Back to Authors

Lou, Zhenkun

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1938-3091

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 71

Tumor protein D52 ( TPD52 ) affects cancer cell metabolism by negatively regulating AMPK
Chen, Yali , Peng, Changmin , Tan, Wei , Yu, Jia , Zayas, Jacqueline , Peng, Yihan , Pei, Huadong , Wang, Liewei , Pei, Huadong , Lou, Zhenkun

Cancer Medicine | June 6, 2022 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 488-499

10.1002/cam4.4911 Get It

Abstract Background The AMP‐activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a central regulator of energy homeostasis, with deregulation leading to cancer and other diseases. However, how this pathway is dysregulated in cancer has not been well clarified. Methods Using a tandem affinity purification/mass‐spec technique and biochemical analyses, we identified tumor protein D52 (TPD52) as an AMPKα‐interacting molecule. To explore the biological effects of TPD52 in cancers, we conducted biochemical and metabolic assays in vitro and in vivo with cancer cells and TPD52 transgenic mice. Finally, we assessed the clinical significance of TPD52 expression in breast cancer patients using bioinformatics techniques. Results TPD52, initially identified to be overexpressed in many human cancers, was found to form a stable complex with AMPK in cancer cells. TPD52 directly interacts with AMPKα and inhibits AMPKα kinase activity in vitro and in vivo. In TPD52 transgenic mice, overexpression of TPD52 leads to AMPK inhibition and multiple metabolic defects. Clinically, high TPD52 expression predicts poor survival of breast cancer patients. Conclusion The findings revealed that TPD52 is a novel regulator of energy stress‐induced AMPK activation and cell metabolism. These results shed new light on AMPK regulation and understanding of the etiology of cancers with TPD52 overexpression.
Abstract OT2-19-05: A phase I/II trial of abemaciclib and T-DM1 in women and men with HER2-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer that has progressed on treatment with a taxane, trastuzumab and pertuzumab (THP) (ACCRU-BR-1801)
Sullivan, Ciara C O, He, Jun , Leon‐Ferre, Roberto A. , Chalasani, Pratima, Yaşar, Demet Gökalp, Anderson, D. Mark , Stella, Philip J., Jaslowski, Anthony J., Tannenbaum, Susan , Saverimuthu, Angela, Northfelt, Donald W. , Moreno‐Aspitia, Alvaro , Liu, Minetta C. , Wang, Liewei , Suman, Vera J. , Kalari, Krishna R. , Villasboas, José C. , Anderson, Daniel M, Carter, Jodi M. , Lou, Zhenkun , Goetz, Matthew P.

Cancer Research | March 8, 2022 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: OT2-19-05-OT2-19-05

