult patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM), or T-cell lymphoma (TCL). For MM or plasmacytoma, patients should have <15% plasma cells and a largest diameter of <5 cm. TCL patients should have a mass <5 cm. Study Design: This is a single-center phase 1 trial aiming to determine the maximum tolerated dose of VSV-IFNβ-NIS in patients with R/R MM, and TCL. Secondary objectives included assessing the safety profile and estimating the clinical response rate of VSV-IFNβ-NIS. Correlative objectives involved monitoring viral replication through plasma IFN-β transgene levels and using SPECT/CT imaging with the NIS gene. Viral genomes were measured through quantitative reverse transcription (qRT) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of VSV RNA, and any virus shedding was examined in body fluids. The tested doses were 5 × 109 TCID50, 1.7 × 1010, 5 × 1010, and 1.7 × 1011 TCID50. The virus was administered via IV infusion over 30 minutes, and patients received 650 mg acetaminophen and 50 mg diphenhydramine hydrochloride before infusion and every 6 hours for 24 hours to manage fever and hypotension. Two expansion cohorts at DL4 have been added (20 additional PTCL, 10 B-cell lymphoma and histiocytic neoplasms) to obtain additional data on tolerability and efficacy and biomarkers of response in these histologies. Safety and Response Assessments: All patients undergo toxicity evaluation, and adverse events (AEs) assessment using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4 criteria, except for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) grading, which follows the 2014 Lee criteria. Dose escalation and tolerability are based on the standard 3+3 phase 1 trial design. Ruxolitinib is added from days 2-5 or day -1 to day 9 depending on the arm to mitigate IFNβ toxicity. Response assessment followed the International Myeloma Working Group criteria for MM and the Lugano Classification for NHL and histiocytic neoplasms. Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Analyses: For viremia and viral shedding assessment, RNA is isolated from whole blood, mouth rinse, buccal swabs, and urine samples. Quantitative RT-PCR determined VSV-nucleocapsid (N) RNA copy number, and virus shedding is assessed through coculturing samples on Vero cells. Anti-VSV antibodies are evaluated using the standard plaque reduction neutralization assay. Plasma cytokine levels are measured with a 30-plex human cytokine kit, and human IFN-β levels is quantified using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit. Statistical Analysis: Incidence of dose-limiting toxicities and AEs are tabulated by dose level (DL). AEs are summarized by type, maximum grade, and duration across patients in each DL. Spearman rank correlation tests are used evaluated correlations between laboratory-based measures, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests compared continuous measures between response groups. Response rates will be summarized by DL and disease group, with estimated response rates and corresponding 95% binomial confidence intervals calculated.

PURPOSE Financial toxicity (FT) affects 20% of cancer survivors and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. No large-scale programs have been implemented to mitigate FT. We evaluated the effect of monthly FT screening as part of a larger patient-reported outcomes (PROs) digital monitoring intervention. METHODS PRO-TECT (AFT-39) is a cluster-randomized trial of patients undergoing systemic therapy for metastatic cancer. Practices were randomly assigned 1:1 to digital symptom monitoring (PRO practices) or usual care (control practices). Digital monitoring consisted of between-visit online or automated telephone patient surveys about symptoms, functioning, and FT (single-item screening question from Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity) for up to 1 year, with automated alerts sent to practice nurses for concerning survey scores. Clinical team actions in response to alerts were not mandated. The primary outcome of this planned secondary analysis was development or worsening of financial difficulties, assessed via the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 financial difficulties measure, at any time compared with baseline. A randomly selected subset of patients and nurses were interviewed about their experiences with the intervention. RESULTS One thousand one hundred ninety-one patients were enrolled (593 PRO; 598 control) at 52 US community oncology practices. Overall, 30.2% of patients treated at practices that received the FT screening intervention developed, or experienced worsening of, financial difficulties, compared with 39.0% treated at control practices ( P = .004). Patients and nurses interviewed stated that FT screening identified patients for financial counseling who otherwise would be reluctant to seek, or unaware of the availability of, assistance. CONCLUSION In this report of a secondary outcome from a randomized clinical trial, FT screening as part of routine digital patient monitoring with PROs reduced the development, or worsening, of financial difficulties among patients undergoing systemic cancer therapy.

