Drake, Charles G.

Abstract Background: Despite efficacy in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), immunotherapy currently has no role in the neoadjuvant setting. Suppressive tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are known to mediate resistance to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in ccRCC. In preclinical studies, IL-1β blockade reprograms TAMs toward an anti-tumor phenotype and promotes T cell activation, creating a tumor microenvironment (TME) more sensitive to ICB. To test this in patients, we conducted a correlative-rich neoadjuvant trial of IL-1β + PD-1 inhibition in localized ccRCC. Methods: SPARC-1 is a single-center, phase 1b study assessing the safety and feasibility of neoadjuvant canakinumab (αIL-1β) and spartalizumab (αPD-1) in patients with localized ccRCC (T1b-T4NanyM0 or TanyN1M0). All patients received 2 doses of canakinumab (300mg IV, Q4w) and spartalizumab (400mg IV, Q4w), 6 weeks (±7 days) prior to nephrectomy. The primary endpoint was safety and feasibility. Key secondary and exploratory endpoints included 12-month metastasis-free survival rate, pathologic response rate, and quantification of immune cell infiltration. To characterize immunologic reprogramming, fresh tumor specimens were collected at nephrectomy for single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) and multiparametric flow cytometry. Tissue from a treatment naïve cohort was collected for comparative analysis (n=16). Results: From August 15th, 2018, to January 30th, 2025, 14 patients were enrolled. There were no severe treatment-related adverse events (Grade ≥ 3) attributed to canakinumab or spartalizumab. At a median follow-up of 12.0 months (range, 6.3-12.0 months), the 12-month metastasis-free survival was 100%. Based on the ASSURE nomogram, the mean predicted 12-month recurrence risk was 16.7% (range, 4.7-46.5%). ScRNAseq revealed that treatment with αIL-1β + αPD-1 increased the frequency of TREM2+APOE+ TAMs (p=0.035), a population typically associated with immune suppression. However, these TAMs exhibited a phenotypic shift toward a less immunosuppressive state, with reduced IL-1β expression and increased CXCL9:SPP1 ratio, consistent with anti-tumor TAM polarization. Immune profiling revealed an increased CD8/CD4 T cell ratio (p=0.042) with modest enrichment of activated CD8+ T cells after treatment, supporting a more pro-inflammatory TME. Conclusions: The neoadjuvant combination of canakinumab (αIL-1β) and spartalizumab (αPD-1) is well-tolerated, feasible, and demonstrated promising clinical activity with no progression of disease observed in a localized ccRCC population at high risk of recurrence. Correlative analyses demonstrated that combined IL-1β and PD-1 blockade reprograms immunosuppressive TAMs, providing evidence that dual IL-1β and PD-1 inhibition can overcome myeloid-driven resistance in ccRCC. Clinical Trial Information: NCT04028245 Citation Format: Patrick J. McCann, Aleksandar Obradovic, Casey R. Ager, David H. Aggen, Catherine S. Spina, Chelsea L. Rahiman, Kaitlyn R. Campbell, Caroline Laplaca, Peyton C. Johnston, Amanda Kim, Katherine Gomez, Kriti Bagri Manjrekar, Mark N. Stein, Charles G. Drake, Karie Runcie, Matthew Dallos. Neoadjuvant IL-1β and PD-1 inhibition in localized clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: Clinical and correlative analyses of the phase 1b SPARC-1 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT017.