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-ot2-19-05 Get It

Abstract Background: Although major advances have been made in the treatment of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC), the goal of care remains largely palliative, therefore better treatments are needed. Given encouraging preclinical and clinical data, the combination of cyclin dependent 4/6 kinase inhibitors and HER2-directed therapy is further being evaluated in this trial. Trial Design: In this phase I/II multicenter trial, we will determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of abemaciclib (Abem) combined with T-DM1. Three Abem dose levels will be examined, 50 mg, 100 mg and 150 mg. The phase 2 portion of this trial will examine whether PFS is increased with addition of Abem to T-DM1 in two pt cohorts - those with ER+ HER2+ MBC and those with ER-HER2+ MBC. For phase 2, a pre-registration biopsy is required to confirm ER and HER2-status and to determine levels of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes; vimentin (an epithelial-mesenchymal transition marker); and CD8 and FOXP3 expression. Blood samples will be collected pretreatment , at 6 weeks, and at progression for all pts. Eligibility Criteria: Phase I&II: All pts must have HER2+ MBC per ASCO-CAP guidelines and prior treatment with a taxane, trastuzumab and pertuzumab. For the phase Iportion, pts can have measurable or non-measurable disease with no restriction on the number of prior lines of therapy. In the phase II portion, pts must have measurable disease with ≤1-2 prior lines of chemotherapy alone, ≤1 HER2-directed therapy alone, and/or chemotherapy with HER2-directed therapies. There is no limit on prior endocrine therapy. Specific Aims: The primary objective of the phase II trial is to assess whether addition of Abem to T-DM1 increases PFS in one or both patient cohorts. Secondary objectives include an assessment of toxicity, objective response rates and overall survival. Correlative studies will assess the association between baseline TIL levels, vimentin expression, and CD8/FOXP3 expression with PFS. Changes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, CTCs, ctDNA and serum thymidine kinase 1 during the course of treatment will be examined to determine if there is a link with PFS outcomes overall and separately for each cohort. Pharmacogenomic studies will determine if pts with the FCGR3A-158 polymorphism derive less benefit from T-DM1 and have inferior PFS outcomes compared with pts who do not have this polymorphism. Statistical Methods:Phase I: Standard 3+3 design, with dose limiting toxicities as per protocol. Phase II: For each pt cohort, a stratified randomization scheme will be used to assign pts to treatment with liver mets as a stratification factor. For each pt cohort, a stratified log rank test will be used to assess whether PFS is increased with the addition of Abem to T-DM1. A non-binding futility analysis will be applied in each cohort after 58 events in the ER+ HER2+ MBC study cohort and 48 events in the ER- HER2+ MBC study cohort. Present Accrual: 0; target accrual: minimal 120 pts., maximal 140 pts CohortOne-sidedalphaPowerAccrual Period (accrual rate)Follow-up after close of enrollmentPFS with T-DM1PFS with abema and T-DM1Number of eligible patientsER+/HER2+0.100.912 months (5-6 pts per month)12 months12 weeks24 weeks64 (32 per arm)ER-/HER2+0.100.8512 months (3-4 pts per month)12 months6 weeks12 weeks50 (25 pts per arm) Citation Format: Ciara C O Sullivan, Jun He, Vera J Suman, Krishna R Kalari, Roberto A Leon-Ferre, Jose C Villasboas-Bisneto, Pratima Chalasani, Demet Gokalp Yasar, Daniel M Anderson, Philip J Stella, Anthony J Jaslowski, Susan H Tannenbaum, Angela Saverimuthu, Donald Northfelt, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Jodi M Carter, Minetta C Liu, Liewei Wang, Zhenkun Lou, Matthew P Goetz. A phase I/II trial of abemaciclib and T-DM1 in women and men with HER2-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer that has progressed on treatment with a taxane, trastuzumab and pertuzumab (THP) (ACCRU-BR-1801) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-19-05.
USP37 regulates DNA damage response through stabilizing and deubiquitinating BLM
Wu, Chenming , Chen, Junliang , Su, Yang , Li, Lei , Chen, Yuping , Li, Yunhui , Wu, Jinhuan , Huang, Jinzhou , Wang, Wenrui , Yin, Hui , Jin, Mingpeng , Zhu, Wei‐Guo , Luo, Kuntian, Lou, Zhenkun , Yuan, Jian , Chang, Yiming, Zhao, Fei , Wang, Shunli , Lou, Zhenkun , Zhang, Jie , Yuan, Jian

Nucleic Acids Research | September 10, 2021 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 19 | Pages: 11224-11240

10.1093/nar/gkab842 Get It

Abstract The human RecQ helicase BLM is involved in the DNA damage response, DNA metabolism, and genetic stability. Loss of function mutations in BLM cause the genetic instability/cancer predisposition syndrome Bloom syndrome. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the regulation of BLM in cancers remains largely elusive. Here, we demonstrate that the deubiquitinating enzyme USP37 interacts with BLM and that USP37 deubiquitinates and stabilizes BLM, thereby sustaining the DNA damage response (DDR). Mechanistically, DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) promotes ATM phosphorylation of USP37 and enhances the binding between USP37 and BLM. Moreover, knockdown of USP37 increases BLM polyubiquitination, accelerates its proteolysis, and impairs its function in DNA damage response. This leads to enhanced DNA damage and sensitizes breast cancer cells to DNA-damaging agents in both cell culture and in vivo mouse models. Collectively, our results establish a novel molecular mechanism for the USP37–BLM axis in regulating DSB repair with an important role in chemotherapy and radiotherapy response in human cancers.
Elevated METTL16 expression in PDAC confers synthetic lethality to PARP inhibition by antagonizing MRE11-mediated DNA end resection
Kloeber, Jake A. , Mer, Georges , Lou, Zhenkun , Lou, Zhenkun , Kloeber, Jake A , Zeng, Xiangyu , Zhao, Fei , Deshpande, Rajashree A. , Paull, Tanya T.