e14594 Background: Voyager-V1 (VV1) is an oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus engineered to express interferon beta (IFNβ) to boost cellular antitumor immunity and sodium iodine symporter (NIS). A phase 1 trial investigating a single infusion of VV1 in patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma and T-cell lymphoma (TCL) showed promising and durable clinical activity, primarily in patients with TCL. VV1 infects tumor cells and macrophages in the lymph nodes and spleen, resulting in release of tumor antigens and IFNβ that activates and boost cellular antitumor immunity. We present the preliminary pharmacokinetic analysis in patients given one intravenous (IV) dose of VV1. Methods: Patients received 5e9 to 1.7e11 TCID50 (50% tissue culture infective dose) of VV1 given over 30 minutes. We also explored the impact of infusion duration (0.25, 0.5,1 and 3 hours) in 17 patients with solid tumors. The objectives were to determine the impact of viral dose on pharmacokinetics (PK) of VSV and IFNβ. For VSV and IFNβ PK, whole blood was collected in 30 patients on days 1, 2, 3, and 8. Dose levels were 1.7E10, 5E10, and 1.7E11 TCID50. The plasma concentration-time data were estimated with non-compartmental analysis using WinNonlin 8.3. Results: The half-life of VV1 is comparable (10-12h) between dose levels of 1.7e10, 5e10 and 1.7e11. Ideal infusion rate was found to be 30 minutes and provides the highest Cmax and AUC. Most peak concentrations for viremia and IFNβ were achieved between ‘end of infusion’ and 2.5 hours, 4.5 and 24 hours, respectively. Following infusion, a second concentration peak is found in over half the patients leading to highly variable terminal elimination half-life, specifically where the second peak is at 24 hours. There was no second peak for IFNβ levels. Peak plasma concentration and systemic exposure increased in proportion to increased dose, consistent with linear clearance. Conclusions: The 30 minute infusion rate was considered the best as its PK provides the highest Cmax and AUC with no significant CRS differences among other groups. IL-6 and IFNα markers at hour 4 indicate a likely CRS and hour 24 provides a possible prediction of the grade. Cmax and AUC were also highest at 1.7e11 TCID50. This is the recommended dose that will be used in the expansion arm in patients with TCL. Clinical trial information: NCT03017820 , NCT02923466 . [Table: see text]

7530 Background: Oncolytic virotherapy is a novel immunomodulatory therapeutic approach currently under study for relapsed refractory (R/R) hematologic malignancies. The engineered Vesicular Stomatitis Virus VSV-IFNβ-NIS used in this study encodes interferon beta (IFNβ) and sodium iodine symporter (NIS). Virally-encoded IFNβ serves as an index of viral proliferation and enhances host anti-tumor immunity. Herein, we report the updated results of the phase 1 clinical trial NCT03017820 of a one-time administration of systemic VSV-IFNβ-NIS among patients (pts) with R/R multiple myeloma (MM), T cell Lymphoma (TCL) and Acute myeloid Leukemia (AML) with particular focus on the TCL cohort treated at the highest dose level (DL4) without Ruxolitinib. Methods: VSV-IFNβ-NIS was administered as a single IV dose following a classical 3+3 phase I trial, starting at 5e9 TCID50 DL1 through 1.7e11 TCID50 DL4. A dose expansion cohort of 8 additional R/R TCL pts was added at DL4 in view of an initial signal of activity. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of VSV-IFNβ-NIS as a single agent. Secondary objectives were determination of safety profile and preliminary efficacy of VSV-IFNβ-NIS. Adverse events (AEs) are reported based on CTCAE V4; cytokine release syndrome (CRS) grading was based on Lee (Blood 2014) criteria. Results: To date, a total of 43 pts received VSV-IFNβ-NIS: MM (N=21), TCL (N=21) and AML (N=1). In the TCL cohort: at DL4 Group A (no Ruxolitinib), 12 pts were registered, but only 11 pts were treated (mycosis fungoides (MF) N=3; ALK- ALCL N=1; PTCL-NOS N=2; AITL N=4; Nodal PTCL, TFH N=2; ages 33-79). These pts received a median of 3 lines of therapy (range: 1-5). No dose limiting toxicities were observed. Grades 3 and higher AEs were hematologic with transient lymphopenia (63.6%), neutropenia (36.4%) being the most common. The non-hematologic AEs observed included unique toxicities such as CRS grades 1-2 (81.8%); the transient transaminitis grade 1-2 (36.4%) and grade 3 (27.3%) along with thrombocytopenia grade 1-2 (63.6%) and grade 3 (18.2%) were a reflection IFNβ toxicity. All the AEs observed were short lived. Responses were seen in pts with PTCL. At DL4, in pts with systemic PTCL (N=9), there were 5 responses including 3 complete responses (CR) with two long-lasting at 24 months, an ongoing 15 month CR, and a 5 month CR, and 2 partial responses (PR) lasting 5 months in one pts and 6 months in the other. Conclusions: These updated results of single agent VSV-IFNβ-NIS which include pts with PTCL treated at the highest dose level and a dose expansion cohort demonstrates not only the safety of VSV-IFNβ-NIS but also a strong efficacy signal in pts with PTCL with impressive durable responses. Two expansion cohorts at DL4 have been added (20 additional PTCL, 10 B-cell lymphoma pts) to obtain additional data on tolerability and efficacy and biomarkers of response in these pts. Clinical trial information: NCT03017820 .