PURPOSE The continuous development of new imaging approaches, molecular phenotyping, genetic subtypes, prognosis assessments, and effective therapies across a range of disease states has created a need to redefine terminology and best practices for clinical trial conduct in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Methods We convened an international expert committee of diverse working groups, the Prostate Cancer Working Group 4 (PCWG4), between 2016 and 2025. Our objective was to formulate updated criteria based on emerging evidence and clinical trial data in a biomarker context to provide guidance for clinical trial design, eligibility, and end point assessments for patients with advanced prostate cancer. RESULTS PCWG4 redefines terminology around the disease state and previous therapies in a patient-centric context and terminology focused on androgen pathway modulation. We consider imaging, with a particular focus on positron emission tomography (PET)–defined disease. New recommendations are provided for disease state terminology, defining eligibility criteria, response and delay/prevent end points, intervals for reassessments including imaging, and patient-reported outcome determination. We provide recommendations in a biomarker-based context of use for the intended indication, reflective of patient benefit for specific interventions. We emphasize the need for development of validated PET imaging and molecular and phenotypic criteria as well as trial designs to appropriately risk stratify patients, predict and assess benefit, and measure post-treatment outcomes reliably in a trial framework. CONCLUSION PCWG4 updates recommendations on patient and tumor characterization, therapy development, and imaging criteria and extends guidance into earlier androgen pathway modulator–naïve/sensitive disease states to reflect an evolving, heterogeneous, and diverse patient population to optimize treatment benefits for all patients.

Abstract Background: Men with high-risk localized prostate cancer are at significant risk for disease recurrence and there is currently no role for neoadjuvant therapy. Although androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is immunomodulatory and can increase CD8 T cell infiltration, these effects are counterbalanced by the expansion of suppressive regulatory T cells (Tregs). We therefore designed a correlative-rich clinical trial for men with high-risk localized prostate cancer to test whether BMS-986218 - a novel afucosylated anti-CTLA-4 antibody optimized for antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) - depletes Tregs and augments response to ADT. Methods: Neo-Red-P is a single-center, two-arm, open-label pilot study assessing degarelix (ADT) versus ADT + anti-CTLA-4-NF (BMS-986218) in patients with treatment naïve high-risk localized prostate cancer. Key eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma with Gleason sum of ≥4+3 and clinical stage T1c-T3bN0M0. All patients received degarelix (ADT; 240mg SQ) 2 weeks before radical prostatectomy (RP). Patients were randomized to Arm A (ADT only), or Arm B (ADT + BMS-986218 [20mg IV] 2 doses Q2w starting 3 weeks before RP). The primary endpoint was the safety and feasibility of neoadjuvant BMS-986218 in prostate cancer. Secondary endpoints included the pathologic complete response rate, rate of undetectable PSA at 12 months, PSA response rate (>50% decrease pre-RP), and time-to-PSA recurrence. Fresh tumor specimens were collected at RP for single-cell RNA-sequencing, cytometry by time-of-flight, next-generation sequencing, and multiplex immunofluorescence. A treatment naïve cohort of matching demographic and pathological characteristics was collected for comparative analysis (n=14). Results: Between February 26, 2020, and November 15, 2022, 24 patients were enrolled. Severe treatment-related adverse events (TRAE; Grade ≥ 3) were rare in both arms; 0% in the ADT alone arm and 4% in the combination arm, suggesting a tolerable safety profile with the addition of BMS-986218. In the combination arm, 54% of subjects achieved a 50% reduction in PSA versus 33% in the ADT alone arm. In the ADT alone arm, 80% of patients had an undetectable PSA at 12 months, with a median recurrence-free survival of 1.61 years (IQR: 1.50-1.99 years). In the combination group, 75% had an undetectable PSA at 12 months, with a median recurrence-free survival of 1.82 years (IQR: 0.89-2.07 years). The overall recurrence rate in patients treated with combination therapy was 25% (3 of 12 patients) versus 20% (2 of 10 patients) in the ADT alone arm. Correlative studies suggest that aCTLA4-NF mitigates ADT-induced Treg accumulation through enhanced Fc receptor activity and augmented CTL activation, indicating an enhanced anti-tumor response with combination therapy. Conclusions: The neoadjuvant combination of ADT + aCTLA-4-NF (BMS-986218) is feasible, well tolerated, and induces significant remodeling of the immune TME through enhanced Fc receptor and CTL activity. Rates of disease recurrence following surgery were low in this high-risk population, warranting further investigation of combination immuno-hormonal therapy in the neoadjuvant setting for high-risk prostate cancer. Clinical Trial Information: NCT04301414 Citation Format: Patrick J. McCann, Casey R. Ager, Aleksandar Z. Obradovic, Matthew G. Chaimowitz, Samuel Pan, Caroline J. Laplaca, Parin Shah, Renu K. Virk, Christopher B. Anderson, Catherine S. Spina, Karie D. Runcie, Mark N. Stein, Charles G. Drake, Matthew C. Dallos. Efficacy and immunological outcomes of non-fucosylated anti-CTLA-4 (BMS-986218) + degarelix acetate vs. degarelix acetate alone in men with high-risk localized prostate cancer (Neo-Red-P) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT137.