No container title available | June 25, 2021 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-598847/v1 Get It

Abstract Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal cancers worldwide. Characterization of the recurrent genetic alterations in PDAC will yield improved understanding and therapies for this disease. Here, we report that PDAC patients with elevated expression of METTL16, one of the “writers” of RNA N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification, may benefits from poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor treatment. Mechanistically, METTL16 interacts with MRE11 in an RNA-dependent manner; and, this interaction inhibits MRE11’s exonuclease activity in a methyltransferase-independent manner, thereby repressing DNA end resection. Upon DNA damage, ATM phosphorylates METTL16 at Ser419 within its C terminus, resulting in METTL16 conformational change and autoinhibition of its RNA binding. This dissociates the METTL16-RNA-MRE11 complex and releases inhibition of MRE11. Concordantly, PDAC cells with high METTL16 expression levels show increased sensitivity to PARP inhibitors, especially when combined with gemcitabine. Thus, our findings have revealed a role for METTL16 in homologous recombination repair and suggest that combination of PARP inhibitors with gemcitabine could be an effective treatment strategy for PDAC patients with high METTL16 expression.
MET Amplification Attenuates Lung Tumor Response to Immunotherapy by Inhibiting STING
Yang, Qifan, Zeng, Xiangyu , Wang, Manxiang , Tu, Xinyi , Wei, Ting , Xie, Wenzhuan , Guo, Qiang , Kloeber, Jake A. , Cao, Yueyu, Guo, Guijie , Zhou, Qin , Huang, Jinzhou , Zhang, Kai , Luo, Kuntian, Kim, Wootae , Hou, Jing , Shi, Yu , Zhu, Qian , Hu, Sheng , Yue, Junqiu , Pi, Guoliang , Kloeber, Jake A , Liu, Li , Kim, Wootae , Zhu, Qian , Wei, Ting , Zeng, Xiangyu , Zhang, Yong , Dong, Shuang , Yang, Bin , Zhang, Chao , Zhao, Fei Linda , Liu, Li , Wang, Mingwei , Yin, Ping , Deng, Min , Chen, Lifeng , Lou, Zhenkun , Guo, Guijie

Cancer Discovery | June 7, 2021 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 2726-2737

10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-1500 Get It

Abstract Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has revolutionized cancer therapy. However, the response of patients to ICB is difficult to predict. Here, we examined 81 patients with lung cancer under ICB treatment and found that patients with MET amplification were resistant to ICB and had a poor progression-free survival. Tumors with MET amplifications had significantly decreased STING levels and antitumor T-cell infiltration. Furthermore, we performed deep single-cell RNA sequencing on more than 20,000 single immune cells and identified an immunosuppressive signature with increased subsets of XIST- and CD96-positive exhausted natural killer (NK) cells and decreased CD8+ T-cell and NK-cell populations in patients with MET amplification. Mechanistically, we found that oncogenic MET signaling induces phosphorylation of UPF1 and downregulates tumor cell STING expression via modulation of the 3′-UTR length of STING by UPF1. Decreased efficiency of ICB by MET amplification can be overcome by inhibiting MET. Significance: We suggest that the combination of MET inhibitor together with ICB will overcome ICB resistance induced by MET amplification. Our report reveals much-needed information that will benefit the treatment of patients with primary MET amplification or EGFR–tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistant-related MET amplification. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2659
DOCK7 protects against replication stress by promoting RPA stability on chromatin
Gao, Ming , Guo, Guijie , Huang, Jinzhou , Hou, Xiaonan , Ham, Hyoungjun , Kim, Wootae , Tu, Xinyi , Zhou, Qin , Zhang, Chao , Zhu, Qian , Liu, Jiaqi , Xu, Zhijie , Luo, Kuntian, Weroha, S. John , Billadeau, Daniel D. , Yan, Yuanliang, Weroha, John, Kim, Wootae , Xu, Zhijie , Zhao, Fei , Yan, Yuanliang , Yin, Ping , Deng, Min , Lou, Zhenkun , Guo, Guijie

