Rizvi, Sumera

Autoimmune liver disease (AILD) spans a spectrum of chronic disorders affecting the liver parenchyma and biliary system. Three main categories of AILD are autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). This review condenses the presentation and discussions of the Single Topic Conference (STC) on AILD that was held in Ottawa, Ontario, in November 2019. We cover generalities regarding disease presentation and clinical diagnosis; mechanistic themes; treatment paradigms; clinical trials, including approaches and challenges to new therapies; and looking beyond traditional disease boundaries. Although these diseases are considered autoimmune, the etiology and role of environmental triggers are poorly understood. AILDs are progressive and chronic conditions that affect survival and quality of life. Advances have been made in PBC treatment because second-line treatments are now available (obeticholic acid, bezafibrate); however, a significant proportion still present suboptimal response. AIH treatment has remained unchanged for several decades, and data suggest that fewer than 50% of patients achieve a complete response and as many as 80% develop treatment-related side effects. B-cell depletion therapy to treat AIH is in an early stage of development and has shown promising results. An effective treatment for PSC is urgently needed. Liver transplant remains the best option for patients who develop decompensated cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma within specific criteria, but recurrent AILD might occur. Continued efforts are warranted to develop networks for AILD aimed at assessing geo-epidemiological, clinical, and biochemical differences to capture the new treatment era in Canada.

INTRODUCTION: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic, fibroinflammatory, cholestatic liver disease of unknown etiopathogenesis which is recognized as a major risk factor for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). We aimed to investigate the roles of the biliary and intestinal microflora in the inflammatory process of PSC and to determine if the microflora is associated with progression to CCA. METHODS: We studied the bile and stool microbiomes in samples obtained from patients with PSC (31 stool and 35 bile samples), sporadic CCA (11 stool and 26 bile samples), and PSC coexisting with CCA (16 stool and bile 17 samples). Control bile was obtained from patients with cholelithiasis or choledocholithiasis (n = 17). DNA extraction was followed by amplification and high-throughput next generation sequencing (MiSeq) of the 16S rDNA (V3-V5) region to identify the microbiota present. We performed: 1. analysis of the stool microbiome between PSC and CCA patients; 2. analysis of the biliary microbiome in PSC and CCA patients; 3. comparison of the biliary microbiome collected before and after biliary stent placement. RESULTS: Although bile samples from study patients had significantly lower sequencing depths than stool, their sequencing depths were much higher than bile from negative controls. The microbiomes of stool and bile samples from the same patients were significantly correlated ( P = 0.022). CCA bile samples had significant difference of alpha diversity from control bile samples with less Streptococcaceae and Desulfovibrionaceae (FDR < 10%) than PSC whereas no significant change of stool microbiome was identified between CCA and PSC. Fusobacterium and Gemella were correlated to PSC duration. An increased abundance of Fusobacteria after stent placement was revealed. Fusobacteria, which is inflammation-promoting, was also increased with the number of stents in the bile duct. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the bile microbiome is potentially a more distinctive biomarker than the stool microbiome for PSC and CCA development. There is increased inhabitance of inflammation-promoting bacteria in the bile of CCA patients and after biliary stent placement. Increased PSC duration also increases the microbial burden in the bile, which may also promote CCA development. We further detected specific bile microbes statistically associated with CCA or stent presence in the bile ducts, which raises the possibility of their role in the CCA progression or stent obstruction. Additional analyses with more samples are needed.

The presence of an intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) in a cirrhotic liver is a contraindication for liver transplantation in most centers worldwide. Recent investigations have shown that “very early” iCCA (single tumors ≤2 cm) may have acceptable results after liver transplantation. This study further evaluates this finding in a larger international multicenter cohort. The study group was composed of those patients who were transplanted for hepatocellular carcinoma or decompensated cirrhosis and found to have an iCCA at explant pathology. Patients were divided into those with “very early” iCCA and those with “advanced” disease (single tumor >2 cm or multifocal disease). Between January 2000 and December 2013, 81 patients were found to have an iCCA at explant; 33 had separate nodules of iCCA and hepatocellular carcinoma, and 48 had only iCCA (study group). Within the study group, 15/48 (31%) constituted the “very early” iCCA group and 33/48 (69%) the “advanced” group. There were no significant differences between groups in preoperative characteristics. At explant, the median size of the largest tumor was larger in the “advanced” group (3.1 [2.5‐4.4] versus 1.6 [1.5‐1.8]). After a median follow‐up of 35 (13.5‐76.4) months, the 1‐year, 3‐year, and 5‐year cumulative risks of recurrence were, respectively, 7%, 18%, and 18% in the very early iCCA group versus 30%, 47%, and 61% in the advanced iCCA group, P = 0.01. The 1‐year, 3‐year, and 5‐year actuarial survival rates were, respectively, 93%, 84%, and 65% in the very early iCCA group versus 79%, 50%, and 45% in the advanced iCCA group, P = 0.02. Conclusion: Patients with cirrhosis and very early iCCA may become candidates for liver transplantation; a prospective multicenter clinical trial is needed to further confirm these results. (H epatology 2016;64:1178‐1188)