Current methods for biomarker discovery and target identification in immuno-oncology rely on static snapshots of tumor immunity. To thoroughly characterize the temporal nature of antitumor immune responses, we developed a 34-parameter spectral flow cytometry panel and performed high-throughput analyses in critical contexts. We leveraged two distinct preclinical models that recapitulate cancer immunoediting (NPK-C1) and immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) response (MC38), respectively, and profiled multiple relevant tissues at and around key inflection points of immune surveillance and escape and/or ICB response. Machine learning-driven data analysis revealed a pattern of KLRG1 expression that uniquely identified intratumoral effector CD4 T cell populations that constitutively associate with tumor burden across tumor models, and are lost in tumors undergoing regression in response to ICB. Similarly, a Helios-KLRG1+ subset of tumor-infiltrating regulatory T cells was associated with tumor progression from immune equilibrium to escape and was also lost in tumors responding to ICB. Validation studies confirmed KLRG1 signatures in human tumor-infiltrating CD4 T cells associate with disease progression in renal cancer. These findings nominate KLRG1+ CD4 T cell populations as subsets for further investigation in cancer immunity and demonstrate the utility of longitudinal spectral flow profiling as an engine of dynamic biomarker discovery.

Abstract Purpose: Intratumoral immunosuppression mediated by myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) represents a potential mechanism of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) resistance in solid tumors. By promoting TAM and MDSC infiltration, IL1β may drive adaptive and innate immune resistance in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and in other tumor types. Experimental Design: Using the RENCA model of RCC, we evaluated clinically relevant combinations of anti-IL1β plus either anti-PD-1 or the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), cabozantinib. We performed comprehensive immune profiling of established RENCA tumors via multiparameter flow cytometry, tumor cytokine profiling, and single-cell RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Similar analyses were extended to the MC38 tumor model. Results: Analyses via multiparameter flow cytometry, tumor cytokine profiling, and single-cell RNA-seq showed that anti-IL1β reduces infiltration of polymorphonuclear MDSCs and TAMs. Combination treatment with anti-IL1β plus anti-PD-1 or cabozantinib showed increased antitumor activity that was associated with decreases in immunosuppressive MDSCs and increases in M1-like TAMs. Conclusions: Single-cell RNA-seq analyses show that IL1β blockade and ICI or TKI remodel the myeloid compartment through nonredundant, relatively T-cell–independent mechanisms. IL1β is an upstream mediator of adaptive myeloid resistance and represents a potential target for kidney cancer immunotherapy.