PURPOSE The standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer in North America is neoadjuvant pelvic chemoradiation with fluorouracil (5FUCRT). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) is an alternative that may spare patients the morbidity of radiation. Understanding the relative patient experiences with these options is necessary to inform treatment decisions. METHODS PROSPECT was a multicenter, unblinded, noninferiority, randomized trial of neoadjuvant FOLFOX versus 5FUCRT, which enrolled adults with rectal cancer clinically staged as T2N+, cT3N–, or cT3N+ who were candidates for sphincter-sparing surgery. Neoadjuvant FOLFOX was given in six cycles over 12 weeks, followed by surgery. Neoadjuvant 5FUCRT was delivered in 28 fractions over 5.5 weeks, followed by surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy was suggested but not mandated in both groups. Enrolled patients were asked to provide patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at baseline, during neoadjuvant treatment, and at 12 months after surgery. PROs included 14 symptoms from the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). Additional PRO instruments measured bowel, bladder, sexual function, and health-related quality of life (HRQL). RESULTS From June 2012 to December 2018, 1,194 patients were randomly assigned, 1,128 initiated treatment, and 940 contributed PRO-CTCAE data (493 FOLFOX; 447 5FUCRT). During neoadjuvant treatment, patients reported significantly lower rates of diarrhea and better overall bowel function with FOLFOX while anxiety, appetite loss, constipation, depression, dysphagia, dyspnea, edema, fatigue, mucositis, nausea, neuropathy, and vomiting were lower with 5FUCRT (all multiplicity adjusted P < .05). At 12 months after surgery, patients randomly assigned to FOLFOX reported significantly lower rates of fatigue and neuropathy and better sexual function versus 5FUCRT (all multiplicity adjusted P < .05). Neither bladder function nor HRQL differed between groups at any time point. CONCLUSION For patients with locally advanced rectal cancer choosing between neoadjuvant FOLFOX and 5FUCRT, the distinctive PRO profiles inform treatment selection and shared decision making.

180 Background: Financial toxicity affects 20% of cancer survivors and is associated with decreased treatment adherence and poor clinical outcomes. No large-scale programs have been implemented to mitigate financial toxicity among patients undergoing cancer treatment. We evaluated the effect of monthly patient-reported financial toxicity screening as part of a larger digital monitoring intervention. Methods: PRO-TECT (AFT-39) is a cluster-randomized trial of patients undergoing systemic therapy for metastatic cancer. Practices were randomized 1:1 to digital symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes (“PRO practices”) or usual care (“control practices”). Digital monitoring consisted of between-visit online or automated telephone patient surveys containing symptom, functioning, and financial toxicity screening questions for up to one year, with automated alerts sent to practice nurses for concerning survey scores. Clinical team actions in response to alerts were not mandated. The primary outcome of this analysis was development or worsening of financial difficulties, assessed via the EORTC QLQ-C30 (“Has your physical condition or medical treatment caused you financial difficulties?”), at any time compared to baseline. A randomly selected subset of patients and nurses were interviewed about their experiences with the intervention. Results: 1,191 patients were enrolled (593 PRO; 598 control) at 52 US community oncology practices. Overall, 30.2% of patients treated at practices that received the intervention developed, or experienced worsening of, financial difficulties, compared to 39.0% of patients treated at control practices (p = 0.01). Patients and nurses interviewed stated that financial toxicity screening identified patients for financial counseling who otherwise would be reluctant to seek, or unaware of the availability of, assistance. Conclusions: Screening for financial toxicity as part of routine digital patient monitoring with PROs reduces the development, or worsening, of financial difficulties among patients undergoing systemic cancer therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03249090.