Nucleic Acids Research | March 2, 2021 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 3322-3337

10.1093/nar/gkab134 Get It

Abstract RPA is a critical factor for DNA replication and replication stress response. Surprisingly, we found that chromatin RPA stability is tightly regulated. We report that the GDP/GTP exchange factor DOCK7 acts as a critical replication stress regulator to promote RPA stability on chromatin. DOCK7 is phosphorylated by ATR and then recruited by MDC1 to the chromatin and replication fork during replication stress. DOCK7-mediated Rac1/Cdc42 activation leads to the activation of PAK1, which subsequently phosphorylates RPA1 at S135 and T180 to stabilize chromatin-loaded RPA1 and ensure proper replication stress response. Moreover, DOCK7 is overexpressed in ovarian cancer and depleting DOCK7 sensitizes cancer cells to camptothecin. Taken together, our results highlight a novel role for DOCK7 in regulation of the replication stress response and highlight potential therapeutic targets to overcome chemoresistance in cancer.
LRRK2 inhibition potentiates PARP inhibitor cytotoxicity through inhibiting homologous recombination‐mediated DNA double strand break repair
Chen, Lifeng , Hou, Jing , Zeng, Xiangyu , Tu, Xinyi , Zhao, Fei , Wu, Zheming , Huang, Jinzhou , Luo, Kuntian, Kim, Wootae , Guo, Qiang , Kloeber, Jake A. , Lou, Zhenkun , Kim, Wootae , Zeng, Xiangyu , Guo, Qiang, Deng, Min , Lou, Zhenkun

Clinical and Translational Medicine | February 26, 2021 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/ctm2.341 Get It

Abstract PARP inhibitors induce DNA lesions, the repair of which are highly dependent on homologous recombination (HR), and preferentially kill HR‐ deficient cancers. However, cancer cells have developed several mechanisms to transform HR and confer drug resistance to PARP inhibition. Therefore, there is a great clinical interest in exploring new therapies that induce HR deficiency (HRD), thereby sensitizing cancer cells to PARP inhibitors. Here, we found that GSK2578215A, a high‐selective and effective leucine‐rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) inhibitor, or LRRK2 depletion suppresses HR preventing the recruitment of RAD51 to DNA damage sites through disruption of the interaction of RAD51 and BRCA2. Moreover, LRRK2 inhibition or depletion increases the susceptibility of ovarian cancer cells to Olaparib in vitro and in vivo. In clinical specimens, LRRK2 high expression is high related with advanced clinical characteristics and poor survival of ovarian cancer patients. All these findings indicate ovarian cancers expressing high levels of LRRK2 are more resistant to treatment potentially through promoting HR. Furthermore, combination treatment with an LRRK2 and PARP inhibitor may be a novel strategy to improve the effectiveness of LRRK2 expression ovarian cancers.
Inhibition of ATM Induces Hypersensitivity to Proton Irradiation by Upregulating Toxic End Joining
Zhou, Qin , Howard, Michelle E. , Tu, Xinyi , Zhu, Qian , Denbeigh, Janet M. , Remmes, Nicholas B. , Herman, Michael , Beltran, Chris , Greipp, Patricia T. , Wang, Liewei , Johnson, Neil , Mutter, Robert W. , Herman, Michael G., Beltran, Chris J., Boughey, JC , Beltran, Chris J , Greipp, Patricia T , Yuan, Jian , Boughey, Judy C. , Goetz, Matthew P. , Sarkaria, Jann N. , Lou, Zhenkun

Cancer Research | February 17, 2021 | Volume: 81 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 3333-3346