TPS5101 Background: There is no standard adjuvant systemic therapy that increases overall survival (OS) over surgery alone for non-metastatic RCC. Anti-PD-1 nivolumab (nivo) improves OS in metastatic RCC and is well tolerated. In mouse models, priming the immune system prior to surgery with anti-PD-1 results in superior OS compared to adjuvant dosing. Remarkable pathologic responses have been seen with neoadjuvant PD-1 in multiple ph 2 studies in bladder, lung and breast cancers. Phase 2 neoadjuvant RCC trials of nivo show preliminary feasibility and safety with no surgical delays. PROSPER RCC seeks to improve clinical outcomes by priming the immune system with neoadjuvant nivo prior to nephrectomy followed by continued immune system engagement with adjuvant blockade in patients (pts) with high risk RCC compared to standard of care surgery alone. Methods: This global, unblinded, phase 3 National Clinical Trials Network study is accruing pts with clinical stage ≥T2 or TanyN+ RCC of any histology planned for radical or partial nephrectomy. Select oligometastatic disease is permitted if the pt can be rendered ‘no evidence of disease’ within 12 weeks of nephrectomy (≤3 metastases; no brain, bone or liver). In the investigational arm, nivo is administered 480mg IV q4 weeks with 1 dose prior to surgery followed by 9 adjuvant doses. The control arm is nephrectomy followed by standard of care surveillance. There is no placebo. Baseline tumor biopsy is required only in the nivo arm but encouraged in both. Randomized pts are stratified by clinical T stage, node positivity, and M stage. 805 pts provide 84.2% power to detect a 14.4% absolute benefit in recurrence-free survival at 5 years assuming the ASSURE historical control of ~56% to 70% (HR = 0.70). The study is powered to evaluate a significant increase in OS (HR 0.67). Critical perioperative therapy considerations such as safety, feasibility, and quality of life metrics are integrated. PROSPER RCC embeds a wealth of translational studies to examine the contribution of the baseline immune milieu and neoadjuvant priming with anti-PD-1 on clinical outcomes. As of February 2020, 396 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT03055013 .

TPS765 Background: There is no standard adjuvant systemic therapy that increases overall survival (OS) over surgery alone for non-metastatic RCC. Anti-PD-1 nivolumab (nivo) improves OS in metastatic RCC and is well tolerated. In mouse models, priming the immune system prior to surgery with anti-PD-1 results in superior OS compared to adjuvant dosing. Remarkable pathologic responses have been seen with neoadjuvant PD-1 in multiple ph 2 studies in bladder, lung and breast cancers. Phase 2 neoadjuvant RCC trials of nivo show preliminary feasibility and safety with no surgical delays. PROSPER RCC seeks to improve clinical outcomes by priming the immune system with neoadjuvant nivo prior to nephrectomy followed by continued immune system engagement with adjuvant blockade in patients (pts) with high risk RCC compared to standard of care surgery alone. Methods: This global, unblinded, phase 3 National Clinical Trials Network study is accruing pts with clinical stage ≥T2 or TanyN+ RCC of any histology planned for radical or partial nephrectomy. Select oligometastatic disease is permitted if the pt can be rendered ‘no evidence of disease’ within 12 weeks of nephrectomy (≤3 metastases; no brain, bone or liver). In the investigational arm, nivo is administered 480mg IV q4 weeks with 1 dose prior to surgery followed by 9 adjuvant doses. The control arm is nephrectomy followed by standard of care surveillance. There is no placebo. Baseline tumor biopsy is required only in the nivo arm but encouraged in both. Randomized pts are stratified by clinical T stage, node positivity, and M stage. 805 pts provide 84.2% power to detect a 14.4% absolute benefit in recurrence-free survival at 5 years assuming the ASSURE historical control of ~56% to 70% (HR = 0.70). The study is powered to evaluate a significant increase in OS (HR 0.67). Critical perioperative therapy considerations such as safety, feasibility, and quality of life metrics are integrated. PROSPER RCC embeds a wealth of translational studies to examine the contribution of the baseline immune milieu and neoadjuvant priming with anti-PD-1 on clinical outcomes. As of October 18, 2019, 317 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT03055013.