Clinical success with intravenous (IV) oncolytic virotherapy (OV) has to date been anecdotal. Here, we conducted a phase 1 clinical trial of systemic OV therapy and investigated the mechanisms of action in responding T-cell lymphoma (TCL) patients. A single IV dose of VSV-IFNβ-NIS was administered to patients with relapsed refractory hematologic malignancies to determine safety and efficacy across 4 dose levels (DL). Correlative studies were undertaken to evaluate viremia, virus shedding, virus replication and immune responses. Fifteen patients received VSV-IFNβ-NIS (7 multiple myeloma, 7 TCL, 1 acute myeloid leukemia); 3 patients were treated at each DL1 through DL3 (0.05, 0.17, and 0.5 x 1011 TCID50), and 6 at DL4 (1.7 x 1011 TCID50). There were no dose limiting toxicities. 3 of 7 patients with TCL had RECIST responses: a 3-month PR at DL2, a 6-month PR and a durable CR ongoing at 20 months at DL4. Viremia peaked at the end of infusion and no infectious virus shedding was detected. Plasma interferon-β levels, a biomarker of VSV-IFNβ-NIS replication, peaked between 4h and 48h post infusion. The patient with CR had robust viral replication with increased ell free DNA in her plasma, a very high peak IFNβ level of 18,213 pg/ml, a strong anti-VSV neutralizing antibody response, and increased numbers of tumor reactive T-cells. VSV-IFNβ-NIS as a single agent was effective in patients with TCL resulting in durable disease remissions in heavily pretreated patients. Correlative analyses suggest that responses may be due to a combination of direct oncolytic tumor destruction and immune-mediated tumor control. Further clinical testing is warranted. (This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03017820).

Abstract Background Anthracycline use in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is hindered by cumulative exposure limits and risk of cardiotoxicity. Pixantrone, a novel aza-anthracenedione with structural similarities to mitoxantrone and anthracyclines, is theorized to exhibit less cardiotoxicity, mainly due to lack of iron binding. We conducted a randomized phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 dosing schedules of pixantrone in patients with refractory HER2-negative MBC. Methods Intravenous pixantrone was administered at 180 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (group A) versus 85 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle (group B). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), median 6-month PFS, overall survival (OS), safety, quality of life, and serial assessment of circulating tumor cells. A 20% ORR was targeted as sufficient for further testing of pixantrone in this patient population. Results Forty-five patients were evaluable, with 2 confirmed partial responses in group A and 1 in group B. The trial was terminated due to insufficient activity. Overall median PFS and OS were 2.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.0-4.1) and 16.8 (95% CI: 8.9-21.6) months, respectively. Notable overall grade 3-4 adverse events were the following: neutrophil count decrease (62%), fatigue (16%), and decrease in ejection fraction (EF) (4%). Conclusion Pixantrone has insufficient activity in the second- and third-line MBC setting. It appears, however, to have limited cardiotoxicity. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01086605).

Abstract Introduction: Factors contributing to the antitumor activity of systemic oncolytic virotherapy (OV) include (i) generalized innate immune activation due to virus infusion; (ii) direct oncolytic and/or immune-mediated destruction of OV infected tumor cells due to intratumoral spread of the virus infection; (iii) collateral boosting of tumor antigen-specific T cell responses that target uninfected tumor cells. We investigated the relative contributions of these 3 factors T cell lymphoma (TCL) patients (pts) responding to a single intravenous infusion of Voyager-V1, an oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) encoding IFNβ and sodium iodide symporter (NIS) on NCT03017820. Of relevance, the virally encoded IFNβ enhances tumor specificity, boosts proinflammatory activity & serves as a convenient serum biomarker of infection. Methods: In a first in human trial, a single infusion of Voyager-V1 was administered to 15 pts with relapsed refractory hematologic cancers; 4 dose levels (DL) were tested (5x10 9, 1.7x10 10, 5x10 10, 1.7x10 11 TCID50); 7 pts had TCL. Cytokine levels and CRS symptoms were determined as a measure of generalized immune activation; serum IFNβ levels were monitored as a pharmacodynamic biomarker of virus infection; antitumor T cell responses were measured using ELISPOT assays. Results: Of 8 TCL pts, 3 had RECIST responses: PR at DL 2, a CR & PR at DL 4. Most pts experience short lived CRS typically resolving within 24 hours of virus infusion. Serum IFNβ levels increased post-therapy in all pts, typically peaking by 24 hours post virus infusion and returning to baseline by median day 10. T cell responses could not be accurately determined in most cases due to suboptimal T cell viability and/or function after thawing of