10.1158/0008-5472.can-20-2960 Get It

Abstract Proton Bragg peak irradiation has a higher ionizing density than conventional photon irradiation or the entrance of the proton beam profile. Whether targeting the DNA damage response (DDR) could enhance vulnerability to the distinct pattern of damage induced by proton Bragg peak irradiation is currently unknown. Here, we performed genetic or pharmacologic manipulation of key DDR elements and evaluated DNA damage signaling, DNA repair, and tumor control in cell lines and xenografts treated with the same physical dose across a radiotherapy linear energy transfer spectrum. Radiotherapy consisted of 6 MV photons and the entrance beam or Bragg peak of a 76.8 MeV spot scanning proton beam. More complex DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) induced by Bragg peak proton irradiation preferentially underwent resection and engaged homologous recombination (HR) machinery. Unexpectedly, the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) inhibitor, AZD0156, but not an inhibitor of ATM and Rad3-related, rendered cells hypersensitive to more densely ionizing proton Bragg peak irradiation. ATM inhibition blocked resection and shunted more DSBs to processing by toxic ligation through nonhomologous end-joining, whereas loss of DNA ligation via XRCC4 or Lig4 knockdown rescued resection and abolished the enhanced Bragg peak cell killing. Proton Bragg peak monotherapy selectively sensitized cell lines and tumor xenografts with inherent HR defects, and the repair defect induced by ATM inhibitor coadministration showed enhanced efficacy in HR-proficient models. In summary, inherent defects in HR or administration of an ATM inhibitor in HR-proficient tumors selectively enhances the relative biological effectiveness of proton Bragg peak irradiation. Significance: Coadministration of an ATM inhibitor rewires DNA repair machinery to render cancer cells uniquely hypersensitive to DNA damage induced by the proton Bragg peak, which is characterized by higher density ionization. See related commentary by Nickoloff, p. 3156
The deubiquitinase USP36 Regulates DNA replication stress and confers therapeutic resistance through PrimPol stabilization
Xu, Zhijie , Huang, Jinzhou , Guo, Guijie , Gao, Ming , Kim, Wootae , Zeng, Xiangyu , Kloeber, Jake A. , Zhu, Qian , Luo, Kuntian, Yan, Yuanliang, Kloeber, Jake A , Kim, Wootae , Xu, Zhijie , Zeng, Xiangyu , Yan, Yuanliang , Zhao, Fei , Lou, Zhenkun , Guo, Guijie

Nucleic Acids Research | October 29, 2020 | Volume: 48 | Issue: 22 | Pages: 12711-12726

10.1093/nar/gkaa1090 Get It

Abstract PrimPol has been recently identified as a DNA damage tolerant polymerase that plays an important role in replication stress response. However, the regulatory mechanisms of PrimPol are not well defined. In this study, we identify that the deubiquitinase USP36 interferes with degradation of PrimPol to regulate the replication stress response. Mechanistically, USP36 is deubiquitinated following DNA replication stress, which in turn facilitates its upregulation and interaction with PrimPol. USP36 deubiquitinates K29-linked polyubiquitination of PrimPol and increases its protein stability. Depletion of USP36 results in replication stress-related defects and elevates cell sensitivity to DNA-damage agents, such as cisplatin and olaparib. Moreover, USP36 expression positively correlates with the level of PrimPol protein and poor prognosis in patient samples. These findings indicate that the regulation of PrimPol K29-linked ubiquitination by USP36 plays a critical role in DNA replication stress and chemotherapy response.
Extracellular matrix stiffness determines DNA repair efficiency and cellular sensitivity to genotoxic agents
Deng, Min , Lin, Jing , Nowsheen, Somaira , Liu, Tongzheng , Zhao, Yingchun , Villalta, Peter W. , Sicard, Delphine , Tschumperlin, Daniel J. , Lee, SeungBaek, Kim, Jung-Jin, Lee, Seung Baek , Kim, JungJin, Lou, Zhenkun , Lee, Seung Baek , Lee, SeungBaek , Lou, Zhenkun

Science Advances | September 11, 2020 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 37 | Pages: No page available

10.1126/sciadv.abb2630 Get It

Extracellular matrix stiffness controls DNA damage response.