TPS4597 Background: The anti-PD-1 antibody nivo improves overall survival (OS) in metastatic RCC and is well tolerated. There is no standard adjuvant (adjuv) systemic therapy that increases OS over surgery alone for non-metastatic RCC. Priming the immune system prior to surgery with anti-PD-1 has shown an OS benefit compared to a pure adjuv approach in mouse solid tumor models. Multiple ph 2 studies in bladder, lung and breast cancers have shown remarkable pathologic responses with neoadjuvant (neoadj) PD-1 blockade. Two ongoing ph 2 studies of perioperative nivo in M0 RCC patients are showing preliminary feasibility and safety with no surgical delays (NCT02575222; NCT02595918). PROSPER RCC (NCT03055013) aims to improve clinical outcomes by priming the immune system prior to nephrectomy with neoadj nivo and continued engagement with adjuv blockade in patients with high risk RCC compared to surgery alone. Methods: This global, unblinded, phase 3 National Clinical Trials Network study is currently accruing patients with clinical stage ≥T2 or TanyN+ RCC of any histology planned for nephrectomy. Oligometastases are permitted if can be rendered NED. We amended the study to enhance accrual and patient quality of life by changing nivo dosing to 480mg q4 wks and requiring baseline tumor biopsy only in the nivo arm. The investigational arm receives 1 dose of nivo prior to surgery followed by 9 adjuv doses. The control arm undergoes standard nephrectomy followed by observation. Randomized patients are stratified by clinical T stage, node positivity, and M stage. Accrual of 805 patients provides 84.2% power to detect a 14.4% absolute benefit in recurrence-free survival (RFS) at 5 years assuming the ASSURE historical control of ~56% to 70% (HR = 0.70). The study is powered to evaluate a significant increase in OS (HR 0.67). Critical perioperative therapy considerations such as safety, feasibility, and quality of life endpoints have been integrated. PROSPER RCC embeds a wealth of translational work aimed at investigating the impact of the baseline immune milieu, the changes induced by neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 priming, and how both may predict clinical outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT03055013.

e14237 Background: Targeting myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), key mediators of intrinsic and adaptive immune resistance, remains a significant challenge in kidney cancer immunotherapy. One potential driver of MDSC mediated tumor immunosuppression is the cytokine interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β). Although large cancer prevention studies show that targeting IL1 decreases cancer risk, the exact mechanism of anti-IL-1 mediated anti-tumor efficacy is not yet defined. To understand the immunogenic effects of IL-1β blockade and effects on MDSCs, we used the RENCA model of RCC. Methods: We inoculated BALB/c mice with 1x106 RENCA cells. On Day +10 we treated mice (n = 8/group) with vehicle, αPD1, αIL1β, cabozantinib, combination αPD1/αIL1β, or cabozantinib/αIL1β. We harvested day +18 tumors to quantify tumor size and immune cells by flow cytometry. We then isolated immune cells for differential gene expression profiling by RNAseq. Results: Treatment with αIL1β significantly decreased tumor size compared to vehicle or αPD1 monotherapy. Combining αPD1/αIL1β or cabozantinib/αIL1β potentiated the anti-tumor effects of αPD1 or cabozantinib monotherapy respectively. Anti-IL1β therapy decreased polymorphonuclear (PMN)-MDSC infiltration (αIL1β: 0.76% +/- 0.21 vs. vehicle: 1.89% +/- 0.37, P = 0.014). Relative to PD1 monotherapy, combining αPD1 and αIL1β decreased PMN-MDSCs (αPD1: 2.14% +/- 0.56 vs αPD1/αIL1β: 0.91% +/- 0.15, P = 0.033) and increased M1-like tumor associated macrophages (TAM) (αPD1: 0.798% +/- 0.21 vs. αPD1/αIL1β: 12.04% +/- 2.9, P = 0.0008). Gene expression profiling from sorted immune cells from αIL1β treated tumors revealed multiple differentially regulated cytokines including interleukin-6, IFN-γ, and IL-10. Conclusions: Blockade of IL-1β depletes intratumoral PMN-MDSCs and increases M1-like TAM with minimal effects observed on the T cell compartment. Treatment with cabozantinib or αPD1 in combination with αIL1β led to sustained control of tumor growth. IL-1β represents a promising target for kidney cancer immunotherapy. Based on the preclinical data, a clinical trial of neoadjuvant αPD1 and αIL1β therapy is planned for patients with high risk RCC.