frozen PBMC. Factors contributing to tumor regression in each of the responding pts appeared to differ significantly, as exemplified by the case reports below. Pt (I) with CTCL experienced grade 1 CRS followed by brisk regression of multiple cutaneous lesions. The PR lasted 3 mo, after relapse of an eye lesion, but responses at other sites deepened after the relapsed lesion was irradiated; pt remained off active therapy for the next 2 yrs. Peak serum IFNβ 4 hours post infusion was only 182 pg/ml suggesting that disease response may have been driven by nonspecific innate immune activation associated with the virus infusion. Pt (IV) (CD30+ PTCL/ cutaneous relapse) had short lived grade 2 CRS, then developed signs of IFNβ toxicity with AST elevation and thrombocytopenia. Oral ruxolitinib was administered for 5 days as IFNβ toxicity mitigation leading to normalization of AST and platelets. All PET-avid tumors regressed completely. This CR continues 16 months post virus infusion. Peak serum IFNβ was 18,213 pg/ml strongly suggesting that response was driven by extensive intratumoral amplification of the virus and oncolytic tumor destruction. Robust CTL responses to tumor neoantigens were detected in this pt at baseline indicating that collateral boosting of tumor-specific T cells may have been responsible for the long term maintenance of this CR Pt (V) (CD30+ PTCL) had short lived grade 2 CRS followed by response at all disease sites (including complete normalization of an enlarged FDG-avid spleen). Her PR ended after 6 months due to relapse in cervical lymph nodes. Peak serum IFNβ level was modest, 600 pg/ml & sustained over 48 hours suggesting slower intratumoral spread of the virus infection. The deepening of the response long after resolution of the oncolytic phase points strongly to a contribution from antitumor CTL but the assay was technically unsatisfactory in this pt. Conclusion: Analysis of the correlative data supports that intravenous Voyager-V1 therapy can recruit diverse antitumor effector mechanisms to impact tumor response in pts with heavily pretreated TCL. Importantly, intratumoral virus amplification, which results in high circulating concentrations of IFNβ, does not necessarily lead to tumor regression perhaps because of defective immune cell recruitment and/or activation in some tumors but not in others. This will be further evaluated in future study participants by performing CTL assays on fresh, rather than frozen PBMC. In conclusion, a single IV infusion of Voyager-V1 shows highly promising activity against treatment refractory TCL and should be further advanced as a new single-shot or combination therapy for this therapeutically challenging indication. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Witzig: Karyopharm Therapeutics, Celgene/BMS, Incyte, Epizyme: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS, Acerta Pharma, Kura Oncology, Acrotech Biopharma, Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding. Paludo: Karyopharm: Research Funding. Patnaik: StemLine: Research Funding; Kura Oncology: Research Funding. Dispenzieri: Takeda: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Sorrento Therapeutics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Bennani: Kymera: Other: Advisory Board; Vividion: Other: Advisory Board; Kyowa Kirin: Other: Advisory Board; Daichii Sankyo Inc: Other: Advisory Board; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory Board; Verastem: Other: Advisory Board. Ansell: Bristol Myers Squibb, ADC Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Regeneron, Affimed, AI Therapeutics, Pfizer, Trillium and Takeda: Research Funding. Gertz: Aurora Biopharma: Other: Stock option; Akcea Therapeutics, Ambry Genetics, Amgen Inc, Celgene Corporation, Janssen Biotech Inc, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Pfizer Inc (to Institution), Sanofi Genzyme: Honoraria; Akcea Therapeutics, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc, Prothena: Consultancy; AbbVie Inc, Celgene Corporation: Other: Data Safetly & Monitoring; Ionis Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board. Dingli: Janssen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy. Kumar: Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy; Carsgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Roche-Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Antengene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Tenebio: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Bergsagel: Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genetech: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: human CRBN mouse; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kapoor: Karyopharm: Consultancy; Cellectar: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Ichnos Sciences: Research Funding; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Glaxo SmithKline: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Lin: Sorrento: Consultancy; Vineti: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: VSV-IFNβ-NIS is an oncolytic virus in clinical trial for systemic administration in hematologic malignancies